User talk:A.palu

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A.palu!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostivere mõisa karjakastell, 19.-20.saj.1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 06:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostivere mõisa viinavabrik, 19.-20.saj..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 06:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kehtna mõisa valitsejamaja *.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikajärve mõisa tall *.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 08:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käru mõisa valitsejamaja *.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kadrioru loss a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anija mõisa moonakamaja 1, 19.-20.saj..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anija mõisa aednikumaja, 19.-20.saj..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 20:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jõelähtme postijaama aidahoone, 19.saj..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little soft but QI imo. --Lewis Hulbert 19:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jäneda mõisa kaalukoda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peeter Suure Merekindluse rannakaitsepatarei nr. 15 helgiheitja positsioon, 1915-1917 a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok but please add description.--ArildV 07:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Kruusamägi

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinna rannakaitse keskkomandopunkt, 1927. a.**.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa kuivati 1, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa laudad, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kultusekivi, I a- tuh. e.Kr. - I a- tuh.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Florstein 16:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peeter Suure Merekindluse rannakaitsepatarei nr. 14 helgiheitja positsioon, 1915. a.*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa härjatall, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa viinavabrik, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa sepikoda, 19.-20.saj..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 06:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikajärve mõisa laut *.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegviidu jaama veetorn, 1870.a..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegviidu jaama peahoone, 1870.a..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegviidu jaama elamu 2, 1870.a..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegviidu jaama pumbamaja, 1870.a..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:24, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saha kabel, 15.saj..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taagepera mõisa teenijatemaja a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taagepera mõisa kaev-pumbajaam a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hõreda mõisa jääkelder a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirgu mõisa peahoone a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purila mõisa tall-tõllakuur a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments At first, it need an accurate description. --Christian Ferrer 05:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Jacek Halicki, before to promote you can respect comments of others or at least to rewiew correctly the image, you can also read the guideline --Christian Ferrer 10:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC) I don't know how it happend, but when I was judging this photo your comments wasn't under it. I think the description is good enough.--Jacek Halicki 19:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Now it's acceptable but when you promoted it there was no description --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa valitsejamaja, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments At first, it need an accurate description. --Christian Ferrer 05:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Jacek Halicki, before to promote you can respect comments of others or at least to rewiew correctly the image, you can also read the guideline --Christian Ferrer 10:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC) I don't know how it happend, but when I was judging this photo your comments wasn't under it. I think the description is good enough.--Jacek Halicki 19:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Now it's acceptable but when you promoted it there was no description --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa ametnikemaja, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments At first, it need an accurate description. --Christian Ferrer 05:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Jacek Halicki, before to promote you can respect comments of others or at least to rewiew correctly the image, you can also read the guideline --Christian Ferrer 10:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC) I don't know how it happend, but when I was judging this photo your comments wasn't under it. I think the description is good enough.--Jacek Halicki 19:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Jacek Halicki Now it's acceptable but when you promoted it there was no description --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa töölistemaja, 19.-20.saj.a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good exposure, crisp detail and nice DOF --Daniel Case 03:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bekkeri laevatehase slipp, 1912-1914 a*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support too much sky, but still not bad --A.Savin 16:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinna Oleviste kirik, 13.-19.saj.x1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tartu vana kaubamaja hoonekompleksi lammutamine *.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kbh3rd 14:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kakumäe pankrannik *.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laupa mõisa valitsejamaja a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 19:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa ait a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 19:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laupa mõisa viinavabrik a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paljassaare sadamasild ehk nn. Katariina muul, 1913-1916 a*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pleclown 12:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jäneda mõisa ait.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türi kirik*.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turba tootmine Viraksaares*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suurupi LKA*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prangli saare põhjakülg*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hõreda mõisa viinaait viinamahutiga*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pritsimaja, Tallinn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinna vanalinn*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:40, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laupa mõisa peahoone*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laupa mõisa kelder*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolga mõisa sõiduhobuste tall, 18.-20.saj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riguldi mõisa kuivati*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hasenläufer 02:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Habaja mõisa viinavabrik, 19.-20.saj.*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 15:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koguva küla Tooma talu vana ait*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koguva küla Pärdi talu mõrrakuur*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koguva küla Hansu talu saun*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 19:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuigatsi mõisa tuuleveski*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Põhja-Kõrvemaa LKA*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prangli saar*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kõue-Triigi mõisa tall-tõllakuur, 18.-20.saj.*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöide kirik*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo, however the description is not enough meaningful --Christian Ferrer 05:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)I have added a description in English, quality is good --Michielverbeek 06:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koguva küla Välja talu vana elumaja*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hageri kirik*.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:``VIRU``hotell, Tallinn.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tallinna laululava ansambel, 1960.a.*.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)