User talk:Koavf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
An icon of a file folder
User talk:Koavf archives
001 59 topics (2006-04-29/2018-08-24) 55 kb
002 42 topics (2018-08-24/2020-06-01) 31 kb

File tagging File:Black Lives Matter protest in Greenwood, 2020-06-12 01.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Black Lives Matter protest in Greenwood, 2020-06-12 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Graffiti from George Floyd protests in Indianapolis, 2020-06-01 33.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Graffiti from George Floyd protests in Indianapolis, 2020-06-01 33.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional Research Service reports[edit]

If you wanted to make these more useful, adding in more metadata , such as report titles (vs just the numbers) and authors would be something to consider.

There's also the issue of 'front sheets' on a number of the uploads, which mention a contentious website, even if the actual reports are public domain as works of US Government, you might want to remove the front-sheets once relevant metadata has been incoporated into the media description pages. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: Thanks. I became aware of this because I've put a lot of effort into the 116th United States Congress and related media, etc. I can try to go back and do some mass renames, etc. 100% agree that those Wikileaks vanity pages need to be removed. I would love to add structured data but it is so cumbersome to do in the browser that it is very off-putting. Is there an easy way to do this? It seems like it has to be semi-automated via a bot to do it with any speed. :/ —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe AWB? I have used Visual File change to add, cange things on Media description pages. Would agree that some kind of semi-automated tool would speed things up. In respect of front-sheet removal, I wasn't aware of a tool that could do this en-masse at present, but is maybe something that could be implemented to be done en-masse server side. (IA-Upload had the option to remove front-sheets , but that only works for Djvu files ( or those generated directly from Jpeg scan collections IIRC). You might want to ask on the technical VP, or respond to my post there, concerning the CRS report uploads. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also in the Suggestions list for IA mirroring, put a collection of Congressional Hearing transcripts that I'd found. Those almost certainly also have an official source for recent ones, So you might want to respond to the suggestion in a particular way..ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ShakespeareFan00: I wish I could use AWB on this structured data but it's nowhere on the page! I have no clue where those data are actually stored and in spite of asking, I've gotten no answers. Honestly, the structured data approach here is a miserable failure. I'm extremely disappointed in how it's been approached all around and I love semantics. It's a travesty. I don't think there are easy ways to fix the data or front page issues, at least without a semi-smart bot (e.g. if page 1 has the word "Wikileaks", delete it and reupload--that's something that someone can program but I am just not smart enough to do it myself). —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The data for the Media description page is in a {{Book}} template, as I understand it. I'm not sure how the actual file is stored. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ShakespeareFan00: We may be talking past one another. Go to (e.g.) my newest upload: File:Pb Neurotoxicity - Neuropsychological Effects of Lead Toxicity.pdf. You'll see that I added a caption in English. But if you were to press Alt+Shift+E to edit that page, you can look at the list of templates transcluded on it and {{Book}} is not one of them. Additionally, you will not see any place where the caption that I just mentioned appears. The only way to interface with that caption is with the clunky and user-hostile panel that appears below the file itself and above the summary. —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A90-192_%28IA_90-192-crs%29.pdf&type=revision&diff=427726493&oldid=427560428 was what I meant about the CRS reports... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seems I was talking about "File information" as opposed to Structured Data, and I would agree that in time the Book template approach should also be migrated to structured Data, so that Biblographic metadata can be used more easily :) However that would be really long term.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think the Structured Data is stored somewhere in Wikidata IIRC. Not sure though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ShakespeareFan00: Gotcha. Yes, that metadata in the standard templates is handy as well but this also seems like something a bot can do as it uploads from Congress.gov. It's worth putting in the time to make a good bot to keep from the overhead of several humans putting forth a ton of effort to manually change all of these tens of thousands of uploads. I also think the data are in Wikidata somewhere but God only knows where or how to access it or how to edit it simply without all of the scripts loading and having to use the mouse alongside the keyboard, etc. Huge pain to edit that stuff. —Justin (koavf)TCM 09:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Uploading direct[edit]

It's possible to get a bulk download from the LOC site of results as CSV from a query (for example there is a button on https://crsreports.congress.gov/search/#/?termsToSearch=&orderBy=Date, to get the CSV). That CSV could be used as the basis of a Bot uploader. I don't know who could write one though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice find! That's a start. —Justin (koavf)TCM 10:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IA mirroring...[edit]

There was an unofficial effort to mirror certain IA collections on Commons.

Do you know of any specfic ones that should? (Other than the collections already uploaded.)

Mirroring the Catalog of Copyright volumes was because being able to check those had a direct impact on being able to confirm if certain works were compatible with Commons licensing (due to the absence of renewals) or to obtain limited metadata for older works.

See User_talk:Fæ/CCE_volumes#Suggestions_for_Collection_Mirrors to make suggestions.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00: Thanks. The why makes sense to me--I was mostly asking about the how and the page you linked explains that, thank you. Fae is uploading thousands of documents and evidently not using a bot account. Is there some straightfoward way to mass import from Internet Archive? (Similarly, tho off topic, is there a way to import directly from YouTube like there is from Flickr?) I don't immediately know of Internet Archive collections that should be uploaded here and I'm honestly confused why someone would use those lower resolution sources with their weird WikiLeaks vanity pages instead of just getting them from congress.gov like I did. That seems odd to me but there may be a reason that I just don't understand. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:St. Louis Blues.webm[edit]

Copyright status: File:St. Louis Blues.webm

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:St. Louis Blues.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:May Irwin Kiss.webm[edit]

Hi, Koavf I was wondering if this is correct, because in the image, imho this is Fred Ott kissing a woman, but the date doesn't match. Thank you for your time. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: All I know is what https://www.loc.gov/item/00694131/ says. :/ —Justin (koavf)TCM 15:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:10 Modern Layouts in 1 Line of CSS.webm[edit]

Copyright status: File:10 Modern Layouts in 1 Line of CSS.webm

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:10 Modern Layouts in 1 Line of CSS.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your images of protests in Indianapolis[edit]

Per the statement given by Reddit user NotSoAngryAnymore (The following is my OC, free for use for any non-profit purpose, without notification, without attribution), I have changed the licenses of the images to {{Copyrighted free use}}, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: Nice. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:“Decentralised Hashtag Search and Subscription in Federated Social Networks” – Schmittlauch.webm[edit]

Copyright status: File:“Decentralised Hashtag Search and Subscription in Federated Social Networks” – Schmittlauch.webm

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:“Decentralised Hashtag Search and Subscription in Federated Social Networks” – Schmittlauch.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:“Is ActivityPub paving the way to web 3.0-” – Maloki.webm[edit]

Copyright status: File:“Is ActivityPub paving the way to web 3.0-” – Maloki.webm

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:“Is ActivityPub paving the way to web 3.0-” – Maloki.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko surface.gif
A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko surface.gif, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Motd-logo 02.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles M. Schulz Congressional Medal 01.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Charles M. Schulz Congressional Medal 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Text, Medal Design, and Peanuts are all likely copyrighted
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peanuts Gang in Japanese grab.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Peanuts Gang in Japanese grab.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP for artworks and sculptures in US
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peanuts Gang Christmas tree.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Peanuts Gang Christmas tree.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP for artworks and sculptures in US
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tea party Indianapolis flyer 2007.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tea party Indianapolis flyer 2007.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChickenMobile.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ChickenMobile.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP for art in US
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@17jiangz1: This passed Flickr Review. Why are you tagging it? Did you even look at https://www.flickr.com/photos/70833745@N00/3617489839? —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: I believe passing Flickr review only means the image has been confirmed to be posted on Flicker with an appropriate license and does not preclude the file from having any other copyright issues (e.g. FOP). For this image, I believe you would not only require permission from the photographer but also the owner/creator of the car decor. Thanks, --17jiangz1 (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nexus 5X.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nexus 5X.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Stock wallpaper is likely copyright Google
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shanghai Tower.stl[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shanghai Tower.stl has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Construction designs and models also expressly fall under the protection of Chinese copyright
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

17jiangz1 (talk) 19:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChickenMobile.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ChickenMobile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peanuts Gang in Japanese grab.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Peanuts Gang in Japanese grab.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 20:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nexus 5X.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nexus 5X.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shanghai Tower.stl[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Shanghai Tower.stl has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 20:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles M. Schulz Congressional Medal 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Charles M. Schulz Congressional Medal 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

17jiangz1 (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peanuts Gang Christmas tree.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Peanuts Gang Christmas tree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pluto TV 2020 logo.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pluto TV 2020 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ThiagoLula (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Pluto TV 2020 logo.svg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pluto TV 2020 logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pluto TV 2020 logo.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Missvain (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Surface of the sun.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Surface of the sun.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

vip (talk) 23:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morocco CIA map.jpg[edit]

Hi. Please follow all the instructions in {{Delete}} when you choose to use it.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: The template and how it works are confusing to the point of unintelligibility. What is wrong? —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:52, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You did not include the year, month or day in {{Delete}}, you did not include a section header in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morocco CIA map.jpg, you did not transclude Commons:Deletion requests/File:Morocco CIA map.jpg in Commons:Deletion requests/2020/12/25, and you did not notify the uploader. This could all have been done for you using the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refreshing once and clicking "Nominate for deletion" in the tools on the sidebar of the page you want deleted.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Thanks--having a script/gadget to do all this cumbersome work is useful. Thanks also for fixing the errors you pointed out.Justin (koavf)TCM —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You did it again in this edit.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 17:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you delete this I will upload another one. - EdDakhla —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EdDakhla: Why are you telling me this? —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To let you know that your deletion will be pointless. There is no other version of this file (that’s more HD), it’s not copyright, just my own work. Delete it and I will upload another EdDakhla (talk) 00:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@EdDakhla: How is this your own work? Did you draw it for the CIA?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:47, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@EdDakhla: If it's deleted, reuploading it will be pointless because that will get you blocked. Don't reupload files that are deleted. —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which Aberdeen is it in?[edit]

File:Welcome to Aberdeen, Come As You Are.jpg is currently categorized under plain Category:Aberdeen, which is in Scotland. Link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iketsi (talk • contribs)

@Iketsi: No, it's not but it was. Your edit was understandable but just inaccurate. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just like your revert. Thanks for the fix. -- Iketsi (talk) 05:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Iketsi: How was my revert "inaccurate"? —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Iketsi: How was my revert "inaccurate"? —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It has been a while, but I think what I meant is that by reverting my addition of Category:Welcome signs in Scotland (which I based on the incorrect assumption that the file had been correctly categorized under Category:Aberdeen (Scotland)), you reverted it back to an inaccurate state, since the file was initially in the wrong Aberdeen category in the first place, as you pointed out. You subsequently fixed it by recategorizing the file under Category:Aberdeen, Washington, but since you immediately edited your revert, I deemed it to be an "inaccurate revert," because I believe that a revert carries an implication that the previous version was good. I fail to see the rationale behind reverting a change that you knew you needed to edit immediately, unless it was to rack up edits or perhaps as a quick way to make sure I get pinged about the change. Thanks again for your innumerable contributions. —Iketsi (talk) 17:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Iketsi: Ah, nice. That makes sense. Thanks as well for cleaning up things here: teamwork makes the dream work. —Justin (koavf)TCM 17:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The New Yorker[edit]

I strongly disagree with your renaming of The New Yorker's category. "The New Yorker, 1925" is consistent with other magazine years listed on Commons: Category:Life (magazine), Category:Judge (magazine), Category:The Saturday Evening Post (magazine), etc. Additionally, because 100+ images come from the first issue, "Volume 001" confusingly implies that the category only applies to the first issue despite the presence of the magazine covers for all other issues from the same year in the category. I think it would be much, much better to create a separate subcategory for the first 21 Feb 1925 issue while keeping "The New Yorker, 1925" as the main category. PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PDMagazineCoverUploading: Sounds good: thanks for educating me about the other categories and I think your suggestion about per-issue categories is sound as well. —Justin (koavf)TCM 18:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I appreciate all of the uploads from the first issue BTW, I just want to make sure the categories are correct. PDMagazineCoverUploading (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:The Inauguration of the 46th President of the United States.ogv[edit]

Copyright status: File:The Inauguration of the 46th President of the United States.ogv

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The Inauguration of the 46th President of the United States.ogv. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't waste your time[edit]

Hi. Given their personal attack, I am now convinced that they are a block evading sock of Taha Khattabi (see SPI), so just ignore them. I have also reverted their change here to a map that was targetted before by Hpyounes (a sock of Khattabi). The map in question cannot be changed seeing as it has been stable since 2016 and is used on many projects (please add it to your watch list). Regards. M.Bitton (talk) 04:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

M.Bitton, even if that map is a 100 years old, its no longer relevant because the source (CIA World Factbook) no longer supports it. Go see for yourself. And talk about a map that has been "stable since 2016", when you're here trying to revert the Portugal Morocco Locator, which has been stable since 2012. And for the record, I certainly did not personally attack Koavf, I simply stated what their stance is because the information was available on Wikipedia (a public site). Best. Al.Massira (talk) 04:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton: Thanks for this and all the work you do on en.wp. I hope that someday we can collaborate there. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Al.Massira: Don't respond on this thread anymore. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: Thank you, let's hope so. Regards. M.Bitton (talk) 19:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journal of Modern Philosophy 01-07 - François Lamy’s Cartesian Refutation of Spinoza’s Ethics.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Journal of Modern Philosophy 01-07 - François Lamy’s Cartesian Refutation of Spinoza’s Ethics.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dylsss (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journal of Modern Philosophy 01-03 - Staying Optimistic - The Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Journal of Modern Philosophy 01-03 - Staying Optimistic - The Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dylsss (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journal of Modern Philosophy 01-02 - Boyle's Reductive Occasionalism.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Journal of Modern Philosophy 01-02 - Boyle's Reductive Occasionalism.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dylsss (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ammon07-66 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ammon07-66 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: Why did you post this here instead of at User talk:Bdubay? —Justin (koavf)TCM 15:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The system will send the DR notice to all users who have uploaded a new version of the file. You may ignore it. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: What system? —Justin (koavf)TCM 15:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: What system? Don't write me messages like this for files where I'm not the original uploader. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:11, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikimedia system. I cannot control it. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Yes, you can. You are responsible for all your edits and the "Wikimedia system" is not. —Justin (koavf)TCM 16:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Justin Anthony Knapp, 2014.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Justin Anthony Knapp, 2014.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Justin Anthony Knapp, 2014.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Justin Anthony Knapp 2017-10-27A.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Justin Anthony Knapp 2017-10-27A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Justin Anthony Knapp 2017-10-27A.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Justin Anthony Knapp 2017-10-28A.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Justin Anthony Knapp 2017-10-28A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Justin Anthony Knapp 2017-10-28A.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Dia de Muertos festival, 2016-10-30, Oakland, CA, US.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dia de Muertos festival, 2016-10-30, Oakland, CA, US.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dia de Muertos festival, 2016-10-30, Oakland, CA, US.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Corazon del Pueblo in Fruitvale, Oakland, CA, US, 2016.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Corazon del Pueblo in Fruitvale, Oakland, CA, US, 2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Corazon del Pueblo in Fruitvale, Oakland, CA, US, 2016.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent afternoon eastside.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent afternoon eastside.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent afternoon eastside.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent afternoon southside.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent afternoon southside.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent afternoon southside.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent morning.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent morning.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oakland fire, 2016-12-03, subsequent morning.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Trump Depression.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:The Trump Depression.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dylsss (talk) 02:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matt groening, kelsey grammer, nancy cartwright, julie kavner, james l brooks, harry shearer, yeardley smith - 3511471167.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Matt groening, kelsey grammer, nancy cartwright, julie kavner, james l brooks, harry shearer, yeardley smith - 3511471167.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Matt groening, kelsey grammer, james l brooks - 3511471167 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Matt groening, kelsey grammer, james l brooks - 3511471167 (cropped).jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Matt groening, kelsey grammer, james l brooks - 3511471167 (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:150px-Wikisource vignette.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:150px-Wikisource vignette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 22:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,  Mysterymanblue  04:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indianapolis tea party 2007.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Indianapolis tea party 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-M.nelson (talk) 13:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

Comet 67P-Churyumov-Gerasimenko.stl
A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Comet 67P-Churyumov-Gerasimenko.stl, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Motd-logo 02.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1=[edit]

I would like to explain it here, to avoid overflowing the thread at COM:AN I do not agree with your comment in Special:Diff/592478177. User:Sarang knows Template-editing better than anyone else I know. So he would not remove it if there is an additional equal-sign.

I'm not shure if you fully read Template:Internationalization_template_doc#Parameter_#1. I know that adding an equal-sign would lead to problems, see User_talk:Sarang#Erklärung_der_Meinungen, however as I said earlier {{en | some text | }} works but {{en |1=some text | }} not, therefore adding 1= is also problematic, and it is also unusual.

I wrote templates (e.g. {{FakeSVG}}) and help-pages (e.g. Help:SVG_guidelines), that does not mean there is a consents on that (it is just defined by someone). Actually Sarang did many edits on Template:Internationalization_template_doc, so he is well aware of this definition. Just because someone did define something. Maybe you should read the right lower corner of User_talk:Davey2010, and if you don't understand it please follow the link.

Please do not repeat old posts in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User_is_making_thousands_of_errors_with_an_automated_script,_refuses_to_discuss.

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I revised the above post to be more polite. Sorry for writing a bit aggressive in the first place.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JoKalliauer: "So he would not remove it if there is an additional equal-sign." Anyone could add one at any time. There is zero reason to remove 1=. Why is removing it somehow better? Please see Template:En, where it explicitly says that 1= is required. I don't care to comment on how otherwise competent any editor is at anything else or whether or not you think that I should post multiple threads when the same problem continues to occur. —Justin (koavf)TCM 21:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke. —Justin (koavf)TCM 13:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: Once more I try to explain he facts, because he shows difficulties to understand the simplest template documentation.
When a parameter is required, this is in all template documentations expressed with a line in the table, which left column shows the parameter name, then a textual description for the parameter value, and right (in this case) the code "required".
  • A named parameter needs to be specified by name=, which may as well be an alias,
  • a positional parameter is specified either by its position or by the positional number (e.g. 1=, 2=, 3=...). With other words: the parameter value is required, the parameter name (= the number) is optional and not even suggested; it is not required but it becomes necessary (another thing than the un/requiredness in the sense of template documentation!) when (and only when) the parameter value string contains a "free equal sign" {an equal sign outside of another template). The positional number is also necessary when positional parameters are specified outside of their positional order.
Your interpretion that the template description "explicitly says that 1= is required" is definitely wrong, it is erroneous and results from your unability to read correctly the template documentation and to understand what it says.
Where you have a continuing problem, Wikipedia hasn't; you should not bore others with it. -- sarang사랑 06:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: Don't come to my talk page and post anything rude ever again. Explain why it is better to remove this code. —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Koavf,

I've just noticed that you created and populated the category:Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language animations. Not all SVG animations use SMIL, though, such as File:Penang_Island_textured_model_CSS3_animation.svg and File:Rolling_circle_optical_illusion.svg which instead use CSS3 animation. As far as I can remember, I've labelled my animations with SMIL with SMIL in the filename.

Cheers,
cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 12:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmglee: Good point: SVG could be animated with CSS or scripts, etc. Do I need to audit what is in the category? —Justin (koavf)TCM 14:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's up to you if you want to. Category:Animated_SVG already has SVG with animations in general. I'll move your category into it and see if anyone wants to audit the files. I'll remove mine which I know don't use SMIL. Thanks for your work regardless, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 13:57, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SI Illustration Base Units and Constants Colour Full.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:SI Illustration Base Units and Constants Colour Full.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

157.25.187.217 21:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Stop your nonsense! --Leyo 14:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Leyo:  ??? —Justin (koavf)TCM 14:29, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You know exactly what I am talking about. --Leyo 14:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Leyo: And so do you. You know that these chemical formula are more accessible, clear, and efficient as vector images. —Justin (koavf)TCM 14:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Chemical structures scanned from a 100-years-old book should not be replaced in Wikisource by “modern” structural formulas (that would be available anyway). --Leyo 15:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Leyo: Yes, they should be. This is not a piece of art where every ink drop and the exact angle of the scan needs to be preciously preserved. An SVG would be superior in Wikisource as well. —Justin (koavf)TCM 15:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dry heat sterilization as a method to recycle N95 respirator masks - The importance of fit.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dry heat sterilization as a method to recycle N95 respirator masks - The importance of fit.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

46.140.3.144 11:51, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordon Lynch - UK Child Migration to Australia, 1945-1970 - A Study in Policy Failure Authors.pdf[edit]

Hi Koavf, did you see any note wrt the copyright-state of the photography on the cover of this book? I downloaded the first and the last pdf from the source-site, but the cover-page with the image was not included nor mentioned. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: I did not. —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Then lets assume the relatively blanket statement in the first pdf covers also the page on the cover. It looks like an official image anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raspberry Pi 4B DVB TV μHat (angle).jpg[edit]

Hi there,

I've reverted your crop of the above image. This might make sense if it was truly a background-less image (i.e. 100% white or transparent), but it's not; the background is still obviously there, and it needs some surrounding space to avoid looking unnaturally cramped.

You added the "opaque" tag suggesting that "a PNG or SVG version" without a background be uploaded from a "non-JPEG source". But... well, it *is* a photo from a JPEG source(!) and- at the risk of stating the obvious- that doesn't come with a PNG version that has the background automatically removed.

If you're willing to do the hard work of Photoshopping it to (convincingly) remove the background yourself, and upload that version as a borderless PNG version under a different filename, please feel free to do so.

Maybe I could have spent more time setting this up and editing it myself, but that's not something I have the time- or inclination- to do for everything I upload.

All the best,

Multicherry (talk) 23:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Multicherry: Thanks. I have no strong feelings on the crop looking weird, but I think there's value in an image that doesn't have this background. —Justin (koavf)TCM 23:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hydrogen - A Renewable Energy Perspective.pdf[edit]

Copyright status: File:Hydrogen - A Renewable Energy Perspective.pdf

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hydrogen - A Renewable Energy Perspective.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any permission?  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: No, why would I do that? —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry my mistake, did not check properly. (I would like to provide a license-template with free text.)  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, meine freunde. Danke. —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Edinburgh from the air, 1920.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edinburgh from the air, 1920.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Western Sahara situation January 1976 en.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Western Sahara situation January 1976 en.svg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Western Sahara situation January 1976 en.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1899 Indianapolis cycling and driving map.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:1899 Indianapolis cycling and driving map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RedFlyAgaric (talk) 00:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edinburgh from the air, 1920.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Edinburgh from the air, 1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:HCN from Aromatics and the Soul.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:HCN from Aromatics and the Soul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 12:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]