User talk:Liberaler Humanist/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongens Nytorv 26, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Leaning in a bit on both sides. --C messier 21:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done, although the perspective is slightly complicating things. -- Liberaler Humanist 03:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Good quality, nice. --Moroder 08:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utzon Center, Eastern side, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontal view of Klosterkirken, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 17:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheds and Quays near the Västra Bryggan ferry station, 17.08.2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the two dust spots (on the left side and above the roof of the back house). --Sandro Halank 21:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done In the ideal case, all the spots were removed. -- Liberaler Humanist 22:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsstugan, Wadköping, Örebro, side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholms kyrka seen from Kungsgatan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartån River and Karolinska läroverket, Örebro, Perspective 2-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geotag would be useful --Podzemnik 00:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtplatz 9 und 10, Eferding, 08.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastetvej 2, Photo 1, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badehusvej 1 seen from Korsgade, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ved Stranden 4, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The southern part of Alsnäsgatan, Wadköping, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holbergsgade 1 and Korsgade, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toldkammer, Toldbod Plads 1, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruttornet, Vaxholm Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It seems to leaning in. --Tournasol7 15:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done I think this should be rather straight now. -- Liberaler Humanist 02:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. Thank you! --Tournasol7 09:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wadköpingsvägen 16, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peder Barkes Gade, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The northwestern part of Gabels Torv, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --IM3847 22:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maren Turis Gade 7, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Studenterhuset, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The southern wing of Aalborghus Slot, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, slight noise in the sky which need to be addressed. --IM3847 22:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)  Comment I reduced noise to some extent and hope that this is sufficient. -- Liberaler Humanist 17:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jens Bangs Stenhus, Østerågade, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalborg Post og Telegraf, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jørgen Olufsens købmandsgård, right building, Østerågade 25, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamnplan 1, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Verticals not stricly vertical but vertical enough for me --Podzemnik 01:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linnéplatsen 1, Göteborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Mariæ Kirke, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the dust spot and the object at the left and fix the verticals. --Ermell 21:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done The verticals and the dust spot should be fixed. -- Liberaler Humanist 22:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paracelsusstraße 4, Eferding, 08.08.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The former site of De Danske Spinderier, Vejle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The southern wing of Aalborghus Slot, elevated perspective, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good point of view. --Augustgeyler 00:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Østerågade 11, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Wolfsbergkogel towards Adlitzgräben, 29.11.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thistedvej 99, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. f/10 and lower ISO would've been better :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rantzausgade 8, Perspective 2, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check the verticals. --Ermell 23:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done -- Liberaler Humanist 01:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastetvej 22, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MR 4048 north of Lindholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalborg Station, Photo 2, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 23:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannon on the east side of Örebro Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please skip a line between nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 00:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12 cm Kanon m-85 at Vaxholm Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krudttårnet, Frederikshavn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I assume that the walls of the building are not 100% vertical in reality. --Aristeas 10:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyhavn 11 and 13 with a ship. .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The ferry to Vaxholm Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The northeastern part of Søndergade, Frederikhavn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindholm Kirke, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oil drilling rig in Frederikshavn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A water tower at Aalborg Station, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louiseplads, Aalborg, Perspective 1 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The exterior of the hall of Göteborgs Centralstation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit low on contrast and there seems to be a shade of haze around edges, but overall good enough. Well lit, no fringing and good colors --Granada 08:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nørresundby Baptistkirke 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toldbodsplatz and Toldkammer, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 09:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danmarksgade 27A, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 09:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jomfru Anne Parken, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 09:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utzon Center, west side, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kommandantboligen, Frederikshavn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veste Niederhaus samt Schiff -Passau-, Passau, 07.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The northern part of Nyhavnsbroen, .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aalborg Kongres & Kultur Center, seen from Prinsensgade, Photo 2,Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Gammeltorv, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gamla kyrkogården and Södra Förstadskanalen, Malmö.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice! There is a dust spot in the sky which should be removed (see image note). --Aristeas 11:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done -- Liberaler Humanist 02:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thank you! --Aristeas 12:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bofors 25 mm gun at Vaxholm Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bofors 75 mm model 1930 anti-aircraft gun at Vaxholm Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiendeladen 6, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'm not very happy with the car but lets consider it a street view --Moroder 10:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sign indicating a post box, Aarlborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weghinweischild Gaiswandweg nächst der Kirchenstiege, Hallstatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice one. You should add some category for signs. -- Ikan Kekek 00:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram M5 92 at Drottningstorger, Göteborg, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Østerågade 17, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But add categories. --Milseburg 19:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Doneadded categories, those got lost during upload. -- Liberaler Humanist 03:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Ok now. --Milseburg 14:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A tram approaching Dokk1, Aarhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtplatz Eferding, 08.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husviksvägen 54, Brännö.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Söderströmsbron and the old town, Stockholm, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pederstræde 11, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danmarksgade 21-Rantzausgade 11, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The vicinity of Borlänge station, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nygatan 80, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ut you should remove the leaves in the upper left corner. --Berthold Werner 18:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SJ Rc5 1388 with an Intercity train at Sala Station, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz, Hallstatt, 17.05.2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The eastern part of Magle Lilla Kyrkogata, Lund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olaigatan 55, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok --Poco a poco 13:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiskaregatan 18, Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The eastern shore of Norrhamnen, Vaxholm, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiskaregatan 16, Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Engelbrektsgatan 31, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Description is missing. --Augustgeyler 12:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC) ✓ Done to some extent. -- Liberaler Humanist 02:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 Support Hopefully, Augustgeyler'll agree. IMO OK now. --XRay 07:05, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bunker entry, Kronuddens batteri, Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pumphuset, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apoteket Lejonet, Stortorget, Malmö, 01.08.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akensgatan 1-Oskarsplatsen 5, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanzel, Heilandskirche, Graz, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gabelsgade 1, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The western wing of Aalborghus Slot, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cronhamns Gata 7, Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cronhamns Gata 10, Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The northern central section of Nyhavn, Perspective 2, København.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddarhuset, Stockholm, seen from Riddarholmsbron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornhamnstorg and Munkbroleden, Stockholm, seen from Mälarrampen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Karl XII, Kungsträdgården, Stockholm, Photo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malmö rådhus, Stortorget, Malmö.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 11:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The entrance to Rosenvingeska huset, Västergatan, Malmö.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of August Palm at Norra Bantorget, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nygatan 49, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A tower at Latinergyden, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skipper Clements Gade 5 and 7, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Thanks of you, I would like to visit Danmark someday :) --Tournasol7 08:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altar, Heilandskirche, Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The pond at the northern part of Kungsträdgården, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

QIC comments

You have comments on your QIC nominations which could use attention. FYI :) — Rhododendrites talk |  16:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Thanks for the reminder, I'll take a closer look at these issues later this day. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The western end of Storkyrkobrinken, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The southwestern part of Lindholm Høje Museet, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtplatz 5, Eferding, 08.07.2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks --Moroder 09:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apollo Belvedere, Drottningholms Slott.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot over the head --Poco a poco 08:35, 14 January 2021 (UTC) ✓ Done Dust spot removed, although only one found. -- Liberaler Humanist 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holmgatan, Malmö.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks --Moroder 09:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The western side of Kvarteret Bodarna, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centralposthuset, Stockholm, seen from Klarabergsgatan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram in front of Kvarteret Bodarna, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turquoise phone box in Skansen, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Not hyperfocal, but a QI for me. --C messier 19:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram M5 92 at Drottningstorger, Göteborg, Photo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 18:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klostergatan 26, Örebro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 17:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The facade of Stockholms Centralstation, seen from Centralplan, Photo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klara kyrka and Klara Vattugränd, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courthouse in Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Østerågade 15, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Töreboda station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World Trade Center, Stockholm, seen from the northern entrance to the central station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please categorize your image. --XRay 04:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC) ✓ Done -- Liberaler Humanist 12:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 16:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindholm Høje, 21.07.2018, Photo 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algade and Budolfi Kirke, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The middle section of Kungsträdgården, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Karl XII, Kungsträdgården, Stockholm, Photo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The entrance to Rådhusgatan 24, Vaxholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindholm Høje, 21.07.2018, Photo 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Kattesundet 15, Aalborg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kattesundet 15, Aalborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordiska museet, seen from Musejkajen, Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely details, e.g the couples on the benches. Picture is a bit soft, IMO, but ok. However, could you fix the CA on the right at the flagpoles and masts? ✓ Done Lightroom didn't recognize the lens, so i had to fix the CA manually, but am not entirely sure if i got all of it. -- Liberaler Humanist 05:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Kattesundet 15, Aalborg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TherasTaneel (talk) 02:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2021 – stort grattis till Måns Hagberg och hans fotografi av reveln vid Vivesholms naturreservat! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2021 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

<!-- A description is required. -->

Gut gesprochen. Von wem soll die Beschreibung kommen wenn nicht vom Fotografen? siehe [1] lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Hög tid att ladda upp: Wiki Loves Earth 2022!

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Tävlingen började 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Även om fortsatt försiktighet är att rekommendera går det bra att ge sig ut på fotosafari och fotografera naturen i ditt närområde – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado!

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 4ing (talk) 08:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Nu startar Wiki Loves Monuments 2022!

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Monuments 2021!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth!

Den 1 september inleds 2022 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, kulturmärkta fartyg och fritidsbåtar och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LH-0920-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A little bit soft, but the image is really nice.
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 14:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Uploadprobleme

Hallo Liberalter Humanist, mit welchem Tool hattest Du denn gestern die Probleme? Ailura (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2023!

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Nytt för i år är att vi utöver bästa foto även belönar fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)