User talk:MJJR/archive 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search



MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2014


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Larkspur R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 13:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Aida Stella R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Hamburg R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Palma Los Cancajos Paseo del Litoral R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Qi for me--Lmbuga 22:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lissewege Toren R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopper Barge DI-69 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:15, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Isn't it ccw tilted? Poco a poco 21:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 Comment I do not see it. In my opinion image is straight. --Halavar 21:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
It's straight: look at the light pylons in the background. -- MJJR 22:01, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Street R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Avenida Maritima R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice --Moroder 20:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Avenida Maritima R14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de la Virgen R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de la Virgen R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 19:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Castillo de Santa Catalina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Tuxyso 13:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz de La Palma Plaza San Fernando R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 02:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear MJJR,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy Memorial R01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Barzoï74 (talk) 09:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy Memorial R02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Barzoï74 (talk) 09:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Vimy Memorial R03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Barzoï74 (talk) 09:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Artevelde R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Skyline R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tug Smit Kiwi R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --DKrieger 22:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Westerstaketsel R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 20:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Oosterstaketsel R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blankenberge Westerstaketsel R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Vote on image?

I would appreciate your opinion on this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Moonrise_over_Nationalpark_M%C3%BCritz.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Canal Grande R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Rocchetta R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 20:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Canal Grande R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Canal Grande R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good sky. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Rocchetta R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Canal Grande R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Canal Grande R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Gesuati R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Celebrity Equinox R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please remove dust spots. --P e z i 15:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Dust spots removed and noise reduced. -- MJJR 21:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Support OK now. --P e z i 21:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Celebrity Equinox R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Gesuati R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a bit underexposed, but QI for me --Uoaei1 08:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Palazzo Balbi R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murano Riva Longa R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murano Fondamenta Venier R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murano Canale degli Angeli R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 06:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murano Fondamenta Venier R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudzele Lentestraat 1 R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FS Loc E402167 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:03, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ECR Loc 77030 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualiy. --ArildV 18:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chioggia Canale Lombardo R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bordeaux Tram R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Train Station R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and composition.--ArildV 20:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostende Sint-Petrus-en-Pauluskerk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Despite the unfortunate situation at the bottom --Moroder 07:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olhao Tide Mill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Motoscafo 216 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please add the geo location. --XRay 10:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Geo location is already added -- MJJR 20:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 Support Sorry. Good quality. --XRay 15:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rexpoede R01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxelaere Church R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:47, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Canal Grande R12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia San Giorgio Maggiore R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:24, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk Broeltorens R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --DKrieger 21:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk Belfort R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk Sint-Maartenskerk R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxelaere Church R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Two dust spots, see annotations --Cccefalon 22:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Dust spots removed -- MJJR 09:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
I am so sorry: I detected another dust spot while reviewing the removal of the other two dustspots. mea culpa :( --Cccefalon 10:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done All dust spots removed now -- MJJR 18:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! --Cccefalon 07:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venezia Molino Stucky R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Relatively harsh light, but still OK. But take a look on the verticals (see notes). --Tuxyso 21:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done -- MJJR 08:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Left side is leaning in. Mattbuck 21:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 Comment It's impossible to correct completely all lens distortions: if one window is straight, another is leaning somewhat... -- MJJR 21:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC) if you don't manage to correct the perspective at left it's certainly a bit tilted on right --Christian Ferrer 22:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
You could also distort one corner separately if necessary, though yes, if perspective correction tool isn't fixing it it means the image is tilted. Mattbuck 22:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done New version uploaded -- MJJR 15:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 Support ok for me --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villers Abbey R35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villers Abbey R49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality, but there is yet an incline of the verticals that should be untilted. --Cccefalon 05:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 Comment Actually it's a ruin, and not all the walls are completely straight anymore -- MJJR 21:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 Comment I considered that possibility, however the outermost windows are leaning in both in the same angle which can only explained by a perspective issue and not by the buildings age. --Cccefalon 20:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Perspective corrected -- MJJR 16:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Well done. --Cccefalon 06:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diksmuide IJzer R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Generic1139 22:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musée de Mariemont R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallorca Inca R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Lourdes grottoes...

Hello Marc.

I'm updating the French page about Lourdes grottoes where you have 2 pictures (1 & 2) in a new table. Would you mind localize those grottoes? May be you have many other grottoes' pictures so if you could do the same I'd be very please.  Thank you. by advance. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 01:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,
J'ai ajouté les coordonnées que vous aviez demandées pour les grottes de Lourdes de Flandre Occidentale. Cordialement, Marc Ryckaert (MJJR (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)).
Bonjour Marc.  Thank you. beaucoup. Ce sont les seules grottes que tu aies ? Pas d'autres ? Si oui, je suis preneur . Bonne fin de semaine. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 00:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

An award for you!

Wiki Loves Monuments Pakistan
Hello Marc Ryckaert, Thank you very much for being part of Wiki Loves Monuments Pakistan jury. Your help and assistance is very much appreciated. We're proud to have such a great Wikimedian and a talented photographer. With love from Pakistan. Thank you! Saqib (talk) 15:37, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crupet R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crupet Castle R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7781 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7781 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 7783 R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iberia Airbus A320 R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:43, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 16:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeebrugge Stella Maris R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zuienkerke Katteroghe R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2843 R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI.--Jebulon 21:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SNCB Loc 2843 R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Jebulon 21:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Centrale Begraafplaats Poortgebouw R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryckevelde Castle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 20:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryckevelde Castle R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 20:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brugge Centrale Begraafplaats Calvarie R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)