User talk:IJReid

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Reid,iain james)
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello.

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, IJReid!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Astrodon and deinonychus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Astrodon and deinonychus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Xenoposeidon hypothetical reconstruction and size.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Xenoposeidon hypothetical reconstruction and size.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Opisthocoelicaudia skeleton restoration.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Opisthocoelicaudia skeleton restoration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Xenoposeidon vertebrae.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Xenoposeidon vertebrae.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Xenoposeidon reconstructed vertebrae.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Xenoposeidon reconstructed vertebrae.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Fixing images[edit]

Hey, cool that you got image editing working! One problem though, you seem to be editing lower res versions of the images! You can see it if you compare with the res of the original versions. Also, the halluxes on the Sciurumimus are on the wrong side, they should be in the inwards side. FunkMonk (talk) 02:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Fixed Sciurumimus image, larger res also. Reid,iain james (talk) 03:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Only problem with the Abrictosaurus image, I cannot make the image larger without having to redo the corrections, which took quite a while to do. Is there a shortcut to increasing image resolution I am not aware of, or do I have to do it the old fashioned way (which I can tolerate having to do)? Reid,iain james (talk) 03:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
I'd just copy the new parts and scale them up, then adjust them so they don't look pixelated or fuzzy. I've done this manually plenty of times, heheh... FunkMonk (talk) 04:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. The image editing program I am using is not something your probably accustomed to, it is Pixlr editor, which is one of the best things I can find for a mac. Reid,iain james (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Weird, you edit directly in the browser? FunkMonk (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Yup. Works quite well, it allows you to zoom in extremely small areas to draw thin lines, although when you upload it it retains the original image size. Reid,iain james (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
By the way, the eye here[1] should probably be twice as small. The visible eye should never exceed the size of the inner side of the sclrotic ring.[2] The nostril should also be confined to the front part of the nares. FunkMonk (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. One strange thing, in all the images I have corrected, a grey line appears at the bottom of the thumbnail, even though it does not appear in the actual image. Reid,iain james (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Alioramus altai.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alioramus altai.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Unaysaurus skeletal reconstruction.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Unaysaurus skeletal reconstruction.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 10:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Albertosaurus scale[edit]

Hi, I noticed you created a scale chart of albertosaurines based on my Albertosaurus scale diagram. This is ok because the original license says derivative works are allowed. However, you violated the CC license for my work in two ways: 1) failure to credit me as the original artist, and 2) failure to retain the same license for the derivative work as the original. For future reference, you are not allowed to make a new image based on an old image without crediting the original artist and keeping the same license. you cannot take a licensed image, tweak it, and release it into the public domain. I have fixed these issues on the albertosaurine scale chart, but please make sure you read and understand the terms of the licensing agreement before making future derivative works. Thanks, Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry User:Dinoguy2. I had originally modified someone else's diagram for the original, and once modifying yours, I forgot to change the licensing and authorship. Sorry again - Reid,iain james (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Paraceratherium skeletal.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paraceratherium skeletal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 10:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Argentinosaurus-meadow-003s.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Argentinosaurus-meadow-003s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:18, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Reid,iain james, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/− INeverCry 18:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Megachile campanulae distribution.svg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Megachile campanulae distribution.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Eoraptor lunensis skull cast.jpg[edit]

Hello IJReid,

I have reverted the file to the uncropped version for the following reason: The image is as yet implemented only in the de:WP article Joggins Fossil Cliffs. In that article it exemplifies the exhibition in the Joggins Fossil Centre or the fact that there are specimens on display which are not from the Joggins Carboniferous, respectively. Hence not the very Eoraptor skull (cast) is of interest but the fact that it is on display at Joggins. Consequently, it is intended that the “museal ambience” is visible in the image. If you would like to have a cropped image of the Eoraptor skull, please upload it as a separate file. Cheers! --Gretarsson (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Apatosaurus model angle.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Apatosaurus model angle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 08:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

User:FunkMonk's talk page[edit]

I think we need to do some more discussing about fossil categorization conventions. Abyssal (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sauropod-track-makers (8277690743).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sauropod-track-makers (8277690743).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 23:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Regisaurus[edit]

Hi,I'm not Sure why did you revent This.the image has already been at the paleoart review and has been deemed inaccurate.it has later been fixed but the posture one of the legs does not match to the posture of the other legs.thanks--Anningia (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Actually, if you look at the image revisions, it was corrected very recently, after the discussion. Also, how does the left back leg not match the posture of the other legs? IJReid (talk) 14:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
if you compare File:regisaurus1DB.jpg withFile:regisaurus.jpg then you'll note that the leg appears to be over-stretched,as if it was swimming.so if it would walk like that then it would had one leg in the groundAnningia (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Well yes, is does look slightly like it is swimming, however, the leg is not over-stretched. It is better to compare a skeletal diagram to an illustration, because in some cases the other image is inaccurate as well (too big eye, too skinny). It might be best to ping FunkMonk to comment in DB's illustration, as he knows more about the subject than either of us. IJReid (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I've already emailed him,but he didn't understand what I meant--Anningia (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Edmontosaurus species categories[edit]

As it seems that Anatosaurus may be split off again, and as Dinohuy is splitting the species articles off; I was thinking we could make individual species categories for annectens and regalis, as they are way overcrowded, and it is hard to figure out which image depicts which species. So it will take some identification work, so could need some help. What do you think? FunkMonk (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure, I'll help. IJReid (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Dinosaur colors/Raptorex kriegsteini[edit]

Could you point me to a source suggesting that Raptorex (or non-avian dinosaurs, or tyrannosauroids or whatever) "Couldn't be green or blue", as you put it on the image page? I’m aware of a few cases of research on dinosaur color (mostly Sinosauropteryx and Archaeopteryx), but none on Raptorex–nor any integument having been preserved in the first place. Also, both extant birds and extant non-avian reptiles are known for sporting green and blue pigments (e.g. 1 2), so how was it concluded that this taxon could not have had this color? I presume that you are aware of something that I’m not, but it would be nice of you could give a reference so that others can benefit from that knowledge. --Ornitholestes (talk) 22:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The problem is the type of feather not the type of animal. Downy "dinofuzz", as depicted here, cannot have such colours. FunkMonk (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Apparently, but what I was looking for was a source elaborating on that.--Ornitholestes (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
I think DInoguy2 wrote it up somewhere, perhaps in the dinosaur image review archives... FunkMonk (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I mostly learned my dinosaurian anatomy for illustrations by looking at old image review archives, and the guidelines page. But other that that I'm not aware of any papers on the subject. IJReid (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Dinosaur National Monument quarry map.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dinosaur National Monument quarry map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Dinosaurs[edit]

Hi Iain Reid ! About the dinosaurs, for an artist view of a fossil animal, we're forced to use & follow the precedent sculptures or drawings (if they are accurate) by fidelity to the scientific validation. But I change some details. If you think than it's a copyviol of my sources, do for the best, no problem for me. The better solution, in my opinion, is the substitution of my drawings by yours, because you are a good graphist. Regards, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Danish description[edit]

Hi, want me to fix the grammar of your Danish description? FunkMonk (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh yah, sure :) I forgot I even had that multi-language thing going on. IJReid (talk) 02:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)