——————————————— Archive, August 2007 ———————————————
This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 08:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're making quite huge changes to that page. Don't you think you had better asked for consensus first? Also, if you would use edit summaries, it would be easier to see what you are trying to achieve with each edit. The page has a talk page, you know ;) Best regards, --rimshottalk 10:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See COM:DEL (existing deletion system). I am making it similar -- Cat chi? 10:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Next time use the talk page first, please - that's what it's there for. I am not quite sure that it makes sense at this point to make it too similar to COM:DEL. COM:CFD is not an official page in any way. --rimshottalk 10:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It wont be official until it is functional :). I was the person restructuring COM:DEL and first proposing COM:CFD. :) -- Cat chi? 10:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't notice that ... anyway, thanks for yor efforts and sorry if I was bothersome. I bet you'll use more edit summaries in the near future :) --rimshottalk 12:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. I just wanted to set the system straight before it breaks. Edit summaries are useful when not editing in bulk :P. I think the system of templates. Do you see a problem? -- Cat chi? 13:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I just noticed the duplicated thread on my talk page. We can keep the discussion in this place, I think. As for the templates: I think we can discuss them on their respective talk pages, if needed. That will make the discussion visible for others as well. --rimshottalk 13:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- COM:CFD's talk page would be a better location. Immediate problems can be discussed privately. :) -- Cat chi? 13:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for starting the discussion over whether these drawings are copyvios. It's great to finally have a proper discussion about all these potential traces from FSHL. This question is related to that, but I don't really want to put it there, as it isn't the issue in hand, and will just complicate things.
If I get a line drawing from the internet/book.etc., can I do a proper trace of it (like Image:B-52_3-view.svg, which was traced from a [NASA source], so PD is given) and put it under a free licence? This example was done by laying down paths by hand on top of a raster background, and no automatic processes like Inkscape auto-trace were used on the original image. If I can, then surely the best option in the Su-37 debate is to gradually replace them with decent traces, which are more useful anyway as they are not blurry.
Thanks, Inductiveload 14:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If the source is PD the trace can be with any license. I really want to use {{PD-USGov}} rather than {{PD-ineligible}}. -- Cat chi? 14:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, my question wasn't that clear. I meant to ask what if the source isn't PD? For example from a webpage or book. Inductiveload 14:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Then we enter the wonderful world of copyright discussions. PD-Gov would be problem free by default. I am more than certain NASA has these technical drawings somewhere on their site. -- Cat chi? 15:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. This edit is adversely affecting DRBot's ability to recognize {{Idw}} postings, causing it to make unwanted duplicate postings[1][2].
Please see Template talk:Idw#Heading for details. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Caution, anything you tell this person may be "available for public view." — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey White Cat. There's a slight misspelling on this image. Should be "Independents" (the "n" is missing). I'd appreciate it if you can upload a corrected version. Thanks --Pinar 11:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Your wish is my command :) -- Cat chi? 12:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you mind creating a 3rd chart displaying the current distribution of MP's and their parties? DTP and DSP have seperated. There are two other minor parties. -- Cat chi? 12:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, thanks.. Levent Abi 21:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. because of the multitude of templates on User talk:とある白い猫/Sandbox 3 I see it popping up everywhere. If you no longer have a purpose for the page's content, please clear it. Cheers! Siebrand 13:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thats all license templates, I am working on standardizing them. Job would be done faster if people assisted. -- Cat ちぃ？ 13:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK. Good initiative; I was not aware of the project. Are there design guidelines and a status overview? I might help if I have some clear guidelines... Cheers! Siebrand 14:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There are no "actual" guidelines. What I am doing is basically this: [3]. I add the countries flag or seal (whichever are available) and put them in using a template. This way we can make changes to all license templates with ease in the future.
- It is unhelpful to just put a seal because seals do not identify countries well. Flags are more universal.
- -- Cat ちぃ？ 14:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
You may like to know that I have today closed this, with the result "Delete". --MichaelMaggs 17:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi White Cat
Could you have a look at the question and answer posted here? It looks as if there has been some nationalistic voting on your FP nomination. You speak Turkish, I think: could you have a look around to see if you can find any evidence of vote-rigging or anything else untoward? Many thanks. --MichaelMaggs 20:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do test run -- ml:user:Vssun 14:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- thanks. bot status granted -- ml:user:Vssun 15:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|
.png){kind=link}