User talk:Cäsium137~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: I'll answer questions allways on thje page where they have been asked to me.
Deutsch: Ich beantworte Fragen dort, wo sie gestellt wurden.

Category sorting[edit]

Hi! I've noticed you did a bunch of edits like this one. Is there a specific reason for using upper case? Also, it would be better if you substed the templates: it uses less ressources and is more easy to read for humans. Cheers, Pruneautalk 08:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Most Subcategories start with "Chess ?...", with either a major or minor letter at "?". I think, that those categories shoudt be sortet not case-sensitive at that position of the string.
  2. "uc" is not a template, its a function, that is surely allways in the memory of the server. Therefore (no file access needed) I think, that it needs only tiny resources. Cäsium137 (T.) 18:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it is better to go for non case-sensitive sorting, but that can be achieved by using [[Category:Chess|Chess boxing]], which is more human readable. The other problem with {{uc}} is that for example Category:Chess by country ends up in the wrong place in Category:Chess. Any category added later on will also end up in the wrong place, since using all-caps is not something that most users do intuitively. You might be right about performance (which we shouldn't care about anyway, sorry for mentioning it), but the point on human-readability remains. Cheers, Pruneautalk 18:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cäsium137, why did you remove some images like [1], [2] and [3] from the category Category:Chess bitmap pieces? Jelte (talk) 08:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to enforce the use of the vectorversions (SVG) of the images instead of the Pixelimages (PNG).

Could you please use the template {{vector version available|new image name.svg}}, but leave the categories on the image pages. All images should have categories, see above (section Please link images). Jelte (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:M97-LHaOO.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:M97-LHaOO.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:M97-LHaOO.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tryphon 11:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've only resized the first upload, but I'am sure, that this image is from the Hubble Space Telescope. Cäsium137 (T.) 20:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the link given as a source, and it is nowhere to be found on http://hubblesite.org or http://www.spacetelescope.org. So unless we get explicit permission from the author (Robert J. Vanderbei), this image cannot be kept. –Tryphon 09:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No longer my problem. If deleted, then it will be so. Cäsium137 (T.) 14:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chess pieces[edit]

Hi. While transparent SVG are a valid way to present the pieces, please revert the light heavy pieces (king, queen, rook) to their usual white fill, and keep only the background transparent. Thanks. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you don't mind, could you please turn the white x tile to svg too? TIA. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:M110-NOAO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rursus (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:M61.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 13:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley Verwendung[edit]

Hi, ich würde deine Smileys gerne in meine Homepage einbinden, z.B. als Emoticons für Tests (grafische Darstellng von "super" bis "schlecht"). GNU und deine Name wird natürlich im Impressum angegeben. Wäre das ok?

File:M20.Trifid.Nebula.vis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheDJ (talk) 08:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ssc2006-08a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huntster (t @ c) 12:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

20:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

02:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]