User talk:FotoFree

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Crep171166)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, FotoFree!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category burning aircraft

[edit]

Dear FotoFree
You added category „burning aircraft“ to a simple engine start.
I don’t think this is apropirate. Do you want to remove it yourself if you think the same at a second view?
this
Regards--Caumasee (talk) 08:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Caumasee: Many thanks for taking the time to feedback - much appreciated as I am certainly a layman when it comes to aircraft! I have now learnt that these flames are a normal part of engine start-up! It's a great photograph, so I wanted to potentially draw attention to the extra dramatic element of the shot, for the benefit of other users. I do indeed agree that Category:Burning aircraft is not appropriate and apologize for allocating it. Fresh from my new knowledge of engine start-ups and still wanting to promote this picture more widely; I propose to change that incorrect category to: Category:Aircraft engine starting if you agree? I note a similar picture: File:Lockheed Constellation N749NL fiery startup engine nr 2.JPG is already there. Let me know. Many thanks again. FotoFree (talk) 12:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
of course I never noticed this really appropriate category of Category:Aircraft engine starting - well done and thanks! Regards --Caumasee (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thanks. FotoFree (talk) 13:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Tallukh Film Poster.jpg

[edit]

Hello FotoFree i saw you deleted a poster uploaded by me on wikipedia commons, i would like to let you know its my original work and it isnt registered for any kind of copyright. Can you please let me know how to get it back and prove my situation? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 05:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiSantashines: Thank you for you enquiry about File:Tallukh film poster.jpg that was recently deleted; I am sorry this was disappointing for you. It was deleted in accordance with policy as it appeared to be a copyright violation – see COM:POSTER. I am a little confused by your statement that is was your original work and it isn’t registered for any kind of copyright, as you uploaded the work from IMDb which states it is a work by AnuragJha Creations and indeed displays the copyright tag © AnuragJha Creations. Also, you attempted to set out a Fair Use rationale and stated in the caption: … The poster art copyright is believed to belong to the distributor of the Film, the publisher of the Film or the graphic artist or similar wording. Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be freely used by anyone for any purpose, including: use in any work, creation of derivative works, commercial use and free distribution. That is why copyright status is so important here, and anything which breaches copyright has to be deleted. ‘Fair Use’ criteria does not apply here: see Fair Use on Commons. HOWEVER; Wikipedia, itself (i.e. not Commons) may allow the hosting and limited use of a low resolution ‘non-free’ image in an article, where the item is itself the subject of the article, as this may constitute ‘Fair Use’. A detailed Rationale must be provided to show how the criteria for this are met – a reviewing editor will have the final say on this. Please have a read through the policy and guidelines at Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. This template, specifically for posters, would then be attached to the Wikipedia image file page – it also includes a useful summary of instructions for the uploader. Please see this file: Wikipedia File:Gulabo Sitabo poster.jpg as an example of how this works. Please note that this poster image file is hosted on Wikipedia itself not Wikimedia Commons. If you think this fits your situation, do have a go at this, and I wish you every success with it. However, if this is indeed your own work (i.e. you are AnuragJha Creations) you would need to prove this and that you are now freely releasing the work / rescinding the © at IMDb above. You can start the process at the request undeletion page. Further instructions are there. P.S. I am not an Admin, the Admin which deleted the file was @EugeneZelenko: but they were largely following my observations. You may want to appeal to them in the first instance or otherwise submit your undelete request on the above page. I hope this helps. Many thanks. FotoFree (talk) 12:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Local lockdowns in England

[edit]

Hi FotoFree, I've added your very useful Leicester lockdown map to a new page I've written for Wikipedia today, COVID-19 local lockdown regulations in England. I was wondering if you might be able to find some time to do similar boundary charts for the other local regulations that I've listed on that page? Several have been published in the press, but none to my knowledge are free to use. All the best MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MichaelMaggs: Many thanks for your kind comments. Your lockdown article does look great so I do hope I can contribute towards it. I will have a look to see what I can do, although I may be limited in time for a while. One tip you may want to follow-up though is a guy, pointed out to me by another user, whose map work I have linked to on the Leicester map file page: Alasdair Rae. Here is a link to his bio page: ALASDAIR RAE. As you can see he is an academic with a real flair for maps - he will knock spots off any offering I can do. I think it will be a real bonus if we can entice a man of his talents into the Wiki-world. Just a thought.... Many thanks. FotoFree (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Quality image nomination File:Faro di San Maurizio.jpg

[edit]

Original message to Maurizio Moro5153:

Hi, I spotted File:Faro di San Maurizio.jpg and thought it was a great picture, so I have nominated it as a Quality image. You can see the entry at Quality images (September 24). Just scroll down until you see your picture.

  • Just to let you know - a reviewer has asked a question about your picture. You can see the question on the nomination panel if you head over there on the above link. You may want to keep an eye on that page encase there are any further queries. Good luck with this - I hope it gets promoted!

Thanks. --FotoFree (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ho notato File:Faro di San Maurizio.jpg e ho pensato che fosse una foto fantastica, quindi l'ho nominata Immagine di qualità. Puoi vedere la voce in Immagini di qualità (24 settembre). Scorri verso il basso finché non vedi la tua foto.
  • Solo per farti sapere: un revisore ha posto una domanda sulla tua foto. Puoi vedere la domanda sul pannello delle nomine se vai lì sul link sopra. Potresti voler tenere d'occhio quella pagina in cui ci sono ulteriori domande. Buona fortuna con questo - spero che venga promosso!
Grazie.
translator: via Google Translate. -- FotoFree (talk) 09:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

.

Reply:

grazie per la segnalazione.Ciao,ciao — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Maurizio Moro5153 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear FotoFree,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Pinging

[edit]

Hello, FotoFree! Just a little tip: pings & user-links only send a notification when they’re posted in the same edit as a four-tilde signature. Adding or editing them after the fact doesn’t do anything without another sig as well.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Odysseus1479: Many thanks for that tip, most appreciated! Didn't know that but always good to pick up these little gems of info... Thanks for taking the time to point it out. FotoFree (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Football Manager 2021 Artwork

[edit]

Hi FotoFree! You logged a copyright violation on the Football Manager 2021 artwork on Wikipedia Commons. I work for Sports Interactive, the company who own the copyright on that image. Could you advise on how I can remove that copyright infringement notice or amend the copyright tag that's currently listed on the image? Thanks —TommyD1990 (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply is at User talk:TommyD1990#Football Manager 2021 artwork -- FotoFree (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:HM Queen Elizabeth II Platinum Jubilee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKay (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback right given

[edit]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: many thanks for those two rights expansions. Your vote of confidence is very much appreciated! Thank you. FotoFree (talk) 15:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]