User talk:Harmonia Amanda/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Images de patinage artistique

Bonjour, Il y a plusieurs centaines d'images de patinage artistique en attente de validation OTRS. J'ai déjà modifié l'avertissement pour un grand nombre d'entre elles pour qu'elles ne soient pas supprimées. Ou en est l'autorisation ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

L'autorisation OTRS vaut en fait pour l'intégralité des images du site en question. @Kvardek du: (qui est OTRS) passe régulièrement transformer les modèles « en attente » en modèles « confirmés ». Je lui ai demandé de repasser un coup sur la catégorie en attente mais je crois qu'il a des problèmes avec son ordinateur ? Bref, l'autorisation est valide (c'est pour ça que j'indique systématiquement le numéro d'autorisation à côté du modèle) mais seul un OTRS peut placer le bon modèle. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 09:32, 21 August 2019 (UTC) (edit @Yann: pour que tu voies cette réponse)

Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Photos – Cup of China 2017 – Pairs (Mingyang ZHANG Bowen SONG CHN – 7th Place) (3) (cropped) - Zhang Mingyang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

193.171.152.104 13:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Request

Hello, I was wondering if you could give me a helping hand. Because of the name confusion and other (date issues), I moved the images from the Category:Ferdinand Domela Nieuwenhuis category to a newly created Category:Ferdinand Domela Nieuwenhuis (1846 – 1919) which I added to the Category:Ferdinand Jacob Domela Nieuwenhuis (because it is his son). No I noticed there is a {{Creator:Ferdinand Domela Nieuwenhuis}} remaining. Do you have any idea what needs to be done next? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:54, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

I do not understand how a person could be born in two places

--Kai3952 (talk) 04:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kai3952: (I'm sorry, I missed the notification and never saw this message before!). I added all these based on Wikidata. It could be that there are conflicting sources about where the person is born, so we have two conflicting informations. I'm checking if there is a birth category already existing on Commons before adding those, but since I'm querying on dumps, this filter doesn't always work. All the cases you listed had no "birth place" categories beforehand. The "People from" categories also includes the cities where people grew up, or lived, or worked for a long time, regardless of if they were born there or not. Does that answer your question? --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 10:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
We have not created the "People from" categories. Please look at Category:People by country.--Kai3952 (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I don't understand this answer? Of course "People from" categories exist? --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 06:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
You said "People from", but I only see "People of" from that category. In all the cases I listed (see 8 diffs) we see most of these people are from Taiwan. Personally, I think zh.wikipedia is more reliable than Wikidata. If you think that the "People of" categories are includes the cities where people grew up, or lived, or worked for a long time, why you did not fill the edit summary?--Kai3952 (talk) 13:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I confused "people from" and "people of" in my message. But my point still stands: I added "Birth" categories (see Category:Births by country if you want), not "People of", so it's no duplicate. I can't know why people are categorized in "People of" categories, because these categories are larger than just the birth place, so I can't just replace one for the other. So I'm adding the birth place when Wikidata knows it. This is also information present on the infoboxes by the way, so if there is conflicting information, it's not new. I did fill the edit summary, it tells you that I did these by batch, using the QuickCategories tool (these batch, in fact). I added hundred thousands of birth and death places on Commons this last year, I did not do that manually. I use SPARQL queries then automated tools. I verified if they already had "Birth places" categories. They did not, so I added the information.
Concerning data, I trust way more Wikidata than any Wikipedia, because every time we seriously listed diverging information between one specific WP and WD and tracked who was wrong, Wikidata came out better. That doesn't mean it's always right, far from it, especially when there exists a specific Wikiproject keeping their small corner of Wikipedia well-curated and nobody is doing the same work on Wikidata. There are some awesome contributors who do a tremendous job of cleaning up their small corner. But generally speaking, I do trust Wikidata more for basic data. In all the cases you listed, the information I added is still present on Wikidata (nobody corrected in one year), and still present on the infoboxes in Commons (so I guess these people are still "born in two places" on Commons, like it was already the case before I added the categories).
Frankly, it just terribly bothered me last year that we had so much information in the infoboxes absent from the categories. So I worked to add all these missing categories. I didn't invent any of these values, so every conflicting information was conflicting information already present on Commons at the time. Conflicting information which is still present, to this day, in all your examples. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 14:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata, Yle topic ID (P8390), bilingual question

Hello Harmonia Amanda,

We at Projekt Fredrika have a question regarding a Wikidata property we hope you could answer. It is regarding the Yle topic ID P8390 - we had a chat with Mårten Seiplax at Yle who asked if we know anybody could help.

Yle provides bilingual URL formats for Finnish and Swedish, but on items in Wikidata with P8390, the Wikidata web-UI it is only showing the Finnish variant https://yle.fi/aihe/t/$1 for any of the 1657 object that has a P8390 - see this search.

Here is an example of Bernie Sanders (Q359442) with only the one link with the Finnish format:

I presume the problem has something to do with the fact that P8390 has two options for format för URL (P1630): Finnish url format is https://yle.fi/aihe/t/$1 and swedish is https://svenska.yle.fi/t/$1. Finnish is prefered ranking, and Swedish is normal. I have not wanted to test changing any ranking without discussing with somebody wiser than me on how this is supposed to work.

Do you have any suggestions who could advice us on this?

Regards, Robert, Lina & Kaj Robertsilen (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@ Harmonia Amanda, your skill of architectural photography is amazing!

--Ulamm (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC) (I take a lot of photos, but only a few are really good, Category:Photo by Ulamm)

OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎

Hello Harmonia Amanda! 🍵 OpenRefine has started development of features for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Would you like to be informed about ongoing work? You can sign up here to receive occasional updates on a Wikimedia talk page of your choice. Also, feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions or input! SFauconnier (talk) 13:29, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Collegiale soignies020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 13:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Collegiale soignies010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

OpenRefine and Structured Data on Commons: community meetup, February 22

OpenRefine logo
OpenRefine logo

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about Structured Data on Commons (SDC) functionalities in OpenRefine.

The OpenRefine team has made quite a bit of progress in the past months. We warmly invite you to a meetup with updates and a first demo of the newly developed SDC editing functionalities in OpenRefine. Bring your questions!

  • When? Tuesday, February 22, at 15:00-17:00 UTC (check the time in your timezone).
  • For whom? For anyone who is curious about the current status of SDC support in OpenRefine!
  • Where? Online, via Zoom. The event's info page has the link.
  • The meeting will be recorded and the recording will be published to Wikimedia Commons afterwards.

Check the event page for more info. With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Dame a la licorne007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Dame a la licorne004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Dame a la licorne005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Dame a la licorne006.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Dame a la licorne001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

OpenRefine and SDC updates: user survey and monthly office hours

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about the Structured Data on Commons (SDC) features that are currently developed for OpenRefine.

Short survey for SDC features in OpenRefine

OpenRefine logo

OpenRefine is running a short survey to learn about user needs and expectations for its new SDC features. If you upload files to Wikimedia Commons and/or edit structured data there, please help by filling in this survey!

Monthly OpenRefine and Wikimedia office hours

OpenRefine's community meetup of February 22 was very well attended. You can see its recording, slides and notes here. The team now hosts monthly, informal office hours for Wikimedians (online, via Zoom). Upcoming office hours are:

The Zoom link of the next office hour will be posted on OpenRefine's info page on Wikimedia Commons. Please drop by and say hi!

All the best! SFauconnier (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Bottom of page

Category:Ancient_Chinese_characters Yug (talk) 20:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 15:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 07:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 07:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

File:ISU pairs Rennik&Saks-1 beax (cropped) - Diana Rennik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Sagrada Familia151.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michael F. Schönitzer 14:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sagrada Familia152.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michael F. Schönitzer 14:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sagrada Familia141.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michael F. Schönitzer 14:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sagrada Familia144.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michael F. Schönitzer 14:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sagrada Familia146.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michael F. Schönitzer 14:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sagrada Familia147.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Michael F. Schönitzer 14:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)