User talk:Isiwal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016[edit]

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gratulation![edit]

... fürs Mitmachen!

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Foto File:Linz Holzstraße 3 Fleischmarkthalle frontal.jpg hat im Hauptwettbewerb Platz 10 gewonnen. Deine Fotos File:Spital aP Oberweng 106 Greßtenberg.jpg, File:Steinbach ad Steyr Messerermuseum Steg.jpg und File:Waldneukirchen Steyrtalbahn Brücke Widerlager Pieslwang 2015.jpg gehören zu den 40 Fotos, die im Hauptwettbewerb ex aequo Platz 11 belegen. Deine Fotos File:Waldneukirchen_Steyrtalbahn_Brücke_Widerlager_Pieslwang_09_2015.jpg, File:Sierning_Letten_Steyrtalbahn.jpg und File:Waldneukirchen_Steyrtalbahn_Haltestelle_09_2015.jpg liegen in der Sonderkategorie zu Bahninfrastruktur auf Platz 2. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/category/news/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


possible FPC[edit]

Hi,

I came across this picture of yours while voting for last month's photo contest. I was thinking about nominating it at FPC but wanted to check with you first (because you may have plans to edit it and/or nominate it yourself). I don't know if others will agree, but it seems like a great action shot IMO. — Rhododendrites talk |  05:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Rhododentrites, I am pleased about your proposal and ask you to nominate this picture as is. It shows the moment of "yeah, I got it" when the girl has successfully completed her exercise in trickski --Isiwal (talk) 10:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ DoneRhododendrites talk |  00:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 pole vault Preiner Katrin-5628.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 pole vault Preiner Katrin-5628.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 pole vault Preiner Katrin-5628.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - June - On the move/Winners[edit]

Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg Photo Challenge Winner
Camera2 mgx gold.svg
Congratulations!

Your picture Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge On the move, in June 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.


WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation![edit]

WikiDaheim Wort-Bild-Marke (bunt).svg

Hallo Isiwal!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war.

Aus rund 500 von der Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger dieses Jahres gewählt und so haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 1. Platz in der Kategorie Gemeingüter zu gratulieren!

Du erhältst von mir ein E-Mail mit Details zur Preisvergabe.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]


FP Promotion[edit]

40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 men´s 110m hurdles Okafor-6401.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 men´s 110m hurdles Okafor-6401.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 men´s 110m hurdles Okafor-6401.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation, die Zweite![edit]

Hallo Isiwal!
nachdem auch die Jury des Bundesdenkmalamtes ihre Preisträger für mehrere Themenkategorien gewählt hat haben wir die Freude, Dir noch einmal zu gratulieren, zum 5. Platz in der Kategorie Denkmale für File:Dürnstein Klostergassl-7365.jpg. Deinen Preis, eine kleine Anerkennung, würden wir Dir gerne bei der WikiDaheim-Preisvergabe überreichen.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Garsten Pfarrkirche Langhaus Joch 2 Kartusche Fresko.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Garsten Pfarrkirche Langhaus Joch 2 Kartusche Fresko.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garsten Pfarrkirche Langhaus Joch 2 Kartusche Fresko.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

2018 STM Austria Skibob Hochficht DERFLINGER Clemens-2143.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2018 STM Austria Skibob Hochficht DERFLINGER Clemens-2143.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018 STM Austria Skibob Hochficht DERFLINGER Clemens-2143.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Alpensteinbock Capra ibex-0801.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Alpensteinbock Capra ibex-0801.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpensteinbock Capra ibex-0801.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Vanessa cardui on Lavandula angustifolia-2459.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vanessa cardui on Lavandula angustifolia-2459.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vanessa cardui on Lavandula angustifolia-2459.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Haliaeetus pelagicus Riesenseeadler-3381.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Haliaeetus pelagicus Riesenseeadler-3381.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haliaeetus pelagicus Riesenseeadler-3381.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiDaheim 2019: Gratulation zum Sonderpreis![edit]

WikiDaheim Wort-Bild-Marke.svg

Hallo Isiwal! Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2019. Die erste der beiden Jurys hat schon getagt und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass dein Foto Gmunden Seeschloss Orth-9513.jpg in der Kategorie für denkmalgeschützte Objekte Platz 2 erreicht hat. Das bedeutet auch, dass dieses Bild nun der internationalen Jury von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 vorgelegt wird und damit die Chance auf eine weitere Auszeichnung hat. Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Österreich. Die Preisverleihung von WikiDaheim findet 30. Jänner 2020 im Bundesdenkmalamt in der Wiener Hofburg statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 10:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiDaheim 2019: Gratulation zum Sonderpreis![edit]

WikiDaheim Wort-Bild-Marke.svg

Hallo Isiwal!
Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2019. Die erste der beiden Jurys hat schon getagt und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass Du mit Museum Geyerhammer Scharnstein Schmiedefeuer-2772.jpg (2. Platz), Gmunden Gisela Tag des Denkmals 2019-2743.jpg (6. Platz) und Scharnstein Schloß Neuscharnstein großer Saal-2688-2.jpg (10. Platz) gleich mehrfach in den Top-Ten des Sonderpreises zum Tag des Denkmals vertreten bist.
Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf Tag des Denkmals 2019 in Österreich. Die Preisverleihung findet 30. Jänner 2020 im Bundesdenkmalamt in der Wiener Hofburg statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Michaelskirche Deckenfresko-4118.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

Congratulations and thanks for your Quality-Images and Featured pictures, you contributed to the photo competitions WLM and WikiDaheim!

Gratulation und danke für deine wunderbaren Quality-Images und featured Pictures, die du zu jedem Fotowettbewerb wie WLM und WikiDaheim beisteuerst!--Regiomontanus (talk) 11:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Die WikiDaheim-Jury hat noch nicht getagt. Daher sind auf Commons derzeit nur die 10 Hauptpreisträgerinnen und -preisträger von WLM 2019 zu sehen: Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 winners. MfG --Regiomontanus (talk) 16:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Danke für die Info - ich war der Meinung das wäre schon gelaufen --Isiwal (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Graureiher Ardea cinerea-4883.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Graureiher Ardea cinerea-4883.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graureiher Ardea cinerea-4883.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiDaheim 2019 – Gratulation![edit]

WikiDaheim Wort-Bild-Marke (bunt).svg

Hallo Isiwal!
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2019! In diesem Jahr freuen wir uns über mehr als 8000 Bilder, mit denen viele Orte oder Sehenswertes in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen oder besseren Bildern versehen werden können.

Aus den von der Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat die Hauptjury nun die Preisträger dieses Jahres gewählt und so haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 2. Platz zu gratulieren!

Eine Einladung mit den Details zur Preisvergabe erhältst Du demnächst noch via E-Mail.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Cala Rajada Punta de Capdepera Faro-1623.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cala Rajada Punta de Capdepera Faro-1623.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cala Rajada Punta de Capdepera Faro-1623.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


FP Promotion[edit]

Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schönbühel-Aggsbach Ruine Aggstein-3492.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


WikiDaheim 2020: Gratulation zum 7. Platz![edit]

WikiDaheim Wort-Bild-Marke.svg

Hallo Isiwal!
Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2020. Die Jury hat entschieden und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass dein Foto Micheldorf Altpernstein den 7. Platz erreicht hat.
Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf de:Wikipedia:WikiDaheim/Jury#Gewinnerfotos 2020. Die Preisverleihung findet hoffentlich im Sommer 2021 statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Piran Portorož Tunnel Valetta-8031.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Piran Portorož Tunnel Valetta-8031.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piran Portorož Tunnel Valetta-8031.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Buchkirchen Pfarrkirche St. Jakob-9332.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Buchkirchen Pfarrkirche St. Jakob-9332.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buchkirchen Pfarrkirche St. Jakob-9332.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Museum Geyerhammer Scharnstein-2915.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Museum Geyerhammer Scharnstein-2915.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museum Geyerhammer Scharnstein-2915.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

2018 FIM Ice Speedway Gladiators World Championship - GP 7 Niedermaier-5563.jpg
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:2018 FIM Ice Speedway Gladiators World Championship - GP 7 Niedermaier-5563.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

Potd-logo.svg

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gratulation - gut erwischt diesen "halsbrecherischen Fahrer". -- Bwag (talk) 13:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
auch Gratulation, für das, dass du noch noch schneller warst, als er es war - und er war grad keine Schnecke :-)) --lg -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 16:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Danke für die Blumen :-) , in der Kategorie dazu gibts noch ein paar Bilder von "de wüdn Hund". Anschauen in Inzell wenn es geht, heuer war ja nix. --Isiwal (talk) 19:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Sankt Moritz Lake Piz Muragl.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sankt Moritz Lake Piz Muragl.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt Moritz Lake Piz Muragl.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WikiDaheim 2021 - Gratulation![edit]

WikiDaheim Wort-Bild-Marke (bunt).svg

Hallo Isiwal,
danke für all deine erstklassigen Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit einige Platzierungen im Hauptbewerb und den weiteren Kategorien erreicht. Wir gratulieren also

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Manfred,
herzlichen Dank für diese erfreuliche Nachricht!
LG Isiwal Isiwal (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steyr Kirchengasse Messererzechhaus-8400.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Kirchengasse Messererzechhaus-8400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Steyr ehemaliges Gasthaus zum Andreas Hofer Enge Gasse 5-8444.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr ehemaliges Gasthaus zum Andreas Hofer Enge Gasse 5-8444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Dom Hauptaltar Rückseite-8264.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Dom Hauptaltar Rückseite-8264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle Portal-8924.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle Portal-8924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle hl. Sebastian-8933.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle hl. Sebastian-8933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Windischgarsten Dambach Wehranlage Artweger-8973.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Dambach Wehranlage Artweger-8973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Bach vom Mayrwinkel-8896.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Bach vom Mayrwinkel-8896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle Apsis-8938.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle Apsis-8938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Heiligenstein-7009.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Heiligenstein-7009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice to look at. --Ximonic 11:15, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Klaffer am Hochficht Klafferbach Holzschlager Straße L1559 bei km 5,4-8892.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klaffer am Hochficht Klafferbach Holzschlager Straße L1559 bei km 5,4-8892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bad Leonfelden Moor-8622.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Leonfelden Moor-8622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klaffer am Hochficht Holzschlag 2-8869.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klaffer am Hochficht Holzschlag 2-8869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Schwarzenberg am Böhmerwald Holzschlag 10-8831.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzenberg am Böhmerwald Holzschlag 10-8831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:36, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Langenlois Weinweg Weingartenhütte-8283.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Weinweg Weingartenhütte-8283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you reduce the chroma noise? --Poco a poco 08:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks for review--Isiwal 05:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirchdorf ad Krems Friedhofsportal Friedhofskapelle-8789.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchdorf ad Krems Friedhofsportal Friedhofskapelle-8789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the dust spot in the sky. --XRay 18:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks for review Isiwal
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 04:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Kirchdorf ad Krems Mariensäule Hausmanningerstraße-8786.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchdorf ad Krems Mariensäule Hausmanningerstraße-8786.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle hl. Leonhard-8934.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle hl. Leonhard-8934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Hauptplatz Dreifaltigkeitssäule-8560.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz Dreifaltigkeitssäule-8560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Wels Altstadt 15-7647.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wels Altstadt 15-7647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Urfahr Landgraf-9048.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Urfahr Landgraf-9048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puchenau Turm 15 Luitgarde-7599.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puchenau Turm 15 Luitgarde-7599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Puchenau Turm 15 Luitgarde-7581-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puchenau Turm 15 Luitgarde-7581-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Traun St. Martin Pfarrkirche Buntglasfenster-9741.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun St. Martin Pfarrkirche Buntglasfenster-9741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Traun St. Martin Pfarrkirche Altarseite-9738.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun St. Martin Pfarrkirche Altarseite-9738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Heiligenstein Fassdaubenkreuz-7017-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Heiligenstein Fassdaubenkreuz-7017-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Anton Bruckner Privatuniversität Pöstlingberg-7658.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Anton Bruckner Privatuniversität Pöstlingberg-7658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Urfahr Bernaschekplatz Denkmal-9045.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Urfahr Bernaschekplatz Denkmal-9045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Traun St. Martin Pfarrkirche-9735.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun St. Martin Pfarrkirche-9735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Museum der Moderne Mönchsberg-8129.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Museum der Moderne Mönchsberg-8129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Traun Pfarrkirche Apsis-9653.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun Pfarrkirche Apsis-9653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Weinweg moderne Weingartenhütte Steinpentagon-8261.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Weinweg moderne Weingartenhütte Steinpentagon-8261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptplatz Hotel Wolfinger-8562.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz Hotel Wolfinger-8562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:18, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Steyr Big Mama Badgasse-6891.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Big Mama Badgasse-6891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steyr Wehrgraben-8415.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Wehrgraben-8415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Krems ad Donau Kleines Sgraffitohaus Untere Landstraße 69-9212.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems ad Donau Kleines Sgraffitohaus Untere Landstraße 69-9212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Kirchdorf ad Krems katholische Pfarrkirche Kirchenportal Südseite-8769.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchdorf ad Krems katholische Pfarrkirche Kirchenportal Südseite-8769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Gstättentor Nordostseite-8135.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Gstättentor Nordostseite-8135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Schlafendes Haus by Not Vital Museum der Moderne Mönchsberg-8127.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Schlafendes Haus by Not Vital Museum der Moderne Mönchsberg-8127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Kirchdorf an der Krems Micheldorf-7891.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchdorf an der Krems Micheldorf-7891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and informative. --Milseburg 16:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Salzburg Gstättentor Südostseite-8137.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Gstättentor Südostseite-8137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 02:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Spital am Pyhrn St. Leonhard-7295.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spital am Pyhrn St. Leonhard-7295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle Heiliges Grab-8941.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Kalvarienbergkapelle Heiliges Grab-8941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steyr Ennssteg-8465.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Ennssteg-8465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Wettersäule Alter Markt-8103-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Wettersäule Alter Markt-8103-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Kapitelplatz Sphaera (Stephan Balkenhol)-8104.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Kapitelplatz Sphaera (Stephan Balkenhol)-8104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Florianibrunnen Alter Markt-8101-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Florianibrunnen Alter Markt-8101-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Urfahr Brunnen beim Rathaus-9266.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Urfahr Brunnen beim Rathaus-9266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Älteste Bäckerei Salzburgs Gstättengasse-8136.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Älteste Bäckerei Salzburgs Gstättengasse-8136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Salzburg Mühlenhof Stiftsmühle St. Peter-8108.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Mühlenhof Stiftsmühle St. Peter-8108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Puchenau Warte Edelburga-7602.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puchenau Warte Edelburga-7602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Krems a.d. Donau Bürgerspitalkirche Altar-9214-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems a.d. Donau Bürgerspitalkirche Altar-9214-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kirchdorf ad Krems Rathaus-8796.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchdorf ad Krems Rathaus-8796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Obere Donaulände Salzamt-8535.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Obere Donaulände Salzamt-8535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Grafenegg Schlosspark Nepomuk-6858-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafenegg Schlosspark Nepomuk-6858-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 07:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Turm am Heiligenstein-6821.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Turm am Heiligenstein-6821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Steyr Kirchengasse Messererzechhaus-8401.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Kirchengasse Messererzechhaus-8401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptplatz ehemaliges Gasthaus Zum Elefanten-8565.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz ehemaliges Gasthaus Zum Elefanten-8565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Landhaus Portal Landhausplatz-8495.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Landhaus Portal Landhausplatz-8495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Salzburg Marko-Feingold-Steg Mönchsberg-8100.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Marko-Feingold-Steg Mönchsberg-8100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Billy69150 09:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spital am Pyhrn St. Leonhard-7297.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spital am Pyhrn St. Leonhard-7297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ansfelden Haid Marienkapelle der Goldhaubengruppe-9702.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansfelden Haid Marienkapelle der Goldhaubengruppe-9702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ansfelden Naturwärme-Heizwerk Haid Strassenseite-9698.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansfelden Naturwärme-Heizwerk Haid Strassenseite-9698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Brunnen vor der Arbeiterkammer-9163.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Brunnen vor der Arbeiterkammer-9163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Pöstlingbergbahn Bombardier Flexity Outlook Mountainrunner-7483.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Pöstlingbergbahn Bombardier Flexity Outlook Mountainrunner-7483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ansfelden Bahnhof Nettingsdorf-9693.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansfelden Bahnhof Nettingsdorf-9693.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Weinweg Installation Weingartenschere-8276.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Weinweg Installation Weingartenschere-8276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Dom Weihwasserkessel-8166.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Dom Weihwasserkessel-8166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Weinweg Installation Christian Morgenstern-8255.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Weinweg Installation Christian Morgenstern-8255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wels Traungasse 9 pano-7644.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wels Traungasse 9 pano-7644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Wels Wasserturm-7652.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wels Wasserturm-7652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Kornplatz Dreifaltigkeitssäule-8245.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Kornplatz Dreifaltigkeitssäule-8245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Traun Pfarrkirche Seitenkapelle links-9658.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun Pfarrkirche Seitenkapelle links-9658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirchdorf ad Krems Nepomuk Pfarrkirche-8768.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchdorf ad Krems Nepomuk Pfarrkirche-8768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Bad Leonfelden Wirterbrunnen-8633.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Leonfelden Wirterbrunnen-8633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Urfahr Villa Nunwarz-0088.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Urfahr Villa Nunwarz-0088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptplatz 10-9106.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz 10-9106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Weinweg Skulptur für den Käferberg by Heimo Zobernig-8297.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Weinweg Skulptur für den Käferberg by Heimo Zobernig-8297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Krems a.d. Donau Stadtpark Musikpavillon-9222-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems a.d. Donau Stadtpark Musikpavillon-9222-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pettenbach Kraftwerkskanal Almmühle-6756-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pettenbach Kraftwerkskanal Almmühle-6756-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Panorama-8312.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Panorama-8312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pettenbach Almburg Kapelle KAtGem 49112 GstNr 744-1-6747.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pettenbach Almburg Kapelle KAtGem 49112 GstNr 744-1-6747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Spital am Pyhrn Großer Pyhrgas-8392.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spital am Pyhrn Großer Pyhrgas-8392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Langenlois Weinweg Weingartentor-8256.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Weinweg Weingartentor-8256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Langenlois Zöbing Heiligenstein Fassdaubenkreuz-7018.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Heiligenstein Fassdaubenkreuz-7018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 13:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Schönberg am Kamp Museum Alte Schmiede Gästezimmer-0008-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schönberg am Kamp Museum Alte Schmiede Gästezimmer-0008-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality, but please link the "Category:Alte Schmiede, Sommerfrische Museum (Schönberg am Kamp)" to a parent category --Llez 13:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks for review --Isiwal 15:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Wegkreuz am Weinweg Kreuzung Seestraße - Taglergraben-8268.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Wegkreuz am Weinweg Kreuzung Seestraße - Taglergraben-8268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Krems ad Donau Piaristenkirche Hauptaltar-6884-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems ad Donau Piaristenkirche Hauptaltar-6884-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Wasserspiegel Mönchsberg-8123.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Wasserspiegel Mönchsberg-8123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krems an der Donau von der Kremsleithen-0019-pano.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems an der Donau von der Kremsleithen-0019-pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Puchenau Kreuzweg Station 13-7559.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puchenau Kreuzweg Station 13-7559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Minoritenkirche Portal-8509.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Minoritenkirche Portal-8509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Neutor Herbert-von-Karajan-Platz-8147.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Neutor Herbert-von-Karajan-Platz-8147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Salzburg Mirabelgarten-8098.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg Mirabelgarten-8098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:36, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz St. Peter Chemiesteg-7987.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz St. Peter Chemiesteg-7987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Traun Christophorus Alte Traunbrücke-7731.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun Christophorus Alte Traunbrücke-7731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ottensheim Bleicherbach Steg-8062.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ottensheim Bleicherbach Steg-8062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Baustelle Vierte Donaubrücke-7663.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Baustelle Vierte Donaubrücke-7663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Pranger-7114.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Pranger-7114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tulln Wasserkapelle Wassergasse 1 donauseitig-0163.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Wasserkapelle Wassergasse 1 donauseitig-0163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tulln Hundertwasserboot Regentag Gästehafen-0105.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Hundertwasserboot Regentag Gästehafen-0105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tulln Minoritenkirche Chor-0113.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Minoritenkirche Chor-0113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Rathausplatz 3 Hermesbrunnen in der Rudolfstraße-0059.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Rathausplatz 3 Hermesbrunnen in der Rudolfstraße-0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

St. Pölten Jugendstilhaus Kremser Gasse 41-0172-pano-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten Jugendstilhaus Kremser Gasse 41-0172-pano-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

St. Pölten Franziskanerkirche Kirchenschiff-0181.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten Franziskanerkirche Kirchenschiff-0181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Karner Dreikönigskapelle Portal-0043.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Karner Dreikönigskapelle Portal-0043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Bezirkshauptmannschaft-0075-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Bezirkshauptmannschaft-0075-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tulln Bahnhof Stadt Denkmal Leopold Figl-0028.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Bahnhof Stadt Denkmal Leopold Figl-0028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael -0240.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael -0240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tulln Nibelungenbrunnen Donaulände-0101.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Nibelungenbrunnen Donaulände-0101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrplatz Figurenbildstock hl. Josef-7097.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrplatz Figurenbildstock hl. Josef-7097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrhof Kirche-6801-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrhof Kirche-6801-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tulln Minoritenkirche Hauptaltar-0118.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Minoritenkirche Hauptaltar-0118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Hauptplatz 15, 16 Durchhaus-9117.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz 15, 16 Durchhaus-9117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptplatz 15, 16-9114.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz 15, 16-9114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

St. Pölten Franziskanerkirchen Hauptaltar0184.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten Franziskanerkirchen Hauptaltar0184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

St. Pölten St. Pölten Prandtauerkirche Chor-0186.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten St. Pölten Prandtauerkirche Chor-0186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Orgel Altar-0230.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Orgel Altar-0230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Altarseite-0227.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Altarseite-0227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is not my favorite style of church interior or stained glass window, but it's excellent of its type and really expertly photographed. I think this would be a good FPC nominee, and I'll nominate it, if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 06:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentThanks for your comment, I will be happy if you nominate the picture --Isiwal 09:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)--Isiwal 09:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wels Maria-Theresia-Straße 3-7778.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wels Maria-Theresia-Straße 3-7778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Nepomuk-7217.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Nepomuk-7217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Schwarzes Rössl-7215.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Schwarzes Rössl-7215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Windischgarsten Pfarrkirche Prielgruppe-7239.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windischgarsten Pfarrkirche Prielgruppe-7239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrhof-7102.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrhof-7102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Langenlois Wegkreuz am Weinweg Kreuzung Seestraße - Taglergraben-8265.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Wegkreuz am Weinweg Kreuzung Seestraße - Taglergraben-8265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Riesenederkapelle-7711.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Riesenederkapelle-7711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Weberschule-7812.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Weberschule-7812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Adalbert-Stifter-Haus-7883.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Adalbert-Stifter-Haus-7883.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Kapelle Schablederweg-7679-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Kapelle Schablederweg-7679-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Loisium-8248.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Loisium-8248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Loisium-8251.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Loisium-8251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrplatz Figurenbildstock hl. Nepomuk-7096.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Pfarrplatz Figurenbildstock hl. Nepomuk-7096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Langenlois Zöbing Kellergasse Heiligenstein-7030.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois Zöbing Kellergasse Heiligenstein-7030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Dom Dombauhütte Exponat-8194-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Dom Dombauhütte Exponat-8194-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Terragio67 05:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Altarseite-0227.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Altarseite-0227.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Altarseite-0227.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Promenade Städtisches Obereinnehmerhaus-8216.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Promenade Städtisches Obereinnehmerhaus-8216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:08, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Pöstlingbergbahn Haltestelle Bruckneruniversität-7681.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Pöstlingbergbahn Haltestelle Bruckneruniversität-7681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptbahnhof S4-7724.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptbahnhof S4-7724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptplatz ehemaliger Neptunbrunnen-8233.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptplatz ehemaliger Neptunbrunnen-8233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tulln Kruzifix Minoritenplatz-0109.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Kruzifix Minoritenplatz-0109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Rathausplatz 3 Ansicht Rudolfstraße-0058.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Rathausplatz 3 Ansicht Rudolfstraße-0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Schiele Museum-0138.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Schiele Museum-0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Hundertwasserboot Regentag Gästehafen-0106.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Hundertwasserboot Regentag Gästehafen-0106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Donaubühne-0136.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Donaubühne-0136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tulln Stadtturm von Osten-0095.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Stadtturm von Osten-0095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. BTW: Your description outside the template {{Information}} should be inside. And it should have a language template like {{En}}. --XRay 07:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
✓ Done thanks for review --Isiwal 07:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Nibelungenbrunnen Donaulände-0098.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Nibelungenbrunnen Donaulände-0098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Wilhelmstraße 18 Villa-0035.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Wilhelmstraße 18 Villa-0035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Bezirksbrunnen Hauptplatz-0079.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Bezirksbrunnen Hauptplatz-0079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Bindermichl Pelikanbrunnen-0257.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichl Pelikanbrunnen-0257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tulln Flamme des Friedens Donaulände-0099.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Flamme des Friedens Donaulände-0099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

St. Pölten Apotheke Zum Goldene Löwen Wienerstraße 1-0193.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten Apotheke Zum Goldene Löwen Wienerstraße 1-0193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael -0250.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael -0250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Buntglasfenster Ostseite-0235.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichlkirche Pfarrkirche hl. Michael Buntglasfenster Ostseite-0235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St. Pölten Prandtauerkirche Orgel-0190-HDR.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Pölten Prandtauerkirche Orgel-0190-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tulln Karner Dreikönigskapelle-0037.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Karner Dreikönigskapelle-0037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Graz Botanischer Garten Altes Gewächshaus-0950-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Botanischer Garten Altes Gewächshaus-0950-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Graz Wartehaus Hilmteich-0976.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Wartehaus Hilmteich-0976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linz Hauptbahnhof Ankunftshalle süd-7718.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptbahnhof Ankunftshalle süd-7718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz St. Theresia Werktagskapelle-0333-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz St. Theresia Werktagskapelle-0333-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tulln Stadtturm Stadtmauer von Westen-0087.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulln Stadtturm Stadtmauer von Westen-0087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Hauptbahnhof ÖBB 2070-014-0803.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Hauptbahnhof ÖBB 2070-014-0803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graz Botanischer Garten Haupteingang und Kalthaus-0922.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Botanischer Garten Haupteingang und Kalthaus-0922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Graz Botanischer Garten Altes Gewächshaus-0962.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Botanischer Garten Altes Gewächshaus-0962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Graz Schlossbergplatz Taubenbrunnen-0989.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Schlossbergplatz Taubenbrunnen-0989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Bindermichl Pelikanbrunnen-0251.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Bindermichl Pelikanbrunnen-0251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Traun Pfarrkirche Orgelempore-9666.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traun Pfarrkirche Orgelempore-9666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graz Botanischer Garten Sukkulentenhaus-0929.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Botanischer Garten Sukkulentenhaus-0929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graz Schlossberg Kriegssteig-0990-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Schlossberg Kriegssteig-0990-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steyr Heindlmühlwehr-6886.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr Heindlmühlwehr-6886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Urfahr Stadtwerkstatt Kirchengasse 4-9254.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Urfahr Stadtwerkstatt Kirchengasse 4-9254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Krems ad Donau Rathaus Obere Landstraße 4-9212-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems ad Donau Rathaus Obere Landstraße 4-9212-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Rathaus-9091.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Rathaus-9091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St. Marienkirchen Pfarrkirche Empore-0902-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Marienkirchen Pfarrkirche Empore-0902-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality even if it is a tad dark --PierreSelim 10:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Linz Urfahr Bernaschekplatz Denkmal-9042.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Urfahr Bernaschekplatz Denkmal-9042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Linz Dom Renovierung 2022-8204.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linz Dom Renovierung 2022-8204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graz Botanischer Garten Altes Gewächshaus-0965.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Botanischer Garten Altes Gewächshaus-0965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Graz Botanischer Garten Tropenhaus und Wüstengarten-0949.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz Botanischer Garten Tropenhaus und Wüstengarten-0949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Wien Wieden Pfarrkirche Hl. Elisabeth interior-1152-2-HDR.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Wieden Pfarrkirche Hl. Elisabeth interior-1152-2-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Reply[reply]