User talk:Gambo7/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gambo7!

Coats of arms

Both coats of arms are hundreds of years olds. Republishing by the Vatican on its homepage doesn't create a new copyright. Great Thing: "I've no idea of nothing. But the images must be deleted. But speedy." :-).--Liutprand-1977 (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Catagory:Umbrellas in art und Category:Umbrellas in heraldry

Hallo Gambo7 - ich danke dir für deine Arbeit am Project Heraldry. Bitte beachte bei der Kategorisierung, dass "... in heraldry" oder "... in art" oder "... in architecture" jeweils nur solche Bilder gehören die Wappen, Kunstwerke und Bauten zeigen. Standard-Elemente wie der "umbracalum" allein sind weder ein Wappen noch Kunstwerk oder Bauwerk. Und warum mussten die beiden Dateien umbenannt werden? Und warum musste ein Nummer in Klammern "(1) und (2)" sein? --maxxl2 - talk 16:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Medal icons

Hello! Before you replace every medal icon there is: They are very widely used - Is this discussed? IMHO the new colors don't look better, besides at File:Bronze medal olympic.svg it makes the red ring nearly invisible (by the way, you made that file four times larger (and harder to read) by saving it with inkscape) --maix¿? 23:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok but bronze should bronze, not brown (!!)... and gold should be gold... I'll see if I can make better colours --Gambo7 (talk) 15:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Moved here by maix. Let's keep this here, I watch the page.
I think it's more important that the colors are recognizable and distinct from each other and look sort of good. You will never accurately reproduce the real colors, as they are metals, which are glowing which a computer display cannot. I think the previous colors do fit both criteria quite good. --maix¿? 19:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your comparision. Let's see whether if is enough for Fry1989. Otherwise, this would demonstrate that Fry1989's actions are motivated by bad faith. --Echando una mano (talk) 18:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

"Somebody"

I do hope you realize that just because you aren't using my name, I don't know when you're talking about me. Fry1989 eh? 17:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I was not talking about you in facts. Unless your name on the Wikis is different than the one you use here. --Gambo7 (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

La ringrazio molto per questa nuova versione, molto meglio degli altri. Cordiali saluti, --Echando una mano (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

No, ma grazie lo stesso. Ottimo lavoro con File:Vatican City CoA.svg! --F l a n k e r (talk) 19:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Grazie mille per il vostro aiuto. --Echando una mano (talk) 23:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


Hello Gambo, only a small pronounced critic, I must say the escutcheon looks indeed a bit something strange. Also a little bit in the original reference, but your version has intensified this, it is to much cambered in every way. Maybe that's also what the others have seen at first sight.User: Perhelion04:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Well you can make lines more curved with few clicks on Inkscape (and I don't even think that an escutcheon can be used to raise a copyvio issue, it's just a common shape), anyway the discussions were more about the emblem itself, especially the tiara, than the whole image. --Gambo7 (talk) 08:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo - hier sind wir ja nun gemeinsam einen Schritt weiter gekommen. Ich könnte mir gut vorstelllen, das das Emblem noch etwas größer, länger auf dem Tuch stehen könnte. Was meinst du dazu? -- Maxxl² - talk 12:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Das Vexillum sollte horizontal sein, wie du in File:Mosaiques de San Salvatore della Scala Santa Rome.JPG (Jesus gibt es zu Konstantin) und anderen alten Bilder sehen kannst. --Gambo7 (talk) 12:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Ein Gonfaleone wird immer senkrecht dargestellt. Sieh mal hier. -- Maxxl² - talk 12:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Aber es war ein Vexillum (vexillum cum armis Ecclesiæ), kein Gonfalone. Vexillum = Fahne, Banner, Standard, ohne besondere Definitionen. --Gambo7 (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Wenn du dir die Quasten und Schlaufen ansiehst, ist unschwer zu erkennen, dass dieser Stoff nur senkrecht wie hier vor dem Papst her getragen werden kann. Das beschreibt doch auch der Text: ... il drappo era attaccato ad una lunga asta dorata, incavata al posto dell’impugnatura e cimata di una piccola lancia metallica, da cui pendevano cordoni a fiocco d’oro.. Vielleicht kannst du das nochmal bedenken. -- Maxxl² - talk 12:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Quasten und Schlaufen wurden von mir hinzugefügt, nur um es mehr "mittelaltlicher" zumachen; da Text sagt nichts darueber, drappo meint nur "Tuch".
Wenn du es senkrecht willst, dann kannst du ein derivatives Bild uploaden, kein Problem. --Gambo7 (talk) 12:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
So wie das jetzt da ist, ist das technisch/praktisch unmöglich, da ein Wimpel/Fahne mit Quasten an den Außenenden niemals "fliegen" kann, Das Seidentuch wird wegen des Gewichts der Quasten immer schlaff am Fahnenstock hängen und die Fahne nicht ihrer Aufgabe gerecht werden: das Emblem deutlich zu zeigen und zu sagen: "Hier kommt der Heilige Vater". Es ist geradezu die Aufgabe der Quasten, das Tuch vertikal zu straffen. Bitte zeige mir eine Abbildung einer horizontalen Fahne mit Quasten.
Zu der Zeit der Entstehung der VSRC wurde noch nicht zwischen "Vexillium" und "Gonfalone" unterschieden. Als Beleg aus der gleichen vatikanischen Quelle: La custodia del Vessillo di S.R.C. era affidata, tanto in tempo di pace che in tempo di guerra, ad un personaggio di alto rango, che assumeva pertanto la denominazione e la carica di "Vessillifero di Santa Romana Chiesa", detto anche Gonfaloniere della Chiesa. Eine Sache - zwei Namen. -- Maxxl² - talk 15:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
File:Fictional Logo for Goodwill Games.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Keφr (keep talk here) 10:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Olos gym 2000.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Keφr (keep talk here) 17:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste


Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Bandiera

Ciao l’immagine che hai postato della bandiera non è corretta. Nella sala del Quirinale come voluto dal presidente scalfaro nel 1995 è presente una bandiera molto diversa da quella messa da te (che stai semplicemente cercando di mettere il logo che trovi nel manuale di immagine). La bandiera è questa

http://bandieredalvivo.com/Pagine%20regionali/Emilia%20Romagna.html

Ti invito pertanto cortesemente a caricare un’immagine coerente e di dimensioni corrette oppure a ripristinare l’immagine precedente che avevi corretto con i colori giusti. Saluti --JN95 (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Ma per curiosità sei veramente un medico come dici? Li facevo più educati i medici laureati all’università di Bologna. Sul file di Bonaccini che ho caricato di pregherei di starne fuori in quanto ne sto discutendo con altri utenti senza bisogno che metti troppi avvisi. Se sei interessato leggi pure i messaggi che ci siamo scambiati. Detto questo tu non sei alcuna autorità, la bandiera che ti ho messo è stata ripresa davanti al palazzo della regione ed è una fonte. Tu non hai messo alcun link o altro riguardo alla modifica che hai fatto. Ti invito pertanto di nuovo ad essere più educato (e te lo aveva già detto anche l’amministratore L.) e a rispettare le regole di Wikipedia.--JN95 (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

e io ti invito nuovamente a non inventarti bandiere o loghi. Ripeto, tu non sei la regione emilia-romagna non puoi inventarti loghi a caso. Le tue innumerevoli immagini cancellate (vedi sopra) dimostrano che forse è il caso che le regole oltre a leggerle le stampi e magari le tieni accanto (non prendertela è una battuta simpatica :-) ) --JN95 (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

edit Opera propria basata su: Stemma Emilia-Romagna.png.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emilia-Romagna_flag.svg Questa va bene, non metti che è ufficiale (poichè nessuna di fatto lo è) e citi che è una tua opera propria. Su questa non si può sindacare (a meno che non violi il copyright il logo). Dato che al momento la bandiera non è formalizzata per legge non si può fare altro che adottare i colori e le dimensioni del gonfalone con la bandiera usata nella sala del quirinale dal 1995 (che è quella che ti ho mandato in foto al link sopra). Tutte le altre sono opere di fantasia e finchè non adottate per legge non vanno bene. Ciao --JN95 (talk) 09:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


L'immagine di bonaccini era presente nel mio archivio con oltre 5000 immagini e come ho già spiegato potrei aver fatto un errore (il primo e sbagliare è umano). Visto che vedo che continui con un atteggiamento maleducato e poco consono allo spirito di wikipedia (e anche per un medico, ammesso che tu lo sia veramente), ti cito questo:

Gambo7/Archive1
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


a proposito di "scemenze e livelli inqualificabili" (tue parole). Saluti --JN95 (talk) 09:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Avviso

Il file è stato caricato una volta sola, su commons. Verifica pure. Per adesso ti avviso con un cartellino giallo, poi passiamo al rosso. Non so se ti sei reso conto ma dare dello stupido a qualcuno potrebbe essere minimo passabile di sospensione per attacchi personali e pure querelabile. Attenzione. Template:Attacco

--JN95 (talk) 10:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)