User talk:Mauswiesel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mauswiesel!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−

Hello, Mauswiesel!
Tip: Add categories to your images
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 19:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cloud chambers[edit]

Hi Mauswiesel, the category for cloud chambers is Category:Cloud chambers, not the far too general Category:Science. -- Ies (talk) 13:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image doesn't match[edit]


You have uploaded this image to Wikipedia:

However, you have the same image in your website, but with different labels for the particles, on this page:

Your website lists one trace as being an electron, while the Wikipedia image shows it as being a gamma ray, for example. Which image is correct? I suggest changing updating either your website or the Wikipedia image to be the correct version.

Regards, Ericobnn (talk) 22:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I dont know how to answer you but both pictures are correct. Physician and students in nuclear physics will understood the difference. Delta ray is electrons, but there is no gamma ray. Maybe the wikipedia picture is more detailled than the one in my website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauswiesel (talk • contribs) 16:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CW building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! 17:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]