User talk:Orange Nr. 5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Orange Nr. 5!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAMBI plumes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAMBI roseau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAMBI chapeau melon 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Bambi (Marie Pierre Pruvot)

[edit]

Hello. The problem with some of these files is that Mrs Pruvot may own a copy of these pictures but she's not the copyright holder of them. For example File:BAMBI chapeau melon 2.jpg is copyrighted by André Nisak and only him (if alive) may consent to renounce to his copyrights by putting his work in Commons under a free licence. In the meantime you could send the permission you received from Mrs Pruvot at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Kind regards, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chèr Patrick Rogel, La permission de Mme Pruvot était seulement très informelle et courte: "Je vais vous envoyer quelques photos et je serai très fière de figurer dans le Wikipédia allemand. Je vous embrasse, B.‌". Je suppose que cela ne suffit pas du tout.
J'ai tenté de la contacter et d'expliquer toute ces complications le samedi, mais elle n'a pas répondu jusque maintenant, et je crains qu'elle n'a pas d'envie de s'occuper de cette chose (elle a 82 ans), qui est extrêmement compliqué (aussi pour moi !!!).
Si M. Nisak serais morte on ne pourrait pas utiliser le Photo ? Connaissez-vous les autre personnes, qui ont le droit d'auteur ? Si les photos vont être éteintes , cela serait très dommage. A bientot, --Orange Nr. 5 (talk) 11:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Chèr Patrick Rogel, Madame Pruvot/Bambi m'a envoyé aujourdhui à 17:07 un e-mail avec ce texte:
"Chère amie; ce que je peux vous dire, c'est que les photos faites au studio André Nisak sont des photos faites spécialement pour être distribuées, éditées. C'est pour cela que je les ai fait faire. On en trouve des reproductions dans les programmes du Carrousel où je me produisais, et dans les publicités de mes tournées, de même que dans certains articles de journaux. Naturellement, si je vous les ai envoyées, c'est que je suis d'accord pour que vous les fassiez paraître. Si vous avez besoin d'un autre accord, je vous le fournirai dans la mesure bien entendu de mes possibilités.
Amicalement à vous,*
M-P. Pruvot Bambi.‌"
Croyez-vous que cela suffit? --Orange Nr. 5 (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour. Avez-vous retransmis ce mail à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ? Les administrateurs vont désormais l'examiner même si à mon avis (mais ça n'engage que moi), les droits d'André Nisak sont protégés en France jusqu'à 70 ans après sa mort et seront donc dans le domaine public en 2086 (2016 +70). Cordialement, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
à Monsieur Patrick Rogel: Oui, je l'ai envoyé à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org le texte original et une traduction allemande, parce que j'ai fait tout cela en allemand (toutes ces choses juridiques sont très difficiles pour moi même en allemand !). Merci et cordialement,--Orange Nr. 5 (talk) 09:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coccinelle et André.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Coccinelle et André.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Pentachlorphenol (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Pentachlorphenol, dies ist leider die gleiche Thematik wie der Abschnitt davor. Ich bitte darum, dass ich etwas Zeit brauche, weil ich vermutlich nochmal Madame Pruvot auf französisch kontaktieren muss, und jetzt ist Wochenende. Könntest Du mir bitte so genau wie möglich sagen, was ich ihr zur Unterschrift vorlegen muss, oder wie das genau formuliert sein muss, damit das dann hinterher auch wirklich gültig ist? Ich bin ja keine Juristin, und wie ich schon dem anderen Herrn versucht habe zu erklären, bin ich auch nicht gerade gut in Computer-Angelegenheiten und habe sowas auch zum allerersten Mal gemacht. Das ist ja wirlich schrecklich kompliziert, und es ist mir auch ganz peinlich, dass ich die über 80jährige Mme Pruvot noch mal deswegen belästigen muss. Die hat es nämlich gut gemeint und war sehr großzügig mir soviele Bilder zuzusenden. Grüße,--Orange Nr. 5 (talk) 13:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist der Name des Fotografen und dessen Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung der Bilder unter freier Lizenz erforderlich.
sonst können die Bilder nicht verwendet werden. Bilder, die auf Commons eingestellt werden, sind nicht nur für die Verwendung in Wikipedia gedacht sondern müssen (unter den im Lizenzbaustein angegebenen Bedingungen) allgemein frei verwendbar sein. (Bei Wirtschaftsunternehmen schreibe ich immer: Auch die Konkurrenz ist dann berechtigt, das Bild gewerblich zu nutzen.) Diese Freigabeerklärung kann ausschließlich der Fotograf geben, nicht die abgebildete Person.
In der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia gibt es dazu die Hilfeseite: de:Wikipedia:Textvorlagen. --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coccinelle, beauté, mariage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Coccinelle, beauté, mariage.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Pentachlorphenol (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bambi, A Belfort.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bambi, A Belfort.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Pentachlorphenol (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]