User talk:संजीव कुमार

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, संजीव कुमार!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Dear Rahul, I am not familiar with the procedure. These days I am a bit busy, so not able to read whole things. So please can you provide me the exact thing what I have to do. I asked the owner of the picture. He said that it is allowed in every sense from his side and he doesn't have any problem. ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 11:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Sanjeev, Firstly Atul Gurtu is not the owner of this picture as he is there in the pic. The copyright owner of a photograph is normally the person who took the photograph (in case, the photographer was employed for work, the employee is the owner). Moreover, the source that you have mentioned is vague. You need to provide the exact link. You should, therefore, find out the exact owner and urge him/her to send an email from his/her official email ID to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The rest of the procedure is explained in the above links and the OTRS people will guide the mailer from thereon. Thanks. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rahul, I have changed the source link. Now I have kept the link of picasa album. Now the second thing is the owner. So, it is like I went on a visit somewhere. There I gave my camera to some unknown person to take my picture for few minutes. After that I took the camera and came back. So please let me know who is the owner of those pictures which were taken in my camera but triggered with another's hand. So in this case if Atul Gurtu is not the owner than I can't say anything but in either case I will ask to Atul Gurtu to send an email on permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and I am sure he will send. So please let me know?☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello again, As long as the person who took the photograph was not employed, (s)he is the copyright owner even if it is someone else's camera. That is my understanding of the copyright laws. Rest is upto the OTRS volunteers to decide. I should add that as an exception, we do allow photographs taken by someone else (upon the subject's request) to be displayed on various user pages of the uploader. But, this exception is ofcourse not relevant here. In addition, the Picasa link that you gave asserts "All rights reserved" This means that hosting this image here on Wikimedia Commons is a clear copyright violation and I'm afraid it shall sooner or later be deleted by some administrator. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok, so can you please tell me what should I ask for to Atul Gurtu?☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
You should ask him about who took the photograph, that person should send an email from his/her official email ID to the above email address. In addition, Atul should change the license and credits on his Picasa page for the image. Rahul Bott (talk) 13:13, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok, so I will ask Atul and let you know.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Dear Rahul, I think now the rights of the Album has been changed and Atul Gurtu has sent an email also to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, so now please let me know whether it is ok or not.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
No, atleast to me now, no copyright statement is visible on the Picasa page of the image which by default implies that it is still copyrighted. Regarding the email, I cannot be of any help anymore as I don't have OTRS account. Some OTRS volunteer will reply to the email if more queries are there and will fix the image page on Commons accordingly. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
So, what I have to do now?☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

┌─────────────┘
We can only wait now. I've already put a note at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Two tickets. Let's see when someone replies. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

thanks☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 06:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Latex devnag.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Latex devnag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

This nomination is done by myself. If merging of both files is possible then I would like that.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 20:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
I know, but the nomination was not complete and several days old. I completed it yesterda and thought better to inform you. It will be decided normaly a week after it got listed on a daily deletetion request page. regards. --JuTa 20:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)


File:फाइनमेन चित्र.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:फाइनमेन चित्र.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Again: Just to inform you that I completed that incomplete deletion request. JuTa 21:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−

The File:100 with newly-weds in Montreal.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.

JuTa 06:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

I have got irritated with this file. If you would like to delete this picture plese do so. I requested to the author of this picture. He sent all the details and got irritated with the nonsense emails from wikipedia. I will not upload others pics in future. So please delete this picture. I don't want to ask anything more about it.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 07:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
OK, ✓ Done --JuTa 08:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


File:लार्ज हैड्रान कोलाइडर.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:लार्ज हैड्रान कोलाइडर.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

@JuTa: This nomination was done by me, so I think this message is useless.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)