User talk:GeorgHH/Archiv 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Contents

Re: File:Kwyshell.JPG[edit]

  • Hello, I came here to say that deleted the image under a free license, I put it in the summary that the image was derived from the Kwyshell's site. FlipsHack (talk) 00:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

RE File:Domingo_Marimón.JPG[edit]

Done --Claudio Elias 16:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

"Missing" source[edit]

Hi. Recently you has tagged two files (made by still inactive user Orange man) as "no source" (File:Elektrarna_Tisová.jpg, File:Elektrarna_Tisova3.jpg. You are right that some fields in the {{Information}} template were empty. However, both these files where tagged with {{PD-self|author=I, [[User:Orange.man|Orange.man]]}} when uploaded, and both have full metadata etc. There is no reason to suspect them as "no source". Please, use such warning templates more ponderously. Thank You. --ŠJů (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Libraries[edit]

You may want to see the discussion I started at Commons:Village pump#Category:Libraries, since you have at some time edited Category:Libraries. - Jmabel ! talk 02:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop[edit]

Self-uploaded images do not require OTRS permission. I am trying to work with Mr. Dodge, but you are making that very difficult, please stop.--William S. Saturn (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, that's wrong. Self-uploading an image is not a proof for the ownership and for holding the copyrights. In particular File:Earl1957.jpg and File:Earl-Dodge-2007.jpg are not User:Caldodges own work so permission of Barbara V. Dodge and Holly Patterson is required. I tagged the files with {{OTRS pending}} now, that gives you more time to get the permissions. --GeorgHHtalk   11:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Matt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Matt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Adrignola talk 20:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Missing licence information[edit]

Hello Georg!

You have marked the following files with "no source"-tags: File:Knoting1.JPG, File:Knoting2.JPG, File:Knoting3.JPG, File:Knoting4.JPG, File:Knoting5.JPG. After that User:Pieter Kuiper removed those tags without rationale. Because I aggree with you and it is easily visible that there is no sufficient author, licence and source information, I reverted Kuiper's edits. And again Kuiper reverted them with the wrong rationale: "information is given". I tried to contact Kuiper hours ago, but he did not react. What to do now? I fear new edits on these files may be reverted, too. What do you suggest to do in this issue? --High Contrast (talk) 07:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Hallo High Contrast, ich habe mir die Dateien nochmal angesehen. Pieter hat wohl recht: unter "Dateiversionen" sind Quellinformationen angegeben. Das habe ich zuvor nicht gesehen, obwohl ich darauf in der Regel beim durchsehen der Dateien auch achte. Es wundert mich nur, das diese Informationen weder in der Dateibeschreibung noch beim bearbeiten der Datei nicht angezeigt werden.

Ich werde die entsprechenden Daten nachtragen. Vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen. --GeorgHHtalk   16:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Perfekt! Jetzt ist alles in Butter. Danke und Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Gerhard_richter_vor_strontium_110205.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gerhard_richter_vor_strontium_110205.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 18:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

File Tagging File:Tlove.jpg[edit]

Hello. The file was originally uploaded on Polish Wikipedia on 11th April 2006 by its author. I've just reuploaded it on Commons. -- Kangel (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank![edit]

Thanks for fixing my typos at Žrnovska Banja images.Quahadi Añtó 09:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Gesamtschule Eppendorf[edit]

Hallo Georg,

da die Schule jetzt "Stadtteilschule Eppendorf" heißt, müsste die Kat. entsprechend umbenannt werden. Da ich mich mit den diesbezüglichen Gepflogenheiten bei Commons nicht so auskenne, wollte ich Dich bitten, das zu tun. Vielen Dank sagt der Mogelzahn (talk) 14:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done --GeorgHHtalk   15:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Ixch danke Dir. --Mogelzahn (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Heimattreue Front[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Heimattreue_Front_Logo.jpg Und was wäre da eine bessere Lizenz? Es wäre schade wenn der Artikel ohne Bild bleiben würde. Peter.Lustig (talk)

Das hängt i.d.R. ganz davon ab wer der Urheber ist. --GeorgHHtalk   15:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Das lässt sich nicht herausfinden wer das Logo designed hat. Wieso wird http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CDU_logo.svg dann z.b. nicht gelöscht? Bzw was für eine Lizenz gehört zu einem Parteilogo / Logo einer Organisation? Ich hatte es selber eingescannt. Ich denke nicht dass jemand darüber (noch) Rechte hat.

self = own[edit]

Hi Georg. Dieses Bild hatte eine Quelle und zwar hatte der Autor das Bild mit der Lizenz: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} freigegeben und self impliziert ja das der Autor das Bild selbst gemacht hat. Ich habe das Bild wieder hergestellt. LG, Amada44  talk to me 13:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for this. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

File:John Petrucci 02.jpg[edit]

Kannst Du mal schauen: File:John Petrucci 02.jpg. Da hast Du ein nicht identisches Foto überschrieben. --ALE! ¿…? 07:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Da hat Master of Puppets das Bild mit einem Cc-nc lizenzierten Bild überschrieben. Ich habe seine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. --GeorgHHtalk   11:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Agustin Rossi.jpg[edit]

This file was taken of the site of the House of Representatives of Argentina. This site says: "La información contenida en este sitio es de dominio público y puede ser utilizada libremente. Se ruega citar la fuente." or in English: "The information contained on this site is public domain and may be used freely. Please cite the source."

You can reed this in: http://www.diputados.gov.ar/

Please take off the deleting tag.

--Robertoe (talk) 22:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Zwei Bitten[edit]

Magst Du bitte Category:Wohnblock Fuhlsbüttler Straße 220-226, Habichtsweg 1-5, 2-6, Habichtsweg 1-7, Schwalbenplatz 17-19 löschen, das Lemma enthält einen Tippfehler. Richtig ist diese Kategorie, die ich nach Bemerken meines Fehlers angelegt habe. Vielen Dank. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Und magst Du bitte die Category:HSH Nordbank Arena nach Category:Imtech Arena verschieben. Vielen Dank. --Mogelzahn (talk) 18:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Arbeit. Magst Du die nun leere HSH-Nordbank-Arena-Kategorie dann auch noch löschen, das wäre nett. Und ich habe noch eine überflüssige Kategorie: Category:Hermann Baumeister (jurist) wird nicht benötigt, da sich alle Bilder zu dem Herrn in Category:Hermann Baumeister befinden. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Moin moin, die HSH-Nordbank-Arena-Kategorie habe ich weitergeleitet, alles andere wie gewünscht.
Ein schönes Wochenende.

--GeorgHHtalk   11:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Ich danke Dir für Deine Mühe und wünsche Dir ebenfalls ein schönes Wochenende. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Salbertrand02.JPG: your report[edit]

Please check if the required infos I have added are correct. Thank you in advance--K.Weise (talk) 08:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

It's fine. Thanks for your help. --GeorgHHtalk   12:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Moin[edit]

Was war hier falsch? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:39, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Es war nicht direkt etwas falsch, nur Category:Brown horses ist eine Begriffsklärungsseite. Das Bild konnte ich nur leider nicht sicher einer der beiden Kategorien Category:Seal brown horses oder Category:Horse coat colors zuordnen. --GeorgHHtalk   20:45, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Autsch, danke fürs Bereinigen und Erklären. --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Ich mal wieder[edit]

Magst Du bitte dieses Bild löschen, das ich hochgeladen habe. Es zeigt nicht das, was in der Beschreibung steht und sollte auch nicht hochgeladen werden (ich habe mich schlicht verklickt). Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. --Mogelzahn (talk) 10:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Das richtige Bild zum Text steht jetzt hier.

Category:St. Sophienkirche (Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord)[edit]

Hallo Georg, ich schon wieder. Der Ersteller der Kategorie (User:Ulf Heinsohn) hat sie ledier unter falscher Bezeichnung angelegt. Magst Du sie bitte nach Category:St. Sophienkirche (Hamburg-Barmbek-Süd) verschieben und die alte Cat. dann löschen. Vielen Dank! --Mogelzahn (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done Nach dem ich deinen Hinweis auf Ulf Heinsohns Diskussion gelesen habe, habe ich auch gleich Category:Epiphanienkirche (Hamburg-Jarrestadt) nach Category:Epiphanienkirche (Hamburg-Winterhude) verschoben. --GeorgHHtalk   06:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. --Mogelzahn (talk) 09:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Lilly Wood & The Prick[edit]

Hallo Georg, ich würde mich freuen, wenn du mir mit dieser Kategorie helfen könntest: sie taucht zwar in der übergeordneten Kategorie "Category:Musicians from France" auf, ich konnte aber nicht die anderen files dieser kategorie zuordnen (das sieht man bei dem File:Lilly wood and the prick au Main Square Festival.jpg). Es wäre auch sinnvoll dieser Kategorie einen anderen namen zu geben: bei Wikipedia heisst die seite Lilly Wood and the Prick. Vielen Dank im Voraus--Lara Janssen (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Lara, bei File:Lilly wood and the prick au Main Square Festival.jpg hattest du nur das "Category:" vergessen. Die Kategorie Lilly Wood and The Prick habe ich nur weitergeleitet, da ich hinsichtlich des Namens nicht sicher bin und er auf http://www.lillywoodandtheprick.com/ auch mit & geschrieben wird. --GeorgHHtalk   19:31, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Vielen Dank, das ging aber schnell:), Grüße aus Hamburg--31.18.90.179 19:50, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Klein_Matterhorn_Bahn_(653712).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Klein_Matterhorn_Bahn_(653712).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 10:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RubyLalitKolhe_Marriage_Registration_Certificate.jpg[edit]

Hi George, I request you to kindly reconsider your "kept" decision on the above file. All uploads by Mrs. Ruby Lalit Kolhe are personal in nature. You can have glance at one of the Hindi documents uploaded by this user translated by me at the following deletion request link. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 06:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Umbenennungsbitte[edit]

Dieses Bild zeigt eindeutig nicht das Hotel Vier Jahreszeiten, sondern das Hapag-Lloyd-Gebäude. Kannst Du das umbenennen? --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)PS: Mit den Bildern unseres italienischen Freundes hast Du mir ja eine Aufgabe gestellt, aber "i'll do my very best", habe schon eine ganze Reihe beschrieben und kategorisiert ;-)

Das Bild heißt nun File:Hapag-Lloyd headquarter Hamburg.jpg.
Bei unserem Freund helfe ich in den nächsten wieder mit, nach dem ich jetzt ein paar Tage durch arbeiten mußte. Gruß --GeorgHHtalk   21:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. Und was den Bilderproduzenten ohne Beschreibungsneigung angeht: Kein Problem, ich brauchte auch ein paar Tage Abstand von ihm. --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Golden Gate Bridge MA.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Golden Gate Bridge MA.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 17:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Johann_Nepomuk_Hummel_02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Johann_Nepomuk_Hummel_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

About deletions[edit]

Hello, you made a deletion request for http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aikido_lesneven_2004_a4dn894_9042.jpg and I would like to know if you are an administrator with the rights and the knowledge to remove (delete and purge) the picture? Please tell me so. Best Regards --Janwikifoto (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, it´s no need to remove the picture before the deletion request procedure is terminated. Maybe others have a different view about deletion of this picture. --GeorgHHtalk   17:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I know that. However, I was curious if you have the right, the skill, and the knowledge to remove pictures. I agree that it is maybe not very educational. --Janwikifoto (talk) 19:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Magst Du mal bitte ...[edit]

diese Kategorie nach "Category:Wohldorfer Graben" verschieben. Da hatte sich beim Ersteller offenbar ein Tippfehler eingeschlichen. Vielen Dank im Voraus. --Mogelzahn (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done --GeorgHHtalk   16:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Firma dankt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Und noch eine Bitte. Diese Karte zeigt nicht die Goldbek (die ist dort wohl schlicht vergessen, sondern lediglich Außenalster mit nördlich anschließendem Streek und rechts die Osterbek), so dass der Name doch arg irreführend ist. Magst Du die bitte irgendwie umbenennen. Vielen Dank im Voraus. --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Auch für diese prompte Arbeit herzlichen Dank. --Mogelzahn (talk) 22:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified people[edit]

Why the removal of "unidentified people" from File:18 Mar 2007 Seattle Demo 06.jpg and File:19 Mar 2007 Seattle Demo 42.jpg? The former is a poet addressing a rally of several thousand people, so presumably if she can be identified we'd want a name. The latter shows three leaders of S.N.O.W. talking with a policeman; I only knew one name, but again presumably if anyone can identify the others, we'd want that. - Jmabel ! talk 21:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

I see no urgent need for peoples names if they're not essential for image description. --GeorgHHtalk   19:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Löschen wg. Urheberrechtsverletzung[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH, lösch doch bitte auch gleich noch das File [[1]] von mir, ist ja der gleiche Fall, wenn ich das (so langsam ;-)) richtig verstehe. Werde mir diesen komplizierten Sachverhalt noch ein paar Mal durchlesen. Du kennst Dich da offenbar bestens aus. Vielleicht erkennst Du noch andere Urheberrechtsverletzungen in meinen Spenden. Dank! VG --JanManu (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done--GeorgHHtalk   19:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Il32-i.jpg[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH, ich hoffe, Du bist gut in das neue Jahr gekommen! Verzeihe mir bitte, wenn ich Dich bezüglich eines lang zurückliegenden Edits behellige, aber vielleicht könntest Du mir doch noch in Bezug auf diesen Löschantrag erklären, wie Du damals dazu gekommen bist, mit diesem Edit diese Datei unter eine GFDL-Lizenz im Namen von Ralf Roletschek zu stellen? Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 10:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Inzwischen war Sargoth auf de-wp so freundlich, die Datei dort zu restaurieren. Und zum Zeit des Transfers stand sie dort tatsächlich unter der GFDL, wenngleich diese Änderung von jemand anders, offenbar im Auftrag von Ralf Roletschek, durchgeführt wurde. Da ich nur den Hochladekommentar von Ralf mit pd gesehen hatte, war mir unklar, woher die GFDL-Lizenz herkam. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Ein gesundes neues Jahr wünsche ich dir! Nur aus der Erinnerung heraus hätte ich nach so langer Zeit natürlich nicht nachweisen können, worauf sich mein damaliger edit bezog. Nach dem ich mir die Sache jetzt nochmal angesehen habe, frage ich mich allerdings warum mich die GFDL-Lizenzierung nicht stutzig gemacht hat... Liebe Grüße --GeorgHHtalk   21:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Danke, GeorgHH, inzwischen ist geklärt, dass die GFDL durch einen irrgeleiteten Bot auf de-wp eingefügt wurde. Es erfolgte nicht im Auftrag von Ralf, da er die Aufnahme nicht gemacht hat, sondern damals davon ausging, dass das Foto gemeinfrei sei, was sich später als nicht zutreffend erwiesen hat. Nunja, das fällt alles in die Frühzeit, wo wir weniger wussten und als noch mehr Dinge schiefgehen konnten. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Moorfleeter Diek 359[edit]

Hallo Georg, magst Du mal bitte obige Cat. nach Category:Staatsdomäne Moorfleeter Deich 359 verschieben. Das ist nämlich der richtige Name des Gebäudes. Vielen Dank sagt der --Mogelzahn (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done Viel Grüße --GeorgHHtalk   12:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Danke! Der User:Flamenc nervt etwas mit seiner ständigen Plattdeutschisierung aller Dateien und Kategorien, die er einstellt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:HirschhornChrystal1.2011.jpg[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH, bitte File:HirschhornChrystal1.2011.jpg (Image:HirschhornChrystal1.2011.jpg ) und File:HirschhornChrystal2.2011.jpg (Image:HirschhornChrystal2.2011.jpg ) einfach löschen. Man lernt nie aus. Dank! VG --JanManu (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done--GeorgHHtalk   17:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Mal eine Frage zu einem Deiner Bilder:[edit]

Dieses Bild und seine Beschreibung irritieren mich etwas. Du beschreibst es als "Shell Raffinerie am Reiherstieg, Hamburg." Laut meinem Stadtplan befindet sich die Shell-Raffinerie auf der Hohen Schaar, die westlich des Reiherstieges liegt. Das Bild ist aber eindeutig nach Norden photographiert (weil man am Horizont Michel und Telemichel sieht), so dass es sich bei den gezeigten Anlagen um ein Ostufer handeln muss. Entweder zeigt es also die Süderelbe (die Hohe Schaar liegt ja östlich von ihr) oder nicht Shell. Kannst Du mir da helfen? --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Moin. Das ist Shell am Worthdamm. Auf dem hinteren weißen Gebäude sieht man (in der Großansicht) das Shellogo. Aufgenommen hab ich das Bild von der Argentinienbrücke / Reiherdamm, direkt über dem Reiherstieg. Liebe Grüße --GeorgHHtalk   17:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Ah, dass da auch eine Shellraffinerie ist, wusste ich nicht. Ich werde mal die Beschreibung ergänzen, damit nicht auch noch Andere drüber stolpern. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

GeorgHH, thanks for the category help, at Category:Jared Polis. ;) Much appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 19:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Status of File:Rayleigh mie fry4a.jpg.[edit]

Hello GeorgHH, There is some note in my personal box saying that this file may be deleted. Please do not delete this file. I created the file personally. It contains only images that I personally created using a free and totally legal copy of some drawing software.

I am no Wiki expert, but I do know spectroscopy and the actual physics of sunrise, sunset, and cloud and sky events. If you read the history of the Sunset and Sunrise articles, I have been the one and only scientist who has written the correct and factual versions of source of the colors at sunset and sunrise for the past 3 years. This diagram has been an important part of ending 3 years of incorrect and non'factual editing by others. Since the other editors could not understand the mathematics of the higher order Bessel functions required to understand Mie Scattering and the successive scattering events that make red sunsets, red sunrises, blue skies and white clouds, if you delete this diagram over my minor misunderstanding of how to fill out the Wiki attribution form, then without the diagrams, the novice physicists and high school teachers who kept mis-editing the Sunrise and Sunset articles will likely not understand and they will begin making erroneous edits, again. The previous critics seem to only understand pictures - since formulae did not convince them for the previous 3 years..

There were 3 years of ongoing incorrect edit changes by several novice physicists and other people who do not understand spectroscopy. These people finally understood the processes, but only after I created these diagrams, along with reporting official NASA and NOAA webreferences of the actual physical explanations now, finally, present in the sunrise and sunset articles. The 3 years of bickering by others was based on bad less-than-thorough high school level explanations that they quoted from low level physics texts.

Please help me maintain these diagrams, as they played, and continue to play an important role in explaining successive complex phenomenae. I do not understand all the eccentricities of Wikipedia - and if the people, like you, who know how to work the Wiki-machinery only blindly execute the rules - destroying useful and the only accurate diagrams and visual descriptions of sunrise and sunset processes, then Wikipedia really may not be worth saving.

If Wikipedia is only about politics and who knows how to attack and delete accurate and useful information - blindly following Wiki-rules and Wiki-protocols, then the site really does need help.

Please remove whatever restriction you have placed. I tried 3 times to get the arcane attribution page to work, but it was less-than-user-friendly - so, please change whatever values that Wiki finds inconsistent - and keep some worthwhile content. Dr. Steven M. Fry The Good Doctor Fry (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

This file is completely my own creation, and I freely offer it for unrestricted usage. Dr. Steven M. Fry The Good Doctor Fry (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done License information added. --GeorgHHtalk   09:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rayleigh mie fry1a.jpg[edit]

Hello GeorgHH, There is some note in my personal box saying that this file may be deleted. Please do not delete this file. I created the file personally. It contains only images that I personally created using a free and totally legal copy of some drawing software.

I am no Wiki expert, but I do know spectroscopy and the actual physics of sunrise, sunset, and cloud and sky events. If you read the history of the Sunset and Sunrise articles, I have been the one and only scientist who has written the correct and factual versions of source of the colors at sunset and sunrise for the past 3 years. This diagram has been an important part of ending 3 years of incorrect and non'factual editing by others. Since the other editors could not understand the mathematics of the higher order Bessel functions required to understand Mie Scattering and the successive scattering events that make red sunsets, red sunrises, blue skies and white clouds, if you delete this diagram over my minor misunderstanding of how to fill out the Wiki attribution form, then without the diagrams, the novice physicists and high school teachers who kept mis-editing the Sunrise and Sunset articles will likely not understand and they will begin making erroneous edits, again. The previous critics seem to only understand pictures - since formulae did not convince them for the previous 3 years.

There were 3 years of ongoing incorrect edit changes by several novice physicists and other people who do not understand spectroscopy. These people finally understood the processes, but only after I created these diagrams, along with reporting official NASA and NOAA webreferences of the actual physical explanations now, finally, present in the sunrise and sunset articles. The 3 years of bickering by others was based on bad less-than-thorough high school level explanations that they quoted from low level physics texts.

Please help me maintain these diagrams, as they played, and continue to play an important role in explaining successive complex phenomenae. I do not understand all the eccentricities of Wikipedia - and if the people, like you, who know how to work the Wiki-machinery only blindly execute the rules - destroying useful and the only accurate diagrams and visual descriptions of sunrise and sunset processes, then Wikipedia really may not be worth saving.

If Wikipedia is only about politics and who knows how to attack and delete accurate and useful information - blindly following Wiki-rules and Wiki-protocols, then the site really does need help.

Please remove whatever restriction you have placed. I tried 3 times to get the arcane attribution page to work, but it was less-than-user-friendly - so, please change whatever values that Wiki finds inconsistent - and keep some worthwhile content. Dr. Steven M. Fry The Good Doctor Fry (talk) 00:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

This file is completely my own creation, and I freely offer it for unrestricted usage. Dr. Steven M. Fry The Good Doctor Fry (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done License information added. --GeorgHHtalk   09:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

A question[edit]

Hi GeorgHH, I want to send an e-mail to a voice actress and ask her to allow me to upload her photo in common galery. If she allowed me to do so, what certificate would I use? and how can I prove that to administrations? Soheyla Sh (talk) 08:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi, go to Commons:OTRS please. There you will find information how to confirm permission. --GeorgHHtalk   09:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Soheyla Sh (talk) 09:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Deine letzen Löschungen[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH, du hast heute und gestern einige Dateien mit der Begründung "Private image without educational content. unused." gelöscht. Ich habe nichts generell gegen die Löschung (obwohl ich nur zufällig zwei Dateien ansah), aber ich finde, du solltest Löschanträge stellen (Grund: out of scope + deinen als Löschbegründnung verwendeten Text), statt sie "schnell" zu löschen. Siehe auch Commons:Löschrichtlinien und welche Dateien dort als schnelllöschfähig aufgeführt sind. Allermindestens sollten die Benutzer Bescheid bekommen, dass du gelöscht hast. Wenn ich das recht sehe, hast du noch nicht mal das gemacht. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Stromdingens[edit]

Moin, weißt Du, wie man diesen "Strommast"(?) bzw. die entsprechende Kategorie auf Commons nennt? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 10:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Moin, das müßte ein de:Dachständer sein. Auf Commons wäre das dann Category:Pylons in Germany. --GeorgHHtalk   16:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Danke. --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File:ADAC-Fahrsicherheitszentrum Lüneburg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ADAC-Fahrsicherheitszentrum Lüneburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 12:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Mal wieder eine Bitte[edit]

Kannst Du bitte Category:Maps of Moorfleet löschen. Die wurde von User:Flamenc angelegt, obwohl alle Hamburger Stadtteilkategorien den Präfix "Hamburg-" besitzen. Die richtige Kat. (Category:Maps of Hamburg-Moorfleet) habe ich gerade angelegt. Danke für Deine Mühe. --Mogelzahn (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Ist gelöscht... --GeorgHHtalk   13:12, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Ich danke Dir. --Mogelzahn (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Schon wieder ich ...[edit]

User:Flamenc hat - in wohlmeinender Absicht - die Category:Emil-Krause-Gymnasium angelegt. Seit Beginn des Schuljahres 2011/12 ist die Schule aber nicht mehr selbständig, sondern Teil der Stadtteilschule Barmbek. Richtig wäre also Category:Standort Krausestraße der Stadtteilschule Barmbek (analog zu Category:Standort Fraenkelstraße der Stadtteilschule Barmbek und Category:Standort Tieloh der Stadtteilschule Barmbek). Magst Du die falsche Kat. bitte löschen? Ich lege derweil die neue Cat. an. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Habe eine Weiterleitung von Category:Emil-Krause-Gymnasium auf Category:Standort Krausestraße der Stadtteilschule Barmbek angelegt. --GeorgHHtalk   13:59, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Danke schön. --Mogelzahn (talk) 14:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Space Center Bremen 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Space Center Bremen 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


Your signature[edit]

Ok, thanks for the information. Sorry for the time I took to answer, I was busy IRL. I fixed the problem. Smile --Woozz un problème? 02:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Nächste Bitte[edit]

Magst Du mal bitte Category:Alster in Alsterdorf löschen. Die richtige Cat. lautet Category:Alster in Hamburg-Alsterdorf. Vielen Dank im Voraus. --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

und weg...
und danke. --Mogelzahn (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Und noch eine Flamencade. Er hat am 24. Oktober 2011 Category:Channel Tower angelegt, obwohl bereits seit Oktober 2009 Category:Channel Hamburg Tower existiert. Folgerichtig ist die Cat. auch leer, magst Du sie bitte löschen. Vielen Dank im Voraus. --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Erledigt. Schönes Wochenende. --GeorgHHtalk   21:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Danke für den immer prompten Service, Dir auch. --Mogelzahn (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Der nächste von User:Flamenc: Das Gymnasium Alstertal hatte er unter Category:Fuhlsbüttel school kategorisiert, nicht bedenkend, dass es in den Stadtteil noch mehr Schulen gibt. Ich habe daher die neue Category:Gymnasium Alstertal angelegt. Magst Du bitte die nun leere Cat. löschen. Vielen Dank im Voraus vom Mogelzahn (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Und erneut vielen Dank! --Mogelzahn (talk) 11:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

... zwei hab' ich noch ;-) Category:Wandse in Tonndorf befindet sich jetzt in Category:Wandse in Hamburg-Tonndorf, um die Hamburger Usancen in der Stadtteil-Kategorisierung einzuhalten. Magst Du die leere Kat. bitte löschen. Das gleich gilt für Category:Rahlau in Tonndorf, die sich jetzt unter Category:Rahlau in Hamburg-Tonndorf befindet. Vielen Dank sagt der Mogelzahn (talk) 18:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

... und noch Einen: Auch Category:Seebek in Bramfeld habe ich der üblichen Nomenklatur wegen nach Category:Seebek in Hamburg-Bramfeld umgetopft. Magst Du auch da bitte nochmal tätig werden. Vielen Dank im Voraus vom Mogelzahn (talk) 13:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

... ich mal wieder: Statt Category:Timber framing in Moorfleet habe nunmehr der üblichen Nomenklatur folgend Category:Timber framing in Hamburg-Moorfleet angelegt und bitte um Exekution der nicht mehr benötigten Cat. Vielen Dank im Voraus vom Mogelzahn (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done --GeorgHHtalk   20:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Ich danke Dir. --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


Und schon wieder: Category:Signs in Moorburg findet sich jetzt unter Category:Signs in Hamburg-Moorburg. --Mogelzahn (talk) 15:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:London Elects.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:London Elects.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amisom (talk) 11:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

EstudanteNet[edit]

What is EstudanteNet? I see that you created Category:EstudanteNet and I tried to categorize the category, but couldn't figure out what EstudanteNet is. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I dont know what it is. For this reason I tagged the red category with {{unc}}. --GeorgHHtalk   14:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thanks anyway. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Ich schon wieder ...[edit]

Nun habe ich auch Category:Rivers and canals in Wilhelmsburg nach Category:Rivers and canals in Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg verschubt und bitte untertänigst um Entsorgung des Altbestandes ;-) Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe vom Mogelzahn (talk) 12:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

erledigt. --GeorgHHtalk   14:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Mange tak. --Mogelzahn (talk) 16:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Auch Category:Wedeler Au in Sülldorf habe ich inzwischen nach Category:Wedeler Au in Hamburg-Sülldorf umgetopft. Ich werde Dich wohl noch häufiger um Nachputzerei bitten müssen ;-) --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Die Category:Road bridges in Barmbek-Nord liegt jetzt unter Category:Road bridges in Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord. Ich wäre Dir dankbar, wenn Du wie schon so oft ... --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! --Mogelzahn (talk) 11:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Nunmal ein eigener Fehler von mir[edit]

Ich habe diese Datei falsch benamst, weil das Gebäude in Wellingsbüttel statt in Sasel steht (da fehlen halt 20 Meter). Kannst Du die umbenennen (oder falls nicht löschen, damit ich sie richtig neu hochladen kann)? --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Moin, habs umbenannt in File:Kirche der Christengemeinde Arche Alstertal in der Saseler Chaussee in Hamburg-Wellingsbüttel 1.jpg. --GeorgHHtalk   08:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Anchal 1.jpg[edit]

This is my work. I dont know why it's author and source are missing. I have added it now. --Sivahari (talk) 13:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Category Barnstar.png The Category Barnstar
For great work growing the category tree of Category:Statistics of Australia --99of9 (talk) 14:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Historische Bahnhöfe in Hamburg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Historische Bahnhöfe in Hamburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Photo usage[edit]

Hello :-) I just wanted to say "Thank you very much" for your picture...

2012-08-08 User Sirleto / Wikipedia User:SirLeto

PS: You just removed/deleted this entry. Any reason? Is it your way of saying "aknowledged" ? Best, Daniel.
The image you talk about is not made by me. I moved it from german wikipedia to commons only. So I forwarded your message to the original uploader.--GeorgHHtalk   16:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for tellimg me. I checked again and saw my mistake. sorry for that! You can remove this section now if you like. --Daniel/Sirleto

Arrgh...[edit]

Hi ! Instead of deleting you could have added the name of the country at the end of Category:Pronunciation of, well, it would help me because now this thing will bother me more than anything else. I had intention to take care of this just be patient, I was quite busy this week-end that's why it wasn't done yet. Next time just patient 1 week before remove and you'll see the job will be done. ;-) PS : By the way Category:Pronunciation of Abyssinia should be stay here Category:Abyssinia but it's automatically move to Category:Ethiopia, it is really a good thing ? V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 21:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I dont know if it is a good thing. In my eyes it is ok because en:Abyssinia says "Abyssinia may refer to: Ethiopia, the modern nation. --GeorgHHtalk   10:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes you're right in any case if people looking for it they'll find it by a quick search so it's not a real problem, thanks you for the information. V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 13:19, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Please don't add Category:Uncategorized categories[edit]

I noticed that you add often Category:Uncategorized categories to uncategorised categories in Special:UncategorizedCategories. The nice thing is that they disappear from the list which we manage to keep below 70 items. The drawback is that they are dropped in Category:Uncategorized categories where they keep hanging for weeks or months. So I guess that it is better to nothing then to categorise them with Category:Uncategorized categories. --Foroa (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, there's a misunderstanding on this. I don't add Category:Uncategorized categories to categories in Special:UncategorizedCategories, rather I add it to Special:WantedCategories. The reason is that I only look through the categories in Special:WantedCategories at one time, and add especially people categories to Category:Uncategorized categories to work with it later - in the rule no longer than two weeks. --GeorgHHtalk   10:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Indeed, a misunderstanding (as happened in the past with a certain user). If you empty Category:Uncategorized categories later on, there is no problem as the system does not monitor that category. --Foroa (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Mal wieder eine Bitte[edit]

von mir: Ich habe Category:Moorwettern in Neuland nach Category:Moorwettern in Hamburg-Neuland umgetopft. Magst Du da mal bitte wieder die überflüssige "Alt-Kat." löschen. Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe. --Mogelzahn (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Is wech.... --GeorgHHtalk   11:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Firma dankt! --Mogelzahn (talk) 11:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Auch Category:Timber framing in Marmstorf liegt nun auf Category:Timber framing in Hamburg-Marmstorf. Magst Du mal bitte ... Vielen Dank im Voraus. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank :-) --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Ich mal wieder Diese leere Kategorie ist redundant zu dieser verwendeten Kategorie. Beide sind vom selben Benutzer angelegt worden. Offenbar wollte er die jetzt leere Kat. (sinnvollerweise) in die jetzt verwendete Kat. umbenennen, hat dann aber vergessen, den Altbestand löschen zu lassen. Magst Du mal ... --Mogelzahn (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

erledigt --GeorgHHtalk   10:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Ich danke Dir! --Mogelzahn (talk) 10:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Djokovic[edit]

Hi, can you upload this piture [2], or this [3] with bot, thank you, greeting.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 11:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The pictures are not free licensed, so they cant be uploaded to commons. --GeorgHHtalk   12:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Dr. h.c. Gustav Guanella 1909-1982.jpg[edit]

Hallo, Diese Foto von Guanella wurde mir von Docuteam GmbH, 5405 Baden-Dättwil, Schweiz zur freien, allgemeinen Benutzung zur Verfügung gestellt unter der Bedingung, dass bei Weiterverwendung als Copyright-Inhaber Historisches Archiv ABB, Schweiz genannt wird. Docuteam arbeitet im Mandatsverhältnis für ABB Schweiz und verwaltet deren historisches Archiv. ABB ist Rechtsnachfolger von Brown, Boveri & Cie, Baden seit 1987. Um die Wiki-Freigabe zu ermöglichen, wollte ich folgendes Standardformular an Docuteam senden und die Bearbeiterin bitten, es per E-Mail an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org zu senden:

Bitte senden Sie dieses Mail an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org zur Autorisierung der Bildverwendung. To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org



I hereby affirm that Docuteam GmbH, Switzerland, represents the Historisches Archiv der ABB, Schweiz, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of File:Dr._h.c._Gustav_Guanella_1909-1982.jpg. I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and the GNU Free Documentation License version 1.3 (with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Raffaela Lütolf

Docuteam GmbH, CH-5405 Baden-Dättwil, Schweiz

October 1, 2012

Ist diese Vorgehen ok ? BBCLCD (talk) 07:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Ja, so ist es richtig. In der email bitte die Datei verlinken, habe den link oben eingefügt. --GeorgHHtalk   16:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


Verwaltungsgliederung Deutschlands[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Verwaltungsgliederung Deutschlands has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this <articlefeedback-table-heading-page>, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hallo Georg, ich wollte dich über diesen Antrag informieren, da du diese Übersicht scheinbar noch wartest. und ich wohl der Grund für die Nominierung bin. sollte wissen wann ein Kampf verloren ist. --79.197.122.32 23:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Bild-Verwendung[edit]

Hi GeorgHH,

Alte Litfaßsäule an der Reeperbahn in Hamburg-St. Pauli.

Das Bild der Litfaßsäule wurde bei Hurraki, Wörterbuch in leichter Sprache, verwendet.

Litfaßsäule

Dankeschön!

Löschantrag der drei Bilder auf der Seite „Wer liefert was?“[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH,

Sie haben am 25.11. einen Antrag auf Löschung der drei Bilder gestellt, die wir (die Wer liefert was? GmbH) am 21.11. auf die „Wer liefert was?“-Seite eigebunden haben. Leider haben wir den Antrag erst heute gesehen, die Bilder waren bereits auf Wikimedia Commons gelöscht. Die Begründung des Antrags lautete, dass der Uploader der Bilder (in diesem Falle wir) einen Nachweis erbringen soll, dass er berechtigt ist, Bilder der Wer liefert was? GmbH hochzuladen. Können Sie uns mitteilen, welchen Nachweis Sie dazu benötigen? Die Rechte aller drei Bilder liegen bei uns. Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Nachricht!

Hallo, entsprechende Informationen finden sie unter Commons:OTRS/de. --GeorgHHtalk   07:19, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Hallo GeorgHH,

vielen Dank für diese Information.

Bitte um Aufräumhilfe[edit]

Hallo Georg,

darf ich mal wieder um Aufräumhilfe bitten? Folgende Kats. sind leer und werden somit offenbar nicht gebraucht: Category:Ingulf Donig, Category:Katharina Feike, Category:Rainer Albrecht, Category:Julian Barlen, Category:Mathias Brodkorb, Category:Andreas Butzki, Category:Manfred Dachner. Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe --Mogelzahn (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

....alles weg.
Ich wünsche dir schoneinmal schöne Feiertage. Liebe Grüße --GeorgHHtalk   11:28, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Ich danke Dir und wünsche Dir auch schöne Festtage und einen guten Rutsch in das neue Jahr. --Mogelzahn (talk) 23:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Aber auch an den Feiertagen muß ich Dich bemühen ;-) Category:Elbe in Wehlen ist überflüssig, da es die korrekte Category:Elbe in Stadt Wehlen (auch wenn es sich bescheutert anhört, aber der Ort heißt tatsächlich "Stadt Wehlen") gibt. --Mogelzahn (talk) 12:23, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Du gönnst mir aber auch keine Pause, was!?  ;-)
--GeorgHHtalk   21:52, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Entschuldige bitte ;-) Wenn ordentliche LAs hier nicht so lange dauern würden, würde ich nicht Deine Diskussionsseite mißbrauchen ;-) --Mogelzahn (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Aber ich habe noch zwei leere McPomm-Politiker-Kategorien (diesmal von der CDU statt von der SPD): Category:Maika Friemann-Jennert und Category:Dietmar Eifler (Politiker). Wenn ich Dich damit nerve, sag' Bescheid, dann lasse ich es in Zukunft. --Mogelzahn (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Nein, du nervst nicht. Ich bin für jeden Hinweis von dir dankbar, und was ich tun kann tu ich. --GeorgHHtalk   23:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Hoffe, Du bist gut in das neue Jahr gekommen. Natürlich habe ich gleich wieder Arbeit für Dich: Category:Lieselotte Funcke ist ein falsch geschriebenes Doppel zu Category:Liselotte Funcke. Ich bin mir - ob des sicherlich häufig vorkommenden Fehlers, der Vorname schreibt sich ja bei anderen Personen meist Lieselotte - nicht sicher, ob hier statt einer schlichten Löschung nicht ein "Falschschreiberedirect" sinnvoll wäre. Gibt es für Commons-Kategorien so etwas? --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Eine gesundes neues Jahr wünsche ich dir.
Für Lieselotte habe ich mittels {{Liselotte Funcke}} eine Weiterleitung erstellt. --GeorgHHtalk   13:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Dir auch gesundes und erfolgreiches 2013. Die Kat., die Du mir anhand gegeben hast, ist jetzt leer. --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Ich bin es mal wieder ...[edit]

... und muß die frisch geweißelte Seite gleich wieder verunstalten. Magst Du bitte Category:Engelbek in Harburg (richtig und vorhanden ist Category:Engelbek in Hamburg-Harburg) löschen. Da hat mal wieder jemand Bezirk und Stadtteil verwechselt. Vielen Dank! --Mogelzahn (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Ist erledigt. Und vielen Dank noch, für deine Hilfe beim aufräumen der Hanseboot cKategorie. --GeorgHHtalk   18:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Jeffrey Epstein Image Deletion[edit]

Hi GeorgHH,

I would like to repost the profile photo of Jeffrey Epstein which you deleted. The photo is indeed the copyright ownership of the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation. However, the image may be used freely by the public with a creative common attribution: please see their website link that states this: http://www.jeffreyepstein.org/Contact.html

Could you remove the image from deletion or let me know the most effective way to do this? The file photo in question is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jeffrey_Epstein%2C_at_Harvard_University%2C_April_2012.jpg

Thank you! Turvill (talk) 16:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


{{[[Template:User:MiszaBot/config |User:MiszaBot/config ]]}}

Archive 1 (11.2005 - 11.2006)
Archive 2 (12.2006 - 01.2007)
Archive 3 (01.2007 - 03.2007)
Archive 4 (03.2007 - 04.2007)
Archive 5 (05.2007 - 11.2007)
Archive 6 (11.2007 - 02.2008)
Archive 7 (02.2008 - 05.2008)
Archive 8 (06.2008 - 12.2010)
Archive 9 (01.2011 - 12.2012)
Archive 10 (01.2013 -             )

Images to be deleted but do have permission[edit]

Hi there, I got your notice that 3 images are to be deleted for lack of permission. However, I received an acceptance response email on 16 Feb from wiki editor "Alfred Neumann". Perhaps I didn't upload or tag them correctly? Please advise. Thanks LauraLeeT (talk) 14:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, please forward a received mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, so an OTRS-user can add the correct tag. For further information see OTRS please. --GeorgHHtalk   15:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

GeorgHH, I have re-sent to permissions-commons the acceptance email I received from wiki editor "Alfred Neumann" on 16 Feb. I have reviewed the OTRS procedures and believe I have done all the correct steps. Since I am making every effort to comply, please do not delete my images without advising what else is needed. Thanks, LauraLeeT (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

The clock is ticking and my images are set to be deleted in 2 days. I have re-sent the acceptance email with the three photos attached. However, the "deletion" warnings are still on my page. Please update me on the status of these images. Thanks, LauraLeeT (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hallo, I have marked the files with a notice, they will be not deleted for next 2-3 weeks. The deletion warnings on your talk page will not be deleted automatically. --GeorgHHtalk   06:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)