User talk:Gyrostat

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Gruinc)
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gruinc!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Gyrostat!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

How to delete a file[edit]

Regarding your question: Please see COM:DEL#How to list deletion requests -- Common Good (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Unsinnige Bildverschiebungen[edit]

Hallo Unkundiger,

bevor du weitere unsinnige Bildverschiebung und/oder Umbennenungen von A319 in A320 startest und dies mit zwei Türen über der Tragfläche begründest: Warum schaust du nicht mal unter http://www.airfleets.net/ nach als welches Muster die Kennung registriert ist, bevor du solche Aktionen startest? Deine bisherigen "Umbenennungen"

waren alle(!) verkehrt. Es kostet viel Zeit und Mühe, deinen Fehler in allen Sprachen wieder umzubiegen. Bitte künftig etwas gründlicher Prüfen und Recherchieren. Gruß, -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 09:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I am sorry about that. I know that airfleets.net, and the other aircraft spotting website, says that G-EZAS is an A319, but I am SURE it's not. The Airbus A320 is the only jet of the Airbus A320 family to have two emergency exit above the wing. IT IS THE ONLY ONE. Anyway, the Airbus A319 has only one emergency exit. I am sorry and I'll try to correct the links on the wikis. Best regards, Gyrostat (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC) I don't speak german.
PS: For example, this jet is an A319-100 (write on), and if you look closer, you can see only one emergency exit above the wing. I think Airbus doesn't built special jet for easyJet, their A319 are the same that the Lufthansa one's.
Sorry for writing in German. I was sure, you were German. Answering your statement, "it's the only one": I can find no proof, that the A320 is the only Airbus (from the A320-family) having two emergency exits. However, I found a document from EasyJet (unfortunately only in German) that EasyJet only operates A319 (see here). This piece information is also stated in the article. Btw: you do not need to copy this discussion to my page. In accordance with the convention I am watching this page. Regards, -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 19:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
PS: On this page, at the end of the first paragraph it is stated that "their fleet is equipped with two additional emergency exits". Here is stated, that the second exit is required by law in order to carry more pax. I hope this solves your confusion. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 20:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
They are no problem for writing in German (because google translation exists Smile). I don't already watch your sources, but someone sent me a document who confirm's me that the A319 of easyJet is equipped with two additional emergency exits. I didn't know, and I am sorry (for me, an Airbus with two emergency exits above the wing was necessarily an A320...) Gyrostat (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
No problem. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 09:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bandeau wikinews2.jpg[edit]

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | Русский | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bandeau wikinews2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

AzaToth 17:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry for that, I hope the correction is good. I used the logo of Wikinews, and we want to use this file for Wikinews so I hope it's OK ;) Gyrostat (talk) 18:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Gyrostat,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Logo Wikinews sport[edit]

Bonjour. le logo File:WN-Sport3.png est dérivé de File:Sport3 icone.svg, dessiné par moi-même sous licences CC-BY-SA et GFDL. Il est normalement nécessaire d'adopter pour un travail dérivé une de ces licences. Je vous demande donc de bien vouloir modifier le copyright Wikimedia Fondation (c) en la licence libre de votre choix. --Barbetorte (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Barbetorte, cette demande n'est malheureusement pas possible : Gyrostat ne détient pas les droits sur le logo de Wikinews.
Gyrostat, le temps que tu négocies avec Barbetorte la chose, j'ai supprimé le logo en question pour violation de droit d'auteur.
J'ai vérifié le reste de la série de logos, tout est en ordre, c'est du travail dérivé autorisant la réutilisation sous une autre licence. --Dereckson (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Aïe, je me doutais bien qu'il y aurait un problème quelque part... Je vais essayer de trouver un logo WN sous licence libre, pour rendre compatible les deux licences. Gyrostat (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Morsi's ouster celebrations Tahrir 20130707-1.jpg[edit]

Hi Gyrostat, you have been uploading this image. Please look at this comment for a short review of license information.Kann es ein Fehler gewesen sein? Kannst du dich erinnern oder den Widerspruch aufklären? Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 11:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Gyrostat, Bobamnertiopsis ‎ already showed me: it was my fault (according to the "missing" source information). Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Non-existent categories[edit]

Hi, noticed your edit here where you have added a category that does not exist. That makes the image invisible to users, so no-one can find it via the category tree system. I suggest you fix that, and that you refrain from such a bad practice, thank you.PeterWD (talk) 08:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for that... As of now, I will be more careful and add several categories and create the registration catefory if it doesn't exist, it might be the best way to deal with it. Gyrostat (talk) 12:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Gyrostat,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SIA 9V-SKN A380!071 EDDF 16042014.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SIA 9V-SKN A380!071 EDDF 16042014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I uploaded these files using Flickr upload bot, so the license on Commons should be the same as the one on Flickr. The license template is located in the Summary, at the section Permission. I hope it's alright, otherwise, thanks for your attention ;-) Best regards, Gyrostat (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

PKIERZKOWSKI 070328 FGZCP CDG.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Air France Flight 447‎.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Copyright status: File:2014-05-12 A319 EZY G-EZWI LFBO.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2014-05-12 A319 EZY G-EZWI LFBO.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I did'nt indicate the license, because I can't choose CC-BY-SA 4.0 during the upload process. I added a valid copyright tag. Thank you for your vigilance ; Gyrostat (talk) 22:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

KoreanAirA380delivery.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delivery of an A380 to Korean Air.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

EP2014 posters Castanet-Tolosan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EP2014 posters Castanet-Tolosan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Malala Yousafzai par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malala Yousafzai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AIB A330 F-WWCB 18jun14 LFBO.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AIB A330 F-WWCB 18jun14 LFBO.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

BGA Beluga F-GSTD 5jul14 LFBO-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BGA Beluga F-GSTD 5jul14 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AIB A380 F-WWOW 5jul14 LFBO-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AIB A380 F-WWOW 5jul14 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.