User:A.Savin/Archive/2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Wo ich gerade hier bin...[edit]

Könntest du mal nach Prüfung diese Bilder killen? Gruß --ST 13:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Dank und du hast Post. --ST 23:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Und noch eine Bitte: Könntest du diese Umbenennung vornehmen? Danke dir. --ST 14:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --S[1] 20:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Danke dir. --ST 03:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Eva_Rivas.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eva_Rivas.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eva_Rivas.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Multichill (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

храмы[edit]

Можно добавить File:Church of Saint Nicholas in Tolmachy 03.jpg и File:Church of the Transfiguration in Bogorodskoe 04.jpg. Сори, что не вставил сам - честно пытался, но вместо сохранения получил сообщение об ошибке. И ещё. Появились новые фотки для храма Category:Church of Theotokos, Joy in Sorrow, in Ordynka. Вместо старой можно вставить например вот эту: File:Church of the Theotokos Joy of All Who Sorrow in Ordynka 03.jpg. --Lodo27 (talk) 20:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Спасибо! На самом деле у Вас получилось, но сообщения об ошибке появляются всегда, из-за слишком большого объёма статьи. --S[1] 23:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Трудности перевода[edit]

Уважаемый S1 подскажите как правильно написать по английски Храм во имя Сошествия Святого Духа на апостолов. Я не силён в английском, а похожего названия храма у нас я найти не смог. --Lodo27 (talk) 19:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Наверное «Church of the Descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles», по крайней мере так стоит в en:Pentecost во втором абзаце. --S[1] 22:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Можно Вас ещё попросить переименовать категорию, а то я отвлёкся и в итоге пропустил название города. Category:Church of the Descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles в Church of the Descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles (Sergiev Posad). Кстати как в таких случаях лучше поступать - можно просто переименовать или обязательно создавать новую категорию с правильным названием, после чего удалять старую? --Lodo27 (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
К сожалению, категории не переименовываются, поэтому приходится создавать новую и все по отдельности туда перемещать. --S[1] 17:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Можно ещё вопрос из той же серии. Как правилно перевести на английский Храм Воскресения Словущего на Арбате - Church of ???? in Arbat. Нигде не смог найти перевода. --Lodo27 (talk) 09:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Полное название есть: Church of the Renewal of the Temple of the Resurrection of Christ at Jerusalem in Arbat - В категории Category:Christ churches in Russia пока нет ни одного такого названия - можно ли использовать такой ваниант: Churches of the Renewal of the Temple of the Resurrection of Christ in Russia или следует подобрать что-нибудь покороче. --Lodo27 (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Мне кажется, можно. --S[1] 17:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hilfe[edit]

Kann es sein, dass hier jemand Hilfe braucht? --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Фото храмов Москвы[edit]

Здравствуйте S1. Поправил немного ваши фотки: File:Церковь святителя Димитрия Ростовского в Очакове.jpg и File:Церковь Рождества Пресвятой Богородицы в Крылатском 02.jpg. Можно вас попросить, если вы снимаете храм, то делайте, плиз, несколько снимков с разных сторон + интересные детали крупным планом. И ещё, может стои делать несколько снимков с разной экспозицией, а потом дома выбрать что получше, потому, что исправлять уже снятые фотки всегда хуже, чем сразу делать удачные снимки. Как считаете? --Lodo27 (talk) 16:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Большое спасибо за исправления и совет! На практике я обычно при наличии соответствующей возможности (которая, однако, не всегда имеется) так или иначе делаю несколько снимков с разного ракурса и потом уже выбираю те, что лучше получились. Что касается тех недостатков, что обычно наблюдаются, то тут не всегда возможно это исключить с самого начала. Чтобы, к примеру, перспектива при высоком здании на близком расстоянии (колокольне и т.п.) была правильной, необходим шифт-объектив, весьма дорогая игрушка, каковой у меня пока еще нет. Правда, можно сколько угодно растягивать потом на компьютере, но обрабатывать фотографии мне обычно просто лень. Что касается экспозиции, то я обычно доверяю автоматике камеры, так как считаю, что она в большинстве случаев доставляет хороший результат при данных условиях. Лишь иногда, когда изображение по всем условиям съёмки "метит" на уровень QI, я делаю еще и несколько альтернативных вариантов экспозиции и выбираю потом. На практике, однако, дело обстоит так, что когда я фотографирую что-либо в России, я вообще стараюсь по возможности быстро дело завершить и рад потом, если все обошлось без того чтобы какие-нибудь тётки не ругались или охрана гнать не начинала ;) Поэтому тут уже не до выборов экспозиций и не до длительных фотосессий с претензией на QI. Вашей помощи и обработкам я, однако, всегда рад. --S[1] 17:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC) P.S. Можно на "ты"?? PPS. Может, нам пересечься как-нибудь?
Конечно давай на "ты", кстати меня зовут Сергей. Можно пересечься, я не против. Насчет "...тётки не ругались или охрана гнать..." - да, есть у нас такое. Первое время меня это очень сильно напрягало. Для меня самыми сложными были съёмки внутри Афонского подворья. Мне с большим трудом удалось получить разрешение всего на три! снимка у настоятеля и всё равно на меня набрасывались с криками, что здесь нельзя снимать :))). Но, как известно, человек ко всему привыкает и сейчас мне стало намного проще в этом плане. --Lodo27 (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Сергей, твой навык общения с традиционным российским долбо**измом, наверно, поистине бесценен ;) В ближайшее время напишу тебе по викимылу. До скорого --S[1] 20:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Добрый вечер Александр. Я посмотрел твои последние фотки храмов. Если включить Levels в фотошопе, то у всех у них можно наблюдать провал в правой части графика - неправильная экспозиция - можно смело ставить +2 (просветление) экспокорекцию на фотоаппарате, а может и +3. По моему у тебя прямо на фотоаппарате есть график Levels (я на него первым делом смотрю перед съемкой). А то уж очень страшные снимки получаются :))).--Lodo27 (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Хорошо, попробую с экспокоррекцией. --S[1] 05:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Добрый вечер Александр. Отличные фотки храма Адриана и Наталии! Я там заметил странные тёмные пятна на обеих фотографиях в одних и тех же местах. На фотке n02 одно из пятен прямо над крестом - может пыль на объективе? --Lodo27 (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Скорее на матрице. Сегодня уже заметил и подчистил.
Ты моё сообщение получил? --S[1] 21:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Прочитал письмо только сейчас (редко пользуюсь тем ящиком) и ответил - письмо отправил со своего основного почтового ящика. --Lodo27 (talk) 04:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Удаление ключевых категорий с файлов[edit]

Открыл тему в форуме.--AndreyA (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Siegesparade in Moskau 2010[edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Für deine Auftragsfotos von der Siegesparade in Moskau 2010! Diese Beiträge stellen definitiv eine Bereicherung für das Medienkompendium Commons dar! Vielen Dank für die Fotografien! --High Contrast (talk) 19:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Das ist ja nett, danke ;) --S[1] 20:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Bilder des Kernkraftwerks Riwne[edit]

Hallo S1, ich hoffe es ist in Ordnung wenn ich dich störe, du warst der einzige deutsche Admin bei Commons, der mir eingefallen ist. könntest du mal folgende Bilder genauer ansehen, anscheinend liegt dort eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor, anscheinend alle von der Website des Kernkraftwerks, bzw. von Energoatom. Bevor ich einen UR-Antrag stelle möchte ich dich vorher fragen, da die Bilder in relativ vielen Wikis bereits eingebunden sind:

Das war zumindest mal der Teil, den ich auf Anhieb gefunden habe. Soweit ich weiß hat die Rechte an den Bildern Energoatom. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Hallo ChNPP,
bei allen diesen Bildern außer beim ersten ist als Autor ein anderer Name angegeben, Details zur Genehmigung/Freigabe jedoch nicht genannt. Theoretisch kann es natürlich sein, dass der Uploader das Recht besitzt. Aber da die Angabe zur Genehmigung fehlt, sind die Bilder so nicht haltbar. Ich werde sie daher mit {{subst:npd}} markieren. Das letzte Bild enthielt bereits seit einem Monat den Hinweis, daher habe ich es soeben gelöscht (war allerdings auch nirgends verwendet).
Beim ersten Foto ist als Autor der gleiche Name wie angegeben wie der Username des Uploaders. Das würde gemäß meinem Rechtsverständnis heißen, dass, falls es dennoch URV ist (d.h. die Autorenangabe schlichtweg gelogen ist) und diese vom wahren Rechteinhaber aufgedeckt wird, für die URV ausschließlich der Uploader (so er denn ermittelbar ist) verantwortlich ist, nicht jedoch die Foundation. Da kann ich allerdings nicht meine Hand ins Feuer legen und empfehle daher, ein paar Rechtsexperten z.B. auf Commons:Forum oder de:WP:UF zu fragen.
Gruß --S[1] 21:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Вопрос[edit]

Я загрузил фотку с Фликера с открытой лицинзией, разрешающей модификацию (переделывание), немного её подправив: File:Храм Иоанна Лествичника Донского монастыря 03.jpg. User:DieBuche поверх неё загрузил родное изображение, неотредактированное. Вопрос - каковы были его мотивы? Зачем он это сделал, как ты считаешь? --Lodo27 (talk) 20:00, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Без понятия. Юзер-DE? Спрошу. --S[1] 20:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Он пишет с более низким разрешением. Забавно! В реальности после поворота я немного обрезал оригинал по краям :))). Александр, спасибо за помощь! --Lodo27 (talk) 05:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Крестовоздвиженская церковь в Алтуфьеве.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Крестовоздвиженская церковь в Алтуфьеве.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hilfe mit russisch...[edit]

Hallo S1, könntest du bitte mal mit User:Hitrovka Kontakt aufnehmen? Er hat mir eine Nachricht auf meiner Disk hinterlasen. Es geht wohl um die Löschung der Dateien File:Плакат Н.М. Аввакумова. 1944..jpg und File:А.М. Горький. Рисунок Н.М. Аввакумова.JPG wegen fehlender Quellen- bzw. Genehmigungsangaben. Vielen Dank ersteinmal im voraus. --GeorgHHtalk   18:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi :)[edit]

Hi du! :) Ich bin auch 'mal wieder da. ;) Sieht man sich in nächster Zeit 'mal im IRC? ;) Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 16:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi ABF, ich hab natürlich schon längst vergessen wie das geht und komme auch gar nicht mehr rein. Aber auf sonstigem Wege stehe ich dir natürlich gerne Rede und Antwort, wenn du was loswerden magst ;) --S[1] 16:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Och, das ist einfach. ;) Ich wollte einfach 'mal plaudern. ;) abf «Cabale!» 16:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Храм Введения на Рязанке[edit]

Category:Church of the Entry of the Theotokos into the Temple in Ryazanka свежие фотки свежепостроенного храма. Прислал мой брат. Чуть позже обещался снять храм в Люблино. А вот с этой церковью адвентистов вышло забавно. Я гулял по своему району, решил срезать дорогу и пройтись по дворам ... Я очень! удивился увидев её. --Lodo27 (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Мерси (между прочим, адвентистов уже успел в свой список включить). --S[1] 15:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Category:Church of Saint Tikhon of Moscow in Lyublino --Lodo27 (talk) 05:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Russisch[edit]

Hi du!
hier sind viele Bilder auf russisch beschrieben, ich habe keine Ahnung, was das heißen soll. Wenn du Zeit hast, könntest du bitte 'mal gucken? Das wäre nett. Danke, Grüße, abf «Cabale!» 19:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Hallo ABF,
es steht bei diesen Bildern als Quellen- und Urheberangabe so viel wie „Ein Einwohner von Oktjabrski“. Das können wir wohl kaum gebrauchen. Bitte entsorgen.
Gruß --S[1] 20:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Danke! :) abf «Cabale!» 12:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Переименование[edit]

Александр, здравствуй. Вот пример: File:Church of Saint Sergius of Radonezh (Almmzovo) 02.jpg - поставил на переименование 9-го числа - и ничего. Мне данная возможность пригодится. --Lodo27 (talk) 13:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Сделано. Теперь можешь переименовывать. --S[1] 16:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Moscow Expo Center[edit]

Восстановите, пожалуйста. -- TarzanASG +1  10:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nicholas Church Moscow Saburovo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicholas Church Moscow Saburovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Удаление категорий[edit]

Ну зачем вы удаляете категории? Уже обсуждали на форуме, что так лучше не делать. Лучше, наоборот, уточнить категорию и сделать "Дальние виды здания МИД", хорошее разрешение фотографии это вполне позволяет сделать. Пожалуйста, отмените свои правки. -- TarzanASG +1  13:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Я прошу меня извинить, но я не буду добавлять категории здания, на конкретном снимке практически не видного. Правильная категоризация состоит не в том, чтобы добавить как можно больше категорий, а в том, чтобы категории были как можно более точными, пусть даже это только одна категория. --S[1] 14:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Во-первых, видно. Во-вторых, вики-проекты же развиваются постепенно - можно в будущем вырезать и увеличить, если позволяет разрешение. Но если убить категории, то это будет большая потеря навсегда, потому что потом эти фото нельзя будет найти. В-третьих, мы не можем позволить себе придираться к фото - в РФ нет свободы панорамы, следовательно, нам нужны именно те фото, где здание не так хорошо видно. Вы как хотите, а у меня есть обсуждение на форуме. Я восстанавливаю и оформляю в соответствии с ним. -- TarzanASG +1  14:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Items missing OTRS ticket ID[edit]

Hallo S1. Könntest du dich vielleicht um die beiden „russischen Dateien“ in dieser Wartungskategorie kümmern? --Leyo 17:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Habe keinen OTRS-Zugang, aber du kannst mir ja den Text des Tickets zumailen oder so. - Gruß --S[1] 18:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Einen solchen habe ich auch nicht. Ich dachte, dass vielleicht in den angegebenen Quell-Internetseiten eine Lizenzangabe gemacht wird. --Leyo 22:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Achso, tschulligung. Nein, auf den beiden Webseiten gibt es keine Angaben zu einer freien oder sonstigen Lizenz. Gruß --S[1] 06:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Александровский кремль[edit]

Здравствуй, Александр. В русской Вики есть статья Александровский кремль. В разное время в этом кремле была резиденция царя, затем Успенский монастырь, сейчас музей. У меня есть фотографии. На Викискладе есть две категории: Category:Uspensky Monastery (Alexandrov) и Category:Alexandrovskaya Sloboda. Фактически это одно и то же место. Предлагаю создать одну категорию с названием Alexandrov Kremlin, все фото поместить туда, старые категории удалить. Что скажешь? Обращаюсь к тебе, как к создателю категории Alexandrovskaya Sloboda. --Lodo27 (talk) 19:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Привет, Сергей! Я не против. - --S[1] 19:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Кстати, только что заметил, в категории Saints Boris and Gleb in Churches in Russia одно «in» лишнее. --S[1] 19:50, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо, что обратил внимание. Если я что-либо делаю поздно вечером, то вероятность ошибок такого плана резко возрастает.--Lodo27 (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Пожалуйста, помогите прибить файл File:Sonkovo-tower.jpg и переместить другой - File:Tower-Sonkovo.JPG - на его место. Пытался загрузить новую версию под старым именем, но у меня ничего не получилось. --Scorpion-811 (talk) 21:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_09.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_05.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_04.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_08.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Ostankino_Tower_Details_08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:KomsomolskayaKL-mm.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:KomsomolskayaKL-mm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Lubyanka_Building.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lubyanka_Building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Kazanstation-night.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kazanstation-night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Kazan-terminal.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kazan-terminal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 17:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Leningradskaya_Moscow_2010_01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leningradskaya_Moscow_2010_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Leningradskaya_Moscow_2010_02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leningradskaya_Moscow_2010_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Protection[edit]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 10:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 11:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 22:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 06:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 10:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 02:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 07:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Bettina_Böttinger_2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bettina_Böttinger_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Utoprak (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Moskau Uni.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moskau Uni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Juetho (talk) 15:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Deine Version der Information-Vorlage[edit]

Hallo, zurzeit bin ich dabei, eine PDF-Version eines deutschen Wikibooks zu erstellen (mehr dazu auf meiner Benutzerseite). Bei der Erstellung des Bildnachweises, die natürlich programmgesteuert laufen muss, bin ich über deine Signatur auf File:Bib-Lenina-mm.jpg gestolpert:

  • Original auf deiner Benutzerseite:
    A.Savin ~~~
  • Wirkung in der Beschreibung:
    A.Savin / --[[User:S1|'''S''']]<sup>[[User talk:S1|[1]]]</sup>
  • Wirkung auf der PDF-Seite:
    A.Savin / --S299[1300]
    Mit Fußnote 299 wird ein Link auf deine Benutzerseite eingetragen, mit Fußnote 300 ein Link auf deine Diskussionsseite, dazu noch vier Wiederholungen. (Die Wiederholungen sind Folgefehler, wenn in einer Fußnote ein Link enthalten ist.)

Das sieht alles andere als schön aus. Da du vermutlich deinen Standardtext nicht ändern möchtest, bitte ich dich um die Genehmigung, bei dem o.g. Bild die Seite so zu ändern, dass nur noch dein Benutzername (Nickname und Klarname) angezeigt werden:

  • [[User:S1|S1 (A.Savin)]]

Selbstverständlich habe ich auch nichts gegen eine andere Vereinfachung, ggf. auch mit Rücksprache. -- Danke für dein Verständnis! Jürgen 15:46, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Lass einfach den Schrägstrich und alles was danach kommt weg, und gut ist. --S[1] 13:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Ist's so okay?[edit]

Vielen Dank für die Mahnung, wir entschuldigen uns dafür, dass wir die Korrektur nicht schon vorgenommen hatten: www.sonntagsblatt-bayern.de/news/aktuell/2010_15_01_01.htm Danke und beste Grüße, Markus Springer, Redaktion Sonntagsblatt (mspringer ät epv punkt de)

Wenigstens in Commons[edit]

Hallo Andreas, habe gerade entdeckt, dass du der WP wenigstens im Unterbereich Commons noch nicht ganz verloren gegangen bist, was mich freut. Finde es nach wie vor schade, dass du dem Projekt WP adieu gesagt hast - wenn auch verständlich, nach den auseinandersetzungen der letzten zeit. Schön, dass du weiterhin deine exzellenten Fotos zur Verfügung stellst. Grüße von der Wladikawkas/Barmaley/Darielschlucht-IP, --84.190.10.12 01:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Andreas? Hmm, naja, danke für den netten Empfang. Gruß — A.Savin 10:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Oh sorry, hatte den ersten Treffer bei google (http://www.lct.jussieu.fr/pagesperso/savin/) automatisch mit Dir identifiziert. Man soll halt google nicht vertrauen :-) Grüße, --84.190.3.58 15:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Hallo auch von mir. Auf de: hat prompt schon wieder jemand претензии an dich - "sowas" verfolgt einen noch nach Jahren ;-) --SibFreak (talk) 07:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Ist der Ruf erst ruiniert, ignoriert's sich ganz ungeniert. — A.Savin 11:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Frage[edit]

Hallo, mein Name ist Benedict Wells, du hast ein Foto von mir für die Wikipediaseite geschossen. Kannst du mich mal auf facebook kontaktieren? Habe eine Frage an dich. Lieber Gruß, Benedict — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libuda84 (talk • contribs)

Zelenodolsk[edit]

Hallo A.Savin,
kannst du hier File:Zelenodolsk monument.jpg mal schauen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio. Tatsächlich stelle ich fest, dass ich das Bild seinerzeit transferiert hatte. Damals gab es noch keine Hinweise auf mögliche URV. Ich kann jetzt auf Anhieb nicht feststellen, wie das Bild auf die Website der Stadt kommt; vielleicht wurde es ja umgekehrt aus der WP geklaut? Kurzum, ich kann da leider nicht viel weiterhelfen. - Gruß A.S. 21:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)