User talk:1997kB

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 1997kB!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Please don't overuse copyvio[edit]

I've noticed you have marked some files with the {{Copyvio}} template. Please use {{Copyvio}} only when an image is a copyright violation beyond any doubt. When there is any doubt, use the "Nominate for deletion" link or {{Delete}} template so the deletion can be discussed. W3ird N3rd (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

@W3ird N3rd: Hi, i don't think that's an overuse of copyvio, because that file is copyright violation. So I restored the cv tag with better edit summary. Thank you! 1997kB (talk) 13:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
@1997kB: Changing "possible" to "suspected" changes nothing. And "suspected" is still not good enough. Copyvio should not be used for anything less than "certain copyvio". I only mentioned it to clarify that even to the person tagging it it wasn't obvious. And it still isn't. We assume good faith here and the username is the same as the name of the person in that picture. That same user is also working on a Wikipedia article about herself. We have no reason whatsoever to believe she doesn't have the rights to that picture. Your deeplink to the image being hosted somewhere on a blog of some kind (as suggested by the wp-content in the link) proves absolutely nothing. Copyvio is for obvious cases. If you spot Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck, copyvio. You spot something and you can provide a link that clearly states/proves the user did not make that picture? Copyvio. This? Not copyvio. You could nominate it deletion, which will fail without more information proving this is copyvio.
I will once more undo your copyvio. Please do not start an edit war. If you are hellbent on getting this picture removed from Commons, nominate it for deletion. Do not use copyvio for this. W3ird N3rd (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I think you are right and I am not hell-bent on removing this picture from Commons. Thank you! 1997kB (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Leopard Lake.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Leopard Lake.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:2018.03.18 sydney temperatures report.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:2018.03.18 sydney temperatures report.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50 and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. --4nn1l2 (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)