User talk:Croucrou

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TUSC token 833bea7c986919c2e81868dbef870616

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Zenith Limoges.jpg

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Zenith Limoges.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

distorsion

[edit]

Bonjour,

Etant nouveau sur "Commons", je m'aperçois qu'on reproche à nombre de mes photos ce que les anglo-saxons appellent "perspective distorsion". Je crains que ça ne vous arrive, hélas, avec votre joli château de Roquebrune. Amicalement --Jebulon (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI image

[edit]

I've fixed it now. The bot will deal with it on the next run. Regards --Herby talk thyme 13:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouziès pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Superbe photo ! ----Jebulon 22:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carabe doré recto-verso.jpg

[edit]

Grace à toi j’ai compris que les photos peuvent gagner en netteté en les diminuant. Je suis vexé de ne pas y avoir pensé plus tôt. Je suis preneur de toutes remarques utiles… et te remercie encore bien vivement tu es un maître. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je vais changer ma signature comme tu me le suggère. Je referais un carabe mais pas celui là car je l’ai trouvé dans ma piscine et le croyant mort j’ai commencé à le photographier mais après une heure sous les spots il a bougé et il est revenue à la vie, je l’ai relâché. Pour être franc je ne pense pas de la photo soit floue à cause de lui mais plus certainement à cause de moi ; j’ai voulu essayer de le prendre verticalement alors que j’ai l’habitude de travailler horizontalement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

[edit]

...do not modify my comments on images. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 11:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouziès chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


File:Kupanskoe 8337.jpg

[edit]

Where did you find the overexposed FFFFFF places on the photo? Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Désaccord ?

[edit]

Bonsoir Croucrou
En réponse à ton message, je t'indique que le fait que tu soies en désaccord avec certains de mes choix récents ne m'avait pas particulièrement choqué, même si je l'avais remarqué. Tu es parfaitement en droit d'avoir tes opinions, de les exprimer, et de me demander de préciser ou d'expliquer les miennes, comme je le ferais pour les tiennes si j'en éprouvais la nécessité. C'est la règle du jeu. L'essentiel est de rester courtois, or je n'ai jamais rien senti de discourtois ni de personnel contre moi dans tes choix ! Tu peux, rassure-toi, être en désaccord avec moi sans que je me sente attaqué ! Ton opinion et tes sentiments valent largement les miens, et voilà tout. Pas de problème de mon côté, donc. Et puis je ne vois pas pour quel motif tu entreprendrais un "croisade" contre moi...
Merci en tout cas de ton aimable mot. Bonne continuation dans tes "reviews", et ne te gêne pas pour me contredire si tu le sens comme ça ! En plus, une contradiction d'opinion amène à une Consensual reviw, et je trouve ça très intéressant, parce que les autres sont plus attentifs. As-tu fait comme moi ce constat ? (Au fait, j'ai mis les notes demandées sur la photo de la chapelle. J'arrive à voir le procédé d'effacement, et il y a aussi encore un bout de toit et une antenne (ou un mat) qui détruisent la composition à mon avis. Mais ce n'est que mon avis !!)
Bien amicalement à toi ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POTY

[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your interest in the 2009 Picture of the Year contest.Your vote got ineligible because you voted from an account ineligible for POTY2009. Votes from users ineligible for POTY2009 will not be counted unless they are confirmed by an eligible account user as their own before the end of each Round.

To vote

  1. You should log in;
  2. You shold have registered before 2010-01-01;
  3. You should have more than 200 edits before 2010-01-15T23:59 in any single Wikimedia projects.

If your eligible username is different from your Commons account, add explanation behind your vote; make your Commons userpage linked to your eligible account's userpage, and your eligible acount's userpage linked to your Commons userpage.

You can check your eligibility with SUL util and AccountEligibility tool. If you have any questions, you can ask at Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2009. Thank you.– Kwj2772 (msg) 04:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Floods in QI

[edit]

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wild flowers and erosion in Pacifica.jpg

[edit]

Hello. You added notes on all the blurry zones here. Since the FPC for it is over, can I remove your notes from the image? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PicsdeSindou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good and interesting --Jebulon 16:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sesterce d'Hadrien

[edit]

Bonjour Croucrou.
Merci d'avoir examiné ma photo.
Je ne vois pas le problème dont tu parles. Pourrais-tu m'aider en étant plus précis s'il te plaît ? Il y avait effectivement un problème de détourage (négligence en haut à droite) sur l'image originale, mais je l'ai corrigé sur la version actuellement présentée. Peut-être ton ordi ne te propose-t-il encore que la version initiale (il faudrait alors "purger", comme on dit. ça m'arrive parfois : le "thumnail" est à jour, mais l'image "en grand" ne l'est pas...).
Quoi qu'il en soit, tu as parfaitement le droit de t'opposer, mais je me permets de te rappeler amicalement qu'il semble plutôt d'usage, dans le cas de problèmes techniques facilement réparables, d'aviser l'auteur de l'image pour solliciter l'amélioration avant de passer l'image à la guillotine.
Merci encore et bon dimanche. --Jebulon (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

salut
merci pour tes notes et commentaires.
tu avais raison, j'ai vu le loupé grâce à toi, ce n'est pas la première fois que ça m'arrive.
grand merci donc, je crois que c'est réparé.
à bientôt.--Jebulon (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burkina 20110119 175308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Question Limoges

[edit]

bonjour, J'ai vu que vous êtes originaire de Limoges ( Condat ?). Or, je suis en train de finaliser l'article Limoges afin de le proposer comme Article de Qualité sur Wiki. Dans la mesure où votre passion semble être la photo, peut-être avez-vous des clichés de qualité encyclopédique et de niveau AdQ dans votre besace, qui me permettraient d'illustrer l'article ? Bien cordialement, Pierre Moins, alias --78.115.180.100 07:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, effectivement Je suis originaire de Limoges/Isle et actuellement j'habite sur Bosmie l'aiguille à la frontiére avec Condat.
La photo est plus qu'une passion c'est devenu mon second métier.
j'ai effectivement dans ma collection des photos de Limoges et plusieurs en préparation si vous me donnez des pistes sur les sujets que vous souhatez illustrer je peut peut être vous trouver les photos.
Note il est difficle de vous répondre alors que vous n'avez pas de compte :-(
--Croucrou (talk) 12:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Femme-assise.jpg

[edit]
File:Femme-assise.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.204.160.185 21:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nouveau modèle utilisateur

[edit]

Salut.

J'ai créé un nouveau modèle utilisateur : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

Je l'ai utilisé sur ma page utilisateur.

Cordialement. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New level {{User PH-4}}

[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

PH-4
This user is able to take professional quality photographs.


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculpture bouziès.jpg

[edit]
File:Sculpture bouziès.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Croucrou&oldid=687143002"