User talk:LordMarcoT

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, LordMarcoT!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Testfoto 12121212.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IronGargoyle (talk) 20:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das war ein Test und kann gelöscht werden LordMarcoT (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Stefanie Speermann2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ThüringerChatte (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

was ist mit dem Foto? das Foto ist mein Eigentum? oder warum soll es gelöscht werden??? LordMarcoT (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, weil hier "Michael Köberling" steht. Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ja, er hat das Foto gemacht, aber er hat es mir gegeben. Gruß Marco LordMarcoT (talk) 13:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Marco,
ich sehe die Diskussion hier (leider) erst jetzt.
Das urheberrecht in Deutschland ist keien ganz einfache rechtliche Sache, die man einfach so zwischen "Tür & Angel" abarbeiten kann; es ist grundsätzlich unveräußerlich und sehr langlebig. Daher bedarf es eines Nachweises, das der Rechteinhaber Dir die Verwendung - insbesondere unter den von Dir angegebenen Lizenzbedingungen - gestattet (hat). Da genügt Deine Aussage leider nicht. ThüringerChatte (talk) 18:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Deine anderen Bilder, die der Kunstwerke, hast aber Du selbst gemacht? Weil zumindest einige davon auch auf Speermanns Website zu finden sind, vgl. [1] ThüringerChatte (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe das Erlaubnis diese Bilder zu verwenden. 2003:EC:AF0C:6700:70D0:1654:15F8:BB91 21:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Maro (?),
dann mußt Du Dich bitte an das hier beschriebene Prozedere halten, da sonst die Bilder wieder gelöscht werden müssen. Liegt leider nur auf Englisch vor, aber ich persönlich kann diese Übersetzungssite empfehlen: DeepL ThüringerChatte (talk) 05:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Das liegende Pferd2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 07:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pegasus 2019 Baustahl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 07:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Der Verlust 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 08:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taurus 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stefanie Speermann.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stefanie Speermann.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Johnj1995 (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ja, ich bin neu hier und deshalb mache ich noch ein paar Fehlern. Ich möchte das Foto ersetzen, kann ich das Foto löschen und mit eine andere ersetzen? Gruß
LordMarco LordMarcoT (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, das Foto wurde gelöscht. Du kannst ein neues hochladen, aber nur, wenn du es selbst von der Person gemacht hast oder du das Foto eines Dritten hochlädst, der die Einwilligung zur Verwendung des Fotos für jedweden Zweck unter einer freien Lizenz erteilt hat und uns seine schriftliche Einwilligung zukommen lässt, siehe Commons:OTRS. --Polarlys (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]