User talk:RevolutionaryPatriot

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RevolutionaryPatriot!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Afghan emblems

You need to quit. This needs to stop now. When images are drawn by hand, the smaller they get the more they become distorted and detail is lost. This is not a legitimate source to use a poorly drawn and distorted rendition when we have a vastly superior one available. Get a consensus if you disagree, but your edit warring must stop. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your visual comprehension problems are no one else's issue sorry. You're talking to nobody. Get this through your head, your redesign IS the change. Wikipedia has a feature where you view history, for years this was adequate until a user's personal design choice. I've already shown how the normal design is better accurate and visually defined. Get a consensus (which shouldn't work) for your flag change.

You're mentioning images being drawn by hand becomes distorted, that picture I showed you have the nation's emblem is an ink stamp, that's exactly how the emblem of the Republic was designed?

Please tell me more, why is it it "vastly superior" lmao, since they are both high quality vector graphics. I think both of us equipped with eyes can say that it has simply been stylized to suit a personal taste, as i've repeatedly explained that's not what the flag looks like. The text was enhanced. That's all that was needed to be done, but I think i've communicated enough about how on this website Wikipedia, the flag is meant to resemble the real life flag. The Emblem Contribution from 2010-2022 got it right, I don't see any evidence of what the author designed to have any real life existence.

Once more I reiterate, there's other websites for what you want. This isn't it. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 06:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Fry your version of the emblem is not accurate to the original 1974 emblem, I agree with RevolutionaryPatriot it should be reverted back to the original. I believe someone has already mentioned the official 1974 Almanac on your talk page and I mentioned the 1975 Almanac showing that the original emblem was infact more accurate then your version. WellWell44 (talk) 02:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop and admit you are in the wrong m. As an Afghan, RevolutionaryPatriot’s version is far more accurate and it pains me to see the flag defaced by something inaccurate. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 02:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Madhubala in Dulari (1949).png

Copyright status: File:Madhubala in Dulari (1949).png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Madhubala in Dulari (1949).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)