User talk:Gryffindor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Contents 1 Welcome 2 Ulaanbaatar vs. Ulan Bator 3 Tirol / Tyrol 4 Gröden 5 Please link images 6 Category:Members of the African Union 7 new 8 Some questions 9 subcats of Category:Quedlinburg 10 Baptismal Ewer and Basin – 1571 or 1771? 11 colors 12 Picture Palais Rothschild Renngasse 1 13 File:State flag simple of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany.svg 14 White Roses 15 File:Habsburg54.JPG 16 File:Habsburg51.JPG 17 File:Habsburg46.JPG 18 File:Habsburg44.JPG 19 File:Austrian election posters Sep 2006.jpg 20 File:State_min_wage2006_copy.jpg 21 Flag of Krain 22 Disambiguation 23 Revert 24 File:Cathedral Holy Resurrection Stanislawow3 .jpg 25 File:Fence, Buckingham Palace London April 2006 077.jpg 26 Your photos from "Sueyda" 27 File:Vienna Graben 1.jpg 28 regarding the synagoga stitch 29 re: Scholl-Denkmal, München.jpg 30 File:Falling leaves installation.jpg 31 Category move proposal 32 Category moves 33 File:Naturhistorisches Museum Vienna Dez 2006 030.jpg 34 Copyright status: Image:Landeshaus Sigmaringen 002.JPG 35 File:Cafe Seelos 002.JPG

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to the discussion board. Please follow the Wikiquette guidelines when posting a message [1]. I believe in good behaviour, and respect of each others opinions and intelligence and knowledge. I also believe in the good intent that each user has in this fine project. Therefore, I would ask users who post messages in the discussion board, to respect certain rules: Please do not post abusive messages. Please post messages in a manner that you yourself would like to be adressed in. Messages deemed abusive or with a rude tone, condescension, nonsense or un-P.C. content will be deleted from this board [2]. Users who continuously disrespect these guidelines will be asked not to post here anymore. Please post a message in neutral letters. Do not post a message in bold or CAPITALISED letters. It is unnecessary. I believe that we can all be constructive members of this project, and therefore will offer my help if anyone needs anything. Likewise I appreciate and thank everyone who so far have kindly helped me out on everything :-) Gryffindor

User talk:Gryffindor/Archive1 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive2 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive3 User talk:Gryffindor/Archive4

To leave a new message, click here [3]

Kindly REMOVE pictures of "Muhammed in Kaba" it is offensive in our religion.

[edit] Ulaanbaatar vs. Ulan Bator

Hi, has there been any discussion on moving all related categories from the former to the latter on Commons? On enwiki, the naming conventions mandate to use the spelling more common in English. The Commons however are a multilingual project, so it seems to make more sense to use the endonym here. This had been done quite consistently until very recently. Any opinions? --Latebird (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, Ulaanbaatar is quite common in English as well, just not common enough to tip the scales according to the strict naming conventions of enwiki (requiring the "most common" name). In other words, both are "English names", with Ulaanbaatar having the benefit of also being valid in most other languages, which is much less the case for Ulan Bator. Do the commons rules say anything about such cases, where there are several possible English names? --Latebird (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Tirol / Tyrol

Hello Gryffindor - I saw you had added a couple category names to CommonsDelinker. As that is a semi-automated process, which is not visible from the "receiving end" until it has happened, I removed several protentially controversial name changes you proposed. Changes in location names as you suggested are not trivial (especially if a site had both names throughout history) and should use a "move" request, like this {{move|Category:NEWNAME|Explanation why.}}. The tag will then be left for at least two weeks, and then eventually actioned by an admin (though I admit that the "requested moves" cat has a great backlog so it may take longer).

Please do not mistake my action for opposition to your proposed name changes - for all I know, every single one of them might be absolutely correct and reasonable. But they aren't the kind of changes that should be done via CommonsDelinker. Cheers and happy editing! Ingolfson (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Gröden

I have put some images back under the category:Gröden, linked to en:Val Gardena so that they can be seen directly under that name. Ciao --alpinus5 (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Please link images

BotMultichillT 05:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:8thDoW(RLH)b.JPG is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Steiermark Landeswappen.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

[edit] Category:Members of the African Union

File deletion warning

Category:Members of the African Union has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Martin H. (talk) 10:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] new

Hello, I am writing from a publishing house. We want to use one of your photos in one of our books. Are we allowed to use it without permission? How can I get your e-mail-address? Kind regards, Carmen

Hi Carmen. Thank you for asking. Please register on the Commons and in that way you can click on the left button which says "E-mail this user". Cheers Gryffindor (talk) 10:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Some questions

Hi Gryffindor, I have seen a lot of recat-actions done by you. Regarding these changes I have some questions:

• I do not understand this edit, as it will define mountain passes to be mountains, which they definitely are not.
• (the same for mountain huts and mountain pastures, which both aren't mountains either)
• regarding the case Drei Zinnen vs. Tre Cime di Lavaredo you have argued: move to native name per Commons convention on articles. I have two questions on this
  1. I do not know this convention, although I would prefer this one to the rule I have found here: According to Commons:Categories#Category name the name should be English except life forms, but a mountain for sure is not a life form. So would you please give me a link on a corresponding citation.
  2. for the very special case what makes you sure the native name is Drei Zinnen? The Drei Zinnen are located at the border of South Tyrol (Bolzano) to province of Belluno, which has also been the border between German and Italian speaking people for centuries. Thus Tre Cime di Lavaredo is also a perfectly sound native name. The situation is similar to Matterhorn / Cervino, two names for the same object. Is there a rule / written convention how to resolve these special cases? Moving to and fro as done last days is definitely not the solution. We need some stable naming, accepted by all. WPs link to these commons-pages!
• What should happen to a category after moving all files to some other category? See Category:Torre Exner and Category:Exnerturm as an example). Leave it empty and untouched, create a #redirect, or add a {{redirect category}}? I always thought the later, according to Commons:Rename a category.

Please help me to understand the reasons for your changes and what rules you have applied. Thanks --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

hi there Herzi Pinki,

thanks for dropping your questions.

About the mountain passes [4], I think it makes more sense to cluster categories together that are related to each other. I had trouble finding the categories "mountain passes", because I kept on looking in "Mountains", which is a subcategory of "Geography". Since mountain passes can only exist in mountains, it makes sense in my opinion to add "mountain passes" in "mountains", since that is already a subcategory of "Geography". Same thing goes again for "Alpine huts", which are located on mountains by definition. The most important thing is to categorise in such a way to make navigation easy. So for example when looking at "Mountains", one can see with one click all the other important categories such as "Mountain passes", "Alpine huts", maybe even "Flora of the mountains", etc., etc.

About the empty categories, yes indeed, they should either have a redirect or be completely deleted. Empty categories can be deleted with {{speedy delete|empty category}} for example. In the case of "Exnerturm", I left it because I think other users should decide whether a deletion should come in or a redirect.

About the language policy, it stipulates that categories should be in English. This is sometimes a cause for discussion, such as you rightly pointed out with Category:Matterhorn. In the case of Category:Drei Zinnen, that category was created half a year before the other one and in this case goes in order of precedence, before User:Godromil put in his edits. Gryffindor (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your answers, here are mine:

The categories involved (mountains, mountain passes, alpine huts and the like) are kept together one level up Category:Geography of South Tyrol (by administration body), and here Category:Alps (by mountain range); Same kind of objects is kept together as Category:Mountain passes, Category:Mountains and so on. At least this is my understanding. For me categories express either a is-a or a has-a relationship (in an ideal world). So for me geography deals with mountains, mountain passes, valleys and lakes in the mountains and in the planes, but mountains are mountains (having a summit, can be climbed, made of stone;). Alpine huts are not located on (top of) mountains by definition, they are located in the Alps, aren't they. Mostly down in the valleys.

the proceeding on moving categories (making them empty) is described here: The move you did for Drei Zinnen and Tre Cime di Lavaredo was a controversial fix, it was discussed already here and also here and decided the other way round. You have seen that, didn't you? To make it clear, I do not have an opinion on what name to choose (just don't want it to be changed every week), I was asking you for the commons-rules you applied. The order of precedence is a rule that cannot be valid here, as if that were the case, nobody could change anything after done once. (And you would not be allowed to move mountain passes underneath mountains). You are an experienced user with ten thousands of edits, I assume, you know the rules. Also the {{speedy delete|empty category}} is not the correct answer, see Commons:Deletion_Guidelines#Categories, {{redirect category}} IMHO is the correct one. At least I did not find anything else and you could not point me there either.

The point here for me and the reason why I think it is important and such naming issues should be discussed before, is that only consensus makes me confident that things are not undone the other day. There is a policy (English names) we should follow. It not, we should improve the policy. So the question here is whether Drei Zinnen or Tre Cime di Lavaredo is the best English name for a mountain having two different non-English names in different languages (funny question, indeed). One criterion could be to consult the English Wikipedia for the correct English name. I have seen the edits done by Gun Powder Ma, Much89 and you, all of them give me the impression of trying to avoid necessary discussions but to create facts by recategorizing and speedy deleting unwanted remainders. WPs linking to categories being removed like this, will become dangling links.

What is the rule for naming geographic objects with different names in bilingual regions / at a bilingual border? What are the proceedings to clarify disputed cases? Additional rules needed? These are my core questions and until now, you could not answer them. cheers. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

you are right. Please excuse my boldness. I did not want to shout, it was for emphasis only. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] subcats of Category:Quedlinburg

I moved the discussion to my talk page to get it together. You find on User talk:Quedel it nows. And there is an answer from me. --Quedel (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Baptismal Ewer and Basin – 1571 or 1771?

Thank you for these fine photos. Now, it seems to me you've written the year twice in German and once in English as 1571, but then, the second time in English, it is 1771.

I'd guess 1571 (at odds of approximately n²:1, where the odds of making the mistake once is 1:n), but why guess when I can ask? :) the Sidhekin (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. :) the Sidhekin (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] colors

Dear Gryffindor!

I'm absolutely confused. In the description of the image File:State flag simple of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany.PNG, you said: "The colours of the cross are Image:Cross of saint stephen.svg". When I draw the svg image, I take the color from that cross. The flag color are taken from the original image. Now you say, the cross, and the flag must have same color...--Gothika (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Picture Palais Rothschild Renngasse 1

Sorry, but this is the wrong building. The Palais Rothschild is Renngasse 3. This picture shows Renngasse 1 which is not the Rothschild Palais. Also the german text "Palais Rothschild (Renngasse)" is using this picture. --Erich Schmid (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

we are trying to find out some information on a sword my husband purchased you can tell its very old and it has inscriptions which he told he had translated and said it was middle eastern countries9 thought theottoman empire era. It wa in the other guys family for many years. Trying to do research and really can't get anywhere. It's got a Jade handle and gold. If you have any information where we could get help please reply, one of pictures on your article looks kinda like it. Thanks. our email is dilts8908@roadrunner.com

[edit] File:State flag simple of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany.svg

Is this new version OK now?

[edit] White Roses

Thank you for the photo memorial of the White Roses.

We forget so very quickly.

[edit] File:Habsburg54.JPG

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Habsburg51.JPG

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Habsburg46.JPG

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Habsburg44.JPG

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Austrian election posters Sep 2006.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Austrian election posters Sep 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Cecil (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:State_min_wage2006_copy.jpg

File deletion warning

File:State_min_wage2006_copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

83.100.224.12 22:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Flag of Krain

has krain anything to do with ukraine ?

[edit] Disambiguation

Hi. Regarding this request, do you have any objection to the "Category:Palais Clam-Gallas (Vienna)" form of disambiguation instead of "Category:Palais Clam-Gallas, Vienna"? Wknight94 ^talk 19:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing a dictionary of medieval personnalities in Romania and I would need to use your photo of the Krakow coat of arms which is linked to the Draggfy family page. The exact address of the image is http://hu.wikibooks.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:Collegium_Maius_Krakow_June_2006_001.jpg I am asking for your permission to use it. We will provide send you the page where the image was used in order for you to see it. Please answer me at vladim_ir.agrigor_oaei@gmail.com (please eliminate the two undersores in the address). Thank you very much, vladimir.

[edit] Revert

Hi,

I reverted the changes made by a so-called User:Dorgan who substituted your file File:Saint-Sulpice Paris April 2006 018.jpg. I think it is not a correct way of acting.

Best regards Gérard Janot (talk) 02:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cathedral Holy Resurrection Stanislawow3 .jpg

Hi, I've tried to improve this one, see my talk page. The other one didn't get better as my first version. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

hi, whose viennese wedding was it on the picture that you postet, and from which point did you shoot this photo? were u standing on a balcony? all the best, acs

[edit] File:Fence, Buckingham Palace London April 2006 077.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Fence, Buckingham Palace London April 2006 077.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--MGA73 (talk) 19:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Your photos from "Sueyda"

Dear Sir or Madam,

You uploaded splendid photos from the Istanbul Archaeological Museum, including four photos from "Sueyda". I have seen those objects too, and was puzzled about them, because there is no place with that name in Palestine. I have consulted an Ottomanist, who checked old dictionaries and concluded that those altars were in fact from Sidon, which, in Turkish, is still called Seyda. I hope this helps.

Jona Lendering (Livius Onderwijs / Jona Lendering (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC))

[edit] File:Vienna Graben 1.jpg

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] regarding the synagoga stitch

was there something wrong with it? if so, please tell me. _→AzaToth 17:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] re: Scholl-Denkmal, München.jpg

re: Scholl-Denkmal, München.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Scholl-Denkmal,_M%C3%BCnchen.jpg

I am the Editorial Assistant for Philosophy at academic publisher Routledge. We would like to use this image for a forthcoming book entitled 'On Courage'. I would therefore like to contact the user 'Gryffindor' to request a high resolution version of the image uploaded for the Wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rose

I understand the image is posted without copyright, however we can pay a small fee for use of the high resolution image.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Adam

adam.johnson@tandf.co.uk

[edit] File:Falling leaves installation.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Falling leaves installation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category move proposal

FYI... Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/10/Category:Gyeongbok Palace. Wknight94 ^talk 01:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category moves

The basic category name rule from COM:Cat is: "The category name would be enough to guess the subject". Moreover, in most area's, there is a coherent category naming style. Therefore, I will not waste our time on renaming categories to pinch one or two words of their name thereby jeopardizing the local naming style and coherence or to have to rename it a bit later again because an item with a similar name appears in another area. For well known places, I will refuse renames if no interwiki's are inserted in the category names. --Foroa (talk) 08:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Naturhistorisches Museum Vienna Dez 2006 030.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Naturhistorisches Museum Vienna Dez 2006 030.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright status: Image:Landeshaus Sigmaringen 002.JPG

Català | English | Français | Македонски | Polski | Português | Suomi | +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Landeshaus Sigmaringen 002.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. You can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

add licence so I could upload combined image Justass (talk) 07:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Cafe Seelos 002.JPG

and some other images like File:Cafe Seelos 003.JPG, File:Cafe Seelos 004.JPG, File:Cafe Seelos 005.JPG missing a license. Please check your gallery. --Martin H. (talk) 23:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)