It's faster to reach me through en:User talk:Jiang.
Greetings from Evrik
Jiang, please stop being a vandal. Jiang (
I am writing this to both you, Evrik, and Jiang. We at the Commons are NOT interested in having a giant war about any images. All we are interested in is determining the correct copyright status of these images. Do not remove deletion tags: an admin or someone neutral can do that after the discussion has closed. No personal comments - stick to the copyright issue. If I see any behaviour from either of you that is not focused solely on the copyright issue, regarding these images and each other, I will have no hesitation in blocking you. Have a nice day. pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- I can see what is going on. Running to the Village pump is not very helpful either. Spreading a dispute to 600 pages doesn't make it any more likely to be resolved. Just keep a cool head, 'the
truthcopyright will out'. Regards, pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: US Government images
|File:Julianne 20121124.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|File:朱蕾安 20140322.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.