User talk:KTo288

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archives 03/10/06 - 31/10/08
Archives 03/11/08 - 31/10/09
Archives 11/09 - 09/10
Archives 10/10 - 04/13
Archives 05/13 - 10/17
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KTo288!


Another speedy delete request[edit]

Good evening. Thanks for your quick reaction to my last request (Category:Twin-piston-engine propeller-driven monoplanes!

As you are now already familiar with the problem, here is an almost identical request. Thank you very much! --Uli Elch (talk) 20:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Uli Elch: sorry, I would have been happy to have obliged, but someone beat me to it. As a sidenote, after reading your deletion rationale for the cat I deleted, I felt compelled to create Category:Twin-piston-engine ducted fan monoplanes :).--KTo288 (talk) 14:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Very good idea to create a cat for the ducted fan BN-2! I have performed some 800+ landings on the very slightly noisier original, covering all the 2-bladed/3-bladed and 4-bladed prop variants.
One (almost) always gets a second chance. Now 15 more or less identical speedy delete requests have accumulated, exactly the same problem, in case you are still "interested". - Thanks and regards --Uli Elch (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

請求幫助[edit]

我英語不好,但是我覺得這個提刪不合常理(我也找不到方針指引依據),不知道你能不能幫忙。當然,如果覺得我的理據有問題,也可以提供指導。--KOKUYO (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KOKUYO: ,你好, 等我了解一下便回你.--KTo288 (talk) 08:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Telamon ARB-8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information about Chinese laws regarding pictures of museums[edit]

In User_talk:Zhangzhugang#Zigong_Dinosaur_Museum I made a question about copyright law in PRC. Is the permission of the museum required or not? I know there is FOP for building, and I have seen images form exhibitions but I ma not 100% sure (and I don't have a lot of time to check myself right now). So I ask you zh sysops maybe you know better--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bertholf in Water.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

新年快乐[edit]

Happy Lunar New Year!


Hello KTo288,
希望你的新年 Chinese New Year 过得好。. 这将是又一个充满成果的年度 Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for this new year.

Kind regards,
Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)(UTC)(UTC)[reply]

File deletions[edit]

hello, 牛津街街拍 (2).jpg is not copyvio, since there is no clue that the file is copied from other website.(google image search), baidu image search and file:“홍대거리가 마비” ... 유앤비, 성공적인 버스킹 -UNB (디패짤).webm, as this talkpage, also not a copyvio and from official dispatch youtube account. Puramyun31 (talk) 11:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please see Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, if it looks and smells like a rat, unless you can conclusively prove otherwise the precautionary principle applies.--KTo288 (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Are you Jungy,if so prove it submit your credentials to OTRS and upload the original files with full exif data, if not show where in your source it shows that the files are free, as I could not find any licensing information at Lofter.--KTo288 (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lofter adopts cc licensing, if you doubt, please ask these reviewers (they reviewed several lofter files): User:Explicit, user:chiyako92 Puramyun31 (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer to it myself, please privide me a link.--KTo288 (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

this link is a screenshot of its source page of 牛津街街拍 (2).jpg, and the link https://i.imgur.com/E1N8Yb5.png is a screenshot of small cc-by-2.5 icon. also this link is a screenshot of its source page of 存个档 甄姬——游园惊梦 (4).jpg, and the link https://i.imgur.com/4X9k7BL.png is a screenshot of small cc-by-2.5 icon. Puramyun31 (talk) 12:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm going to have to choose to disbelieve you. As an application of logic, these are recent uploads,given your interest in the subject you could have uploaded these before today if you had known about them, if you had uploaded them at that earlier date the copyright status would have been clear and we would not be having this conversation. Yet you did not choose to upload these images at that time but did have the forsight to make screen captures of the pages so that you would have evidence to trump any arguments that could be made against your uploads.--13:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

虽中国大陆原创性门槛比美国低,但该图片显然极易手绘(一笔可画出),以至于我认为够不上门槛。不知如何提起删除复核,故在下在阁下处留言,谢谢!

Though originality threshold in PRC seems to be lower than that in US, but it is just too simple to be copyrighted since it could be even drawn by hand. Also, I leave this message since I don't know how to start a review on this deletion, thank you.--WQL (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need some help identifying[edit]

Hi there - could you maybe help with File:Antoine Joseph Jobert de Lamballe. Wood engraving by L. Dumo Wellcome L0009587.jpg, which is not a portrait but what looks like a scientific drawing of some type with (what looks to me like) Chinese lettering? The file needs to be renamed to something better than "Not a portrait of Jober de Lamballe" :P - Thanks in advance. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Salsa verde has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ptko (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Winter and mountain warfare has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 20:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Car decks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Blue Elf (talk) 11:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Navy of Turkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Toronto Community Housing Corporation Special Constable Service has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 10:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning (Aug 2019)[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear KTo288. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2019 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Sail-steamer frigates has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Fuel tanks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 06:34, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Turret fighters has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Naval ships of the People's Liberation Army Navy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Undercategorised_files has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 08:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Medical colleges and universities has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


RZuo (talk) 00:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Navies of Turkey has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 03:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Frame tents has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 08:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Innovation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Adamant1 (talk) 21:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ship christenings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Dingley (talk) 11:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Soldiers throwing grenades has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Dvaderv2 (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Groups of the United States Army Air Forces has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Aircraft carrier landings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 05:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]