User talk:KTo288

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archives 03/10/06 - 31/10/08
Archives 03/11/08 - 31/10/09
Archives 11/09 - 09/10
Archives 10/10 - 04/13
Archives 05/13 - 10/17
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KTo288!


Another speedy delete request[edit]

Good evening. Thanks for your quick reaction to my last request (Category:Twin-piston-engine propeller-driven monoplanes!

As you are now already familiar with the problem, here is an almost identical request. Thank you very much! --Uli Elch (talk) 20:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

@Uli Elch: sorry, I would have been happy to have obliged, but someone beat me to it. As a sidenote, after reading your deletion rationale for the cat I deleted, I felt compelled to create Category:Twin-piston-engine ducted fan monoplanes :).--KTo288 (talk) 14:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Very good idea to create a cat for the ducted fan BN-2! I have performed some 800+ landings on the very slightly noisier original, covering all the 2-bladed/3-bladed and 4-bladed prop variants.
One (almost) always gets a second chance. Now 15 more or less identical speedy delete requests have accumulated, exactly the same problem, in case you are still "interested". - Thanks and regards --Uli Elch (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

請求幫助[edit]

我英語不好,但是我覺得這個提刪不合常理(我也找不到方針指引依據),不知道你能不能幫忙。當然,如果覺得我的理據有問題,也可以提供指導。--KOKUYO (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

@KOKUYO:,你好, 等我了解一下便回你.--KTo288 (talk) 08:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Telamon ARB-8.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Telamon ARB-8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Information about Chinese laws regarding pictures of museums[edit]

In User_talk:Zhangzhugang#Zigong_Dinosaur_Museum I made a question about copyright law in PRC. Is the permission of the museum required or not? I know there is FOP for building, and I have seen images form exhibitions but I ma not 100% sure (and I don't have a lot of time to check myself right now). So I ask you zh sysops maybe you know better--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Bertholf in Water.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bertholf in Water.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

新年快乐[edit]

Chinese New Year decorations and the Merlion statue, Sentosa, Singapore - 20150222.jpg

Nouvel an chinois 2015 Paris 13 danse du lion cropped.jpg

Happy Lunar New Year! Good health and good fortune (3233557417).jpg

Edmonton Chinese New Year 2015 (16444087956).jpg


Hello KTo288,
希望你的新年 Chinese New Year 过得好。. 这将是又一个充满成果的年度 Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for this new year.

Kind regards,
Artix Kreiger (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)(UTC)(UTC)

File deletions[edit]

hello, 牛津街街拍 (2).jpg is not copyvio, since there is no clue that the file is copied from other website.(google image search), baidu image search and file:“홍대거리가 마비” ... 유앤비, 성공적인 버스킹 -UNB (디패짤).webm, as this talkpage, also not a copyvio and from official dispatch youtube account. Puramyun31 (talk) 11:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

please see Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, if it looks and smells like a rat, unless you can conclusively prove otherwise the precautionary principle applies.--KTo288 (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Are you Jungy,if so prove it submit your credentials to OTRS and upload the original files with full exif data, if not show where in your source it shows that the files are free, as I could not find any licensing information at Lofter.--KTo288 (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Lofter adopts cc licensing, if you doubt, please ask these reviewers (they reviewed several lofter files): User:Explicit, user:chiyako92 Puramyun31 (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
I'd prefer to it myself, please privide me a link.--KTo288 (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

this link is a screenshot of its source page of 牛津街街拍 (2).jpg, and the link https://i.imgur.com/E1N8Yb5.png is a screenshot of small cc-by-2.5 icon. also this link is a screenshot of its source page of 存个档 甄姬——游园惊梦 (4).jpg, and the link https://i.imgur.com/4X9k7BL.png is a screenshot of small cc-by-2.5 icon. Puramyun31 (talk) 12:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm going to have to choose to disbelieve you. As an application of logic, these are recent uploads,given your interest in the subject you could have uploaded these before today if you had known about them, if you had uploaded them at that earlier date the copyright status would have been clear and we would not be having this conversation. Yet you did not choose to upload these images at that time but did have the forsight to make screen captures of the pages so that you would have evidence to trump any arguments that could be made against your uploads.--13:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo Metro Shanghai.svg[edit]

虽中国大陆原创性门槛比美国低,但该图片显然极易手绘(一笔可画出),以至于我认为够不上门槛。不知如何提起删除复核,故在下在阁下处留言,谢谢!

Though originality threshold in PRC seems to be lower than that in US, but it is just too simple to be copyrighted since it could be even drawn by hand. Also, I leave this message since I don't know how to start a review on this deletion, thank you.--WQL (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)