User talk:Vizu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Arch1

Contents

Полезные ссылки[edit]

  • Pixlr — растровый графический редактор онлайн, по возможностям довольно хороший, явно лучше, чем Paint
  • WebInpaint — простой онлайн-инструмент для удаления лишних деталей
  • Google Translate — онлайн-переводчик, переводит вполне сносно, смысл можно понять

Надеюсь, пригодятся --Butko (talk) 07:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Thanks! --Vizu (talk) 16:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Исправление перспективы в фотошопе[edit]

Здравствуйте, Виктор!
Прочитайте здесь Поиск по фразе даст еще сотни подобных статей.
С уважением, Георгий. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Ответы[edit]

Здравствуйте, Виктор!
Краткое описание Избранных изображений есть по-русски, но процедура номинации описана по-английски. Если коротко, то изображение должно быть полезным, иметь художественную (эстетическую) ценность и безукоризненными технически. Еще требования: минимальный размер 2Мп, свободная лицензия (отсутствие претензий по копирайту).
По поводу номинации лепного герба - не качественно. Половина фото, там где тени, имеет плохое качество. Цифровые шумы, рябь из зеленоватых и розовых пятен (noise). Композиция хорошая, техническая реализация - не очень.
С уважением, Георгий --George Chernilevsky talk 21:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Спасибо! Правда, мне никогда не удавалось при плохом освещении избегнуть пятен. Как это вообще достигается? Даже если выдержка 1/2 секунды, пятна есть. --Vizu (talk) 21:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Это проблема техники. Маленькая матрица (сенсор) всегда дает много шумов в тени. В этом одно из существенных различий между дорогими и дешевыми фотокамерами. Прочитайте здесь: ru:Кроп-фактор. Если есть финансовая возможность, выбирайте фотокамеру хотя бы с матрицей 1/1.6" - 1/1.8" а не 1/2,3", которую сейчас используете. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Спасибо. А аналоговые (ну не было тогда цифры) фотографии выдвигать на качественные изображения бесполезно? --Vizu (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Аналоговые фото тоже могут быть качественными. Если сканировать отпечаток крупного формата, да еще сделанный хорошим аппаратом (ФЭД, "Зенит" и т.п.), то вполне. Можно и плёнку сканировать, если есть хороший фильм-сканер.
Вопрос о композиции. Добрый вечер, Георгий! Просьба, если есть время, высказать своё мнение о композиции фото. Предлагается обрезать листья справа. Но, с моей точки зрения, они как раз держат композицию.. --Vizu (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Справа листья мешают восприятию, я согласен с тем, что их надо отрезать. Только важное замечание: берите оригинал, опять корректируйте баланс цвета, и потом отрезайте. А то последовательные корректировки ухудшают качество. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Исправления[edit]

Исправления сделаны. С уважением --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Большое спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 18:28, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kharkov116SchoolAir.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kharkov116SchoolAir.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

KharkovRadioInstituteWinter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KharkovRadioInstituteWinter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kharkov116SSchoolBookSculpture.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kharkov116SSchoolBookSculpture.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rock Pigeons in 2010 Northern Hemisphere summer heat wave9.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Pigeons in 2010 Northern Hemisphere summer heat wave9.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Кран и листья Новгородская.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Кран и листья Новгородская.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

KernesRoad2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KernesRoad2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Переименования в Харькове[edit]

Неуспел Кернес приступить к своим обязанностям, а вы уже переименовали категории с украинскими названиями на русские…… Просьба объяснить, на каком основании Naukova (metro station) стала Nauchnaya (metro station), Pushkinska Street — Pushkinskaya Street и т.п. Разве менялись какие-то праивла на Commons или принимались какие-то законы? Просьба вернуть все назад и непереименовывать без обсуждений особенно в таких спорных случаях.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

  • ВП:НО кто-то отменил, ув. г-н Гончаров?. "Не успел Кернес приступить к своим обязанностям"..? Занимайтесь украинизацией в любом другом месте. Кроме Харькова, где русский язык является официальным. Какое правило Коммонз нарушено? Конкретное правило, пункт, предложение, однозначное толкование. Было ли какое-то обсуждение, когда лично вы все категории нашего города переименовали? Естественно, нет. Правила транскрипции и траслитерации не предусматривают подстрочник всех названий с украинского на английский. Вы в который раз поднимаете эту тему. Естественно, согласно постановлению 2006 года, Англо-русскому словарю Миллера 2009 года и статье 4 Конституции Украины, ничего переименовывать не буду. Более того, любые Ваши переименования без обсуждения будут доведены до внимания представителей фонда Викимедиа. С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 22:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
    В дискуссиях по поводу названий Kharkiv/Kharkov, Kyiv/Kiev основным аргументом было то, что в английской Википедии статьи именуются именно Kiev и Kharkiv, аналогично и станции метро по такому же принципу следует именовать. А угрожать мне и пугать представителяии Фонда не надо. К тому же неизвестно, кого будут слушать в Фонде постоянно конфликтующего участника или опытного админа.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
    Вы не являетесь нейтральным администратором в данном вопросе:
1. Вы ещё три года назад украинизировали то, что украинизации не подлежит, в частности некоторые русские названия украинских городов в русскоязычном разделе Википедии. Диффы есть и будут представлены.
2. "Постоянно конфликтующего участника" - Вы это про кого? Если про меня - нарушение ВП:НО. Также см. журнал блокировок. Диффы будут представлены.
3. Вы вопреки консенсусу участников в обсуждении и АИ переименовали на Коммонз категорию Kharkov в Kharkiv, а также перименовали вообще безо всякого обсуждения десятки украинских городов (все, за исключением Киева.) Диффы будут представлены.
4. Вы без всякого обсуждения удалили все первоначальные подкатегории в первоначальной категории Kharkov, не оставив перенаправлений (за исключением двух), в результате чего ссылки из статей на соответствующую категорию Коммонз во всех статьях русской и других Википедий про город, где они были, стали вести в никуда (красные). Диффы есть и будут представлены.
5. Вы не проживаете в Харькове, не хотите знать нормативных документов по вопросам его английского названия (в официальных городских документах, а также документах ЕВРО-2012 Kharkov), не наполнили ни одну категорию по теме Харькова ни одной фотографией, зато украинизировали все категории.
6. В вопросе украинизации названий Вы являетесь ненейтральной стороной, потому решение о наименовании категорий на Викискладе совершенно логично доверить нейтральному русскоязычному администратору.
С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 23:08, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Не надо меня пугать ВП:НО. Вы меня переоцениваете. Вы говорите, что я ненейтрален, а привидите диффы (именно касательно Викисклада) в доказательство. По поводу «украинизации» названий в руВП — в большинстве случаев, я руководствовался правилами (разве что кроме Ривненской области, но тогда в руВП не было правил, что геоназвания должны именоваться согласно атласам Роскартографии). Я не являюсь ярым руссофобом, больше опираюсь на правила, чем на политические убеждения (иначе я бы отстаивал вариант Kyiv, а не Kiev). Если даже я и ненейтральный, то другие украинские участники будут еще более ненейтральны. P.S. А вообще то мы обсуждали наименования улиц и станций метро, а не участников. Спокойной ночи.--Anatoliy (talk) 00:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Banknotes[edit]

the source of that files is here: http://www.bundesbank.de/bibliothek/bibliothek_sammlung_bildarchiv_bbklll.php and this: File:200_DM_Serie4_Rueckseite.jpg (20:32, 14. Nov. 2010) is from 1989

  • See paper banknotes, pls! Very contrasted. --Vizu (talk) 20:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Лавочка парк Горького.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Лавочка парк Горького.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Новгородская дорога Кернеса Vizu 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Новгородская дорога Кернеса Vizu 2010.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Маршрутка 285 Х ЛАЗ.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Маршрутка 285 Х ЛАЗ.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Маршрутка 230 Х GAZ.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Маршрутка 230 Х GAZ.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

DinamoStadiumKharkov.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DinamoStadiumKharkov.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Urartian caldrons in QIC[edit]

Перевод
"Очень интересный и редкий [объект], о неизвестной древней цивилизации, но беспокоит задний фон, уродливый, с "шумом". Как насчет маскировочной работы? Голова на переднем плане пересвечена, и у ней не хватает деталей. Это можно улучшить". --Michael Romanov (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello Vizu.
I'm sorry, I don't know nothing in russian (except read the cyrillic letters, but that is not enough to understand)...
I hope you will understand me with my bad english.
I like the photos of caldrons very much, because it has high educational value.
Just to say this : I do not have Photoshop, neither do I ! It is very expansive ! But there is on the Web a FREE software called "The Gimp", which is something like a free photoshop. It is very interesting to discover it, even if it is a bit difficult at the beginning. But you will find some well made tutorials on "Youtube", (I don't know if they exist in russian). I encourage you to dowload it.
Friendly regards from Paris --Jebulon (talk) 10:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Перевод:

Урартские котлы в Качественных изображениях
Привет, Vizu.


Извините, я не знаю русского (только читаю кириллицу, но этого недостаточно для понимания)...
Надеюсь, Вы поймете мой плохой английский.
Мне очень нравятся фото котлов, потому что у них большая образовательная ценность.
Скажу лишь одно: у меня нет Фотошопа, у меня тоже его нет! Он очень дорогой! Но в Интернете есть БЕСПЛАТНАЯ программа под названием "The Gimp", которая представляет собой нечто вроде бесплатного фотошопа. Очень интересно открыть ее для себя, даже если вначале будет трудновато. Но Вы найдете несколько очень хорошо сделанных обучающих роликов на "Youtube", (я не знаю, есть ли они на русском). Призываю Вас загрузить ее.
С дружеским приветом из Парижа

  • Thank you! Friendly regards from Kharkov. --Vizu (talk) 20:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello Vizu.
I am a bit late, but i tried something with one of the caldrons. No made with Photoshop, but with GIMP. I am sure you are able to do same improvements alone. It is far from perfection, but maybe interesting for you and the photographer. It is a gift, then it is free to be used. It is your caldron, not mine !! Friendly from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Spassiba Google: Я немного опоздал, но я пытался что-то с одним из котлов. Не Сделано с Photoshop, GIMP С целью. Я уверен, что вы в состоянии сделать только сами улучшения. Это далеко от совершенства, цель может быть интересно для вас и фотографа. Это подарок, то это бесплатно для использования. Это для вас котлом, а не моя! Friendly из Парижа--Jebulon (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


UrartianCaldron02a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UrartianCaldron02a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A gift for you and EvgenyGenkin, from Aristeas and from me !--Jebulon (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Thank you very-very! --Vizu (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Файл:Баня-автомобиль русской армии, подаренная французам. Нива №23-1916.jpg[edit]

Здравствуйте, у вас есть на картинке:[1] изменилось описание. В оригинале [2], кажется Баня русской армии? --LutzBruno (talk) 20:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Баня русской армии, подаренная французской армии.
Спасибо! --LutzBruno (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

С Новым годом![edit]

Виктор, поздравляю Вас с Новым 2011 годом! Желаю Вам счастья, здоровья и творческих успехов в фотографии! --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Большое спасибо!--Vizu (talk) 02:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Привет из Франции[edit]

Привет, Виктор. Наилучшие пожелания Вам и Вашей семье. Вы должны прийти чаще на « Quality Image », мы узнаем много ... С уважением --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Thank you! --Vizu (talk) 10:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Wishes[edit]

Привет Виктор, Благодарим Вас с Новым Годом и к вам тоже !!--Jebulon (talk) 11:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Thank you! --Vizu (talk) 01:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Wishes (bis) in Julian calendar[edit]

Merry Christmas ! --Jebulon (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Thank you very! --Vizu (talk) 10:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

"herb"[edit]

The word "herb" does not mean "coat of arms" in English! AnonMoos (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Sorry? I do not speak English.. --Vizu (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
ГЕРБ ПО РУССКИ = "Coat of arms" ПО АНГЛИЙСКИ. AnonMoos (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Kraz 214[edit]

Sure that it is Kraz 214? I would say Kraz 257!Sandmann4u (talk) 10:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Если вы уверены, исправьте категорию. --Vizu (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

снятие шаблона duplicate[edit]

Если вы считаете, что сканирование выполнено не качественно, то загрузите новую версию поверх старой. Не надо плодить сущности и одну и ту же марку загружать несколько раз с разной контрастностью. Это не разновидность марки, поэтому иметь несколько сканов одного и того же экземпляра излишне. --Dnikitin (talk) 15:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Загружаю несколько раз с разной контрастностью не я. Данные сканы, о которых идёт речь, выполнены в стиле "чтоб вам всем было красиво" с весьма увеличенными параметрами контрастности и цветности. Настоящая бумажная марка так не выглядит и близко. Она выглядит именно так, как было отсканено раньше (на пару лет). Спасибо за принцип Оккама, очень полезен. Не могли бы Вы отсканить данные марки в нормальной цветности и контрастности в тем разрешением, которое считаете нужным? Тогда, пожалуйста, на все ставьте шаблон "дубликат". С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Pahonia -> Category:Pogonja[edit]

Hello. Please, make it clear from what point did you decide to move category Pahonia to Pogonja. Pahonia is a Belarusian phenomenon, therefore it should be named after Belarusian variant. I can't get from which language was this variant transliterated. A request for moving back will be filed in a day to prevent edit war. Wizardist (talk) 23:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Only Belarus? Is a phenomenon Poland, Lituania, Russia. Over 200 years - Russian (1654/1796 - 1917). See trancription and traslitiration. See 10 Lituanian town arms/ Belostok (Poland)/Vilno (Poland, Lietuva). --Vizu (talk) 23:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
There is no only in my message, although I've really missed Lithuania, Poland and Russia - that's my fault. Anyway, that's not an evidence to move the category to the one after Russian transliteration. Moreover, Lithuanian coat of arms has its own category, named after its name Vytis. Pahonia has a minority presence in Russian heraldy (both in present time and history). At the same time, Pahonia is either a coat of arms or an element in one for numerous Belarusian towns, cities and voblasts. Moving the category without a proper discussion shouldn't take place. Wizardist (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Rus. language is the off. language UN. RuWP is the one of the greatest in Wiki and language - in Commons. This arm is the Russian and Poland - but not only small Belorussian and Lietuanian. Thanks. --Vizu (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
OK, now I see you do not have proper arguments to justify your actions. Wikipedia along with other Wikimedia projects doesn't use such terms as object's authority. Just give me examples of use of Pogonja forms which are more competent than Pahonia use examples and we'll end this discussion. Otherwise, a request will be filed and category will be moved back. Wizardist (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Pogon or Pogonja = largest languages, Pahonia = small language. --Vizu (talk) 00:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Посмотрел выше, вы не знаете английского языка, извините. Продолжну на русском. И так, что вы имеете ввиду под последним комментарием? Английский, значит, теперь - малый язык? Адекватных римеров употребления Pahonia на английском - навалом. Pogonja - ни одного. Ещё раз повторяю: приведите АИ употребления термина Pogonja в более широком масштабе, чем вариант Pahonia, и вопрос будет снят. Одно дело с, скажем, Слуцком, который имеет значительное количество употреблений на английском именно в такой форме, и никто бы не стал подавать запрос на переименование категории в Sluck/Słuck, либо тем более самовольно переносить. Когда нет примеров употребления, обычно производится транслитерация. Употребление же Погони на английском более менее устоялось в форме Pahonia. Вот, например, можно заказать майку с Погоней. Или вот небольшой исторический экскурс. Wizardist (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Кто написал статью "Пахоня" в ен-Вики? Белорус. Если писал поляк, назвал бы её "Погонь". Майка - не АИ. Английский в Белоруссии не государственный, герб более польский и литовский, чем белорусский (восемь воеводств Речи Посполитой, из которых белорусское одно - Витебское), поэтому исторический герб, которому 700 лет, разделённый между четырьмя государствами в настоящий момент, с 1500-х годов до конца 1700-х принадлежавший одному государству (Речи Посполитой), а на протяжении 1796 - 1917 принадлежавший другому государству (России), не может называться на языке одной маленькой страны, причём путём прямой замены букв на английские. Дайте ссылку на английский словарь. --Vizu (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Подучите историю, пожалуйста. Речь Посполита (Rzeczpospolita I) - явление 16 века, а Погоня уже в 14 веке использовалась. Максимум, что тогда было, так это личная уния 1386 года, которая Речь Посполитую напоминала совсем никак. Собственно, о том, белорусским ли считать Виленское воеводство, или литовским, тут ещё подумать надо. Вспомните Рижский мир 1920 года и куда уехала Вильня. А Полесское, Минское, Новоградское, Полоцкое воеводства? Неужели не белорусские? И это ваши "одно из семи"? Не надо путать факты, коллега. Тем более, Речь Посполитая на первом этапе была выраженной конфедерацией, и указывать на неё как целое стоило только лишь в военных походах. Если вам нужны примеры употребления на английском, вот вам пример: много релевантной Pahonia и нерелеватной Pogonja.
P.S. это не прямая замена букв на английские, а латинка - алфавит, а не транслит.
P.P.S. попрошу не разделять государства на маленькие и большие. Мало ли, Никарагуа вот тоже маленькое государство без английского как официального, а на английском называется как и на испанском - Nicaragua. Wizardist (talk) 10:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Количество пользователей ВП намного больше. В случае с польским - в несколько раз, с русским языком - раз в 20-30. --Vizu (talk) 23:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
А всё-таки, почему надо транслитерировать (и ломать копья с какого языка), если слово переводится на английский. В конце концов это будет соответствовать Commons:Language policy. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Согласен. Или же назвать категорию Pogon. --Vizu (talk) 23:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
На всякий случай создал Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/03/Category:Pahonia, чтобы, в случае чего, в будущем ссылаться на то обсуждение, а не где-то в дебрях. Wizardist (talk) 19:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Vizu!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ford Mustamg Kharkov.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Mustamg Kharkov.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Victory Day[edit]

Croix de la liberation.jpg

Thank you Vizu for kind words. Happy V.-Day for you too. I was a bit surprised whith your message, because in the western part of the world, we celebrate the 8 may as Victory Day, end of war in Europe. It is due to the nocturnal signature in Berlin. It was the 8th of May in west, but already the 9th in Moscow, even if the german armies reddition was signed in Reims... the 7th !! Did you know that? (As you can see, I love History !!). I send you this medal, the "order of Liberation", allowed by Gen. De Gaulle to his "Companions for the liberation of the Homeland, in honor and independence". Very few people, military units or cities deserved it... The ribbon is black, symbolizing death, and green, symbolizing hope. Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 07:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Thank you! Interesting information. --Vizu (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Харьков Пасха 2011.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Харьков Пасха 2011.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Пасха Харьков 2011.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Пасха Харьков 2011.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Люк тел.НКПТдо1932 Мироносицкая 87.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Люк тел.НКПТдо1932 Мироносицкая 87.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Есенин_Сергей_1924.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Есенин_Сергей_1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.99 18:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Aвтор фото нигде не указан. Фото точно 1924 года. --Vizu (talk) 16:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Prunus armeniaca flowers in Kharkov.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prunus armeniaca flowers in Kharkov.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Скорая помощь ГАЗ.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Скорая помощь ГАЗ.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:DPS BTR 80.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Извините, но просто весьма долго грузятся изображения (до 5-10 минут), и когда появляется скорость интернета, я гружу их поскорее, без описания, давая его потом. В противном случае, давая описание перед загрузкой, время будет потеряно и изображение с описанием может быть не загружено вообще (сизифов труд). С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 18:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi High Contrast!
User Vizu uploads images at first, and always supplements descriptions and categories after short time.
With best regards. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Чахохбили.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Чахохбили.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Люк кан.1890е ХМЗф.Дитмар ПушкинскаяIMG 4792.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Люк кан.1890е ХМЗф.Дитмар ПушкинскаяIMG 4792.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

ГАЗ 24 IMG 8516.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ГАЗ 24 IMG 8516.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Чахохбили 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Чахохбили 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Creator:Nikolai Samokish[edit]

Vizu, I noticed your edit here with the question "why?". The purpose of the edit was to bring the template to use standards outlined in the {{Creator/doc}}. Creator templates are meant to be small so they look properly when inserted into images and categories. I changed:

  • Nationality from "RU, USSR" to "RU". Please check documentation at {{Creator/doc}} for allowed values and required format. Also this is "nationality" which is independent of the current name of the country, or the fact that RU become USSR does not mean that all citizens changed nationality. Alternatively we could use "RU/soviet" code there which will be parsed and translated into user languages.
  • I also removed {{en}}, {{ru}} templates from the city names as is documented at {{Creator/doc}}. Commons supports over 300 languages translation to every language is not possible and quickly becomes unreadable. Also use of {{city}}, {{LangSwitch}} and country templates like {{Russian Empire}}, allow translation on the fly to the language of the user and provide links for further invstigation.
  • I changed Workloc to {{Russia}}, since It does not seem like the painter moved only country was changing names. Also names DKR, UNR, White Russia, UkrSSR, RSFSR are not widely known you might be better off listing the cities while using {{city}} template as most other creator templates do that go into work location details. This section should not use templates like {{en}} but rely on templates listed in the documentation
  • finally "Homecat = Nikolai Samokish|Samokish' does not do anything and is confusing

I will fix the template again. If you want to feel free to list cities and dates in Workloc, but the rest should stay as it was. Hope that explains it. Greetings --Jarekt (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Good evening. Samokish is the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union painter. DKR - in Soviet Russia. UNR - Ukraine. White Russia - anti-Soviet Russia. UkrSSR - before USSR. RSFSR - in USSR. III Reich - Nazi Germany occupation. --Vizu (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

About the categories you deleted in some pictures[edit]

Hi Vizu, I don't understand your changes of categories.

Can you please explain the reason for the delation of these categories, please. From my point of view they are right. Thanks.

--Ferran Cornellà (talk) 15:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Hello. All deleted categories уже содержатся in this category, стоящей на данных изображениях, и таким образом её полностью дублируют. --Vizu 16:09, 19 декабря 2011 (UTC)

Category:Gerbovnik Vinklera[edit]

А почему там не все страницы книги? Например, не вижу страниц 4, 50.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Добрый день. Потому что у меня нет скана всех страниц книги. Есть не более 40-45 процентов. Кроме того, в книге нумерация страниц не сплошная, а в трёх разделах своя. Основы геральдики - одна нумерация. Исторический очерк - другая. Самый большой раздел - это, понятно, алфавитный действующих гербов городов и посадов - третья. Гербы областей и губерний - прололжение третьей нумерации. Гербы деревень и бывших городов - ещё продолжение. Титульные листы и предисловие не нумерованы. Так что страницы из книги могут повторяться. --Vizu (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
    Немного погуглив, нашёл книгу в Интернете, в формате pdf. Поскольку книге больше ста лет и она давно в общественном достоянии, загрузил сюда.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Спасибо! Только там весь скан чёрно-белый). В принципе, качество моих сканов лучше. --Vizu (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Какой был. Найдёшь лучше, загрузи. А книга разве цветная (кроме титульных страниц)?--Anatoliy (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Обложка и титул цветные. Печать других - с оттенком сепии. Где-то так: File:Хар губ Чугуев 1781 из Винклера.jpg --Vizu (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Ну сепия - это наверно уже от старости книги. К тому же цветной скан занял бы намного больше места, лимита в 100 Мб не хватило бы.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Это понятно. Только качество чб какое-то нечёткое... Хотя отпечатки до революции иногда делали с оттенком коричневого, здесь не тот случай. --Vizu (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

С Новым годом![edit]

* * * С Новым 2012 годом ! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Большое спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 16:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:39 Zis Stalin.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:39 Zis Stalin.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 06:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

  • В источнике автор не указан. Вероятно, это ТАСС (без указания автора). У вас же нет доказательств того, что автор хоть кому-то известен? Защита АП неизвестного фотокорреспондента на госслужбе (другой не было), с предположением, что он пережил войну и умер после 1943 года, при этом он нигде не указан и установить его не представляется возможным, - это допущение на допущении в отношении неизвестно кого. С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Первая публикация - "За Рулём" №21-24 за 1939 год = 73 года. --Vizu (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kharkov Losk bus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kharkov Losk bus.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Цукор.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Цукор.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

DPS Pesochin.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DPS Pesochin.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Soiuzpechat Kharkov 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soiuzpechat Kharkov 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Месторасположение фото File:1935 Москва Ремонт тролл линии.JPG[edit]

Похоже, что описание фотографии не соответствует действительности. Вероятно, оно было скопировано с другой старой фотографии File:Trolleybus end station 1934.jpg. Можете уточнить, где была сделана фотография ремонта троллейбусной линии? Могу предположить, что это недалеко от первого гаража троллейбусов в Головановском переулке. Andreykor (talk) 13:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Не соответствовало, это так. Правильное описание - "Ремонт троллейбусной линии. Москва. 1935 год." Где - не указано. --Vizu (talk) 17:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kharkov Milicia VAZ 2109.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kharkov Milicia VAZ 2109.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Trolleybus end station 1934.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Trolleybus end station 1934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sasha Krotov (talk) 09:21, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Три святителя икона.jpg[edit]

Заполни, пожалуйста, карточку. --Kaganer (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Готово, извиняюсь. --Vizu (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

BMW 600 fr.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW 600 fr.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ford Consul front.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Consul front.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:COA of Kharkiv Oblast.svg[edit]

Good day Vizu, what do you say about this version (from Лобачев Владимир, he is really not the creator, this version is from the same source of mine)!? I'm not a friend of many Coa versions. Sometimes free vector versions get on official websites (also from Wikipedia), so this is not really a sure reference of a official source. -- Perhelion (talk) 08:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Фон не тот. Фон герба - достаточно глубокий зелёный. Никаких салатных светлых оттенков, как на фоне флага. А на этой заливке не нормальный зелёный, а салатно-светло-зелёный. Цвет фона герба вот такой: File:2009KharkovOblastHerb.jpg. Цвет фона герба города на оригинале (эталоне) герба в городском совете - такой: File:Kharkiv-town-herb.gif.

Non deep green colour. Original colour - File:2009KharkovOblastHerb.jpg. --Vizu (talk) 09:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Жены Мироносицы икона.JPG[edit]

Заполни, пожалуйста, поля описания. --Kaganer (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Да, извиняюсь. Дело просто в том, что инет тупит. Но когда не тупит, тогда загружаю. Только нет времени на описание) Иначе не загружу. --Vizu (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
    Да не проблема. Проверяй просто иногда совй последний вклад через вот этот инструмент. --Kaganer (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Панорама Москвы Храм Христа Кремль 1912 IMG 9294.JPG[edit]

  • Спасибо за напоминание. --Vizu (talk) 00:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Wounded_Dmitry_Donskoy.jpg[edit]

Please don't load a different coloured image over the top of a previous version. We can have two different versions of the same image, as you have done with your other uploaded version. Utilise {{other version}} as required.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

  • 1) Original colours, 2) quality, 3) original source.--Vizu (talk) 17:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kharkov-Volchansk 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kharkov-Volchansk 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Ahmatova original stamp.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ahmatova original stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ze-dan (talk) 09:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Тифлисская губерния изд.Сукачова.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Тифлисская губерния изд.Сукачова.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

149.156.172.74 16:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Что за весьма странная номинация. Это: 1. оригинал, 2. стопроцентный ПД-олд, 3. рисунок, отличающийся от версии пнг. Его всё равно не удалят ни при каких обстоятельствах. --Vizu (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Кольцов Хуан Амбоу Овьедо 11окт1936.JPG[edit]

Добрый день, Виктор, в описании изображения сказано, что Амбоу несёт матрёшку, но эта кукла на матрёшку как-то совсем не похожа, ошибка? — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Совершенно правильно. Это просто русская кукла. --Vizu (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

little something[edit]

Check answer to your too quick judgment. Greet. 149.156.172.74 13:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  • OK. --Vizu (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Belorussia_Governorate[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Belorussia_Governorate has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Gce (talk) 22:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

  • OK. --Vizu (talk) 14:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Загрузка[edit]

Скажите пожалуйста, а зачем вы не заполняете описания картинок, загружая их? чтобы побыстрее их удалили суровые админы? --Shakko (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

проставление категорий - тоже очень полезная штука. Сижу вот с утра, категоризирую загруженные вами иконы. Мне это, конечно, в удовольствие, но остальную часть вашего вклада какие найдутся фанаты категоризировать? --Shakko (talk) 11:36, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Большое спасибо! Просто не было времени... То есть проставлена была загрузка, а описания все разные. А иконы абсолютно все PD-old. --Vizu (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Рига памятник Петру Великому открытка.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Рига памятник Петру Великому открытка.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 16:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Это стопроцентный PD-RusEmpire. --Vizu (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 169-0338, Charkow, Blick aus Quartiersfenster.jpg[edit]

А где-нибудь в Харькове или его окрестностях были терриконы? --Butko (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Предположительно, в 1942 году терриконы шлака могли быть возле крупнейших угольных электростанций. А именно в Эсхаре (Электрическая станция Харькова) либо возле электростанции ХТЗ (Орджоникидзевский район Харькова). См. обсуждение. --Vizu (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Эйзенштейн Сергей в Париже 1930.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Эйзенштейн Сергей в Париже 1930.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Piisamson (talk) 09:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Ясновельможная Польша плакат РСФСР 1920.jpg[edit]

How is File:Ясновельможная Польша плакат РСФСР 1920.jpg not communist propaganda if it's issued by Moscow after 1917? ----DanTD (talk) 16:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Советский Союз (СССР) создан в 1922. В 1920 не существовало СССР! Printed by Gosizdat RSFSR (not USSR). 07.1920 is not 12.1922. --Vizu (talk) 19:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Всецарица русский список.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Всецарица русский список.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Всецарица русский список.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Всецарица икона.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Всецарица икона.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Всецарица икона.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Дезертир 1920.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Дезертир 1920.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Дезертир 1920.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Juggler2005 (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Сосок нет плакат СССР.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Сосок нет плакат СССР.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Juggler2005 (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)