User talk:Vizu/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Mustamg Kharkov.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tight crop but good enough.--Jebulon 08:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Victory Day

Thank you Vizu for kind words. Happy V.-Day for you too. I was a bit surprised whith your message, because in the western part of the world, we celebrate the 8 may as Victory Day, end of war in Europe. It is due to the nocturnal signature in Berlin. It was the 8th of May in west, but already the 9th in Moscow, even if the german armies reddition was signed in Reims... the 7th !! Did you know that? (As you can see, I love History !!). I send you this medal, the "order of Liberation", allowed by Gen. De Gaulle to his "Companions for the liberation of the Homeland, in honor and independence". Very few people, military units or cities deserved it... The ribbon is black, symbolizing death, and green, symbolizing hope. Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 07:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Харьков Пасха 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe the photographer could be cropped out.--Jebulon 08:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done--Vizu 13:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Better, thank you. Looks a little busy, and the perspective needs a slight correction, but good enough for QI now, IMO.--Jebulon 14:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Пасха Харьков 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not sure it can be QI, but sure it needs a perspective correction--Jebulon 08:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC) :...A new version? --Vizu 13:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 Comment Sure it can be QI, but it needs some contrast and a cropping out of the disturbing foreground. Please remove the thing in the bottom left corner --Carschten 20:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done See a new version, pls. --Vizu 17:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 Support QI now imo --Carschten 20:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Люк тел.НКПТдо1932 Мироносицкая 87.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--Ankara 13:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Есенин_Сергей_1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.187.106.99 18:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prunus armeniaca flowers in Kharkov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Скорая помощь ГАЗ.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Please give images good descriptions

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  occitan  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  العربية  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:DPS BTR 80.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Извините, но просто весьма долго грузятся изображения (до 5-10 минут), и когда появляется скорость интернета, я гружу их поскорее, без описания, давая его потом. В противном случае, давая описание перед загрузкой, время будет потеряно и изображение с описанием может быть не загружено вообще (сизифов труд). С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 18:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi High Contrast!
User Vizu uploads images at first, and always supplements descriptions and categories after short time.
With best regards. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Чахохбили.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me, but I do not like the table cloth, nor the object of the right upper side of the image--Lmbuga 22:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Люк кан.1890е ХМЗф.Дитмар ПушкинскаяIMG 4792.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 20:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ГАЗ 24 IMG 8516.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Чахохбили 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks tasty! --King of Hearts 12:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Vizu, I noticed your edit here with the question "why?". The purpose of the edit was to bring the template to use standards outlined in the {{Creator/doc}}. Creator templates are meant to be small so they look properly when inserted into images and categories. I changed:

  • Nationality from "RU, USSR" to "RU". Please check documentation at {{Creator/doc}} for allowed values and required format. Also this is "nationality" which is independent of the current name of the country, or the fact that RU become USSR does not mean that all citizens changed nationality. Alternatively we could use "RU/soviet" code there which will be parsed and translated into user languages.
  • I also removed {{En}}, {{Ru}} templates from the city names as is documented at {{Creator/doc}}. Commons supports over 300 languages translation to every language is not possible and quickly becomes unreadable. Also use of {{City}}, {{LangSwitch}} and country templates like {{Russian Empire}}, allow translation on the fly to the language of the user and provide links for further invstigation.
  • I changed Workloc to {{Russia}}, since It does not seem like the painter moved only country was changing names. Also names DKR, UNR, White Russia, UkrSSR, RSFSR are not widely known you might be better off listing the cities while using {{City}} template as most other creator templates do that go into work location details. This section should not use templates like {{En}} but rely on templates listed in the documentation
  • finally "Homecat = Nikolai Samokish|Samokish' does not do anything and is confusing

I will fix the template again. If you want to feel free to list cities and dates in Workloc, but the rest should stay as it was. Hope that explains it. Greetings --Jarekt (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Good evening. Samokish is the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union painter. DKR - in Soviet Russia. UNR - Ukraine. White Russia - anti-Soviet Russia. UkrSSR - before USSR. RSFSR - in USSR. III Reich - Nazi Germany occupation. --Vizu (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

About the categories you deleted in some pictures

Hi Vizu, I don't understand your changes of categories.

Can you please explain the reason for the delation of these categories, please. From my point of view they are right. Thanks.

--Ferran Cornellà (talk) 15:00, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Hello. All deleted categories уже содержатся in this category, стоящей на данных изображениях, и таким образом её полностью дублируют. --Vizu 16:09, 19 декабря 2011 (UTC)

А почему там не все страницы книги? Например, не вижу страниц 4, 50.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Добрый день. Потому что у меня нет скана всех страниц книги. Есть не более 40-45 процентов. Кроме того, в книге нумерация страниц не сплошная, а в трёх разделах своя. Основы геральдики - одна нумерация. Исторический очерк - другая. Самый большой раздел - это, понятно, алфавитный действующих гербов городов и посадов - третья. Гербы областей и губерний - прололжение третьей нумерации. Гербы деревень и бывших городов - ещё продолжение. Титульные листы и предисловие не нумерованы. Так что страницы из книги могут повторяться. --Vizu (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
    Немного погуглив, нашёл книгу в Интернете, в формате pdf. Поскольку книге больше ста лет и она давно в общественном достоянии, загрузил сюда.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Спасибо! Только там весь скан чёрно-белый). В принципе, качество моих сканов лучше. --Vizu (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Какой был. Найдёшь лучше, загрузи. А книга разве цветная (кроме титульных страниц)?--Anatoliy (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Обложка и титул цветные. Печать других - с оттенком сепии. Где-то так: File:Хар губ Чугуев 1781 из Винклера.jpg --Vizu (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Ну сепия - это наверно уже от старости книги. К тому же цветной скан занял бы намного больше места, лимита в 100 Мб не хватило бы.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Это понятно. Только качество чб какое-то нечёткое... Хотя отпечатки до революции иногда делали с оттенком коричневого, здесь не тот случай. --Vizu (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

С Новым годом!

* * * С Новым 2012 годом ! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:39 Zis Stalin.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:39 Zis Stalin.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 06:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

  • В источнике автор не указан. Вероятно, это ТАСС (без указания автора). У вас же нет доказательств того, что автор хоть кому-то известен? Защита АП неизвестного фотокорреспондента на госслужбе (другой не было), с предположением, что он пережил войну и умер после 1943 года, при этом он нигде не указан и установить его не представляется возможным, - это допущение на допущении в отношении неизвестно кого. С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Первая публикация - "За Рулём" №21-24 за 1939 год = 73 года. --Vizu (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)