User talk:Heb/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2


Alla filer i denna kategori verkar ha märkts med {{subst:npd}}. Är detta verkligen lämpligt? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. It does seem like a somewhat overheated reaction. I have raised my concern on the users talkpage. Thank you for notifying me :) --heb [T C E] 07:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

The Commons Barnstar
Thanks so much for giving feedback on the Commons brochure! You can see the print version here. Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ESC2004logo.png

Hello Heb, I wanted to warn you they have re-uploaded the 2014 Eurovision logo at File:ESC2014logo.png. Baskesc (talk) 09:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bot abuse?

IlyaBot works wrong and probably without permission. 31.175.128.4 08:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, have a nice day. ;> 31.175.128.4 08:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Thank you for letting us know and have a nice day :) --heb [T C E] 08:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fil:Wotan(Odin)-coins AD 670-755.jpg

Helt ærlig heb, der er tale om et billedet fra en møntsamling, hvor mønterne stammer fra år 670-755 e.Kr. Vh. Kontoreg den 12.10 2013 kl. 13:37 (jeg kan ikke sætte min signatur, fordi linket til denne funktion mangler på mit skærmbillede ?)

  • Har du selv taget billederne?
  • Har du selv sat dem sammen til det pågældende billede?
  • Er billedet taget på et sted hvor de må tages (eller mener du at det er en PD-art ting?)?
Hvis du kan svare nej til blot et af disse spørgsmål (minus det i parenteserne), skal du som minimum have kilder på, i stedet for at anvende {{Own}} (og så skulle jeg måske have indsat {{Nsd}} og ikke {{Npd}} i stedet, men resultatet havde nok været det samme...). Du kan i øvrigt indsætte signaturen "manuelt" ved at skrive --~~~~. --heb [T C E] 09:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tak for svar - jeg har fundet en anden løsning.

Kendo-kanji.gif

Jeg har fortrudt, at jeg har uploadet ovenstående fil, kan jeg slette den igen?

Jeg har uploaded en anden fil, som jeg i stedet vil anvende: Kendo-kanji-2.gif (jeg kan stadigvæk ikke foretage underskrift, eftersom linket ikke ses på min skærm? Kontoreg (talk) 21:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC))[reply]

hi

fyi https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=10.4.1.65 --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Wikimedia Labs IP, it is your bot? --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is. It was a test function, which was however was killed by itself, as I hadn't touched it's "kill cord" file for a week (as I was away). Thank you for bringing this to my attention :) --heb [T C E] 13:09, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fil:Kendo-oprindelse-3.jpg

Ovenstående billede er blevet slettet fra artiklen 'Kendo' https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kendo&diff=7388899&oldid=7378825 Jeg kan ikke forstå hvorfor, at denne fil er blevet slettet, eftersom jeg selv har designet billedet helt fra bund, - hvilket jeg også har redegjort for i forbindelse med upload af billedet. --Kontoreg (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Billedgodkendelse til afsnittet om Den danske Hund

kære Heb, Jeg har pr. e-mail givet godkendelse til brugen af de fem billeder du har fremhævet. Gider du give mig et praj hvis der stadig mangler noget. mvh Flemming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flemming Rickfors (talk • contribs)

Hej Flemming, jeg har mærket billederne på passende vis. Jeg har også "gjort lidt rent" i billedernes beskrivelse og kategorisering og jeg vil opfordre dig til, at du kigger på det jeg har gjort, til glæde for andre brugere i fremtiden :) MVH heb [T C E] 09:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dit sp. vedr. Rettighsafskrivelse, fotoupload til Commons

Hej Heb,

Du har i går sendt mig 3-4 mails i forb. med 3- 4 fotos jeg nyligt har uploadet til Commons - med henvisning til at jeg skal bruge en formular, hvor jeg skal bekræfte, at ejerskabet er mit, og at jeg faktisk har rettigheder til at uploade disse fotos til Commons.

Jeg forstår det ikke helt, idet jeg har indtryk af, at jeg allerede har anført, at jeg er skaber og ejer af værkerne, og overdrager rettighederne til Commons - dette i forbindelse med den almindelige upload-procedure?

Gider du ikke lige kigge på, om dette ikke skulle være tilfældet - og giv mig et meld herom - før jeg evt. sender en standardmail, som din mail linker til, der kan anvendes til at slå fast, at man ejer de værker, man oploader, og at man afgiver rettigheder til Commons.

Jeg kan da lige nævne, at der faktisk er tale om fotos, jeg selv har taget, og ejer.

På forhånd tak.

Med venlig hilsen

Sebastian Nils/ Old Dane

Old Dane (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vedr min tidl mail om rettigshedsfraskrivelse

Hej Heb, I Commons-galleriet over min foto-uploads kunne jeg se, at der faktisk var billeder uden retighedsangivelser - skyldes vist, at de er uploadet med en Wizard hos Commons, der åbenbart ikke får dette med - derfor er jeg nu ved at sende retighedsfraskrivelses-formularen som tilsendt af dig.

Se dermed bort fra min første mail-forespørgsel.

Håber dette ordner tingene. Ellers hører jeg gerne herom på ny.


Med venlig hilsen, og tak for hjælpen.

Old Dane (talk) 10:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely McZusatz (talk) 10:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Heb/Archive 2, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 19:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship

Hi Heb! This is just to inform you that earlier today, you had your adminship privileges revoked on Meta by a Wikimedia steward. Thank you for you service as an administrator, and I hope you will stay active on Commons as a regular contributor. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when you get more active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Environmental_Protection_Vessels_of_Denmark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Alan Liefting (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Boardingpass Lufthansa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

MB-one (talk) 10:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Heb, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons bot inactivity

Hello!

Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Current_ministers_of_Denmark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rhadamante (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]