User talk:Ies/Archive 2022-1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Hagen - Hohenhof in 11 ies.jpg[edit]

File:Hagen - Hohenhof in 11 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Goesseln (talk) 17:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Palma - Santa Cruz - Calle El Castillete - Castillo de Santa Catalina 01 ies.jpg[edit]

File:La Palma - Santa Cruz - Calle El Castillete - Castillo de Santa Catalina 01 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mike Peel (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norderney, Conversationshaus -- 2018 -- 1008.jpg[edit]

Vielen Dank für dein Verschieben bzgl. "Dark skies". Du hast recht, mit "Dark skies" ist wohl nur der schwarze Himmel gemeint. Die aus dem Verschieben entstandenen Überkategorisierungen habe ich übrigens entfernt. In einem Fall habe ich die Zuordnung korrigiert. Die Blaue Stunde war leider schon vorbei, auch wenn noch eine restliche blaue Färbung im Himmel zu sehen ist. Ich setze Kategorien der Blauen Stunde nur lt. astronomischer Berechnungen, nicht nach äußerem Anschein. -- Schönes Wochenende noch! --XRay 💬 17:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, XRay, ich denke, dass Benutzer, die Bilder einer Blauen Stunde suchen, einfach Bilder mit blau gefärbtem Himmel während der Dämmerung erwarten. Und das völlig unabhängig von astronomischen Berechnungen. Bei einer Blauen Stunde geht es eben genau um diesen äußeren Anschein: Blau. Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 10:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sieh es mir nach, sehe ich aber als schwierig an. Wenn ich nach der Blauen Stunde suche, suche ich nach astronomischen Dingen. (Ich bin auch Benutzer.) In der Blauen Stunde kann es durchaus sowohl schwarze als auch orange/rote Anteile im Himmel geben. Das wird dann noch schwieriger. Und das Ganze dann noch schwieriger zu machen, es gibt auch Kategorien für die Dämmerungsstadien wie "Bürgerliche/Nautische/Astronomische Dämmerung". Die sind auch genau. --XRay 💬 10:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vein sceleton picture[edit]

Thanks for this beautiful picture. How did you create it? ◅ SebastianHelm (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SebastianHelm, my old camera Caplio G4 I had many years ago allowed images like this. It was good for small macro images but rather bad in resolution and also bad in colour reproduction when used for "normal" images. I made this image in my greenhouse where I had diffuse light and used styrofoam plates as light reflectors and a black cardboard as background. Finally I retouched the image by removing the leaf holding clamp. -- Ies (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! I thought you somehow had to fill the veins with a hardening substance and then remove the leaf itself. It's also a smart idea to use the styrofoam plates. Sometimes the simplest tools can work nicely, as in the image discussed at User talk:MjolnirPants#Galanthus nivalis, which was created using a cheap makeup mirror. ◅ SebastianHelm (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malta - Gzira - Triq Ix-Xatt 26 ies.jpg[edit]

File:Malta - Gzira - Triq Ix-Xatt 26 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2600:100C:A210:CFE:E558:FFF7:9A04:AF93 08:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified locations in Wuppertal[edit]

Hallo, Ies

es ist schon eine ziemliche Weile her, aber vielleicht kannst Du Dich noch halbwegs an das Elberfelder Quartier erinnern, wo Du damals die vierzehn schönen Fassaden-Fotos Wuppertal Elberfeld 01.jpg bis Wuppertal Elberfeld 14.jpg aus den Unidentified locations in Wuppertal aufgenommen hast. Immer mal wieder habe ich die Bilder genau betrachtet, um Hinweise auf den Standort der Häuser zu finden, aber Elberfeld als ganzes ist einfach zu groß. Und witzigerweise fallen mir, obwohl ich aus dem Westteil der Stadt stammme, fast immer Barmer Straßen zu den Fotos ein. Falls Du mir also weiterhelfen könntest, ob es eher in der Nord- oder der Südstadt, im Briller Viertel oder Richtung Hardt war, wäre das nach so langer Zeit ein Glücksfall, der meine Erfolgschancen bei der Suche erhöhen würde.

Du scheinst ja öfter von Löschanträgen verfolgt zu werden, bei drei laufenden habe ich meinen Senf dazugegeben. Manchmal schon leicht abwegig, welche Petitessen moniert werden. Bei den Glasfenstern in der Krypta von St. Patrokli könnte es hilfreich sein, wenn Du die Kategorie 'Hans Kaiser' herausnähmest; es ist ja eh kein Fenster komplett zu sehen.

Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 21:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ergänzung: dank der Anschubhilfe von Atamari konnte ich die Rätsel auflösen, auch für Dich vielleicht interessant, dann siehe den folgenden Abschnitt. --Im Fokus (talk) 04:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wuppertal Elberfeld 07.jpg[edit]

Bingo

Über Google erwischt, Google-Bildersuche (optisch ähnliche) zusätzlich Stichwörter "wuppertal 17": ergibt diesen link. Was zu diesem Link führt: also PARSEVALSTRASSE 17, 42285 WUPPERTAL, Barmen. user:Ies war wohl in Barmen in der Category:Parsevalstraße (Wuppertal) unterwegs. --Atamari (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wuppertal Elberfeld 08.jpg ist als Category:Parsevalstraße 23 (Wuppertal) identifiziert. --Atamari (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Atamari: Super der Hinweis. Damit konnte ich die Bilder Häusern in Gronau-, Hergesell-, Kronen- und Parsevalstraße zuordnen, nachdem ich die zeitliche Reihenfolge, die nicht immer mit der numerischen des Filenames übereinstimmt, geklärt hatte. Außer für Parsevalstraße 16, 17 und 23 sowie Kronenstraße 22 gab es schon die entsprechenden Kategorien mit Fotos von Banffy, was gut war, da die Identifizierung per Google Maps Globusansicht wegen Bäumen teilweise kaum möglich wäre. So will ich Kronenstraße 22 noch in Augenschein nehmen, wenn ich demnächst mal wieder nach Barmen fahre.
Apropos Barmen: die vermutlich schon 2007 vorgenommene Klassifizierung von Straßen des Lohs als Elberfeld in der Benennung der Bilder mutet sub specie der aktuellen Weltpolitik wie ein kühner Vorgriff auf die aktuellen Usancen eines osteuropäischen Potentaten an und hat mich ebenso in die Irre geführt wie der Politverbrecher P die Weltgemeinschaft. [Ironie aus]
Eine Frage noch: wie bist Du auf meine Frage hier auf der Diskussionsseite von Ies aufmerksam geworden?
--Im Fokus (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wie ich auf die Frage aufmerksam geworden bin? Ich habe diese Seite auf meiner Beobachtungsliste. Was mir wieder Recht gibt, das die Kategorie "Unidentified locations in Wuppertal" berechtigt ist, irgendwann - vielleicht nach Jahren - kann man die Bilder doch noch lokalisieren. Zu "zeitliche Reihenfolge der Bilder" im Detail (Zeitstempel) habe ich mir das nicht angeschaut, fand aber das Ies seine Bilder mit der Benennung "File:Wuppertal Elberfeld ??.jpg" recht durchaneinder gemacht hatte, meine die laufende Nummer passt nicht zu einem Rundgang. --Atamari (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Im Fokus File:Wuppertal Elberfeld 09.jpg ist sicherlich Kronenstraße 22: [1] --Atamari (talk) 14:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sehr gut, Dein Ergebnis für Kronenstraße 22. Ich bin mit meinem ersten Versuch einer Google-Bildersuche gescheitert, zumindest kam nichts Verwertbares dabei heraus. Da ich aber demnächst sowieso u.a. an der Ecke Gronau-/Parsevalstraße vorbeischauen will, weil es da ein Sgraffito geben soll, hatte ich die Sache nicht weiter verfolgt.
Im übrigen: es lebe der Zeitstempel! Denn dadurch war User:Ies' gepflegter Foto-Spaziergang von der Gronaustraße über die Kronenstraße (mit Sidestep in die obere Hergesellstraße) zur Parsevalstraße recht einfach zu rekonstruieren.
Die Kategorie "Unidentified locations in Wuppertal" hat sicher ihre Berechtigung. Gerade diese schönen Fassaden-Fotos haben mich schon lange fasziniert und ich wollte wissen, welche sehr gepflegte Ecke Elberfelds ich da vielleicht noch nicht kenne. Allerdings dürfte es bei den verbleibenden Aufnahmen mit der Identifizierung recht schwierig werden (mit Ausnahme vielleicht des Bunkers für immerhin 1000 Personen). - Im Fokus (talk) 19:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ergänzung: die 6 Bunker-Aufnahmen gibt es auch auf einer Internetseite des hochladenden Users, wo sie als Bilder aus dem ehem. Bayer-Werksbunker kategorisiert sind, was ich übernommen habe. Bleibt also nur noch das dreckige Dutzend nicht identifizierter Fotos ;-) --Im Fokus (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Im Fokus und Atamari, das waren noch Bilder aus meiner Anfangszeit bei Wiki. Da gab es noch ganz viele schlechte Beispiele, als viele Bilder, wenn überhaupt kategorisiert, wahllos in die Hauptkategorien der Orte gesetzt wurden. Zudem hatte ich mir damals noch gar nicht vorstellen können, was aus Wiki mal werden und wie groß mein Engagement dabei sein würde. Daher hatte ich mir damals auch nicht behalten, wo genau ich denn meine Bilder gemacht habe. Ich danke euch sehr, dass ihr euch um meine alten "Sünden" kümmert und meine Bilder nachkategorisiert. Allerbeste Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 12:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ies, was Du schreibst, hatte ich schon vermutet, weil Du bei späteren Aufnahmen ja sehr penibel kategorisiert hast. Bei der Menge an Fotos, die Du zu Commons beigetragen hast, sind 14 örtlich nicht kategorisierte Bilder sehr lässliche Sünden! Beste Grüße zurück --Im Fokus (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wuppertal Langerfeld - Katholische Grundschule Windthorststraße 05 ies.jpg[edit]

File:Wuppertal Langerfeld - Katholische Grundschule Windthorststraße 05 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

88.134.5.96 10:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Streets_named_after_Cologne[edit]

Category discussion warning

Streets named after Cologne has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 08:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brassica napus 05 ies.jpg[edit]

file:Brassica napus 05 ies.jpg is not a picture of Brassica napus, this is Category:Sinapis alba. Your other photos called "Brassica napus" aren't brassica napus either. Stok (talk) 06:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 09:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Ausgrabung des Kölner Doms für Buchprojekt[edit]

Lieber les, Ich bereite ein Buchprojekt über den Kölner Dom für den Michael Imhof Verlag vor. Dazu würden wir gerne das beiliegende Foto der Fundemente nutzen, das Du 2012 veröffentlicht hast.

File:Köln - Dom - excavations 01 ies.jpg

Können wir kurzfristig darüber sprechen oder mailen? Lieben Gruss Doppelklecks (talk) 04:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wuppertal Elberfeld - Rex 03 ies.jpg[edit]

File:Wuppertal Elberfeld - Rex 03 ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zimtbaum.jpg[edit]

File:Zimtbaum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SpinningSpark 20:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ies/Archive_2022-1&oldid=821434044"