User talk:Moroder/Archives 2019-3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QIC für File:Eremo di San Valentino cappella Gargnano.jpg[edit]

Moin! Bin gerade über die Diskussion auf QIC zu dem o.a. Bild gestolpert. Warum hast Du es nicht einfach selber in CR gegeben? Ich finde jedenfalls auf Anhieb keine Fehler und hätte daher den Kommentar von Ermell nicht einfach so stehen lassen, sondern durchaus mehrere Leute drauf sehen lassen. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 10:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Der Ermell hat mich schon richtig belästigt mit seinem pixelpeeping, deshalb ziehe ich mein nomination einfach ohne Diskussion zurück, um Platz für eine weitere nomination zu schaffen. Die Zeit ist mir einfach zu schade und ich habe Bilder genug zu nominieren. Grüße aus Südtirol --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, wenn man von jemandem genervt ist, kann ich die Reaktion verstehen. Da hat wohl so jeder seine "ganz speziellen Freunde". ;-) Aber dass er große Sachen an Deinen Bildern auszusetzen hat, kann ich bei den Sachen, die ich von Dir gesehen habe, nicht nachvollziehen. Schöne Grüße nach Südtirol (bin ich das letzte Mal so um 1999 rum gewesen) --Dirtsc (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Höchste Zeit, du kommst wieder vorbei, wir brauchen gute Fotografen für schöne Projekte ;-) Kategorie:Liste (Naturdenkmäler in Südtirol) und Kategorie:Liste (Baudenkmäler in Südtirol)
Wenn ich einen Urlaub in Südtirol plane, lasse ich mir von Dir eine Arbeitsliste mit abzuarbeitenden Fotozielen machen. ;-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 12:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Pietro e Paolo a Toscolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use of photograph of ultrasound[edit]

I am writing to request permission to use your photograph of an ultrasound of a human fetus in the second edition of my textbook Human Biological Diversity to be published by Routledge in 2019. Your image is titled "Ultrasound image of the foetus at 12 weeks of pregnancy in a sagittal scan. Measurements of fetal Crown Rump Lenght (CRL)." Thank you for your consideration.

Daniel E. Brown Emeritus Professor of Anthropology University of Hawaii at Hilo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.234.3.21 (talk) 19:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it's a pleasure. Please kindly send me the precise reference of your publication. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone vernalis snofia sun plan de Corda Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle di Sur Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Pietro e Paolo portale a Toscolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Pietro e Paolo interno a Toscolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Streda salejeda San Piere Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Michele in Valle di Sur a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Michele Valle di Sur Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deltaplano a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Musicaline 13:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deltaplano vola nella Valle di Sur a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality now. --Cayambe 09:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan y lech de Ciampëi y Sassongher Val Badia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please crop/fix the white areas (from stitching/rotating) on the right side. --Tsungam 06:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you --Moroder 16:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is still a thin white line... --Tsungam 06:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)✓ Done --Moroder 21:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tsungam 08:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deltaplano nella Valle di Sur a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deltaplano nella Valle di Sur a Gardone Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Valle di Sur Gardone Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredles Resciesa Mont dedite 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odles Fermedes Secëda Resciesa Mont dedite Scienboden te Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fermeda vërda Jëuf de Pana Putia Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Odles y la Mont de Ncisles da Col Raisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zirm sun sas Jahnstein te Ncisles Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle di Sur a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fermedes Sas Rigais Pastura de Ncisles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val dala Roa Odles y Puez Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Resciesa dedite Odles y Secëda Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ëur de Bredles Secëda Odles y Sas Rigais da Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mëusna Rossa Mont dedite sëura Bredles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont dedite sun Resciesa cun Furchëta Sas Rigais Fermedes y Secëda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pastura de Resciesa cun ciavei tëunesc y Odles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:29, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ëures de Resciesa te Gherdëina Eisacktal Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Superb --MB-one 08:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Pieres Pastura de biesces de Stevia Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Pieres y Stevia da la Piza Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Pieres y la pastura de Stevia cun Sela y Saslonch Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sienes dl Tëune sun Danter la Montes Resciesa Gherdëina .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crëp de Resciesa dedite Odles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ëures y pastura de Resciesa te Gherdëina Eisacktal Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruf y roa de Ncisles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forces de Siëles Fermedes Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piciudel y Mescula sun Stevia Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forces de Siëles Fermedes La Cansles y Val da la Roa Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val da la Roa Odles Cansles y pizes de Puez Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roa sëura Plan Ciautier Val da Mesdi Fermedes Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pütia da Göma Val Badia Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:56, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ultima nëif sun Forces de Siëles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forces de Siëles troi per Puez Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Troi ti plans de Ncisles cun la Fermedeste Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Col Raisa Roa blancia Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 12:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ncisles Sas dla Porta cansles Muntijela Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benutzung der Abbildung "Nuchal translucency"[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder,

vielen Dank für die Bereitstellung des sehr guten Bildes zur Nackentransparenz. Wir möchten es gerne im Rahmen der Prüfungsvorbereitung von Medizinstudenten in unserem Vortrag zur Gynäkologie nutzen. Eine Videoaufzeichnung des Vortrags wird den Kursteilnehmern auf unserer Plattform viku.de zur Verfügung gestellt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Heide Madry, MEDI-LEARN — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.151.174.76 (talk) 06:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fetal Yawning 4D Ultrasound[edit]

Dr. Moroder, I want to thank you for sharing this wonderful image of fetal yawning. I am linking to it in a course I am developing for undergraduates in developmental psychology. The addition of this will enhance their learning experience. I am citing and references the source to acknowledge your contribution to that experience. Thanks again, Dr. Diane Neal Learning Design Specialist — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 98.25.80.235 (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Furcela de Pütia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crëpes de Puez vaciaria Val Badia Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sas Pütia y bosch de Pütia Val Badia Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munt de Antermëia y jü de Börz Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munt de Antermëia ududa dal Börz Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deltaplano vola a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 05:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deltaplano partito Val di Sur a Gardone Riviera Lago di Garda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Cayambe 16:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pra de Pütia Val Badia Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frea pass Sella group Pisciadu Dolomites South Tyrol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plans de Frea Murfrëit y Saslonch Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pütia papaver alpinum pavé da mont Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giovanni Evangelista facciata principale Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tofana di Rozes parete sud Dolomiti Ampezzo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tofana di Rozes parete sud Dolomiti Ampezzo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autere San Michiel Lusenberg Vinazer San Antone Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I assume that the altar piece is not perfectly rectangular in itself. If it is rectangual, a bit of perpective correction would be advisable. --Aristeas 12:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Funtana dan plaza Sant Antone Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autere dla dlieja de San Antone a Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autere Imacolata Lusenberg Vinazer San Antone Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Franzësch zipla da Ludwig dl Mëune dlieja San Antone Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality though the window is a bit bright -- Spurzem 07:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corda de Resciesa Mont de dite Plose Putia Odles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:20, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciofes dinsta te Ncisles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crist de Vinzenz Peristi tla capela de Monte Pana te Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Use of your image in a Computational Health Informatics Book"[edit]

Hi, I am writing a book on "Computational Health Informatics" to be published by CRC Press. I intend to use your ultrasound image with proper credit. Please let me know if you have any reservation.

Best regards and thankyou,

Arvind Bansal, PhD Professor (Computer Science) Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA http://www.cs.kent.edu/~arvind Email: akbansal@kent.edu — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2607:FCC8:61C5:E300:C436:53F3:82D9:5067 (talk) 22:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoofdorgel van de Grote of Sint-Bavokerk in Haarlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Text content is good visible. --PantheraLeo1359531 09:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Crusc da Pescol.jpg[edit]

Hallo Herr Moroder,

ich würde gerne Ihr Bild Santa Crusc da Pescol.jpg auf thecrag.com verwenden um die Einträge der Fanesgruppe zu illustrieren. Es wäre toll wenn ich Ihre schönen Bilder generell für diesen Zweck verwenden könnte. Sie können der Verwednung Ihrer Bilder mit einer Email an support@thecrag.com widersprechen. Bitte geben Sie dazu die Links der Bilder an die entfernt werden sollen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kai K — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.201.236.2 (talk) 06:43, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Häderlisbrücke Schöllenen Schlucht Kanton Uri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Felsen und Wasserfälle an der Gotthardstrasse Kanton Uri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ellbogen Kapelle Südansicht in Silenen URI Schweiz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 13:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ellbogen Kapelle Silenen URI Schweiz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 13:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

use of image[edit]

Thank you very much for this photo. I have used it in my university teaching notes, distributed on a closed network and attributed your work. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.35.201.99 (talk) 13:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Häderlisbrücke Schöllenenbahn Kanton Uri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:06, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Joseph Kirche und Reuss in Gurtnellen Kanton Uri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:05, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brücken über die Reuss Mündung Fellibach Kanton Uri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The stitching errors on the motorway rayling need to be fixed. Otherwise very good. --Ermell 18:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 04:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josefskirche Kœnigshoffen Südfassade Straßburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterfront on Ill canal and Saint Nicholas church Strasbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedrale Notre Dame Strasboug France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:04, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purons sui ëures de Resciesa te Gherdëina Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building on Rue des Grandes Arcades in Strasbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historical fountain front of Au Vieux Strasbourg Restaurant Strasbourg downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mujiga y dlieja dla pluania de Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nutzung Ihres Photos "File:Val Gardena with Sella and Saslonch from Resciesa.JPG"[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder, wir sind ein Laienchor aus dem Schweizer Kanton Appenzell (Chor über dem Bodensee") und würden Ihr Photo gerne im Rahmen einer Konzertreihe auf unserer Chorseite in Facebook verwenden. Das Werk das wir damit inhaltlich gerne verbinden würden ist "Senore delle Cime". Wir würden selbstverständlich die Herkunft und Ihre Eigentümerschaft entsprechend vermerken. Bitte teilen Sie uns mit, ob das für Sie in Ordnung ist. Herzlichen Dank und mit besten Grüssen aus der Schweiz Ralph Kühnle Ralph.Kuehnle@hispeed.ch — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:AA14:57E:CC00:F9C5:5746:4ED5:CCED (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image use[edit]

Hello! I am using your beautiful image of Ca' d'Zan in an article on private house museums on www.lovehappensmag.com. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:3003:32AE:8000:5508:7185:62CD:97F2 (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madona cun Bambin de Jacob Jenewein Sociastel Santa Cristina Ciastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Santa Utilia Madona cun Bambin Jacob Jenewein Santa Cristina Ciastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Santa Utilia autere Santa Cristina Ciastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Santa Utilia Madona cun Bambin Jacob Jenewein Santa Cristina Ciastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Santa Utilia Santa Cristina Ciastel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Unlucky lighting but well handled --Podzemnik 01:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macrolepiota procera Parasol Riesenschirmpilz Mont de Sëuc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp detailed photo --Michielverbeek 09:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Die Schöllenen Schlucht mit Teufelsbrücke im schweizerischen Kanton Uri.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Die Schöllenen Schlucht mit Teufelsbrücke im schweizerischen Kanton Uri.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12 week ultra sound[edit]

Thank you for sharing this image. I would like to use it in the open educational resource lab manual I am writing for our one semester anatomy and physiology course, BIO 160, at Pima Community College. Thanks, Lisa Werner lwerner@pima.edu — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.90.42.128 (talk) 19:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balest Urtijëi Mont de Sëuc Sciliër y Bulacia udui Gran Punton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crëusc sëura Lavies Bula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balest Urtijëi Mont de Sëuc Sciliër y Bulacia Gran Punton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and high resolution. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crist de Plan Vinela y Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crist de Plan Vinela a Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I'd have lighten up the Christ a bit, but ok --Poco a poco 08:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urtijëi Mont de Sëuc Sciliër y Bulacia udui dal Gran Punton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted and it would benefit from a dehaze, the houses are also a bit too bright --Poco a poco 08:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 12:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better --Poco a poco 19:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciastel Fischburg te Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The picture may tend slightly towards reddish-violet, but I think this is tolerable. --Smial 21:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We made a landscape for YoWindow Weather app from your photo[edit]

Dear Wolfgang, I am the author of YoWindow Weather app. I have found your photo of Roman forum on wikipedia. It is amazing! We made a landscape for YoWindow from your photograph. The landscape is available for Rome in the app. Your name and the link to the original photo are displayed at the bottom left corner of the app. Thank you for your wonderful work!

YoWindow is available for Android and iOS for free. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=yo.app.free https://itunes.apple.com/app/id799653744 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowindow (talk • contribs) 12:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hoofdorgel van de Grote of Sint-Bavokerk in Haarlem.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hoofdorgel van de Grote of Sint-Bavokerk in Haarlem.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welches Equipment?[edit]

Hallo sehr geehrter Herr Moroder. Jetzt muss ich nochmal stören. Würden sie mir verraten welches Fotokameraequipment sie für die aktuellen Fotoansichten verwenden? Also aus den Exifs geht hervor, daß sie eines der Hasselblad Digitalbacks zur Verfügung haben. Die aktuellen Backs sind in der Lage durch pixelschift mehr als die vom Sensor zur verfügunggestellten Bildpunkte zu erzeugen. Um bei einigen Ansichten den Sichtbereich noch zu erweitern verwenden sie zusätzlich noch die Funktion mehrerer Einzelbilder? Bietet dies die Kamerasoftware automatisiert an? Dann zum Objektiv, abermals die Exif Info, sie zeigt hier 45mm, haben sie hier um Shiften zu können noch den HTS Adapter am (50C?), oder eine völlig andere Hardwarelösung? Die Images, also die Bildergebnisse, sind einfach so perfekt. Ich verwende bisher die nikon d850 mit dem 19er TS. Und da fehlt manchmal dann doch das vom "Mittelformat" gewünschte Ergebnis. Vielen Dank für all ihre Bemühungen. Ich muss noch anmerken, es ist einfach unglaublich wieviel Mühe und Zeit sie investieren um an all den gezeigten Schauplätzen mit ihrer Kamera zu sein. "Großartig" Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 15:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo lieber Fotofreund @Fentriss: ,

Da ich gerne Landschaftsbilder mache, verwende ich keinen Weitwinkel sondern das Fixobjektiv 45 mm und stelle dann die gewonnenen Bilder mit Lightroom zusammen. Das macht die Kamera nicht. Die X1D Kamera ist im Vergleich zur D850, die ich vorher hatte, sehr einfach und auch langsam, also für Events nicht geeignet. Ich benütze sie immer im manuellen Modus nur die Fokussierung mache ich automatisch. Die ist aber auch im Vergleich zur D850 sehr primitiv, im Prinzip nur ein Spot. Ich habe kein Zusatzgerät zum shiften sonder mach das im nachhinein manuell mit photoshop. Ich besitze noch ein XCD 130 mm Objektiv, das ich aber eher selten benütze. Bin insgesamt von meiner letzten Kamera sehr begeistert. Danke für deine Bewunderung für meine Arbeit die vielleicht auch mühsam ist aber mir viel Spaß in der Freizeit bereitet. LG aus Südtirol--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Habe dieses Foto mit 1600 ISO gemacht und finde es erstaunlich gut

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frans Hals Museum portal in Haarlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vleeshal building Harlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frans Hals Museum garden in Haarlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 19:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grote Kerk an Vleeshal building Harlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albe Turm in Serralbe Frankreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischburg in Gröden Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annunciation Adriaen Van de Velde Rijksmuseum Amsterdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 17:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vleeshal building Speckstraat Harlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though I would remove the 'broken' bicycle at left. . --Cayambe 17:41, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vleeshal building Speckstraat 2 Harlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haar Castle in the Netherlands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Pity about the person on the right --Podzemnik 10:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. I like to have people on my photos, it gives the photo a more specific sense of the epoch and size of the objects --Moroder 12:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Lixheim France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pond in the region near Utrecht in the Netherlands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Big dust spot in the right top corner --Podzemnik 10:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 12:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --SH6188 07:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cows pasture in the Netherlands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grote Markt Stadthuis Harlem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Purons sui ëures de Resciesa te Gherdëina Südtirol.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Purons sui ëures de Resciesa te Gherdëina Südtirol.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Antoine Lixheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
something not right with perspective --Charlesjsharp 15:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Comment Please specify --Moroder 17:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure, end walls are vertical but roof seems distorted. No basis for oppose though. Charlesjsharp 08:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like this verticalizing aesthetic, but I don't find any technical flaws worth mentioning. --Smial 19:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:De Haar Castle South in the Netherlands.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:De Haar Castle South in the Netherlands.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aspen Galena Street.jpg[edit]

Hello Wolfgang,

I would like to use your beautiful photo of Galena Street for the cover of a thank you card for a co-worker, and am excited because I think he'll really enjoy it!

Hope you have a great day, please let me know if there is anything else required to use the photo, and hope you have a great day!

Thank you for your photographic eye and artwork!

Jon Obayashi — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.176.227.25 (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Martin Sarralbe France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --大诺史 11:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De Haar Castle in the Netherlands.jpg[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to shoot you a message to use the image below on my website.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_Haar_Castle_in_the_Netherlands.jpg

Great shot! I will give you credit in the caption :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwander (talk • contribs) 19:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci ![edit]

Bonjour Wolfgang Moroder,

Ce message pour vous informer que j'ai intégré et cité votre photographie dans un travail de doctorat. Le château de la Morinerie a été la résidence d'un commissaire de Marine de Saintes sous Louis XIV et Louis XV. Je vous remercie donc pour cette belle photographie du logis. Vous souhaitant une belle journée, Bien cordialement, Jean-Christophe Temdaoui. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB18:CC:700:D58E:DF8B:37B7:1F38 (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grieser Pfarrkirche Grabstein Bozen Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:44, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grieser Pfarrkirche Ost Bozen Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 16:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grieser Pfarrkirche Bozen Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, the aspect ratio is wrong. If I rescale the picture to a quadratic format, it looks much better. --Tsungam 11:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)✓ Done @Tsungam: You are absolutely right, thanks for the hint --Moroder 14:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Pro now. --Tsungam 14:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bartolomeo a Salò sul Garda lato sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bernardo Cristo benedicente Serniga Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
null --Ermell 14:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Could be cropped, but that's a matter of opinion. WB is perhaps a little too blue. --Ermell 14:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bernardo Cristo Risorto Serniga Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bernardo portale Serniga Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bernardo transetto sinistro Serniga Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture of Knossos Ivory Acrobat[edit]

I would like to use your picture in a book on the Minoan I am currently writing. I will fully acknowledge that this is your picture.

Best wishes, 

Nicoletta Momigliano. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N.Momigliano (talk • contribs) 14:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message for Wolfang Wolfgang Moroder[edit]

O would like to use your picture of the Ivory Acrobat for a book I am writing. The caption will say 'photo: Wolfang Wolfgang Moroder). Many thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by N.Momigliano (talk • contribs) 15:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't misspell my name --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Valle di Sur da Gardone Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Valle di Sur casa rurale sud Gardone Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Valle di Sur casa rurale Gardone Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:14, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo della Mille Miglia ruderi del monastero Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Mille Miglia cortile Chiesa Sant'Eufemia chiesa San Paterio Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 08:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Garda visto dalla chiesa di San Bernardo Serniga Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 04:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo della Mille Miglia lato sud chiesa Sant'Eufemia Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cappella del Monastero di S. Eufemia della Fonte Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Martinelli Municipio Cologne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa rurale Bassa Via del Garda Gardone Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oratorio femminile Cologne BS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Sharp and well exposed. --Bobulous 20:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Bernardo transetto destro Serniga Salò.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]