User talk:Nefronus/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nefronus!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nefronus!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Cs-sračka.ogg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Cs-bobr.ogg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Earth-cutaway-schematic-Czech.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

More fun nominations

Nominating photos for deletion because of low quality isn't really a way to make friends here. I would suggest you look for good quality images and nominate them for quality image or valued image and maybe if the image is really outstanding, for featured picture. That's more fun for everyone involved and files using these quality badges end up much higher in the search rankings because the search engine is configured to give these a boost. Multichill (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The deletion policy says "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." and in my opinion such media hinder searching for the right/representative ones. But well, I might try it the other way from time to time. --Nefronus (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Fragaria vesca

Dear colleague, do not bother to clarify, why did I attract such close attention from you? Or are you outraged by the presence of strawberries (Zemlyanika/Wald-Erdbeere - Fragaria vesca) and strawberries (Klubnika/Hügel-Erdbeere - Fragaria viridis) [1][2][3]? Ural-66 (talk) 20:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

• Dear colleague, I'll gladly bother. Once I was searching for a photo of a wild strawberry and found one that looked good as a thumbnail, but when I opened the full-sized version, the strawberry itself was completely blurred (it was not a photo of yours). I nominated it from deletion (deletion policy: "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.") and the admins accepted that nomination. I thought that presence of such images just makes searching for a certain one harder, and I thought deleting such an image just makes the category more organized/accessible. In this conviction, I continued looking around the category. Let’s admit that especially the first image is very blurred and hardly useful for anyone searching for a strawberry flower. After this, I learned that the admins don't like this approach and now I see it leads to disputes among users – so I apologize. I'm already focusing on things other than deletion nominations. --Nefronus (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Well, for the quality, excuse me for what we have. There are no professional photographers on Wikipedia, and besides, biologists. As for the photos you indicated, they are not only about flowers, but about plants in general. for example: thirdly, the leaves and their distinctive properties are clearly visible, as well as the soil (soil surface) in which they grow. Secondly, the variation of the flower and the plant itself is clearly visible depending on the growing conditions (dense soil in the sun (on the side of the forest road)). Well, in the first photo - a general view of growing plants, growth conditions, density of growth, surrounding vegetation, etc. Well, in Russia, not only wild strawberries [Zemlyanika] (Fragaria vesca), but also strawberries [Klubnika] (Fragaria viridis) grow in the wild. And in stores they sell cultivated strawberries [Zemlyanika] (Fragaria × ananassa), also called strawberries [Klubnika], incorrectly. Ural-66 (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Earth schematics

Hello Nefronus,

Thanks for your interest in these schematics. Glad to hear it helps :)

I saw you localized in Czech. Good job ! Feel free to ask for some design if you need. If I could help, I'll do it.

Bibar (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraxinus excelsior infructescence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corylus avellana male and female flowers 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussilago farfara TK 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulmonaria officinalis TK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chlamydomonas reinhardtii vector scheme.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucojum vernum TK 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salix caprea female TK 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primula veris TK 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wow, completly in focus ! --Sebring12Hrs 22:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurinia saxatilis TK 2021-04-22 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primula veris TK 2021-04-22 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juniperus communis TK 2021-04-27 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anacamptis morio TK 2021-05-01 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamium album TK 2021-05-09 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardamine pratensis TK 2021-05-08 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel Radotín TK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 11:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praskolesy TK 2021-05-16 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagus sylvatica TK 2021-05-22 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice--Lmbuga 11:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myosotis sylvatica TK 2021-05-21 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality: would be nice to have a bigger depth of field but meets all meets all QI creteria for me --J. Lunau 14:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza majalis TK 2021-05-22 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hop garden Mšec TK 2021-05-28 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza majalis TK 2021-05-29 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula patula TK 2021-06-05 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Just a hint:

Hello Nefronus,

I just want to let you know that my comment about ‘strict newbies’ was not about you. It was inspired by some new Commons reviewers which IMHO seem to exaggerate strictness in assessing QI candidates and also seem to act a bit arbitrarily, at random. I did not mean you. Your QI reviews are sometimes a bit strict, yes, but they are always correct, fair and well thought-out. Thank you very much for the good work!

All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Aristeas, thank you for the message. I certainly did not take that personally. There are still things I need to learn and I make mistakes, but I hope my reviews will be useful in the QI assessment. ----Nefronus 06:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drosera rotundifolia TK 2021-06-12 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris sibirica TK 2021-05-29 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tanacetum corymbosum TK 2021-06-19 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PFC Arda by BISO 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthropogenic vegetation TK 2021-06-26 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lolium perenne TK 2021-06-26 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Securigera varia TK 2021-06-24 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gladiolus imbricatus TK 2021-07-03 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gladiolus imbricatus TK 2021-07-03 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gladiolus imbricatus TK 2021-07-03 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver somniferum TK 2021-07-01 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gladiolus imbricatus TK 2021-07-03 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anacamptis morio TK 2021-05-08 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments would be better without foreground flower --Charlesjsharp 18:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Macro photographs

You keep rejecting my macro photographs as "too little detail", "too little sharpness", etc. I'm wondering if you realize that the subjects I'm photographing are only slightly bigger than an ant. Due to diffraction limiting, there is a very tight trade-off between depth of field and overall image sharpness at that level of magnification. Unfortunately, it isn't possible to have both (without focus stacking which isn't a realistic possibility for something like a jumping spider which rarely stops moving). For a four-thirds lens and sensor combination, f/10 is about as tight as you can close the aperture without introducing noticeable diffraction softening. Would you prefer that the over-all image be softer if it had more depth of field? Or are you looking for more absolute sharpness in the in-focus areas? Nosferattus (talk) 02:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, basically I have the same problem with plants. Focus stacking isn’t an option for me, because they are still moving in the wind, and I would have to sell my other kidney to afford Helicon Focus (and it would also take so much more time). I realize the limitations and understand that your photos are good in terms what is technically possible, I was just „spoiled“ by what I saw e.g. on Facebook groups related to arachnology. So next time I won’t be so critical + you can always take the opposing vote to discussion (if you already haven’t). ----Nefronus 06:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

I looked at the photos again, and I didn’t oppose them for low depth of field, but, as you mentioned, imagined more absolute sharpness in the in-focus areas. E.g. the hair look a bit like upscaled. So it’s probably limited by the lens/camera/crop or combination of these. --Nefronus 06:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the specific feedback! I can definitely increase the absolute sharpness by using more more magnification/less cropping and giving up a little depth of field. Opening up to f/9 might help a tad as well. I had actually been trying to maximize my depth of field lately since the folks at English Wikipedia Featured Picture Candidates are slightly obsessed with getting the entire subject in focus. I guess you can't please everyone, lol. No hard feelings though! Cheers! Nosferattus (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oil traps.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 16:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vodní hamr Dobřív TK 2021-07-10 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carduus acanthoides TK 2021-07-10 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slapy TK 2021-07-08 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vodní elektrárna Štěchovice TK 2021-07-08 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)