User:Böhringer/Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyommatus icarus, Kopula 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Ankara 22:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stupa, Buddhistisches Kloster Letzehof 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Typisch Vorarlberg ! QI nevertheless--Jebulon 21:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Polyommatus icarus, Kopula 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polyommatus icarus, Kopula 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild1.JPG

{{Autotranslate|1=File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild1.JPG|base=Copyvionote}}--[[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Retracted. Jappalang (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild2.JPG

{{Autotranslate|1=File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild2.JPG|base=Copyvionote}}--[[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Retracted. Jappalang (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild3.JPG

{{Autotranslate|1=File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild3.JPG|base=Copyvionote}}--[[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Retracted. Jappalang (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild4.JPG

{{Autotranslate|1=File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild4.JPG|base=Copyvionote}}

The opera stage sets are copyrighted works of art and Austria's freedom of panorama applies only to permanently installed works. --Jappalang (talk) 22:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I have tagged File:BregenzToscaBühnenbild5.JPG and File:Trovatore01.JPG for the same reasons as well. Jappalang (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I failed to note that the sets only exist for their two years at the Bregenz Festival and are in public display at all time in their "life". Jappalang (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus, Hahn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Kategorien

Hallo Böhringer!

Bitte Überkategorisierung vermeiden. Ich danke im voraus. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 20:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

werde mich bemühen mehr darauf zu achten; danke --Böhringer (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staudammkrone Lünersee 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice shot --Mbdortmund 21:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Übergelaufen? ;-)

Hi Fred, hast du etwa das Lager gewechselt? Bei diesem, sehr schönem, Bild hast du ja ein Konkurenzprodukt benutzt. Wie kommt's? Wirklich übergelaufen oder nur mal so? Besten Gruß mathias K 06:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

:-)) noch nicht ganz. Ich habe ja noch sooo viele (alte) Objektive von Minolta. Nachdem aber Sony mit der oft versprochenen Objektiventwicklung nicht weitermacht und die von Carl Zeiss sehr teuer sind, musste ich nun zu Nikon wechseln. Natürlich erhoffe ich mir hiervon etwas mehr. Mit Canon hatte ich schon öfters probiert. Die hatten schon zu analogzeiten immer diese grünlich, gelblichen Stiche in den Bilder. Minolta war in den Farben Blau, Grün und Rot immer schon sehr gut. Also werde ich, man wird sehen mit beiden Typen vorläufig weitermachen. L.g. --Böhringer (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

ja das mit den objektiven ist natürlich doof, da hast du recht! Was hältst du denn von "Drittanbietern" wie Tamron oder Sigma? Ich hab jetzt zum Geburtstag für meine A700 das 17-50 f/2,8 von Tamron bekommen und bin ziemlich zufrieden! Mit meinem 90er Macro von Tamron bin ich ja auch sehr glücklich. Als nächste hätte ich dann gerne noch nen 70-200mm f/2,8. Da gibts ja auch von Tamron und Sigma eins (hat sogar Ultraschallmotor). Muss ich mal schauen, aber das dauert noch n Moment... Kost ja auch alles was... ;-) Nun denn, jedenfalls danke für die ausfürliche Antwort und viel Erfolg mit der "Neuen"! :-) Besten Gruß mathias K 09:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

das gibt es wirklich gute Objektive; aber die Originale sind (so finde ich) einfach noch besser abgestimmt. Letztes Jahr habe ich das einzigste fremde Objektiv Sigma 150mm f2.8 EX DG APO HSM IF Macro Minolta/Sony um 700 Euro gekauft. Das ist wirklich sehr gut und ich überlege mir ob ich es jetzt um 500 weiterverkaufen soll. --Böhringer (talk) 10:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Das die Originale immer noch n Tick besser sind glaub ich gerne; aber da bittet Sony (gerade mit den Carl-Zeiss Teilen) natürlich ordentlich zur Kasse... Naja, ich würde das Sigma glaubh ich nicht verkaufen, ich hatte es zwar selber noch nicht an der Cam aber von dem was ich gelesen habe is das schon ein feines Stück. Dschwen hat das Ding auch, nur ohne HSM, und die QWualität der Panos die er durch die Linse gebastelt hat is ja bekannt... Hier und hier um nur 2 zu nennen. Ansonsten is sowas natürlich auch immer eine Bauchgefühlssache.

Ich kann nur sagen das ich mit der Kombination Sony und Tamron (aber nur die mit SP im Namen, der Rest is Mist) bisher ganz zufrieden bin. Gerade der Unterschied zwischen meinem alten 28-200 (ohne SP)zu dem neuen 17-50 is doch heftiger als ich dachte. Ich lade die Tage mal ein paar Beispiele hoch. Die kann ich dir dann ja gerne mal zeigen. Bis dann, besten Gruß mathias K 16:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauhechel-Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus Paarung 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI anyway, perhaps a crop on left and top would be even better --Mbdortmund 23:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for this negative note, but apparently there is a problem with the butterfly species in this beautiful image. You state that it is Plebeius argus, but another contributer thinks it is Polyommatus icarus. I do not have expertise in entomology, so I can't decide. Polyommatus icarus and Plebeius argus look quite the same for non-specialist, so do you have more identification info? --Berru (talk) 20:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lünersee vom Saulakopf 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Ankara 22:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zimba Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The "skyline" of Vorarlberg - beautiful --Haneburger 05:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Panorama creation

Hello.

Could you say me how do you make your panorama ?

Do you use a panoramic head (like it)?

--ComputerHotline (talk) 08:47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I have designed my own angle to the camera to be mounted vertically. --Böhringer (talk) 09:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Could we view it ? --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

see [1] passt zu Sony Alpha700 und Nikon D300s --Böhringer (talk) 10:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silvretta Stausee Bielerhöhe Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment This picture is truly beautiful, but it appears to be tilted to the left. --Quartl 07:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)  Done 1,8° --Böhringer 18:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Much better! --Quartl 09:47, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lünersee vom Saulakopf 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lünersee vom Saulakopf 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zimba Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zimba Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Böhringer!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Nodaladapter.pdf was uncategorized on 16 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Photo - apis melifera biodiversity route

Hello,

My name is Rita Neves.

I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal.

Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photo´s we would like to use are the following:

Apis Melifera

- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trinkbiene4.JPG 
-  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trinkbiene6.JPG  

The brochure will have four brackets.

- Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration - Schedules for species identification - Panels that will be fixed in the Land

As i said the free access will be everything :)

If you provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? name credit :)Böhringer?

If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt

Thank you very much.

Our best regards

Rita

thank you

Thank you very much.

Our best regards

:-)) gerne --Böhringer (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Silvretta Stausee Bielerhöhe Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silvretta Stausee Bielerhöhe Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

biianca_rieder@yahoo.de

Lieber Herr Böhringer!

Dieses alte Hotel vasziniert mich sehr. Haben Sie noch mehr Informationen über das Hotel Alpenhof? Zum Beispiel, wie viele Sterne hatte dieses? Hat es Skandale, zum Beispiel Geschichten über Morde? Gibt es Gerüchte über Geister? Warum hatt dieses Hotel zugemacht? Liegt es am Alter oder hat es einen anderen Grund? Wenn Sie irgendwas über das Hotel wissen bitte schreiben Sie mir.

Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort freuen!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Rieder Bianca

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scolia hirta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it! --Kuli 20:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)  CommentIf you want to promote you have to change the word "Nomination" to "Promotion" --Mbdortmund 14:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)  Support Like it, too. --Quartl 14:08, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

New proposal about changing the rules of FPC

is here.Cheers.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Palast Hohenems

Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer, Wir, Familie Waldburg-Zeil würden gerne ihr Photo unseres Palastes auf unserer Homepage verwenden. Selbstverständlich werden wir Sie als Photograph nennen. Ich wäre Ihnen dankbar, wenn sie uns dieses nochmals bestätigen könnten. Herzlichen Dank im Voraus für Ihre Mühe Stépahnie Waldburg-Zeil

Anfrage per Mail beantwortet --Böhringer (talk) 15:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

2 fehlbestimmte Graslilien

Hallo Herr Böhringer/Archive 3,

Ihre Bilder File:Anthericum_liliago,_Astlose_Graslilie_1.JPG und File:Anthericum_liliago,_Astlose_Graslilie_2.JPG zeigen die Ästige Graslilie (Anthericum ramosum), da der Blütenstand (wie auf einem der Bilder deutlich erkennbar) verzweigt (rispig) ist und nicht traubig und außerdem wegen des im Verhältnis zu den Kronblättern sehr langen Griffels. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

oh vielen Dank, werde die Bilder namentlich und im Text in Kürze korrigieren. --Böhringer (talk) 21:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpendohle, Pyrrhocorax graculus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Lmbuga 23:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forests in Alberschwende 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 06:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Noisy sky. Can be fixed. Lycaon 19:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Lycaon 10:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borik Zadar 1b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. Alofok 13:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Macro lens

Hi Böhringer. Nice to see you got a Nikon! For macros, such as this, do use the Sigma 105mm lens or the Nikon 105mm? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

:-)) Nikon 105mm :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 21:30, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burenziegenlamm 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (UTC) Good --Ankara 21:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wespenspinne, Argiope bruennichi 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taubenschwänzchen, Macroglossum stellatarum 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunvieh Jungtier 1 Tag alt 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure, but I think that it's good and useful--Lmbuga 22:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junge Waldeidechse, Zootoca vivipara 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 18:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wildgrubenspitzen Roggalspitze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Carschten 20:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Heidelibelle, Sympetrum striolatum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow.. what are they doing? Nice and sharp, QI. --Elekhh 04:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forests in Alberschwende 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürsersee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perhaps there are some small quality problems and maybe it's a bit underexposed, but the composition is very good. QI imo --Carschten 09:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpenmurmeltier, Marmota marmota 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wildgrubenspitzen Roggalspitze.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wildgrubenspitzen Roggalspitze.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Image:Ballota nigra ssp. meridionalis, Schwarznessel1.JPG und Image:Ballota nigra ssp. meridionalis, Schwarznessel2.JPG

Hallo Herr Böhringer/Archive 3, ich habe die beiden Bilder Image:Ballota nigra ssp. meridionalis, Schwarznessel1.JPG und Image:Ballota nigra ssp. meridionalis, Schwarznessel2.JPG zu Category:Lamium maculatum geschoben, da beide eindeutig die Gefleckte Taubnessel zeigen. Ballota nigra hat anders aussehende Blätter und vor allem ganz anders aussehende Blüten mit deutlich dreilappiger Unterlippe (vgl. z. B. Image:Ballota nigra IP.jpg). Auf den beiden zu Lamium maculatum verschobenen Bildern sieht man die Seitenlappen entweder gar nicht oder als fadenartig dünne Gebilde, wie das bei Lamium maculatum üblich ist. Die Beschreibung habe ich auch etwas geändert. Schauen Sie mal, ob sie so für Sie o.k. ist. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

das kommt, wenn ein Holzfachmann sich mit Pflanzen beschäftigt. werde auch hier die beiden Bilder neu benennen. Vielen Dank für deine Korrekturen. --Böhringer (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Ich finde es schön, wenn sich der Holzfachmann mit Pflanzen beschäftigt, auch wenn dabei ab und zu eine Fehlbestimmung vorkommt. Mit der Angabe, dass die Pflanzen aus Vorarlberg sind, ist es schon viel einfacher als sonst hier üblich, so etwas zu korrigieren. Und dein völlig richtig bestimmtes schönes Bild File:Kornblume02.JPG habe ich bereits anderswo als Ersatz für ein fehlbestimmtes Bild eingesetzt. Ich habe nochmals deine Bilder durchgeschaut und bin auf zwei weitere fehlbestimmte Bilder gestoßen, und zwar File:Angelica sylvestris, Wald-Engelwurz1.JPG und File:Angelica sylvestris, Wald-Engelwurz2.JPG. Die Blätter sehen gar nicht nach einer Engelwurz aus, welche Blätter haben sollte, die so ausschauen: File:Illustration Angelica_silvestris0.jpg. Bei deinen Bildern handelt es sich um Bärenklau, und zwar wahrscheinlich um ein kleineres Exemplar des Riesen-Bärenklaus (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Kannst Du das bitte selbst ändern, da du so ausführliche Kommentare in die Beschreibung geschrieben hast, die für Bärenklau alle nicht so recht passen? Vielen Dank vorab und freundliche Grüße -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

sodala, die zwei habe ich korrigiert, mit neuem Namen hochgeladen, Beschreibung angepasst sowie einen Schnell-Löschantrag für die falschen zwei gestellt. Die oberen Nesseln mache ich auch gleich sauber. Danke noch und hoffentlich kommen nicht zu viele, der falsch bestimmten Blümchen. Liebe Grüsse aus dem Ländle --Böhringer (talk) 20:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Danke! Ich habe erst mal nur noch ein "a" ergänzt bei File:BergAhorn Acer pseudoplatanus 1.JPG. Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus Hessen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürsersee 09 Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice job! QI for me. --Chmee2 15:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ampfereule, Acronicta rumicis 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! But (in my opinion) it would look even better without that leaf in the background. --Bartiebert 21:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360 Grad Wildgrubenspitzen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupula Edelkastanie, Castanea sativa 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As for me, good!.--Vizu 19:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canadair CL-415 Kroatien 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow. Featurable IMO --Jebulon 22:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brombeerspinner Raupe Macrothylacia rubi 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Geocoded, unobstructed, DOF and exposure are fine. --Wsiegmund 22:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gewöhnliche Rosskastanie, Aesculus hippocastanum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition and good colours -Tobi 87 09:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpen Edelweiß, Leontopodium alpinum 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saulajoch 2065 Wildberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments FP ?--Jebulon 23:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Canadair CL-415 Kroatien 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canadair CL-415 Kroatien 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Alpabtrieb Schwarzenberg

Guten Morgen Herr Böhringer,

wir haben Ihr Foto vom Alpabtrieb 2009 gesehen und wollten uns erkundigen, ob dieses Bild für eine Imagebroschüre Schwarzenbergs verwendet werden darf?!

Für eine rasche Rückmeldung bedanke ich mich ganz herzlich im Voraus!

Liebe Grüße, D. Hammerer Tourismusbüro Schwarzenberg

kein Problem, irgendwo sollte halt ganz klein "Foto by Böhringer" stehen. --Böhringer (talk) 15:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopfloser Böhringer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wunderbare Idee ! But please correct the tilt (horizon).--Jebulon 23:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)  Info  Done I corrected the tilt --Carschten 15:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)  Support Ok. --kallerna 11:11, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File:2008_Sagrada_Familia_28.JPG

File:2008_Sagrada_Familia_28.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cmprince (talk) 14:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image

Hi Böhringer. I cropped your image: File:Nationalpark Krka Kroatien 03 edit1.jpg. If you could make a similar, but a higher resolution crop from one of your originals, it will be a better composition than the one you have now IMO, because the fall would be framed by the trees. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skradin Kroatien 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Bgag 23:59, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Foto Heißluftballon

Danke für das tolle Bild! http://www.chronoblogie.de/?p=562 Gruss chrob

gerne --Böhringer (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

English description

Hi Böhringer, can you please translate the description of your pic in english language? So I can add the image in some wikipedia article :) Thanx. --95.232.152.85 17:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

 Done --Böhringer (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Tischlerarbeit

Hoi Fred

Bin beim Studieren der verschiedenen Stösse beim Tischlern auf deine super Illustrationen gestossen, vielen Dank fürs Erstellen. Hier bei uns muss man dem Tischler genau sagen, wie er einen Tisch, Bett etc. machen soll. Da lohnt sich ein bisschen Stöbern in WP! En guete Rusch is neue Jahr --41.59.3.197 18:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

• • gern geschehen; dafür ist die WP wirklich gut. Ebenfalls an guata Rutsch. --Böhringer (talk) 09:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vordere Parpfienzalpe, Vandanser Steinwand.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut! --George Chernilevsky 11:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Denkmal Johann Strauß (Sohn)

Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer, für das Buch "Wir vom Jahrgang 1932", Wartberg-Verlag, würde ich gerne Ihr Foto vom Johann-Strauß-Denkmal http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:JohannStrauss_02.jpg verwenden. Falls möglich bitte ich Sie um einen kurzen schriftlichen Vermerk an der@textmaker.at, in dem Sie mir das für alle Auflagen der Publikation genehmigen. Als Fotocredit würde ich böhringer.friedrich/CC-BY-SA angeben, es sei denn Sie wünschen etwas anderes. Als Bildgeber stünde Ihnen auch ein Belegexemplar zu, wenn Sie das in Anspruch nehmen wollen bitte um Bekanntgabe einer Zustelladresse. Vielen Dank für Ihr Entgegenkommen, mit freundlichen Grüßen Helmuth Santler

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsteinpanorama Sennwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 18:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotfuchs, Vulpes vulpes 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vulpes amat fraudem, Lupus agnum, Foemina laudem.--Jebulon 23:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zimba vom Saulakopf 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschengla Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and useful. Great annotations job !!--Jebulon 18:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rätikon Panorama Saulakopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Meets the criteria for me.--MrPanyGoff 10:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinadler Augenschlag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice, but the border should imo be much smaller --Mbdortmund 23:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC) *I share that opinion, because the editing is very interesting. May be a gray color for the border. --Archaeodontosaurus 15:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC) Good now. --Mbdortmund 20:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynx lynx, Luchs 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Ankara 23:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Even the haze in left-down corner, still QI --Chmee2 09:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tschengla Bürserberg 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 21:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Tschengla panorama (in FPC)

Hello Friedrich Böhringer.

Because I like this picture very much, I've tried to make some little improvements on it, especially according to Benh's review & comments.

I've uploaded it over your own file, but reverted to your personal version.

If you enjoy it, please feel free to use it as if it was made by you.

I've only reworked the sky with the mountain backround (over the clouds), levels and contrast, and the snow at right (but not the trees), brightness.

Nothing else.

I used masks in GIMP.

Thank you for this beautiful picture, and for the very interesting annotations.

Freundliche Grüẞe aus Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

vielen Dank, das ist ok so :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 07:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinadler, Aquila chrysaetos 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 21:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotwild, Cervus elaphus 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting, composition, DOF and background. Useful. Please add to Cervus elaphus. Wsiegmund 00:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

new version of the image that you proposed as FPC

Dear Böhringer,

I tried an edit at the image you have proposed as FPC. I think that the color of the snow now is more natural.. If you like my version update your image with my image.. and we can request to delete my edit. Ggia (talk) 23:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

dieses Bild ist perfekt bearbeitet. Bitte so lassen. --Böhringer (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tschengla Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tschengla Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot 14:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausziege, Capra aegagrus hircus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 09:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohe Wacht Skigebiet Mellau Damüls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice --Taxiarchos228 15:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Faschina Panorama

Hallo, gerade habe ich eine Nachricht von dir in meinem User talk gefunden, jetzt ist sie wieder weg, warum auch immer. Gerne mache ich dir die Übersetzung, aber bitte: Was heißt auf links - ist das von links gesehen? Ich kann es sicher nur unvollkommen übersetzen, aber es wird schon gehen. Ich probier's mal. Grüße, --Schnobby (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

ja, da müsste ein Komma noch rein. Es sollte sinngemaäss heissen: Von links gesehen.

danke vorerst für den Versuch. Das können ja andere wieder korrigieren, wenn es nicht genau passt. :-) --Böhringer (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Fred, ich habe es mal übersetzt (steht auf meiner Diskussionsseite in Wikipedia) und schreibe es unter dein Bild in Commons. Stimmt schon, wenn es nicht perfekt ist, kann man es nachträglich korrigieren. Bei den Eigennamen habe ich kaum etwas verändert. Schönes Foto übrigens! Ich habe auch dafür gestimmt. Gruß, --Schnobby (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

oh, vielen herzlichen Dank für beides! Hoffe, ich darf wieder einmal Deine Hilfe in Anspruch nehmen. --Böhringer (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Klar doch. --Schnobby (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Banstar

Vielen Dank für den Barnstar! Ich fühle mich sehr geehrt. Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 07:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

habe ich gerne gemacht --Böhringer (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapperswil SG Panorama 02 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Taxiarchos228 07:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Faschina Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Faschina Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Dear Böhringer, Thank you for the Photographer's Barnstar . Im very happy Regards Masaki Ikeda

Danke!

Hi Böhringer, vielen Dank für den netten Barnstar von dir - hat mich sehr gefreut! Bin gerade erst aus dem Urlaub zurück, daher mein Dankeschön mit etwas Verspätung. Wünsche dir weiterhin gut Licht! :-) --AngMoKio (座谈) 11:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapperswil SG Panorama Februar 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI or even more --Taxiarchos228 10:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gais AR Dorfplatz Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent ! --M0tty 20:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Diedamskopf panorámico flash html

http://www.wuala.com/Manuel%20Vega%20Velazquez/Fotos/Fotografias%20Panoramicas/Diedamskopf

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rapperswil SG Panorama Februar 2011.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rapperswil SG Panorama Februar 2011.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gais AR Dorfplatz Panorama 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gais AR Dorfplatz Panorama 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpendohle, Pyrrhocorax graculus 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Kopfloser Böhringer.JPG

Hi Fiedrich,

I really found your photo not only charming but of such fine caliber that I used it on my blog. Take a look. I appreciate that you have made it available without any strings!

Thank you,

David C. Wood

das ist ok, wo sehe ich deinen blog?

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchsmanguste, Cynictis penicillata 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Good FP candidate for me --George Chernilevsky 22:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Krippe Wolfurt 5.JPG

Hi! I#ve seen your images of the nativity. Presumably the statues have been painted by de:Alois Kostner, the brother in law of Ferdinand Stuflesser. Do you have any evidence (signature on the statues?) to prove that. In that case I could put some work of Kostner on his article.Thanks--alpinus5 (talk) 08:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

kein Beweis! Auf der Krippe rechts unten im Bild habe ich diese Informationen abgeschrieben. Ich denke, das sie nicht falsch ist. --Böhringer (talk) 11:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Alles klar, besten Dank --alpinus5 (talk) 18:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erdmännchen, Suricata suricatta 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Vorsäß Vorderhopfreben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful ! --D4m1en 08:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks by your beautifull image. I used it in "www.facebook.com/ecologistas.leon"

Enrique Garzo Cano León - Spain

gerne --Böhringer (talk) 15:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

File:070429_21.JPG

File:070429_21.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Torsch (talk) 21:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

mach was du willst damit, habe kein Problem wenn das Bild gelöscht werden sollte. --Böhringer (talk) 19:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Erdmännchen, Suricata suricatta 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Erdmännchen, Suricata suricatta 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Feldhase, Lepus europaeus 6a.JPG

Hi Böhringer Friedrich

I want to use your great picture of a hare in a media release. While I will acknowledge you as the photographer, I can't guarantee that the newspapers here will. Is this OK?

Regards.

Marion.

das ist ok. :-) --Böhringer (talk) 08:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

MS_Sonnenkönigin_01.JPG

Dear Bohringer

I am very much interested in using your photo MS_Sonnenkönigin_01.JPG in a feature about a Mercedes-Benz Club Rally for the Mercedes-Benz Club Gazette.

Please could you let me know whether it would be OK to do this?

This would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards

Annabelle

ich habe dir per E-Mail geantwortet --Böhringer (talk) 19:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schimpanse, Pan troglodytes 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Makele-90 22:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Bild

Lieber Herr Böhringer,

Wir würden gerne das Bild der U-Bahn Station Stadtpark Wien für die Modellbeschreibung in Minimundus - die kleine Welt am Wörthersee, verwenden, damit unsere Besucher das Originalbild mit dem Modell vergleichen können.

mfg aus der kleinen Welt Claudia Dörfler

hab ihnen per E-Mail geantwortet --Böhringer (talk) 19:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schimpanse, Pan troglodytes 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info beautiful picture but there is a dust very disturbing who need to be delete before promotion --Croucrou 08:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Done--Böhringer 20:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)  Support Looks good now. --Makele-90 22:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle in Brenden, Doren.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)  Comment please remove the dust! --Carschten 20:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, New version File:Kapelle in Brenden, Doren - retouched.jpg, to me without several errors, but the image have still little zones underexposed. The original image has vertical distortion, tilted, noise at the sky, and a little vignetting. --Lmbuga 21:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC) To me the image can be QI, but it is not the best possible--Lmbuga 21:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schimpanse, Pan troglodytes 3.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schimpanse, Pan troglodytes 3.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Kirchplatz 2 Hohenems.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition imo. --Cayambe 09:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Nutzung Ihres Bildes

Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer, unser gemeinnütziger Verein Medienbildung Eine Welt e.V. möchte ihr Rosenfoto gerne für ein entwicklungspolitisches Projekt nutzen. Wir nennen Sie selbstverständlich als Bildautoren und würden uns freuen, Ihnen den Link des Internetblogs nach Fertigstellung zu senden.

Falls Interesse daran besteht, freuen wir uns über eine kurze Nachricht an: info@mbew.org

Vielen Dank! Und viele Grüße

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hl Martin im Lorenzerhof, Lana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tadellos! --Ralf Roletschek 14:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurhaus 1874 Meran 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting --Jebulon 15:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hauhechel-Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus Paarung 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hauhechel-Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus Paarung 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Kastelbell, Tschars.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:59, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurhaus 1874 Meran Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botanischer Garten Meran 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beschreibung könnte besser sein. --Mbdortmund 23:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hl Johann Nepomuk, früher Mariahilf in Lana 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerpromenade, Meran 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringelnatter, Natrix natrix mit Teichmolch 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow!...very good!--Jebulon 22:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Ebnit0205.JPG

Hallo Böhringer, hättest du bitte zu dem Bild eventuell noch eine rahmenlose Variante, nach {{Remove border}} sollten Bilder rahmenlos sein. Ein Wegschneiden des Rahmens ist bei diesem Bild vermutlich nicht einfach. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki,

warum muss der Rahmen weg? Und wer bestimmt hier so etwas? Hier handelt es sich um eines der ersten Bilder, das ich hochgeladen habe. Ob ich dieses Bild noch rahmenlos habe muss ich erst im Archiv nachsehen. Ich weiss nur, ich habe einmal für ein Ebniter Reitsportverein dieses Bild für die Homepage so gemacht. --Böhringer (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haflinger Hengstfohlen 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 20:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haflinger Hengstfohlen 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 06:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)