User talk:Bgag/Archives 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Tarragona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. ZooFari 22:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaça Nova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Angle seems a bit strange, but great clear colours none the less. --Jolly Janner 19:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brihadeeswarar Temple 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, good enough. Yarl 16:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria del Miracle Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, good photo --Pudelek 16:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amphitheatre of Tarragona 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 13:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amphitheater of Tarragona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support General shot that shows well the amphitheatre of Tarragona and its situation between town and see. Criteria met. --Coyau (talk) 10:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment The current phrasing of the scope seems to present Tarragona as a subscope of "Amphitheater". Could it be rephrase to something like "Amphitheater of Tarragona"? --Eusebius (talk) 10:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree but I'm not sure which is better: Amphitheater of Tarragona or Tarragona Amphitheater? --Bgag (talk) 14:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

  I'd say "Amphitheater of Tarragona", according to a Commons category naming custom: avoid inversion, prefer "X of Y". Not a clear rule, though. --Eusebius (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Done OK, done. --Bgag (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Majahilo River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Tarragona 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful. --Cayambe 21:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crypt of Santa Eulalia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- H005 00:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Tarragona 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Tarragona 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and lighting.--Cayambe 09:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isalo National Park 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannon in Bastion of St. Dominic, Tarragona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 11:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eulemur rufus (Red Lemur).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 09:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Batlló 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, though it would be nice to see the entire house. Could you please expand a bit the story of the house? A Wikipedia-link to this famous building would also be useful. --Cayambe 11:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment I have added some information in the description. It's almost impossible to take a good picture of the entire building. You can see some here. --Bgag 13:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment Ok, thanks for the feedback. --Cayambe 14:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Lleó Morera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 15:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Milà 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I love the subject. However these seems to be some fringing/ca on the left hand side of the towers? --Herbythyme 17:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Should be better now. --Bgag 22:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Thanks - qi and nice image :) --Herbythyme 15:41, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital de Sant Pau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Archaeodontosaurus 07:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastion of St. Dominic, Tarragona 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and good. --Cayambe 16:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sagrada Familia 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Güell 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Berthold Werner 13:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbey of Montserrat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cova Chapel, Montserrat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice place, excellent work. --Cayambe 09:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torii and Itsukushima Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iotatau 16:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Palace of Madrid 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and symmetric, also sharp. Good! --MichaelBueker 11:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Palace of Madrid 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 20:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Palace of Madrid 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 20:08, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almudena Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. -- Smial 23:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de la Panadería.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Smial 00:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almudena Cathedral 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 16:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Calle de Botoneras, Madrid.jpg

I had forgotten a notification about File:Calle de Botoneras, Madrid.jpg prior to your fix. Apologies for that. ZooFari 17:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Paja 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 13:10, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment There is a CW tilt of about 1.0 degree, though, see middle horizontal wall joint, it could be corrected. --Iotatau 13:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 17:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks! --Iotatau 18:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Paja 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 13:10, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment There is a CW tilt of about 1.0 degree, though, see middle horizontal wall joint, it could be corrected. --Iotatau 13:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 17:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks! --Iotatau 18:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basílica Pontificia de San Miguel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope IMO, all criteria met. The perspective distorsion amplifies the convexity of the facade, but as the singular convex shape is the main distinctive feature of this church (see [1] for instance: (in Spanish) "se trata de una de las construcciones arquitectónicas más relevantes del barroco español, por la singular forma convexa de su fachada, poco habitual en el país y única en el barroco madrileño."), it isn't really disturbing, on the contrary.--Myrabella (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Artillería, Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Segovia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 17:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Vera Cruz, Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iotatau 07:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery of Santa Maria del Parral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me --Archaeodontosaurus 18:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Alcazar of Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC). Former Null vote corrected now. --Cayambe 14:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment perspective correction necessary --Berthold Werner 13:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 15:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC) Good. --Berthold Werner 09:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hermitage of La Santa Cueva de Montserrat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met. Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Archaeodontosaurus 18:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The photo would look more dynamic if most of the wall to the horse's left was cropped out, I think. -- Avenue 04:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 22:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC) Much better, thanks. There are some blown highlights, particularly on the breastplate, but IMO they are small enough to pass. -- Avenue 03:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery of Santa María del Parral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met, best in scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Husa Imperial Tarraco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --Iotatau 22:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Segovia 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a pleasure to see an easy promotion :-) --Iotatau 07:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, nice composition. Elekhh 02:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good contrast to background, althoug everything is sharp. --Ikar.us 14:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell tower of Church of San Martín, Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good: it meets the guidelines. --Elekhh 06:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de San Martín, Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, well detached from the difficutl background. (Would prefer the car cropped.) --Ikar.us 17:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casa de los Picos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support criteria met , best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Artillería, Segovia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Elekhh 21:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Nicolás, Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The cars are a bit disturbing... but QI nevertheless. --Cayambe 07:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Segovia 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exemplary composition. --Iotatau 23:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)  Comment Geolocation corrected. --Ikar.us 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Segovia 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Geolocation corrected. --Ikar.us 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Justo and Church of El Salvador, Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Ikar.us 12:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of Segovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is toolserver out of sync now? Doesn't reflect the changes yet. Anyway, thanks. --Ikar.us 23:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ES1526-Aqueduc de Ségovie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 17:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Juan de los Reyes, Toledo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting --George Chernilevsky 08:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tympanum of Puerta del Perdón, Cathedral of Toledo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:37, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Segovia 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI. --Elekhh 21:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Vieja de Bisagra, Toledo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Meets QI criteria. Fred Hsu 01:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Santiago del Arrabal, Toledo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Meets QI criteria. Fred Hsu 01:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Juan de los Reyes, Toledo 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 19:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Juan de los Reyes, Toledo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 19:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrio de Antequeruela, Toledo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Elekhh 23:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta Nueva de Bisagra, Toledo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Elekhh 23:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Cambrón, Toledo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery of El Escorial 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Toledo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Chaotically Zen-like capture of the Toledan spirit. I approve. Fred Hsu 00:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery of El Escorial 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signs in Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like. --PetarM 21:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Tarragona 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, imo. --Coyau 23:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmyra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 11:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road sign Palmyra Irak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 22:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silk Tomb, Petra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street of Facades, Petra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 06:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastery of El Escorial 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gravestone in Damascus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is something over the stone. (?) (I would have removed the levitating branches in the upper right corner.) --Berthold Werner 12:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)  Done Probably a bird. I have removed it and also some branches. --Bgag 22:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC) There is one small part of the branches left that should also be removed, but already  Support from me. --Berthold Werner 06:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcázar of Segovia 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The room is tilted to the left. You should fix it first. Скампецкий 23:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)  Done--Bgag 23:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC) * Support OK --Ianare 19:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments this photo is OK --Pudelek 11:18, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Takiyya as-Süleimaniyya Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice. I was there just a few days later and couldn't take a clean picture of the mosque. Just curious, what focal length did you use? I think I remember I missed some distance (the grids were shut). --Eusebius (talk) 12:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theater of Amman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, useful for WP--Jebulon 09:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roman theater of Amman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Please check the geotag. Isn't it too far considering the lens focal length used? (object location is N 31.95169 E 35.93930). --Myrabella (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I am willing to support if the geotag as stated by Myrabella is corrected. I feel the correct co-ordinates for the camera location should be N 31.95195 E 35.93833. --JovianEye (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I have made a little correction but I was more far than you think, I really was on the site of the Citadel. I have a 20X zoom on my camera. --Bgag (talk) 17:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)]]
•  Comment The minimum focal length for your camera model is 5mm based on the tech specs. The lens focal length in the metadata is 20.2mm. That means the image was shot at a little over 4X zoom. So, IMO the geotag is still too far from the camera location. Also, wasnt this shot taken from a tall building as clearly suggested by the view! --JovianEye (talk) 20:35, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
  • You can feel coordinates? Ever thought of a geodesy career? Unfortunately, the tall building that the felt coordinates indicate is the one whose roof is visible in the right part of the picture... --Ikar.us (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The new geotag seems enough and OK to me. Jovianeye, it can't be where you suggest, because we see that building in the right bottom corner. And we can trust the nominator/creator when he says that he took his photo from the site of the Citadel :-) All criteria met now, the most valuable image of its category IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support too. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --JovianEye (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret of Jesus, Omayyad Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Coyau 00:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serjilla 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Coyau 00:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Hamidiyah Souq, Damascus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  SupportAgain, jealous. --Eusebius (talk) 08:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Too many issues with lighting, blurriness, and the image is not used that widely suggesting limited importance that would make up for the flaws. Even the people who are standing still have problems with blurriness (perhaps there was some movement with the camera, see the lower right for confirmation - outfits are blurry). Ottava Rima (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Picture is largely over the quality requirements for this project. This place is very dark and the candidate picture reflects the atmosphere well. --Eusebius (talk) 14:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Please read project scope and guidelines before voting.  Support by me. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met. Lycaon (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the scope would improve if at least the country was added. Lycaon (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
  • That's fine too. Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 19:55, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 06:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église St-Michel-de-Bellechasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deir Mar Musa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness my be better but  Support for this extraordinary view. --Berthold Werner 13:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deir Mar Musa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some jpg compression artefacts, but otherwise good. QI for me -- Smial 13:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deir Mar Musa, Syria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think the scope would improve if at least the country was added. Lycaon (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met. Has an article on wikipedia and is best in its category. Lycaon (talk) 19:47, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azem Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp.. and informative. --Cayambe 21:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azem Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very shar and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 21:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Street of Facades, Petra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'm really unsure about the scope. I can't even find a mention of it in the English or the French WP article. It is listed as a sub-site on other websites though, but I don't think every item of this list (20-25 sub-sites for Petra) is worth a scope. --Eusebius (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it reasonable to sub-divide such a major scope, out of fear of only having a wideshot, and not pointing out high-quality shots that can be used to show smaller aspects in articles. However, I need to ask: What about things like File:Facade_at_petra.jpg? Presuming this is accurately categorized, it shows a much more interesting façade than the ones in this one, and I wonder if it might be more relevant? Not sure. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support For the 'Street of Facades' scope a photograph that shows an overall view ist imho better. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:04, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:48, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret of the Bride, Umayyad Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 09:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Saint Paul, Damascus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maaloula, Syria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I won't vote on this one... An MVR might be needed in a while :-) --Eusebius (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support For now the best available image for the scope IMO, giving an overview of the village. All criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 23:53, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I have finally stitched my version. It is more detailed, but less focused on the town, so I won't nominate it as a VI. --Eusebius (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apamea.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support One of my two favourites. Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Shows the site comparably to the others and in addition the vicinity. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
  • By the way, shouldn't the scope be more like "Ruins of Apamea, Syria"? Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
    • There is no currently active town of Apamea. Lacking a drawing of the intact ancient city, the ruin photo can represent it. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

MVR Scores: 
1. Apamea.jpg: +1 
2. Apamée - Cardo.jpg: 0
3. Apamée - vue des thermes.jpg: +1
4. Apamea 01.jpg: +2 <--
File:Apamea.jpg: Declined. 
File:Apamée - Cardo.jpg: Declined.
File:Apamée - vue des thermes.jpg: Declined.
File:Apamea 01.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Myrabella (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mar Takla monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mar Takla monastery 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good & useful --Ianare 08:31, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mar Takla monastery 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 18:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mar Takla monastery 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments also good --Ianare 05:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massey Ferguson tractor, Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusual but interesting subject. Hard light looks normal in this kind of countries. QI IMO.--Jebulon 15:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alamo Square, San Francisco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of Mausoleum of Saladin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very impressive... Oriental dream... Richard Lion-heart... furthermore, a QI to me--Jebulon 21:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC), Too much denoising. --Dschwen 18:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grace Cathedral-Ghiberti doors detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sound the trumpets, and fail the walls of Jericho ! QI now !! Hallelujah !!--Jebulon 16:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Comment Thanks McDortmund --Bgag 23:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convent of Our Lady of Saidnaya 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Needs no perspective correction IMO. --Cayambe 07:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Convent of Our Lady of Saidnaya, Syria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support File:Monastery St Sergios .JPG would be a competitor, but it shows less of the immediate surroundings (stairs, tower). --Eusebius (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convent of Our Lady of Saidnaya 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See annotations in image. --Jovianeye 05:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)  Done Corrected. --Bgag 23:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC) It's fine now. --Jovianeye 14:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wadi Rum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done.--Jebulon 23:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wadi Rum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers Village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 07:51, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful -- Archaeodontosaurus 20:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 18:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 14:12, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 05:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hall of the Knights 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks a bit oversharpened, but quite good IMO. --Jebulon 16:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 30-West Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 23:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 27-Chemin de ronde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 23:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 31-South Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light is not optimal (another moment of the day would probably be better), but very nice view though. -- MJJR 21:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Women of Puducherry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, très joli. --Jebulon 22:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheep of Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp --Mbdortmund 22:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Salisbury Cathedral

Lovely photo. I want to use it in the article on cathedral architecture etc. My only problem with it is that you have digtally "corrected" the perspective! Aaaargh! This isn't a "correction". It merely makes the verticals parallel. However, neither the eye or the camera really see them as parallel. And when you force them to be, it distorts everything else in the picture. To my artist's eye, those columns are now splaying out! That is a vault which will crash down, if they don't raise umpteen million pounds to prevent those columns from all falling over backward.

Frankly, I'm sick of the trend on Wikipedia Commons that calls digital manipulations "corrections" and then uploads them over perfectly OK originals. When it comes to a Gothic interior, (or an exterior for that matter) on of the overwhelming effects is that of height. Once you have killed the effect of height by straightening the lines nicely, you have lost a lot of the power of the building, and of your photograph.

Don't get me wrong. I utilise digital manipulation myself, though at a fairly basic level because I don't have a sophisticated program. It can be a good tool for fixing an image of a smaller scale object that you simply can't get far enough back from. That straightening tool is great for things like stained glass windows. And as for colour and tone, well sometimes you can resurrect an image that is so badly lit as too be almost invisible. And I have been known to cutn'paste intrusive heads, powerlines and temporary barricades out of otherwise good pics. But when people run an automatic colour "correction" on a Vincent van Gogh, a Renoir or a Botticelli, it's bound to be a disaster, unless the person knows with a fair certainty how the paints that the artists used should look.

The bottom line is, can I please have a pre-perspective-manipulated version of the Salisbury interior? Amandajm (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Bernard! Amandajm (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Takiyya as-Süleimaniyya 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--Jebulon 21:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street sign in Damascus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just a sign... but quality is ok... and it's useful, I think. --Cayambe 15:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 32-Aqueduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly overexposed imo, but no blown highlights,sharp and otherwise also good, therefore QI to me. --Cayambe 14:46, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noria in Hama 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fruit market in Hama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp for 1/30 Sek --Mbdortmund 01:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée maritime du Québec, l'Islet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade in Hama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 13:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hama, Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Criteria satisfied; well-composed. Wsiegmund 23:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosque in Hama, Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 00:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus in Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting --Mbdortmund 00:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Photo permission

Hi, Bernard - The City of Phoenix, Arizona is preparing an architectural publication and would like to use one of your photos in the book. The book is primarily on Modern architecture, but it also includes examples of other key buildings and styles leading up to the Modern movement, including the California missions. We would like to use one of your two pictures of the Santa Barbara Mission (either Mission_Santa_Barbara01.jpg or Mission_Santa_Barbara.jpg). This is a non-commercial use, so I believe we are OK under the license, but will you please verify and let us know to whom we should credit the photos? Our e-mail address is historic@phoenix.gov. Thanks - Kevin Weight, City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office, 200 W Washington St, 17th Floor, Phoenix AZ 85003. 148.167.2.10 23:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravanserai of Qalat el-Mudiq 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What are all those specs in the sky? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Birds --Bgag 03:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Ok for me. --Berthold Werner 09:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravanserai of Qalat el-Mudiq 09 - Stele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 10:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Eusebio_Francisco_Kino.jpg

File:Eusebio_Francisco_Kino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wknight94 ^talk 12:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Mattbuck 09:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 08:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good to me.--Jebulon 08:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky looks very noisy, IMO.---Jebulon 08:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC) I have uploaded a new version. --Bgag 17:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC) Much better now, thank you.--Jebulon 20:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful - and hier without tourist, the native doesn't disturb me --Haneburger 06:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC)How do you know its a native ? Prejudice ? --Jebulon 08:52, 21 August 2010 (UTC)FP material to me. --Ikiwaner 17:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 11 - Fluted columns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also g--Cayambe 14:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)ood.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 15:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportSoft but qualifies IMO. --Nevit 07:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apamea 20 - Column bases.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good detail there --Ianare 21:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)  CommentThe "Landscape" composition does not suit the vertical subject well. IMO framing a single column in "Portrait" mode, would be better. --Nevit 22:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ma'arrat al-Numan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ma'arrat al-Numan 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and informative--Jebulon 23:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serjilla 08 - House .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting subject. QI requirements met.--MrPanyGoff 23:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serjilla 12 - Lintel .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well presented detail.--MrPanyGoff 23:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serjilla 03 - Village Inn .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great colors. QI requirements met.--MrPanyGoff 23:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophagi in Serjilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok to me, though probably a bit overexposed. --Cayambe 08:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Khusruwiyah Mosque, Aleppo.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khusruwiyah Mosque, Aleppo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit noisy in the sky, but QI to me.--Jebulon 20:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Baron thermometer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good !--Jebulon 20:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 03 - Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 10:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serjilla 02 - Village baths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me -- Albertus teolog 13:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 13 - Great Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 22:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 14 - Great Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maybe some spots in the sky ? (not sure)--Jebulon 22:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 05 - Inner gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Valuable and good, despite the shadows. -- MJJR 09:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravanserai of Qalat el-Mudiq 10 - Stele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 06 - Inner gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 07 - Inner gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 09:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 19 - Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 02 - Bastion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be promoted after a perspective correction (the tower left, for example)--Jebulon 21:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)  Done--Bgag 21:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Good improvements IMO.--Jebulon 21:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammam Yalbougha al-Nasri, Aleppo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. — Jagro 11:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 26 - Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Albertus teolog 13:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo Citadel 27 - Right Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleppo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, although everything's wonky. Mattbuck 21:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bimaristan Argun fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice ! mais quel dommage que la symétrie ne soit pas exactement parfaite !--Jebulon 21:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Mosque of Aleppo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 11:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bimaristan Argun 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Intriguing how it gives the feeling of tilt while being perfectly level. Mattbuck 11:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 03:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Mbz1 03:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 10:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Apamea Cardo

Wow! Looks like you got ripped off! No wonder that guy's not on Flickr anymore!

My apologies; I have updated the image info. Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are two dustspots --Berthold Werner 17:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 17:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC) Ok too me --Berthold Werner 18:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door in Aleppo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 04:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 04:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 04:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 15- Graves of the monks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mud houses, Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse in Aleppo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --DKrieger 23:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC) I had a look at this image every time I was browsing here. And every time, I wondered why nobody had promoted this unique (and IMO very good) image. If I am wrong, I would be grateful for a short note!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, though the tight crop at left looks a bit unattractive to me. --Cayambe 10:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, even if the sky is not perfect.--Jebulon 23:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Voie romaine en Syrie

Bonjour Bgag.
Bravo et merci pour vos belles photos d'orient.
Je trouve votre Voie romaine réussie, et très intéressante sur un plan historique et documentaire. Je suis toutefois un peu gêné par le bosquet de droite, que je trouve particulièrement sombre et sous exposé. l'arbre vertical (if ?, cyprès?) est ainsi presque noir, on n'en voit aucun détail. Je pense que c'est aisément correctible avec une simple retouche d'éclaircissement sur la zone. Le reste est très bien. Voilà le sens de ma remarque, j'espère avoir été, (moi aussi !) plus clair. C'est plus facile dans sa langue maternelle...
Bien cordialement depuis Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Bonjour Bgag.
Moi je le trouve bien à sa place, l'arbre. Il contribue à l'atmosphère... Le supprimer risquerait de se voir... Je ne sais pas vraiment, mais je crois que je le laisserais.--Jebulon (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Jebulon 21:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a frontal view should have benn more useful, but otherwise sharp and good.--Jebulon 21:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are one rather large dustspots (at right) and several other small ones in the sky. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 08:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)  Done I have removed them. --Bgag 17:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)QI to me.--Jebulon 22:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Simeon Stylites 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Jambiya en FPC

Salut Bgag
Je ne regarde jamais le nom du nominator avant de faire un examen de photo.
Donc je n'avais pas vu que c'était toi, l'auteur de ce poignard yéménite.
Il est très réussi en lui-même, mais la toile noire derrière est affreuse à mon avis. Au risque de te paraître très sévère, je trouve que c'est flou, plein de poussières, ou de petites saletés, et très "bruité". Je serais ravi de soutenir cet objet avec un autre fond, même s'il n'est pas noir, d'ailleurs. Qu'en penses-tu ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Bon, je vois que tu l'as fait. ça me parait beaucoup mieux ainsi, merci.
c'est vraiment très long avant d'arriver en bas de ta page... Peut-être devrais-tu envisager un archivage ? --Jebulon (talk) 11:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 06:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman road of Tall Aqibrin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and informative. Could you fix the dark black-green areas at right ?--Jebulon 22:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC) What do you mean? --Bgag 00:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)  Done I have imported a new version. --Bgag 17:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC) It's unfortunate that the tree on the right be cut, but nothing redhibitory there, and the photograph is otherwise quite good. I'd say promote. -- Rama 23:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Support suivi --Jebulon 10:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good one. Although it does not only display the Temple of Bel. --High Contrast 00:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)  Comment Yes, this is the Temple of Bel complex in the background. See the notes on the picture. --Bgag 01:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please help the poor reviewers by giving different names to your following nominations... But good and QI. The shadow adds, in a way... A geocode too...--Jebulon 00:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC) Comment The picture is geocoded. --Bgag 01:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, better if geocoded--Jebulon 00:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)  Comment The picture is geocoded. --Bgag 01:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmyra - Decumanus Maximus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 11:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balcony on Elahbel Tower, Palmyra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 15:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower tombs, Palmyra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jambiya.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jambiya.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theatre of Palmyra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmyra - Monumental Arch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 23:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Baal-Shamin, Palmyra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it.--V-wolf 01:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmyra Tétrapylon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--V-wolf 01:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmyra Tétrapylon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Jovianeye 21:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghorfas of Medenine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great contrast with those shadows on the bottom.--Murdockcrc 19:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmyra Tétrapylon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agora of Palmyra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 10:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City of Tadmor, Syria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but too interesting to decline. --kallerna 09:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple of Baal-Shamin in Palmyra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The main subject is well presented. I find the photo best in scope.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 08:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road sign Homs-Palmyra-Baghdad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work. I like it. -- MJJR 13:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diocletian's Camp, Palmyra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deir Mar Musa 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deir Mar Musa 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! License plate of Syria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 16:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deir Mar Musa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Cayambe 19:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Bel, Palmyra 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Razor-sharp, great detail and great texture. --Murdockcrc 21:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC) But the sky is noisy--Jebulon 17:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 00:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC) Thank you. Much better now. Could be FP ?--Jebulon 11:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sayyidah Ruqayya Mosque - Chandelier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krak des Chevaliers 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 07:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convent of Our Lady of Saidnaya 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Berthold Werner 16:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock of the Melkite Greek Catholic Church, Damascus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 10:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ville de Québec01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ville de Québec01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umayyad Square, Damascus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}