User talk:Lumbar~commonswiki

Silene littorea und Silene colorata

Servus! Für mich zeigen Image:Silene littorea.jpg und Image:Silene colorata b.jpg dieselbe Art. Bist du dir mit der Bestimmung sicher? Mir ist bisher Silene littorea noch nicht begegnet, so weiß ich nicht, in welchen Merkmalen sie sich von S. colorata unterscheidet. Grüße --Franz Xaver 23:47, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Sehr schwierig. Sie stehen bei mir so, aber ich stimme dir zu. In meinem Buch steht nur die colorata. Ich würde sagen, die colorata ist richtig bestimmt. Was machen wir? PS: Ich habe neue Pflanzen eingebaut. Lumbar 11:09, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Ich habe inzwischen ein wenig nachgelesen: Beide Arten besiedeln die gleichen Standorte, nämlich Sand im Küstenbereich, S. colorata zusätzlich auch im Landesinneren. S. colorata ist sehr weit verbreitet, S. littorea kommt nur auf der Iberischen Halbinsel vor. Der Bestimmungsschlüssel in der Flora Europaea verwendet zur Trennung Samenmerkmale, die übrigen Merkmale sind ähnlich. Das einzige sonstige Merkmal, das ich gefunden habe, wäre die drüsige Behaarung von Silene littorea. Bei S. colorata steht zumindest in der Flora Europaea nichts von Drüsen. Da könnte ich meine Herbarbelege nochmals vergleichen. Jedenfalls schaut das, was man auf den Bildern so sieht, nach einer stark drüsigen Behaarung aus. Da kleben ziemlich viele Sandkörner an den Haaren. Im Internet hab ich Bilder gefunden, nach denen die beiden Arten recht ähnlich aussehen. Ich tendiere aber bei allen drei Fotos eher zu S. littorea. Außerdem könnte sogar auch noch Image:Silene obtusifolia.jpg da dazugehören. Flora Europaea schreibt bei Silene obtusifolia: "stems 15-35 cm, erect, branched, ...". Das Foto macht nicht ganz diesen Eindruck.
Inzwischen ist übrigens ein weiteres Bild von Tuberaria guttata hochgeladen worden. Und das Bild schaut genau so aus, wie IMO die Art auszusehen hat. Grüße --Franz Xaver 12:00, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

"Ulex parviflorus" von der Algarve

Servus Lumbar! Ich hab mir jetzt endlich nochmals mit „Flora Iberica“ (Bd. VII, 1999) dein Image:Ulex parviflorus.JPG angesehen und denke jetzt, dass es sich wahrscheinlich um Ulex argenteus handelt. Aus der Ulex parviflorus-Gruppe kommt an der Algarve offenbar nur Ulex australis vor, nicht aber U. parviflorus im engeren Sinn. Ulex australis soll nach „Flora Iberica“ gekrümmte Dornen haben und von dunkelgrüner bis gelbgrüner Farbe sein. Von den übrigen von der Algarve angegebenen Arten scheiden für mich Ulex europaeus und Ulex minor aus. So bleiben also der häufigere U. argenteus subsp. argenteus und der damit eng verwandte, seltenere U. erinaceus, für die beide eine silbrig-grüne Farbe und gerade Dornen angegeben werden. Wahrscheinlich wirst du jetzt nicht mehr sagen können, wie lang die Kelche (bzw. Blüten) gewesen sind, ob (9.5-)10.5-12(-13.5) mm (U. erinaceus) oder (6.5-)7.5-8.5(-9.5) mm lang (U. argenteus subsp. argenteus)? Aber vielleicht hilft eine genauere Angabe zum Fundort: U. erinaceus wird nämlich nur für Cabo de São Vicente und Ponta de Sagres angegeben. Zuletzt gäbe es dann auch noch Ulex argenteus subsp. subsericeus, der mit (8.5-)9-10.5(-12) mm eine intermediäre Kelchlänge hätte, aber sich von den beiden anderen durch gekrümmte Dornen unterscheidet. Grüße --Franz Xaver 07:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Wow, nun bin ich aber beeindruckt von dir. Ich habe leider zZ überhaupt keine Zeit für die Wikipedia oder solche "Details" (nicht abwertend gemeint)... Hast du die entsprechenden Änderungen vorgenommen? Lumbar 09:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Nein, ich hab noch nichts geändert. Ich warte da noch darauf, dass du mir vielleicht einen genaueren Fundort verrätst. Damit könnte ich dann vielleicht eine Entscheidung treffen, ob das Ulex argenteus oder Ulex erinaceus ist - außer das Foto stammt von Cabo de São Vicente oder Ponta de Sagres. Da könnten es nämlich beide sein. Grüße --Franz Xaver 11:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Chamaerops humilis

Hi Lumbar - do you have locations where Image:Chamaerops humilis.jpg and Image:Chamaerops humilis b.jpg were taken? It would be useful information to have! - Thanks, MPF 10:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Lumbar~commonswiki!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 18:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Fagus sylvatica bark.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Plastiden ornigramm.png
• File:Lumbar animal mallard female.jpg
• File:Lumbar plant acerleaf sick.jpg
• File:Lumbar plant taxus arillus.jpg

BotMultichillT 20:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Permission to use Fennel photograph on Wikipedia Commons

Sept 1, 2010

Hello Mr Neilhaus,

I am a science researcher in Denver, Colorado, USA and my job is to develop academic and meaningful science experiment for the online undergraduate science student. The experiment is part of a lab manual (called a LabPaq) and is sold to students taking the course much as a traditional lab manual sold to students on a university campus. The difference is that our LabPaqs also include the supplies necessary to complete the lab outside of the college lab setting. We use microchemistry, small-scale experimentation and other methods to provide a safe and economical way for the non-traditional student. Many of our students are in the armed forces, working full time or they could reside too far from a traditional college campus.

I am in the process of creating and designing an environmental science LabPaq and would like to use your picture of a fennel plant in the lab about the food web.

Please contact me at your earliest convenience to tell me how you would like to be credited for use of the picture.

Thank you for your time, your picture was clear, balanced and will be an asset to student understanding.

Sincerely,

R. Natasha Galvez

I can be reached at Natasha@labpaq.com

You can view our website at www.LabPaq.com

File:Asphodelus microcarpus b.JPG

I have put this mage under the name Asphodelus tenuifolius, but with some doubt. The name Asphodelus microcarpus has been used at least three times for different species; A. fistulosus, A. ramosus and A. tenuifolius. It would be useful information to know where the photo is taken. Uleli (talk) 13:32, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Permission for photo

Lieber Lumbar, für unser Lehrbuch zum Thema Charles Darwin möchten wir gerne das Bild der Orchis italicus verwenden. Wir bitten Sie um die Erteilung Ihrer Genehmigung. Selbstverständlich erscheint Ihr Name in der Abb.-Liste.

Mit den besten Grüßen

Paul Wrede Charité-Universitätsmedzin Berlin Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin (Germany) paul.wrede@charite.de --92.78.190.225 17:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission for photo

Lieber Lumbar, für unser Lehrbuch zum Thema Charles Darwin möchten wir gerne das Bild der Orchis italicus verwenden. Wir bitten Sie um die Erteilung Ihrer Genehmigung. Selbstverständlich erscheint Ihr Name in der Abb.-Liste.

Mit den besten Grüßen

Paul Wrede

Dear Lumbar, for our student textbook about Charles Darwin we want to use your nice photo of the Orchis italicus. We kindly ask you for permission to use your photo for commercial purpose. Of course your name appears in the list of figures together with a hint of the licence conditions. With best regards Paul

Prof Paul Wrede Charité-Universitätsmedzin Berlin Molekularbiologie und Bioinformatik Arnimallee 22 14195 Berlin (Germany) paul.wrede@charite.de --92.78.190.225 17:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission to use Cistus ladanifer image

Dear Mr. Niehaus,

Thank you very much for contributing this image of Cistus ladanifer to wikipedia. I am currently preparing a text book chapter designed to provide students with an overview of plant chemicals and their industrial uses. With your permission, I would like to use the image of Cistus ladanifer for this book chapter. Please let me know if this would a possibility.

I can be reached under pzerbe@ucdavis.edu.

Kind regards, Philipp Zerbe

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Lumbar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Lumbar~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

21:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

04:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cloppenburg church st andreas.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cloppenburg church st andreas.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Lumbar animal bird 2.jpg
• File:Lumbar plant ephedra distachya.jpg
• File:Ophrys lutea.JPG

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wound sewed.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wound sewed.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Fehlbestimmtes Bild File:Hedysarum coronarium.JPG

• 
  fehlbestimmtes Bild
• 
  Hedysarum coronarium

Hallo Lumbar, Dein obiges Bild links wurde kürzlich von einem anderen Benutzer als fehlbestimmt markiert. Ich bin ganz seiner Meinung und würde nach meinen bisherigen Erfahrungen die Gattung Onobrychis als wahrscheinlich akzeptieren, auch wenn ich mich mit den Pflanzenarten der iberischen Halbinsel leider gar nicht auskenne. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2018 (UTC)