User talk:Aharonium

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aharonium!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Aharonium!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:GPL+FE.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GPL+FE.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mabdul 11:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:GPL+FE.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GPL+FE.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mabdul 11:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Coincidence[edit]

I just sat down to begin reading "nothing sacred" by douglas rushkoff. I then went to the Commons, and decided to review new files, and saw File:Open Source Judaism Logo.png there. i then went to the article its associated with, and saw 2 things: one, the term is associated with rushkoff. two, the logo further down the page File:The Open Siddur Project logo.jpg, for the open siddur project. Your logo is the one of the few times where a 12 color rainbow is in use. now, why is that a coincidence? because i myself created and posted the only other 12 color rainbows (not as well done as yours), at File:12 color rainbow flag.png and File:12 color rainbow flag triangle.png. perhaps this is more than coincidence. its certainly good to feel like im a part of something bigger...Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

w00t! double 12 color rainbow serendipitous coincidence! I've been strangely driven over the last couple days to get that page improved. It's strange since I've been working in open source and my Open Siddur Project for the last five years and only a couple days ago did I find that page and realize I needed to do something about it. It had a notability warning on it... Aharonium (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Siddur Torah Ohr images resolution[edit]

First of all, thank you so much for the scan of the Siddur! It is a wonderful resource!

In transcribing it, I have encountered some parts (examples are Nekudot at some places, and small instructional/footnote text) that are difficult to decipher due to lack of image resolution. Therefore I ask you:

Do you have a scan with a higher resolution, by any chance? If you do not, do you have the original Siddur of which this is a scan, in which case perhaps it can be rescanned in higher resolution? If you do not have an original, then do you know if/how it is possible to get a similar Sefer from this printing (or another which is in the public domain)?

Yasher Koach for your great work! :-) Hhm8 (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


File:GPL+FE.png[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:GPL+FE.png. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

CSD F6 (license laundering).

File:Heckert GNU white.svg is tri-licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0/FAL/GFDL 1.3-only of choice. CC0 is not a compatible license with any of these. Whether this work exceeds a threshold of originality and if CC0 could be applicable is… tricky, to say the least.

Author's rights to redistribute this work:

  1. Under CC BY-SA 2.0 have been automatically terminated per section 7(a) indefinitely.
  2. Under FAL license have been terminated per section 8 indefinitely.
  3. Under GFDL 1.3-only has been automatically terminated per section 9, and would usually provide an option to reinstate rights automatically.
For #1 or #2, Commons needs Commons:OTRS permission from Aurelio A. Heckert to reinstate copyright and redistribution. #3 isn't so certain, because CC0 is an irrevocable license and GFDL 1.3 terminates automatically if attempting to sublicense. OTRS permission is needed for all of these, it seems…

2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 10:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:GPL+FE.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GPL+FE.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 20:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:GPL+FE.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GPL+FE.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 20:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)