User talk:Editorcarolus

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Editorcarolus!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Pedro "El Mago" Septién Orozco.JPG

Hi Editorcarolus, who has drawn the original drawing, of which your image is a reproduction? --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Túrielo. I don´t know the artist´s name. It was given to me by the man who was drawn there.

As Mr. Septién is still living, you might ask him for the name. As explained below, a work created in 1995 is still under the copyright of the original artist (death +70 years). So we need his/her permission. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I see. But I´m afraid we have nothing then. Mr. Septien doen not know the name. It was taken from an old magazine article, from an artticle devoted to his career. I read the date. But the drawing could be even older.

Copyright is with the author, thats the creator of the original drawing. The copyright will expire 70 years following the authors death. Not knowing the original author does not mean that you can declare the drawing your own work, as you did with uploading it here. --Martin H. (talk) 14:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Maestro Enrique Gimeno Teixidó.jpg

Hi Editorcarolus, who has shot the original photography and when (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I don´t know who shot this. It was a studio picture in 70´s. But the owner (the person shot there) gave it to me.

Then we have a problem. An image shot in 1970s is still copyrighted as the photographer cannot be dead since 70 years (1970 +70 = 2040). Is there any further information (name of photographer or studio) on the backside of the print?

Please, always sign your comments with this string --~~~~ . --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I undesrtand it perfectly. But this studio and photographer cannot have any right on this image since it was bought by the person shot there, who gave it to me. It is common in Mexico to be shot by a studio and buy the picture. Immediately the owner becomes the one whou bought it. And later, his heirs.

This would be rather strange, but not impossible if you follow US law. In most countries of the world, the original photographer holds the copyright for his life +70 years thereafter. We'll have to check for this later. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Alright. And I can also say this picture was used sometimes in some concerts hand programme, so no photographer could ever had any right on it.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Maratón radiofónico.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Maratón radiofónico.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Maratón radiofónico.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I assume this is a scan from a newspaper article, right? --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

It is. This newspaper doesn´t exist anymore.

Do you have the full newspaper page? Then please look whether the article or the image caption mentions an author/photographer. Also you should add the name and the date of the newspaper to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I´ve done, Túrelio, even though I´m not sure whether ir was correctly set. Maybe you could tell.

File:Carlos Fuentes en Serenata, XEB.jpg

Hi Editorcarolus, who has shot the original photography? --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Túrelio. It was me who shot this in 1973, too.

File:Radiofonía032.jpg

When has this image really been shot? The description says 2007 and 2009. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC) I cannot understand why there are two dates. The correct one is 2007. I have already corrected it.

File tagging File:JorgeRiveroporCarlosFuentesyE.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:JorgeRiveroporCarlosFuentesyE.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Afeef (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Como en otras ocasiones, se daba por sentado que el permiso estaba otorgado, cuando se declaraba la titularidad de los derechos en la opción "soy dueño de los derechos" a partir de "trabajo propio". Todos los trabajos donados a este portal son, en efecto, trabajos propios y en la declaración realizada al subir el archivo, quedaba asentado.

En suma, yo mismo dono los derechos de esta imagen de mi creación al presente portal. Y, de inmediato, solicito retirar esta alarma. Gracias. Editorcarolus (talk) 02:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Luis Gimeno T..jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luis Gimeno T..jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luis Gimeno T..jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Afeef (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

El permiso de esta imagen, como en otros casos, estaba otorgado automáticamente al subirlo al portal como "trabajo propio". No aparece un epígrafe que hablara del autor, porque se usaba como imagen de la ficha, pero tampoco existe la necesidad de declararlo, a diferencia de los dibujos con atribución. Gracias. Editorcarolus (talk) 02:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

En todo caso, la autorización expresa ha sido enviada en ambas obras. Gracias. Editorcarolus (talk) 09:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)