User talk:Klippenstipper

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Klippenstipper!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Datum der Aufnahme des ORIGINALfotos ist gefragt

Hallo @Klippenstipper: Vielen Dank für das Hochladen deiner Fotos. Ich möchte dich auf einiges aufmerksam machen:

• Wenn du selbst ein Foto deiner heutigen Umgebung machst, dann ist im Hochladevorgang bei Datum dieser Zeitpunkt einzutragen. Also wenn du dich heute in Görries vor die Ruinen des Flugleitzentrums stellst und knippst, dann nimmst du das heutige Datum.
• Wenn du einen Scan alter Fotos machst oder diese abfotografierst, dann trägst du beim Hochladen das Datum des Originalfotos ein. Nicht das Datum des Scannens/Abfotografierens. Das machst du bisher grundsätzlich falsch. - Das Datum kann auch nur ein Jahr sein oder ein Zeitraum, wenn es nicht genau bekannt ist.
• Beim Abfotografieren/Scannen handelt es sich NICHT um dein Bild im rechtlichen Sinn. Bitte füg in die Beschreibung ein, woher du das Foto hast. (Buch, Webseite mit Link ...) Auch Stadtarchiv Schwerin Nr. XY123 reicht nicht. Soweit mir bekannt ist, sind es nur Brosamen, die aus dem Stadtarchiv im Internet verfügbar sind. Online gibt es sonst nur die Findbücher. (Schwerin läuft wie immer der Zeit 100 Jahre hinterher *seufz*). Vor allem reicht dein Eintrag Internet nicht!
• Weil du nicht der ursprüngliche Fotograf bist, sind auch deine vergebenen Lizenzen für die Fotos falsch. Ich nehme an, dass du beim Hochladen als Formular Es ist ausschließlich meine eigene Arbeit. gewählt hast. Du musst aber Es stammt von woanders wählen. Dann bekommst du auch so etwas wie Der Fotograf ist vor mehr als 70 Jahren verstorben angeboten. Das Programm wandelt das Ausgewählte beim Hochladen in den richtigen Lizenztext um.

Ich empfehle dir eine Nachbearbeitung, v. a. Herkunft und die Lizenzen betreffend. Für das Datum habe ich es teilweise schon gemacht. Du musst andernfalls mit Löschungen rechnen bzw. rechtlich gesehen bist du als Uploader angreifbar, denn du bist verantwortlich für das Einhalten der gesetzlichen Bestimmungen. Dann fehlen die Bilder auch bei Wikipedia und das wäre sehr schade. Lies bitte hier dazu Commons:Lizenzen. Zugegeben, das dauert und man muss ganz schön nachdenken. Manchmal ergibt sich daraus, dass man leider auf das Hochladen verzichten muss. Wenn du irgendwo Zweifel hast, kannst du im Forum fragen (linke Leiste). Beste Grüße Tozina (talk) 13:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass es dir schwerfällt, existierende Kategorien zu finden. Du schreibst irgendwelche eigenen Namen, legst aber keine Kategorien an. Für Schwerin biete ich dir an, einfach Schwerin auszuwählen. Das ist die Hauptkategorie, in die ich von Zeit zu zeit schaue. Ich mache dann für dich die Feinkategorisierung auch über die Stadt hinaus, z. B. für Personen und Flugzeuge. GrußTozina (talk) 13:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Logo Hanseatische Brauerei Rostock 640x640.png

Copyright status: File:Logo Hanseatische Brauerei Rostock 640x640.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Hanseatische Brauerei Rostock 640x640.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Julius Perzina.tif

Copyright status: File:Julius Perzina.tif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Julius Perzina.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:1913 Gustav Schulze DSC 4814.jpg
• File:1915 Fokkerschuppen Goerries Fokker A.II 1511361535.jpg
• File:1899 Gesamtansicht.jpg
• File:1907 Schwerin Fabrik Perzina.jpg
• File:1911 Hilgers DSC 0007 Hilgers.tif
• File:1940 Jacob Goedecker.jpg
• File:1912 Heinrich Luebbe Aviatiker 005.jpg
• File:1918 MAG Budapest Poster.jpg
• File:Reinhold Platz in 1921.jpg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1918 MAG Budapest Poster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1918 MAG Budapest Poster.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1912 Heinrich Luebbe Aviatiker 005.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1912 Heinrich Luebbe Aviatiker 005.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:47, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1940 Jacob Goedecker.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1940 Jacob Goedecker.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1911 Hilgers DSC 0007 Hilgers.tif

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1911 Hilgers DSC 0007 Hilgers.tif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Reinhold Platz in 1921.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Reinhold Platz in 1921.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1907 Schwerin Fabrik Perzina.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1907 Schwerin Fabrik Perzina.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1899 Gesamtansicht.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1899 Gesamtansicht.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 06:51, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1915 Fokkerschuppen Goerries Fokker A.II 1511361535.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1915 Fokkerschuppen Goerries Fokker A.II 1511361535.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 07:06, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:1913 Gustav Schulze DSC 4814.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1913 Gustav Schulze DSC 4814.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 07:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Julius Perzina.tif

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Julius Perzina.tif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 10:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)