User talk:TheSaint250
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific topic
[edit]lNeverCry 18:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Héctor Ferrer.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked soon
[edit]
/St1995 14:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
File:US House with Proportional Representation FAKE.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B (talk) 12:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
All files nominated:
- File:US House with Proportional Representation FAKE.png
- File:1942 House of Representatives Makeup FAKE.png
- File:1980 Democratic Primaries FAKE.png
- File:FAKE LOGO Centrist Political Party.png
- File:FRA FAKE.png
- File:FAKE Democrats.png
- File:PEI Election 2019 NOT REAL.png
- File:DeweyWins1948 NOT REAL.svg
- File:DeweyWins1952 NOT REAL.svg
- File:State of Italy FAKE.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1980fake.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2032.svg
- File:Senate 2018 FAKE.svg
- File:Alberta Election Map 2019 FAKE.svg
- File:Fakeparliament.svg
- File:2018 Austria election FAKE.svg
- File:Kingdom of Austria FAKE.svg
- File:1860 election FAKE.svg
- File:1860 election house FAKE.svg
- File:1864 election FAKE.svg
- File:Election map FAKE.svg
- File:Ny 2018 FAKE.svg
- File:Csa house election 2017 FAKE.png
- File:Election 1996 map FAKE.svg
--B (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:EP 2019 results by constituency.svg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:EP 2019 results by constituency.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Castillo blanco (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
File:EP 2019 results by constituency.svg
[edit]Hey, why on your map in Slovakia EPP did not won? They have 4 MPs --ThecentreCZ (talk) 11:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, ThecentreCZ! While I was originally going to put down EPP as the winner, the official website for receiving European election results apparently has EPP, S&D, and ECR receiving the same number of votes. I believe this was due to numbers before the UK leaves the EU, which is what I based the map on. --TheSaint250 (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- In France, both National Rally (ENF) and LREM (ALDE) got 23 seats. The comment under your map says that in constituencies where some groups have had the same number of seats, the groups with the most seats are displayed with hashing. Could you therefore reflect this in the map? Place Clichy 13:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, the same thing applies. In pre-Brexit predictions, RN won 22 seats while LREM won 21; however, you are right with the 23 for post-Brexit predictions. --TheSaint250 (talk) 17:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)