User talk:Vysotsky/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Vysotsky!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pierre Vinken.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pierre Vinken.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pierre Vinken.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vera (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Image replaced after clearance as Image:AMGATE 6059 138 TICH R202697542459865.jpg Vysotsky (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:EJBrill.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Done (information added). Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rijswijk1940.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rijswijk1940.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Prüm (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Information added. Vysotsky (talk) 20:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Stanislaus Kostka.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stanislaus Kostka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Clearance of copyright asked from holders. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC) Clearance given by copyright holders; proof deposited. Image replaced under different heading. Vysotsky (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:JimFouche.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:JimFouche.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikia is geen bron, net zoals dat je Wikipedia niet als bron mag noemen. Wikia is wat dat betreft nog minder authoritair aangezien het knip en plak werk is van fans. Er staan héél véél auteursrechtenschendingen op Wikia Vera (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Right. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vrouwenarbeid.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vrouwenarbeid.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Done. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC) And also:

Please provide hotlinks to where you found them on Europeana, Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Done. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Mail

Trijnsteltalk 22:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Gereageerd op mijn overlegpagina. :) Trijnsteltalk 10:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

File:GJelgersma.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:GJelgersma.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

File:GJelgersma.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GJelgersma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 22:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Categories: Chess players from...

Hello. Please, do not add categories "Chess players from..." to images which have their own categories, like File:Hans Ree 1968.jpg - there is category Category:Hans Ree which is in category Category:Chess players from the Netherlands. That doubles categories and this is mistake. Did you made many of editions such this? Please, correct that. Regards, pjahr @ 11:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The same to adding category:Chess grandmasters. If main category about player consists that category, there is no need to add this category to each image. You did a lot of mess... pjahr @ 11:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Didn't know that. I will correct the things I changed with players who have their own category. Thanks for the tip. Vysotsky (talk) 21:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I corrected everything, I suppose. Regards, pjahr @ 22:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 22:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:CarelStolker.jpg

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−

The File:CarelStolker.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.

JuTa 21:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


Clock

09:02 [update]
approx. 09:02 (or 21:02) displayed on clock/watch
Commons clock - made from this set [update]

Hi Vysotsky,

Thought you might like the clock on the right side. It is based on the time categories we discussed the other day.

Cheers. --  Docu  at 09:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Nice. Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Holiday wishes

Christmas Barnstar2.png Happy Holidays!
Vera (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | +/−

File:SimonvanderMeer.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SimonvanderMeer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

shizhao (talk) 03:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Scipione-riva-rocci-4.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Scipione-riva-rocci-4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

4 your information

Your edit in File:AratKilo.jpg

  • Category:Time 02:23 it means Time 02:23: clocks and watches displaying the time 02:23. For 12-hour clocks, this may be at 02:23 a.m. or at 02:23 p.m. (14:23)
  • Category:Time 14:23 it means Time 14:23: clocks and watches displaying the time 14:23 (2:23 pm). 12-hour clocks are categorized in category:Time 02:23

Greats --217.246.221.222 08:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I will keep it in mind. See also this proposal. Vysotsky (talk) 13:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Leiden109.JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:Leiden109.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 14:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Dank voor de melding. Ik heb het nog nagevraagd bij de maker van de op straat gefotografeerde poster. Hij had geen bezwaar tegen opname in Wikipedia, maar wilde geen CC-BY-SA-licentie afgeven. Terecht verwijderd dus. Vysotsky (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Bonaventura College

Hoi Vysotsky,

Ik zag een foto van jou gemaakt in het Bonaventura College te Leiden. Boudewijn Büch is daar opgeleid. Kun je er een artikel over in elkaar draaien? 151.40.247.75 13:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC) (Klaas `Z4us` V o.b.a. Patio)
Beste 151.40.247.75, Dank voor je vraag. Als je inlogt, zie je dat je mij ook een email kan sturen. Als je je vraag wat toelicht (waar is het artikeltje voor bestemd, wat moet precies het onderwerp zijn), wil ik er wel serieus naar kijken. Vysotsky (talk) 13:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Zo is geschied :-) Alvast dank voor wat je er mee gaat doen. Gewoon w:nl:Bonaventuracollege donorprincipe of zoiets. Ga je het niet aanmaken, even goede vrinden, collega!  Klaas|Z4␟V:  07:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Onze Jan

Hi Vysotsky. Category:Onze Jan Hofmeyr seems to be a duplicate of Category:Jan Hendrik Hofmeyr (1845–1909). Do you mind if I merge them? HelenOnline 15:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do. Thank you! Vysotsky (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Cambridge49.JPG

Copyright-problem.svg Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Cambridge49.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Railway timetables are eligible for copyright - the data (probably) isn't, but the presentation is.-mattbuck (Talk) 09:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Naturalis1.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Naturalis1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Images from Anefo

That would be right if these photographers worked for Anefo all their life, but they didn't. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Skip or workaround? How to connect otherwise? Vysotsky (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • BTW, Johan Cruyff is (WikiCommons) member of Category:Players of Feyenoord. Vysotsky (talk) 20:32, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Most of the individual images already have the category Images from Anefo assigned to them, so there is no need for it. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Perhaps link them to Category:Anefo - Algemeen Nederlands Foto ? Because all their photographs clearly aren't Images from Anefo, but they once were employees. And it's important to link them to Anefo as photographers too, in my point of view. Vysotsky (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
        • I understand. Okay, do what you think is appropriate. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
          • Thanks. I'll change to Anefo - Algemeen Nederlands Foto. If you look at it and think it's a misfit, don't hesitate and delete. Vysotsky (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Rename

Hoi Vysotsky, je vroeg om een hernoeming van File:Portret Marieke Bok.tiff. De naam die je voorstelde is echter mi ongeschikt omdat het lijkt alsof de persoon Leertouwer Bok heet. Ik stel voor km te hernoemen naar "Lammert Leertouwer by Marike Bok". Laat me weten wat je denkt en indien akkoord dan hernoem ik het bestand. Mvg, Taketa (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Prima! Vysotsky (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:AnkvdMoer.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AnkvdMoer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Vysotsky, ich habe es glücklicherweise bei www.spaarnestadphoto.nl gefunden. Du siehst an diesem Beispiel, wie wichtig es ist, den "spaarnestadphoto-PD-Baustein" zu setzen! (Ich habe mich schon gewundert über deine eigene PD-Begründung, denn hier schlagen sofort die Commons-Löschteufel zu). Könntest Du bitte einmal das Nationaal Archief prüfen, ob deren Bilder nicht ohnehin alle PD sind? mfg --Drdoht (talk) 11:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Stones1982KuipRotterdamMarcelAntonisse.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stones1982KuipRotterdamMarcelAntonisse.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

1989 20:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FvanRaemdonck.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FvanRaemdonck.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Image collections at Dutch universities

(not all PD or CC; keep copyright in mind)

Vysotsky (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

File:AyaZikken.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AyaZikken.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Buxtehude (talk) 12:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Cambridge42.JPG

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cambridge42.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


File tagging File:TKoopmans.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TKoopmans.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:TKoopmans.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

NickK (talk) 03:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Porto69.JPG

Hello Vysotsky The building is the Port of Leixões Cruise Terminal building located in the harbour of Matosinhos.Kolforn (talk) 07:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Great! Thanks, Vysotsky (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Porto Leixões Cruise Terminal

Hello Vysotsky I have requested that the title of [1] be changed to "Porto Leixões Cruise Terminal" as this reflects a more accurate description of the prominent feature in the centre of your photograph. A more accurate description will help search engines discover your image in Commons. I hope you are happy with this?Kolforn (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Archief Leiden

Hey, Hoeveel behoefte is er denk je aan het kunnen downloaden van hoge resolutie foto's van het archief van Leiden? Ik ben al redelijk ver met het reverse engineeren van waar je die vandaan zou moeten krijgen. Het implementeren van automatiseren is nog wel even een kriem. Ik zie dat je de 250x250 thumbnails uploadt, als je dat gedeelte van de URL verandert in 500x500, heb je al snel iets meer. --Vera (talk) 09:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Beste 1Veertje, Dank voor de tip! Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, ik heb de Dememorixer ontwikkeld. Nu is het redelijk makkelijk de volle resolutie te krijgen. Simpelweg de code die bij "insluiten" staat daar plakken. --Vera (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

File:LEI001018092.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:LEI001018092.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 09:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Samuel Sarphati

Wederom dank voor je bedankje. Het is toch wel grappig dat onze wegen daar weer kruisen. -- Mdd (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:AGvanHamel(Keltic).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AGvanHamel(Keltic).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Vysotsky. You have new messages at JotaCartas's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

OppenheimGijselaarLorentz1917.jpg

File:OppenheimGijselaarLorentz1917.jpg heeft een niet-werkende URL, kon hem zelf niet terugvinden. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Beste Sjoerd de Bruin, Dank voor je melding. Het klopt dat deze URL niet meer werkt. Nog vervelender is, dat het niet de enige verbroken link in GaHetNa is. Ik heb honderden zogenaamde "permanente" URLs overgenomen uit deze website van het Nationaal Archief, maar een deel van die links werkt niet meer, omdat ze in GaHetNa zelf inmiddels veranderd zijn. De permalinks naar ANEFO-afbeeldigen lijken allemaal nog wél te werken, maar de links naar veel andere afbeeldingen zijn verbroken. De afbeelding zelf is gewoon aanwezig in de betreffende website: de afbeelding waar jij over mailt, staat netjes hier, maar de URL is veranderd: de oude -nu niet meer werkende- URL is vervangen door een nieuwe URL die ook niet lijkt te werken. (En zoeken met de correcte naam van de Nobelprijswinnaar helpt niet, want hij heet in het bijschrift Laurentz). Ik merkte die op grote schaal veranderde links zelf op in augustus 2015, en heb toen per email navraag gedaan bij het Nationaal Archief, maar ondanks herhaling van mijn vraag nog geen antwoord gekregen. Ik weet dus ook niet of deze links uit GaHetNa allemaal handmatig in Commons vervangen moeten worden, of dat het op een andere manier [in GaHetNa] in orde komt. Vysotsky (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Security_Service_of_the_Netherlands

Sanandros (talk) 15:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified churches in the United Kingdom

Thankyou for donating your images File:Church21.JPG, File:Church22.JPG and File:Church23.JPG. They are categorised as "Unidentified churches in the United Kingdom". Please will you help to identify them? You describe the locations as "along the road from Cambridge to Harwich", but I don't know which road you mean. Do you remember the road numbers, or the names of some places you passed?

Thanks, Motacilla (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Within 10 miles from Bradfield? Vysotsky (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
3 unidentified churches now identified (Bradfield & Dovercourt). @Motacilla: thanks for asking the question. Vysotsky (talk) 08:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Vraagje

Ik zag je net hier een bron toevoegen. Op grond waarvan laat je de foto staan? De fotograaf is pas in 1983 overleden en ik zie -ook in die bron- geen toestemming voor gebruik. Het is in elk geval zeker geen eigen werk van de uploader. Ronn (talk) 16:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

De bron en het jaar heb ik toegevoegd om duidelijk te maken dat de uploader niet de foto gemaakt had (want hij of zij stond vast niet in 1930 achter de camera). Ik zal ook de licentie in twijfel trekken, maar ik wilde de uploader even een dag de gelegenheid geven er een andere bron tegenover te zetten. Wellicht dat de familie etc.? Vysotsky (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Ik ben geen voorstander van verwijderen hoor, maar de licentie moet wel kloppen natuurlijk. Had de fotograaf maar niet achterhaald, dan hadden we 'm kunnen laten staan omdat hij meer dan 70 jaar geleden anoniem is gepubliceerd. Haha Gr. Ronn (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Ik zeg altijd tegen mezelf: Blijf rustig en respecteer auteursrecht Vysotsky (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Avenue de France, Paris2015.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Avenue de France, Paris2015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Escher.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Escher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hop on Bananas (talk) 02:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:2011 Busquets 3.png

Hoi Vysotsky, mooi dat je wat foto's van de Praemium Erasmianum Foundation vrijgegeven hebt weten te krijgen. Kan je ervoor zorgen dat er een correcte toestemming in OTRS komt? Multichill (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear Multichill, Thanks need to go to SPE (Praemium Erasmianum Foundation). SPE sent me pictures of laureates still lacking a photograph in Wikipedia. I uploaded twelve of these photographs, and they are now used more than 60 times on several Wikipedia's (and even more on different user pages). I sent the letter in which SPE gave usage permission (CC-BY-SA-license) to OTRS-NL on 15 December 2015 at 14:24 hr. December is a busy month, I guess. Vysotsky (talk) 23:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Now I see the email in the OTRS queue. I probably looked in the wrong queue the other day. Great! Thanks for the effort. Multichill (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:WCWilliamsWallpoem.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:WCWilliamsWallpoem.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DieseEineIP (talk) 00:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Summary

Description
English: Concertgebouw Amsterdam, 1 Sept. 1967. Standing, from left to right: Michael Cooper, Mick Jagger, a pregnant Marianne Faithfull, Al Vandenberg, Brian Jones. Sitting:Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Photo by Ben Merk (ANEFO)
Date
Source GaHetNa (Nationaal Archief NL)
Author Ben Merk (ANEFO)


I would like to upload a cropped version of this picture in which only Maharishi appears and then use it on Wikipedia. Would you agree? Cordially--Am Ator (talk) 22:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

No problem at all. I now extracted this file -but you could try to use some of the other photographs of the Maharishi Yogi in the same collection, and upload or extract some yourself! Vysotsky (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Vysotsky for your prompt answer. I was not aware of the full collection. You are right it seems even better and particularly the very last picture would the best. Just to be cropped as a portrait. I am good in cropping but I am not sure I will be experienced enough to do the actual upload on Commons :-) (added by User:Am Ator)
Just try. It is fun to discover, try and succeed. Trial and error brings you to a next level. If you fail or wonder how it works, just let me know and I will happily assist you. Vysotsky (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind help. We'll see if I made it well - probably the name of the file is too long. Wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! --Am Ator (talk) 15:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
My pleasure. You did great. I added the name of the photographer to the description & categories, because I always like to give credit to the artists. Vysotsky (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure that I "did great": I got a message on my discussion page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Am_Ator#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7C1.3DFile:Maharishi_Mahesh_Yogi_.281st_Sept_1967_in_Amsterdam_by_Merk_Ben_from_Nationaal_Archief.29.jpg.7Cbase.3DImage_license.2Fheading.7D.7D
You advise would be welcomed - what to do now? (I don't really have the mind for these kinds of complicated things)...--Am Ator (talk) 15:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry. This was already fixed yesterday, when I added the complete license (CC-BY-3.0) and source to the image's description. You can sit back and relax. Vysotsky (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks once again! I "sit back and relax!" --Am Ator (talk) 22:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Elsschot

Is there anyone who knows why I (technically) can't upload this photograph from the collection of Letterenhuis Antwerpen to Wikimedia Commons? It is a photograph of Willem Elsschot from ca. 1920 from an unknown photographer, so clearly Public Domain, to my best knowledge. Vysotsky (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Tree after Pierre Alechinsky; poem by Yves Bonnefoy. Rue Descartes, Paris July 2015.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tree after Pierre Alechinsky; poem by Yves Bonnefoy. Rue Descartes, Paris July 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

A short question if I may

Dear Vysotsky, A friend would allow me to upload a picture that he has on flickr.com. It is licensed on Creative Commons under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Is it okay to upload it? I have a doubt since it mentions that "You may not use the material for commercial purposes."??? Awaiting for your kind answer, cordially, --Am Ator (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Am Ator, Unfortunately NC means non-commercial, so you are not allowed to upload the picture to Commons. You could ask your friend to change the license of this picture on Flickr to CC-BY. Vysotsky (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Vysotsky thank you for your answer. I had this impression but I am not so good in all this juridical things that is why I felt like taking your advise in order not to do some upload which would be deleted after... Have a great day!--Am Ator (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:TimKrabbéBoekenweekgeschenk2009.jpg

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | português | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:TimKrabbéBoekenweekgeschenk2009.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request. Ww2censor (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Grave of HPN Muller.jpg

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | മലയാളം | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Grave of HPN Muller.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:GSevenster.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GSevenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

File:WybrenElgersma.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:WybrenElgersma.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ronn (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

File:JoopZwart1960.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:JoopZwart1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:UiltjeDeJong.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:UiltjeDeJong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:AnneFrankSchoolPhoto.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AnneFrankSchoolPhoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Jan Foudraine?

Hoi Vysotsky, ik heb je bedankje gezien. En twijfel bij JFoudraine1975.jpg lijkt me inderdaad op z'n plaats. Op andere foto's is een bredere neus te zien, bijvoorbeeld hier en hier. Daar zie ik eerder gelijkenis met de persoon helemaal links op de 'donorfoto' DemoBoekovskiAmsterdam1975.jpg (die met de stropdas).
N.B. het plaatje heb je zojuist verwijderd bij het NL artikel over Foudraine zelf, maar hij staat nog wel in diverse andere artikelen (zie "File usage on other wikis"). Apdency (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Zelfs dat Foudraine helemaal niet op de donorfoto voorkomt hou ik voor mogelijk. Op DemoBoekovski1975.jpg zie je iemand met nogal zware wenkbrauwen (de man vóór het bord "Wij eisen vrijlating van Boekovski"), die had Foudraine ook. En de man daar draagt iets om z'n nek dat wellicht verband houdt met oosterse spiritualiteit, dat zou ook goed in het plaatje passen. Apdency (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Ik had de foto nog in diverse kranten nagezocht, en daar werd Foudraine in het onderschrift genoemd -ook bij de foto waar de man met het witte baardje niet op staat. Maar het lijkt er op dat de man met het donkere sikje in elk geval niet Foudraine is. Ik vraag of JFoudraine1975.jpg verwijderd kan worden. De man met het witte baardje zou mogelijk Foudraine kunnen zijn, maar laten we wachten met die toeschrijving tot dat 100% zeker is. Vysotsky (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
OK. Ik heb in de Nederlandse kroeg ook een vraag hierover gesteld. Apdency (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Zie de overlegpagina van Jan Foudraine. Vysotsky (talk) 08:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

File:GoudenKalfNFF.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GoudenKalfNFF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wendingen1928tenKlooster.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wendingen1928tenKlooster.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:LindaDeMol2012.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LindaDeMol2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:LindaDeMol2012.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ariadacapo (talk) 07:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Eysinga.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eysinga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File:KarlEberhardSchongarth.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:KarlEberhardSchongarth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:NIOD collections

Voor uw info: Lege cat, het zal worden verwijderd. Groeten, --Achim (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Re:Please stop

Commons:Overcategorization Cathy Richards (talk) 21:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

rest of the discussion Vysotsky (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Still

Hoi, ik zag je foto van Ahmet Polat, een still van Vorsten TV op YouTube. Op grond waarvan kies je voor de licentie CC-BY-SA? Misschien zie ik iets over het hoofd.. New Skool Media, de club achter Vorsten, is nogal strikt wat copyright betreft. Gr. Ronn (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Beste Ronn, De opgegeven licentie op YouTube -door VorstenTV zelf- is Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed). Remix this video. (Te zien door te klikken op Show more). Is een andere CC-licentie een betere vertaling? Vysotsky (talk) 23:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Ha, dat had ik inderdaad over het hoofd gezien. Het verbaast me, gezien alle restricties van de organisatie op hun site. Bij die omschrijving op YouTube past m.i. de licentie CC-BY. Ronn (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Je hebt

een dubbele cat gecreiert, en had beter het tl creator meeverschuifd en een cat redirect aangelegt.--Oursana (talk) 09:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Apologies if I caused any inconvenience. There are two persons named Arnold Hendrik Koning, so the addition of the years is needed to make the disambiguation clear between Arnold Hendrik Koning (1860-1945) and Arnold Hendrik Koning (1784-1850). Perhaps best to make the plain Arnold Hendrik Koning a disambiguation page? Vysotsky (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Photo requests in Amsterdam

Hi! Do you do photo requests in Amsterdam? WhisperToMe (talk) 02:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Yep (if you are not in a hurry) Vysotsky (talk) 10:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC) Vysotsky (talk) 10:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

There's no rush! Anyway I have the following requests:
  • Meidi-Ya Amsterdam (Japanese grocery store), Beethoven.Straat 18-20 1077 JG Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
  • Japanese School of Amsterdam: Karel Klinkenbergstraat 137, 1061AL Amsterdam
  • Lycée Vincent van Gogh Amsterdam: Rustenburgerstraat 246 1073 GK AMSTERDAM (NL)
  • British School of Amsterdam:
    • Nursery & Early Years: Anthonie van Dijckstraat 1a Amsterdam, 1077ME
    • Infant School: Jan van Eijckstraat 21, 1077 LG Amsterdam
    • Junior & Senior School : Fred. Roeskestraat 94a, 1076 ED Amsterdam
  • Russian trade representative building in Amsterdam at Veluwelaan 22, 1079 RA Amsterdam
  • Ahold Head office, Piet Heinkade 167-173 1019 GM Amsterdam The Netherlands - Map
Thank you!
WhisperToMe (talk) 11:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Clear. Thanks for the complete addresses. Vysotsky (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome! If I have any more I'll add them to the list :) - If you go to the Hague I can give you places from there too WhisperToMe (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
The Hague is even easier. Vysotsky (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Great! In that case I'll add those too
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Nationaal Archief

Thanks for fixing this upload. Please have a look through my contributions; there will be about a dozen uploads from the Nationaal Archief over two or three days. Problem is that I can't read Dutch, so I'm flying blind. Schwede66 18:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. Your uploads: nice amount of pics. Nice pics too. Metadata of the Anefo photographs were OK, apart from small things. I especially care about the names of the photographers. Vysotsky (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

File:AFTh1988.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AFTh1988.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:OrnsteinHulshoffPol1933.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:OrnsteinHulshoffPol1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:GroeneveltKroese.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GroeneveltKroese.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

47.150.70.205 23:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Writers from the Netherlands

Hi,

Ik zag dat je net een bestand in deze cat hebt geplaatst. Iemand heeft eerder vandaag zonder overleg deze hele cat overgegooid naar Category:Writers from the Netherlands to be categorised by name zonder te kijken of het nuttig is om bepaalde foto's op naam te sorteren. Mocht je je afvragen waarom die hele categorie bijna leeg is. Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Ik zag het ook. Deze foto past toch in die nu vrijwel lege categorie, omdat er allemaal niet-te-identificeren schrijvers op staan. Ik hoop dat de leegmaker ook die 470 categorieën van schrijvers aan gaat maken, anders is het een zinloze actie geweest. Vysotsky (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Writers to be categorised by name

Please note I did not create this type of category (existing before for Russia, Ukraine...). I believe theese categories are discussed. So I am waiting the decision. Best. 16:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC) (Previous message was posted by User:Palamède)