User talk:Beta M: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 144: Line 144:


If you did, what was meant by 'indulge their basest desires'? How is indulging this 'base desire' meant to achieve enlightenment? [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
If you did, what was meant by 'indulge their basest desires'? How is indulging this 'base desire' meant to achieve enlightenment? [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

:http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=pedophilia&diff=32287&oldid=31952 &ndash; An anon wrote that. After "MrDog" [http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=pedophilia&diff=32986&oldid=32495 rewrote the "pedophilia" article] in June 2008, Beta_M [http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=paedophilia&diff=33996&oldid=33977 created the "paedophilia" article] from [http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=pedophilia&oldid=32464 an old revision] of the "pedophilia" article. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 00:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:51, 11 March 2012

OWS

Hi Beta -thanks for categorizing but I'm going to update the descriptions/cats/etc for all the photos I am uploading in one fell swoop in a bit, so no need to expend your time. Thank you, though. --David Shankbone (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Beta M!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sergio k.jpg

Please use:

  • {{Vk}} which displays as  Keep
  • {{Vd}} which displays as  Delete

in Deletion Request discussions.  Oppose and  Support are ambiguous -- it is often unclear whether you support the image or support the deletion. Thanks,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i have discovered it already and have been using these votes. But previously i always meant Oppose as keep and Support as delete. Beta M (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupy_the_Present_-_Dig_Deep_-_Power_Up.transparent.png

File:Occupy_the_Present_-_Dig_Deep_-_Power_Up.transparent.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ŠJů (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Israel/Palestine

Please do not comment on further Israel/Palestine matters unless you are capable of remaining level-headed. Calling other contributors "genocidal maniacs" is not appropriate. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auto-fellatio.jpg

Hello, I closed this DR. However I would like to say that your comment there is wrong and not useful. Thanks, Yann (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "many copies on web" indicates a bad faith in nomination. There are many copies of images of butterflies on the web, that is not a reason to delete them all from Commons. And if my comment isn't useful to you, then feel free to ignore it, i'm not playing a populist game. Beta M (talk) 06:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupy_the_Present_-_Dig_Deep_-_Power_Up.transparent.png

File:Occupy_the_Present_-_Dig_Deep_-_Power_Up.transparent.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ŠJů (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horst_Widmann_portrait.png

Hello, thank you for help for this upload. I hope that now it meets the commons ways on licencing and it won't by deleted. Tell me ?
We could have a little chat on the words free and unlimited, which find their meanings in the vision of each of us...
But with your summarise, it have been more clear to me.
So thanks again. --Subiratsc (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the follow-up assistance. I'm Waiting now for the acceptance. Thx --Subiratsc (talk) 03:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volzhskiy_-_Karbyshev_memorial_02.jpeg

File:Volzhskiy_-_Karbyshev_memorial_02.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.187.102.99 16:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:W&J College tobacco silk.jpg

You commented on the undeletion for File:W&J College tobacco silk.jpg (archived at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2011-12). You might be interested to know that 2 days after that image was undeleted, it was again nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:W&J College tobacco silk.jpg.--GrapedApe (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on self nudity

Your involvement in deletion requests suggests that you might be interested in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Excessive posting of self nudity (exhibitionism). --Stefan4 (talk) 00:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Joaquim_Monchique.jpg

I took the liberty of changing your comment here -- "deleted" >> "restored" -- because the context makes it clear that that is what you intended to say and I was afraid that the other editor would be confused by it.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Of course that's what i meant, but i've been horribly busy and still am trying to stay active on Commons, hense such blunders. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 17:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding links

Please stop advertising (a site you have frequently repeatedly promoted). That is not appropriate use of talk pages. --99of9 (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

People wish to contribute content which is less and less welcome here. I am informing these people of a better venue. Please advise how should i do that. I consider e-mail feature to be too intrusive and too much like spam, talk pages are a safer way of giving an information, so i'm probably going to ignore your proposal if you were to suggest something like this. But i am open to other suggestions. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 14:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, i am being respectful about this. I have for now stopped posting anything which is similar to advising people to go to another project. I have asked for help as to the way i should proceed, in hopes of coming up with the mutually acceptable way forward. It would be appreciated if you do not simply use a threat-and-silence tactic to get your way. In good faith i am going to continue to wait for a while longer. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 14:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't get back to you. The problem is the link and the name of the site you are advertising. If you leave it general, your message might be ok. You're right that emailing the message would also be considered spam, but talk pages are not that different to email. Commons is not improved by advertising for other sites. --99of9 (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that you look at the case that is too specific (i.e. just Commons). I am not trying to benefit just this project but the free community in general, look at what is happening in the debates on whether or not something is in scope, quite often people do propose a better place for something. And anticipating what you may say, some of those projects are not Wikimedia subprojects (i'm thinking of Wikilivres for example). Many people upon learning that the licence that the author demands to have one's work to be distributed under is unacceptable here suggest Flickr and others. The thing that i have done differently is using talk pages of the specific uploader, because i believed that stating this on deletion requests themselves would be slightly disruptive. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 02:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well I choose to defend the interests of Commons. We have a longstanding prohibition against advertising on Wikimedia in general. As well as pushing it on talk pages, the other think you have done differently is to repeatedly promote a particular site. If you really can't take my word for it, I am happy to start a request for comment, but I'm pretty confident of the community feeling against direct advertising on Wikimedia. Now, if I may ask a pointed question: Do you have an interest in any way in the particular site that you have been advertising? --99of9 (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you want, i will have no objection to RFC. One way to move forward that i can think of is to change how i am going about what i was doing. Perhaps the single link with no explanation is a form of "advertising" (although i think that it's twisting of the definition), but i think there should be something on Commons which says "This content is out of scope, you may wish to explore these venues for sharing your content". When there were mass deletions of personal art works going on, i have on several occasions raising on DR discussions the question as to where people should go with these things (because many of them should be distributed even if not here), i think the best proposal that arose from this is Wikilivres or Flickr (i believe the former is a better choice, as it is the free knowledge provider while the other is just a personal file host). You are asking if i have any interest in the site mentioned, well, yes i do, not a financial or other reason, but psychological one (i want it to develop, it gives me happiness), but no i don't have any interest in "advertising" which i believe you are using as a power word to shift the topic of discussion (i.e. i have no interest in paying anybody to spread the information, no interest in adding the links to the unrelated material, etc. so nothing which is considered to be advertising). VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 05:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to summarise how i see the situation right now: 1) I have not been advertising, i was posting targeted notes on the people's talk pages who were already uploading material that could be removed from here; 2) Giving people an idea of the venue to place the content that maybe out of scope here does not take anything away from this project; 3) There should be something on Commons which directs people to other venues when Commons isn't such a venue, i am at this time unsure whether or not repeating it verbatim is the best way, maybe some page can be created and people can be given a link; 4) I have an interest in preserving freely licenced sexually explicit images, i think that would create a much healthier and freer culture (on Commons and in the world); 5) There is absolutely nothing wrong with the name of any site that i have linked to; 6) I am more than able to change how i go about preserving free content, but less inclined to stop doing that permanently. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 05:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, while i dislike your claims about advertising without any evidence, i do appreciate that you are being cool in this discussion. I believe that you are taking this issue about as seriously as i do, so i must thank you for that. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 05:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moore diagram of Binary Adding Machine.svg

Hi. You have added

All graph images in this gallery could be re-created using vector graphics as SVG files. This has several advantages; see Commons:Media for cleanup for more information. If an SVG form of this image is available, please upload it and afterwards replace this template with {{vector version available|new image name}}.

to File:Moore diagram of Binary Adding Machine.svg. I do not understand it because it is svg. Could you explain it ? Regards --Adam majewski (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File names

I have declined your request to rename Slavic-language files into English ones. Commons is a multilingual project and the name of the file should consider (i) Uploader's wish (ii) Words appearing in the file (iii) File usage, there's no reason to favor English over other languages. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, cheers, i will only request moves now where the name is actually wrong or non-descriptive. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 04:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uspehov. This might be my own opinion, but I also decline many move requests when the improvement is minor, but the file is used in multiple articles - this is important because the move happens almost immediately, but the file substitution + caching may have a serious lag, which can easily span a few days depending on the servers. Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I urge you to look again at File:Схема1.PNG, the name would translate as "diagram 1", imho this is akin to IMG32345.JPG uploads, as it is not at all descriptive (btw, it is not russian, it's bulgarian, and i've recategorised it). VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 04:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Bulgarian, and with a non-descriptive name, but it agrees with the label and it's hard to understand what exactly it shows. Such files are not worth fixing because nobody will use them except the uploader ;-). Time is limited, and I myself prefer to prioritize the tasks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i guess i was planning to recreate it as an SVG anyhow, so i'll upload it under the correct name then. And i do disagree with you, i think it's very useful. Anyhow, won't waste more of your time. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 04:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Talk Nation Radio - 2009-06-02 Chip Berlet on the Tiller Murder, the Media, and the Patriot Movement.vorb.oga

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, i have made a mistake with this one. It's a non-derivative licence, and thus can be deleted. Thanks for spotting this one. I'll try to be more careful. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 03:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queer Review - 02 - 2011-04-05 - Gary Kinsman's 'The Canadian War On Queers'.vorb.oga

File:Queer Review - 02 - 2011-04-05 - Gary Kinsman's 'The Canadian War On Queers'.vorb.oga has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

79.221.106.56 12:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On a partial potential violation like that, it would make tons more sense not to hide behind an anonymous account and nominate for deletion, but to contact me. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 14:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category created, any more to add to it ?

Category created, any more to add to it? -- Cirt (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Looks like a lot more have been added to it. :) -- Cirt (talk) 19:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great job. Thanks. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 19:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re Hot sex barnstar

Thank you very much, this is most inspirational! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Beta M (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log). This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Geni (talk) 09:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Meta discussion

meta:Talk:Pedophilia#Update – You're mentioned here. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheffield Indymedia - 2010-06-12 Transition Network Conference 2010 - 2 Open Space Introduction.vorb.oga

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


File:Sheffield Indymedia - 2011-07-09 Transition Network Conference 2011 -ttcon2011 - 8 A conversation about Transition in Cities.vorb.oga

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Children soldier.bw.jpeg

File:Children soldier.bw.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

radio4all.net

Гм, вы уверены, что файлы с этого сайта каким-то образом принадлежат COM:SCOPE? Проблема еще и в том, что многие из записей содержат фрагменты из защищенных АП музыкальных произведений. Trycatch (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Русский: Нет не уверен, но я так считаю. В случае если чась аудио записи не подходит под указанную лицензию, прошу указывать имена файлов и временные отрезки, я буду редактировать.
English: No, i'm not sure, but i believe it to be the case. If a part of audio recording isn't under the specified licence, please provide me with the name of the file and time-codes, and i'll edit.
VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 15:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Все прослушивать я не осилю, но вот в первой попавшейся File:Puissance Maximale - 2008-10-20 Monkey Maximal.vorb.oga -- в самом начале используется тема из Monkey Island. Да практически какую запись ни возьмешь -- везде используется какая-то музыка неизвестного происхождения. Trycatch (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Русский: Да с Puissance Maximale могут быть большие проблемы. Вообще мне хотелось-бы чтобы какой-нибудь человек со знанием французского языка и культуры проверил эти передачи. Я знаю некоторые их них - это интервью, их точно надо оставлять. Некоторые другие... я не уверен.
English: Yes there maybe problems with Puissance Maximale. Actually i'd like to have somebody with the knowledge of the French language and culture to check them. Some are interviews, they must be kept. But some others... i'm not so sure.


Hello, Beta M. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Pedophile fantasy island

Hello. Did you write this? It is from the Anarchopedia site, and was written by a user called Beta M

One of the dearest fantasy held in the paedophile sub-culture is that of the fantasy island - the secluded island community where paedophiles and children roam free, enjoying total sexual freedom. The idea behind this fantasy is the suggestion that away from the oppressive teachings of these organised religions, those who feel a sexual attraction towards the pre-pubescent can indulge their basest desires and, in doing so, also achieve some form of enlightenment... that the freedom to establish their much maligned and negated altruism will result in some kind of mass overhaul of opinion amongst the general population. [1]

If you did, what was meant by 'indulge their basest desires'? How is indulging this 'base desire' meant to achieve enlightenment? Peter Damian (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=pedophilia&diff=32287&oldid=31952 – An anon wrote that. After "MrDog" rewrote the "pedophilia" article in June 2008, Beta_M created the "paedophilia" article from an old revision of the "pedophilia" article. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beta_M&oldid=68158870"