User talk:Otto S. Knottnerus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Otto S. Knottnerus!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuw-Scheemda-Schaftende landarbeiders ca. 1955.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ploegende landarbeiders NIeuw-Scheemda ca. 1947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ploegen met de trator Nieuw-Scheemda ca. 1955.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tekstman (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominaties[edit]

Beste heer Knottnerus, het spijt mij dat ik bovenstaande nominaties moest doen. De rechten op deze foto's liggen in principe bij de maker en niet bij u. Mocht dit anders liggen (bijvoorbeeld als u rechthebbende erfgenaam bent), dan kunt u dat aangeven bij de nominatie). Ik heb nog een rechtenvrije foto gevonden en geüpload: file:Spitploeg Termunten.jpg. Wellicht is die geschikt om te gebruiken in uw artikel. Tekstman (talk) 11:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, ik ben eigenaar van de foto's, wijlen mijn vader heeft ze gemaakt. Wat had ik dan moeten aangeven?Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 01:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wirth op de aartsluit?[edit]

Herman Wirth op de aartsluit of J. Aukes op de luit?

Beste Otto, Is de man zittend op de foto Herman Wirth op de aartsluit of J. Aukes op de luit? Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inderdaad, ik ging er automatisch vanuit dat de leider er het oudst uitzag. Dom! Inderdaad J. Aukes op de luit. Kende je het? Wirths instrument wordt aangegeven als aartsluit, zijn vrouw speelde volgens een andere bron dubbelkorige luit.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 00:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ik vond de zittende man op de foto niet lijken op Herman Wirth. Daarom heb ik de bron gecontroleerd en volgens de bron moet de man op de foto J. Aukes zijn. --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:RT Dutch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dollardpolders.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Commons is niet voor publiek domein werk.[edit]

Beste Mr. Knottnerus, Door de jaren heen heeft u meerdere keren publiek domein werk geupload en dit gelabeld als werk dat onder een Creative Commons licentie valt. Dit is niet juist, en heb ik zojuist recht gezet. Gelieve in de toekomst in de upload wizard aan te geven dat de auteursrechten verlopen zijn. Door op het penceel icoon naast het datum veld te klikken in de upload wizard kan ook enkel het jaar van publicatie aangegeven worden, en niet die valse accuratie van 1 januari die nu op deze bestanden geplakt was. Vera (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Het gepubliceerde logo hoort hier inderdaad niet. De kaart is wel eigen werk, maar al eerder gepubliceerd. Ik heb de bron nu aangegeven.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 09:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Als werk eerder is gepubliceerd en daarna een vrije licentie krijgt moet de identiteit van de auteur via OTRS geverifieerd worden. Vera (talk) 17:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He wat een gedoe. Ik heb het formulier opgestuurd.Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kuinre en imgeving in 1534.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kuinre en imgeving in 1534.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]