Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:An)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:AN

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section] 		User problems
[new section] 		Blocks and protections
[new section] 		Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES

Note

  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Weird processing result of a DR

Hello,

what happened to File:Landtagswahl 2019.31.jpg that should have been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Saxony state election 2019? There are no JPEG data left, but a file page is still there. I used two different browsers to check, where one is seldom if ever used to access Wikimedia sites (so, it's likely not a caching issue on my side). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the file. I remember a similar case to this at w:File talk:Ignatyevo Airfield - NASA World Wind.jpg, w:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_209#File:Ignatyevo.jpg_not_rendering. Usually this means the file's data has been lost for some or another reason. The thumbnail was still there though. This case is weird because the file is so recent. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think something is wrong, the file File:Άγιος Γεώργιος Φερών.jpeg which was uploaded 7 days ago is missing contents. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 20:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
? That file was uploaded in 2014. And deleted yesterday. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prolific copyvio uploader

It looks like Siveohalloran12 (talk · contribs) has uploaded multiple copyright violating images - they all look like internet publicity material, not their own work. I have tagged a couple for speedy deletion but it might be quicker for an admin to go take a look and do a mass-nuke. --10mmsocket (talk)

There are no previously deleted contributions. New user so I nuked and warned Gbawden (talk) 11:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello, can an administrator please delete the file redirect File:Nadja Stiller Com C07-089-001.jpg? The file was recently uploaded and has since been renamed to File:Nadja Tiller Com C07-089-001.jpg. I forgot to suppress the redirect while reaming and I'm not sure if {{Db-author}} would be applicable here. Ratekreel (talk) 16:16, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done In the future you can use COM:G6 —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted! Thank you, Matrix. Ratekreel (talk) 16:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Matrix & @Ratekreel, I'm sorry but G6 doesn't apply here per Commons:File renaming#Leaving redirects. G2 is a good go in such cases. Regards, Aafi (talk) 17:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aafi, I think the policy is relevant in case of vandalism or when one's not sure if it's vandalism. Ratekreel (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All broken redirects are under G2, and otherwise suppression is against policy, if the previous name is not clear vandalism. ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
typos, wrong names etc. should be tagged with G2, and yours was a G2 case. G6 doesn't fit in here. ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clearing this up —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about admin responding to concern with ""Cross-project shit-stirring by a suspicious user" "

A wikipedian referenced my uploading/adding of images as one sign of alleged COI, so i wanted to check if Wikimedia had concern about efforts here being used against editors. But instead I got that comment on a deletion (I'm not saying I have an issue with the deletion of my comment on other noticeboard, i dont know. But they havent indicated where else i could raise my concern. Whenevery (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you bringing WP issues here? This issue seems irrelevant to Commons Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The purpose of WM Commons for a content contributor ("user"?) is to improve WP content. Whenevery (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actions of someone using our content anywhere outside Commons is irrelevant. We are only concerned about the behaviour of Commons users on Commons Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well they're described by WM as a "family" with "shared values", but thx for answering my question from the user noticeboard. But no response about the admin on Commons calling me a "suspicious user" here after I referred to an allegation at WP? Whenevery (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The place to handle problems they are not properly handled in a local Wiki is Meta and not Commons. GPSLeo (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thx I've always been confused about meta & wm & wf, never really looked into it as was focused on content. I was just looking at the WF Universal Code of Conduct, seems the AgF & civility & possibly psych requirements were not met in the edit comment ive raised here & the colleague justifying it. Whenevery (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with my fellow admin - I think you are stirring and looking for attention. Commons is not wikipedia - don't bring your drama here Gbawden (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's false, there was no drama I simply retired from WP. Whenevery (talk) 13:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't bring EN-wiki drama to commons. Commons isn't en-wiki, and we don't want its drama spilling over here. (Note to admins: A user posted a very friendly notice explaining that their editing patterns are not what they expect of new editors). @Whenevery, I don't know why you came to commons, and it doesn't matter to me why you came to commons, as long as you aren't here to vandalize, advertise, use commons as a personal web host, or bring en-wiki problems to commons. We are part of the Wikimedia family of projects, but just as wikibooks doesn't complain to wikivoyage, Commons doesn't want to hear about en-wiki's drama. We will happily support all of the wikimedia projects by hosting, catagorising, and maintaining their freely licensed images, but we are not another drama board. If you have a problem on en-wiki, solve it on en-wiki. The values of commons (and all Wikimedia projects, is to make the sum of all human knowledge, and make it available for free for everyone. Commons specifically is the largest collection of free to use images on the internet. All images here are under CC-BY-SA or less restrictive license, all of witch are irrevocable, meaning you can use them forever. Commons does see a lot of cross wiki vandalism/abuse without people bringing it here. We don't solve cross Wiki problems, that's metawiki's whole purpose. If you have any more questions, leave them on my talk page. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's already been explained, but thx for further. Again I didn't bring any 'drama', that was the rude characterization that i was trying to get addressed here. I was confused at an idea that adding images to an article is an excessive interest. I had noticed a lot of articles, even important ones, had no images, so I wondered how true that was. You yourself now bring in a WP detail, so I now have to note that I wasn't new to editing, I mentioned so, and why would that be assumed after decades of WP anyway, and that fact in itself was then used to allege sockpuppetry. Whenevery (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please explain what you mean by "I have to note I wasn't new to editing"? (I got caught up in a similar situation on en-wiki, and want to make sure you are thoroughly explaining yourself without causing miscommunication.) When most en-wiki admins hear that, they assume you had a prior account (especially as your account is about a month old on en-wiki, and only a week on commons, yet you are writing high quality articles on relativly obscure topics), and will block you for sock puppetry. I can't speak to the adding images part, but what caused concern was high quality, well sourced articles about a particular court case, not something new users normally do unless they have involvement in the actual case or personally know the people involved. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aside: there are terms that, while they contain a word that might be considered somewhat obscene, are not really all that strong. "Shit-stirring" is one of those. If one editor said another was "shit", or even that all their contributions were "shit", that might call for admin action (although still probably not on a different wiki from the one where the matter came up). Accusing them of "shit-stirring" is quite different from that. - Jmabel ! talk 20:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamant1 made a lot of Speedy deletions I do not agree with, please do not delete them

User:Adamant1 made a lot of Speedy deletions I do not agree with, but there are too many to revert them. See Commons:Deletion requests/List of libraries in Paris for an overview. Please do not delete them (yet). See Commons talk:Galleries#How to handle Gallery pages with a wrong format? for the discussion. JopkeB (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy of the enwiki article and therefore clearly out of scope and as I do not see this fact mentioned anywhere also a copyright violation. Such copies from Wikipedia are regularly deleted. GPSLeo (talk) 04:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see how lists of places without images are galleries or wouldn't qualify for speedy deletion under either G1 or G2 depending. G1 literally says "Mainspace pages (galleries) that are empty or contain no useful content, such as pages that contain text but no images or other media" qualify for speedy deletion. Sure with "galleries" like Commons:List of hospitals in Paris there's the boiler plate image on the top, but so what? It's clearly not a gallery regardless.
Not to mention the whole "list" thing doesn't seem to be widely used outside of galleries for France. Even if someone wanted to convert such a page into a gallery then it should have the same name as the parent category. The word "list" is totally meaningless and just shows that the creator never intended for them to be actual galleries. And I could give a crap if there's a conversation about it. Nothing says the guidelines should just be ignored while or when a couple of people are discussing something on a random talk page. At the end of the day who cares? This isn't an encyclopedia and the person who created the "galleries" isn't even active anymore. So I don't really see a legitimate reason to keep the pages. It's not like someone can't recreate them under the normal names of the categories and with actual images if they wanted to anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find a List of libraries in Paris, not in the enwiki and neither in the frwiki.
The List of libraries in Paris is not just a list, but also shows a gallery. And the links are to Commons categories. That to me makes it a "a guide to the subcategories of a large main category", one of the purposes we mentioned on the discussion about good galleries. I admit, it would have been better if each line in the table would have got an image as well, then it would be a gallery page like List of paintings by Paul Gauguin, of which there are many more. And perhaps there is a better format for it. But are that good enough reasons to just delete it? To delete a work where so much effort has gone into? Without even a warning? (Because a speedy deletion can be deleted even before the creator had a chance to react.) Please have some more respect for the work of others, even when the creator is not active anymore. It might be usefule (see page views). So I prefer that we first have a policy for these kind of gallery pages before they are recklessly deleted. JopkeB (talk) 10:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The List of libraries in Paris is not just a list, but also shows a gallery. @JopkeB: Your free to revert the speedy deletion template in move the gallery to one that's better named while getting rid of the list in that case. I could really care less. I don't think it should exist in it's current form or explicitly as a "list of libraries in Paris" though. Most galleries are inherently lists. So calling them "lists" is just pointless.
Please have some more respect for the work of others, even when the creator is not active anymore. Your the one saying we should give people warnings before the deleting the galleries. It's not that I don't have respect for users, if the user was active and the galleries weren't created more then 10 years then I'd have zero problem warning them. There's no point doing that in this case. It's just a waste of everyone's time and energy.
I prefer that we first have a policy for these kind of gallery pages before they are recklessly deleted. I think your reading to much into this. I spent plenty of time researching the user's editing history and how long the galleries existed before I nominated the images for deletion and there's at least a couple that I didn't nominate for deletion because I plan to improve them. So there was nothing reckless about it on my end. Your just cherry picking. Again, I have absolutely no issue what-so-ever with giving people time to work on things. These galleries weren't created recently by an active user though. I just don't think we should waste our time or resources giving warnings about 15 year old pages that clearly aren't being improved and to people who aren't even active anymore. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly wouldn't speedy-delete stuff like this—certainly at least give those who have been working on them reasonable time to move them somewhere more appropriate (user space, or off of Commons entirely)—but List of libraries in Paris doesn't look to me like a gallery as intended. On the other hand, if the info there isn't duplicated in one of the Wikipedias, then a list like that is certainly useful for maintenance purposes, if only to keep track of which of these do and do not yet have categories. But I'd sure like to see more of a Commons focus: which of these buildings are out of copyright, for example, is a lot more important to Commons than the surface area. - Jmabel ! talk 19:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

at least give those who have been working on them reasonable time to move them somewhere more appropriate @Jmabel: I checked the edit history of most of these before I nominated them for deletion. Most, or all of them, were created more then ten years by a user who hasn't edited since March of this year. So they aren't working on the galleries or anything else at this point and I really don't think they care about them either way. Although I agree with you generally, but it's clearly just a waste of everyone's time in this case. Plus I don't think it's worth moving pages given the lack of meaningful content to begin with. There are other galleries in the same category that I'm probably going to move myself since I do think that they are worth improving though. But there is no "one size fits all" solution here. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Adamant1: It still gives the time to someone who is watching the page, or who is aware the the user has left and is following the notifications they get. For example, I follow User:Fæ's talk page and comment on DRs when I think the image in question should not be deleted. I'm sure many others are doing similar things for other departed users. - Jmabel ! talk 04:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair, but I still think it depends on the situation and realistically how many people watching a talk page are going to care about something that specific anyway, especially more then six after the person stopped contributing? I'm really not a fan of bureaucracy for it's own sake. It just comes off like derailing and/or makes things needlessly complicated. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Former Cinema in Bečov nad Teplou

please merge the categories

Thank you Gampe (talk) 06:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming well-established categories

Militum professio scriniarii, has been, renaming established categories without consensus, ignoring COM:CFD.? Example: Category:People of the Royal Navy to Category:Royal Navy people Please "cease and desist", till its sorted out.

Are they intending on renaming every category, beginning with "People from..." and "People of ..."?

He has been warned about this behaviour regarding other file types and cats already on multiple occasions. Broichmore (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Broichmore: - I respectfully ask you to stop LYING about me. I have NEVER received any warning!
Furthermore, there is not any clear consensus regarding 'People from...' for category naming. I have seen a variety of different naming conventions for people who belong to or somehow connected to an organisation - and as an approximation, from my experience, the primary subject matter comes first. 'People from...' does NOT follow conventions of British English. The National Archives in the United Kingdom categorises people associated to an organisation by organisation first - such as 'Royal Air Force pilots', 'Royal Navy submariners', National Coal Board miners, 'British Army sappers'. Trying to enforce diametrically opposite grammar for subjects which are very clearly against the fundamental spirt of a wiki, and is highly likely to result in editors failing utilise appropriate categories. Commons is NOT Wikipedia, it is a global multilingual, multi-cultural project. All languages are accepted here, including ALL versions of the English language. Kind regards. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps not warned, but certainly made aware of. On your talk page you were diplomatically informed on 19 May about Marine petrol stations => Marine fuel stations, and reminded of COM:CFD.
On 4 September about moving categories like Category:RAF Transport Command, without redirects. You didn't like RAF Transport Command which has been around a long time (in the world, that’s a tacit warning), to impose "Royal Air Force Transport Command".
You should expect criticism when making fundamental far reaching design changes to tree and nesting structures here.
People by name categories have been around since at least 2010, without complaint.
I remind you the default language here is English, for good reason.
There are many instances here the primary subject matter doesn't come first. In fact it's the norm here.
Whats happening here is your extending the admin time of every user to identify cat names. I did not create this system, we have Painters_from_Great_Britain, not British painters, and
18th-century painters from Great Britain, not British painters of the 18th-century, etc. Best regards. Broichmore (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Militum professio scriniarii: I don't know whether you are deliberately or accidentally making this more confusing than it inherently is, but I have never seen a category "People from" for an organization. Do you have an actual example? If so, yes, I would agree that is poorly named. If not, then it is a red herring.
"People from" is quite common with the indirect object being a place. I prefer "people of" in this case as well, but "from" in this case is perfectly good English. - Jmabel ! talk 21:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All languages are accepted here, including ALL versions of the English language. Actually that's technically incorrect because the Universality Principle. Generally if most other categories are "people of X Naxy" then you can't rename a small subset of categories to "Navy X people" just because of local conventions. Otherwise it can break things and make it that much harder for people to browse through related categories. This being a "multi-cultural project" or whatever isn't a valid reason to rename the categories either. You should have a done a CfD and then renamed the categories if or when there was a consensus to. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Militum professio scriniarii I'm at fault here for mentioning "People from", it was glib attempt to reference the thousands of cats such as Photographers from Denmark), "Professional sumo wrestlers from Japan" etc., as well as "People of Aukland" all of which could be altered as a follow on.
I may well have jumped to the wrong conclusion, about your motives here, but I have bad experiences before with heavy hotcat users changing categories for no better reason than inflating their statistics, or just because they don’t like the syntax employed. Hotcat can make immense changes of this type in an extraordinarliy short time. If that not you, then I apologise.
The implications of your strategy are immense, left unchecked. What's to stop your expanding it to renaming such cats to Danish photographers", "Japanese professional sumo wrestlers", "Aukland people" This, whole strategy that I have brought attention to is not just confined to "People of Id organisation". It potentially crosses over into many different areas.
You’ve also put forward a notion that the National Archives in the United Kingdom categorises people associated to an organisation by organisation first - such as 'Royal Air Force pilots', this is just not the case. The NA in particular still uses cat filing structures conceived in the days before computerisation, and there’s no consistency about it, they could and do use RAF more often than "Royal Air Force" The same goes for the British Library, the Imperial War Museum, Greenwich, and even the Library of Congress, all of which are immense collections and all are haphazard. It’s the case with all of the established GLAM’s. Commons is in fact one of the first organisation to take a fresh look at how to structure cat names, from the premise that the vault is paperless.
Furthermore, in fact, its normal in the UK to use "RAF" as opposed to "Royal Air Force". There is never usually any confusion over it, only once have I seen an individual improperly assigned as being as a member of the RA (Royal Academy) when they were in fact an amateur artist serving as an officer in the Royal Artillery. IMO if you were to start a consensus a hypothetical discussion on making afresh cats for the RAF or USAF, you would find the acronyms preferred, as they are instantly identifiable and known, easy to type and give an uncluttered look to the master header index pages. Long cat names are not the best for scanning by eye. “RAF Transport Command”, is infinitely better than "Royal Air Force Transport Command". Even Wikipedia adopted the shortened version as this is the universal way of referring to it. From our point of view there’s hardly anything in the cat, to make it worth defending, so Andy gave way. However, for anyone to overturn a cat created by such an influential editor without warning, consideration or consensus is astounding, and not a good look. Broichmore (talk) 15:04, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unusual Deletion of Images of Vietnamese Artists

Hello Commons community, I am Plantaest, an administrator of the Vietnamese Wikipedia community. Recently, our community has noticed something unusual regarding articles related to figures in the Vietnamese entertainment industry, specifically the continuous deletion of images.

Upon reviewing the Commons logs, I found that on September 20, an administrator named Krd deleted many images related to Vietnamese artists, all with the same reason: "No permission since 12 September 2024," according to the deletion log.

The question arises: who added the "No permission" template to these images? Since I cannot access the history of the deleted files, I am unable to determine who added them. However, I have identified a user with suspicious activity.

User "Thich an che"

The user "Thich an che" is a very new account, created on September 20, but has already added the "No permission" template to files related to several Vietnamese artists such as Mỹ Tâm, Lý Hải, Chí Tài... Clearly, a new account wouldn’t easily know how to use these techniques.

Vandalism of Deleted Files

Reviewing the log of File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png, I noticed two unusual points:

  • At 4:22 on September 20 (UTC), administrator Krd deleted this file with the reason "No permission since 12 September 2024." This suggests that someone, possibly another account of "Thich an che," added the "No permission" template to this file a few days earlier. Did Krd delete the files in bulk without thoroughly checking?
  • At 6:13 on September 20 (UTC), the user "Thich an che" uploaded an image of unclear origin, mocking a Vietnamese YouTuber named Nguyễn Phương Hằng.

It is worth noting that this file was being used in the infobox of the Nguyễn Phương Hằng article, and she has been a highly searched figure recently, having been released from prison on September 19 after nearly two years in detention. I have temporarily removed this file from the article about her.

Conclusion

In my view, someone using the account "Thich an che" and possibly several other accounts has been placing the "No permission" template unjustifiably on images related to Vietnamese artists. Moreover, this person deliberately re-uploaded a deleted file to have it displayed on a heavily viewed Wikipedia page. This is clearly an intentional act of vandalism.

Therefore, I kindly request that the Commons administrators, especially Krd, assist the Vietnamese Wikipedia community with the following issues:

On behalf of the Vietnamese Wikipedia community, thank you all. Plantaest (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bấy bi cute tried to remove undeletion requests (see Special:Contributions/Bấy bi cute). Cherry Cotton Candy (talk) 14:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tagged File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png as copyright violation with evidence.  Băng Tỏa  14:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I asked MGA73 to restore the old version of the file. It's a screenshot from a YouTube CC video from a legitimate copyright holder, so its license is compatible with Commons. The copyright of the original file was fine before the vandalism.  Băng Tỏa  16:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked Bấy bi cute for a week for vandalism, and Thich an che for abusing multiple accounts, clearly a sock of Funny Man 1999. Yann (talk) 14:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Thank you very much. I hope the admins will continue to support our community in restoring the deleted files, as well as creating a filter to prevent similar actions in the future. Plantaest (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Plantaest: Here's a dump of all of what Thich an che edited that has since been deleted. Feel free to use this as the basis for an undeletion request:

Extended content
    06:13, 20 September 2024  +233‎ File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png ‎ ‎Changed label, description [[:File:/or aliases in en
    06:13, 20 September 2024  +313‎ File:20181013 Nguyễn Phương Hằng at Talkshow.png ‎ Uploaded own work with UploadWizard
    05:09, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7276986482).jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:26, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Minh Tuyet.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Cam Ly 1.png ‎No edit summary
    04:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TrangPhap.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRANG PHÁP - THE 6TH SENSE P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRANG PHÁP - THE 6TH SENSE P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRANG PHÁP - THE 6TH SENSE P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Le Quyen.png ‎No edit summary
    04:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Le Quyen 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:KHOI MY 2015.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khoi My.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khoi My (more cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khoi My (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:HOANG MY AN.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:04, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngoc Mai 2018.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MinhHang1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MinhHag3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MinhHag2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Minh hang 3.JPG ‎No edit summary
    04:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chân dung Minh Hằng.jpg ‎No edit summary
    04:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chân dung Minh Hằng cropped.png ‎No edit summary
    04:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Diệu Nhi GQT6.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Duong Lam 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:LeDuongBaoLam1989.png ‎No edit summary
    03:58, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khả Như.png ‎No edit summary
    03:46, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngọc Trinh in Chị mẹ học yêu.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NGỌC TRINH VÀ SIÊU MẪU VÕ HOÀNG YẾN KHOE VẺ RẠNG RỠ TẠI HẬU TRƯỜNG VIFW SS18.webm ‎No edit summary
    03:44, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:2018-10-08 Gymnastics at 2018 Summer Youth Olympics – Girls' Artistic Gymnastics – Vault qualification (Martin Rulsch) 207.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:44, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngoc Trinh va Fan.png ‎No edit summary
    03:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngoc Trinh va Fan (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    03:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nha Phuong 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:42, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nha Phuong.png ‎No edit summary
    03:42, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nha Phuong (Vietnamese actor).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:41, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:DSC01858.png ‎No edit summary
    03:41, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi17.png ‎No edit summary
    03:40, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi Zalo.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:40, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi Zalo (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đông Nhi - Chí Thiện - Khổng Tú Quỳnh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dongnhi2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dongnhi (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong-nhi-2014.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong-nhi-2014 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi 2015.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Dong Nhi 2015 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:2018 - Dong Nhi at Quan khu 7 Stadium (2).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:2018 - Dong Nhi at Quan khu 7 Stadium (1).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:35, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:1410060361-dong-nhi-1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bao Thy.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy.png ‎No edit summary
    03:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy Idol 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy Idol 2012 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Thanh Duy BBSD.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:DoanLPDapcanh.png ‎No edit summary
    03:28, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ANHTU52024.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:28, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ANH TU - SEPTEMBER 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:27, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ya Suy at Vietnam Idol Finale on Feb 1, 2013.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:27, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà An Huy - Quán Quân Vietnam Idol mùa 8 và Bài Hát Hay Nhất ( Sing My Song ) mùa 3.png ‎No edit summary
    03:26, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Lê Quang.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:26, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Le Minh Son.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2722268119).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2723057080).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2722268119) (crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vietnam Idol (2723057080) (crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:24, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Uyên Linh, tháng 8 2013.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Uyen Linh Singer.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ul0.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hongocha.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha in 2009 Asia Song Festival.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha at the 2009 Asia Song Festival 2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha (2676933861).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha (2676929535).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ho Ngoc Ha (2676929535) (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:20, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ha Ho in 2019.png ‎No edit summary
    03:19, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nhật cường (cropped).JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:19, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nhật cường.JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:18, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hong Quang Minh's mug shot (March 2016).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:18, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng at Số phận live show July 2012 (2).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng at Số phận live show July 2012 (1).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng at Số phận live show July 2012 (1) cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ĐÀM VĨNH HƯNG 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:16, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ĐÀM VĨNH HƯNG & HUY TUẤN.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:16, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Damvinhhung3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:16, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Damvinhhung.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bao Anh.png ‎No edit summary
    03:14, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bao Anh (2018).png ‎No edit summary
    03:14, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Trung Quân at Bài hát yêu thích tháng 6 live show 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:14, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Trung Quân at Bài hát yêu thích tháng 6 live show 2012 cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TRUNG QUÂN 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Huong Giang in 2015 (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    03:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Huong Giang Idol, a famous transgender singer in Vietnam, attends the ceremony and shows her support for the new innitiative (20643882158).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Huong Giang - Miss International Queen Vietnam 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:BaoHan2000.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ung Hoang Phuc.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ung Hoang Phuc (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nhất Trung.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:09, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:VŨ NGỌC ĐÃNG.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:09, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tran Huu Tan.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:08, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chau Dang Khoa 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Touliver.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:07, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Touliver (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Xuân Bắc, Ngô Kiến Huy & Dương Anh Vũ.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:06, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngô Kiến Huy hosting Bộ 3 Siêu Đẳng SS2 EP13.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngô Kiến Huy hosting Bộ 3 Siêu Đẳng SS2 EP13 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngo Kien Huy.png ‎No edit summary
    03:05, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NGO KIEN HUY 2021 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Den Vau in Song Gallery 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Isaac Pham Luu Tuan Tai.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:03, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Isaac2017.png ‎No edit summary
    03:02, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tóc Tiên at the premiere for "Big Girls Don't Cry" music video (2015).JPG ‎No edit summary
    03:01, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TÓC TIÊN 2024 P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:01, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TÓC TIÊN 2024 P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:01, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TÓC TIÊN 2024 P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tóc Tiên (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    03:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:TOC TIEN - THE BRAIN VIETNAM (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    03:00, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Toc Tien (2016).png ‎No edit summary
    02:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ca Si Tóc Tiên (Vietnamese singer).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:59, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bich Phuong.png ‎No edit summary
    02:58, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:BICH PHUONG 2019.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:58, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:BICH PHUONG - VIETTEL++.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:57, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE 2023.08.29 P3.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:57, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE 2023.08.29 P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:57, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE 2023.08.29 P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:56, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - YOUR FACE SOUNDS FAMILIAR VIETNAM 2020.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:56, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - YOUR FACE SOUNDS FAMILIAR VIETNAM - 2020.11.28.png ‎No edit summary
    02:56, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - MAY 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:55, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ORANGE - APRIL 2021.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:55, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Khuong Hoan My.png ‎No edit summary
    02:54, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Tangduytan.png ‎No edit summary
    02:54, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Suni Ha Linh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:54, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:SUNI Ha Linh in 2024.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:53, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:SHYN3192.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:53, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nguyenthuychi.png ‎No edit summary
    02:52, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chi Pu.png ‎No edit summary
    02:52, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chi Pu tiết lộ những bí mật về vai Hạ Linh (Min Hari) - Mối Tình Đầu Của Tôi - She Was Pretty.webm ‎No edit summary
    02:52, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:CHI PU KÍN CỔNG CAO TƯỜNG ĐỌ SẮC CÙNG DÀN HOA HẬU VÁY ÁO RỰC RỠ TRÊN THẢM ĐỎ VIFW THU ĐÔNG 2016.webm ‎No edit summary
    02:51, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Chi Pu as Hạ Linh in She Was Pretty (Mối tình đầu của tôi).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:51, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee in a video 2020.png ‎No edit summary
    02:50, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee in a fan meeting.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:50, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee in a fan meeting (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:50, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee at the fansign.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:49, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee at the fansign (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:49, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Amee 2020.png ‎No edit summary
    02:48, 20 September 2024  +57‎ [[:File:MIN tại sự kiện 2020-03-21.png ‎No edit summary
    02:48, 20 September 2024  +57‎ [[:File:MIN tại sự kiện 2020-03-21 (cropped).png ‎No edit summary
    02:48, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MIN - 2020.03.21.png ‎No edit summary
    02:47, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Erikthanh13.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:47, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Erikthanh13 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:46, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Erik tại sự kiện, 2020-03-21.png ‎No edit summary
    02:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Viethuong.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:VIET HUONG.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:45, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:VH-aodaixanh0615.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:44, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hongdao.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Quangminh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:43, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Baoliem2019.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:42, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Vanson2019.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:41, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:MY TAM - LIGHT & SHADOW LIVE - INAX VIETNAM.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:40, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Dũng 2021 P2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Dũng 2021 P1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:39, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi, 2023.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi, 2023 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi, 2019.png ‎No edit summary
    02:38, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hà Nhi singer.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:37, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ha Nhi in Khau Vi Ngoi Sao.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nam Em quay gameshow.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nam Em 2020.png ‎No edit summary
    02:36, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Nam Em 2019.png ‎No edit summary
    02:35, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NAM EM X BẠCH CÔNG KHANH 26.06.2022.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:34, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Bach Cong Khanh.png ‎No edit summary
    02:34, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:HOAI LAM 2022.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:33, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:33, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012 (3).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012 (2).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Mỹ Tâm ở phòng trà Đồng Dao July 2012 (2) cropped.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at the MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:32, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at the MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7277018516).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at MTV EXIT Concert in Hanoi, May 26, 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam Performs at MTV EXIT Concert in Hanoi, May 26, 2012 (7276405972) (Crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:31, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam performs at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (727729513).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam MTV EXIT concert Ha Noi 2012.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:30, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam MTV EXIT concert Ha Noi 2012 01.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan on stage at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7280165088).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan on stage at MTV EXIT concert in Hanoi against human trafficking (7280165088) (crop).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:29, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam joins Simple Plan for song on stage (7285318430).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:28, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam and Pierre Bouvier of Simple Plan join hands at MTV EXIT.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:25, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:My Tam 2.JPG ‎No edit summary
    02:23, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Hải - Vu vơ - Behind the scenes 1.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Hoàng Hải - Vu vơ - Behind the scenes 1 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:22, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh2.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh2 (cropped).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:21, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:NooPhuocThinh cropped.png ‎No edit summary
    02:20, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:DuongTrieuVu.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:19, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:ThuyTienTran.png ‎No edit summary
    02:17, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Lam Vlog.png ‎No edit summary
    02:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Ngo Johnny Nguyen 22072007.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:20090626 Ngô Thanh Vân, Johny Trí Nguyễn.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:15, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Johnny Nguyen 22072007 BKKIFF.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Sơn Tùng M-TP hát Chín bậc tình yêu tại đêm nhạc An Thuyên 27s.jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:13, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Sơn Tùng M-TP at KUL News, July 2015.png ‎No edit summary
    02:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 5 (2017).jpg ‎No edit summary
    02:12, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 4 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 3 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 2 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:11, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP 1 (2017).png ‎No edit summary
    02:10, 20 September 2024  +57‎ File:Son Tung M-TP (2014).jpg ‎No edit summary

Jmabel ! talk 15:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thats an impressive list, @Krd, Can you provide some insight as to what happened (as of when I'm writing this) 12 hours ago? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: Thank you. If possible, I hope you can investigate accounts that are similarly disruptive, like: Special:Contributions/Nguyễn Thanh Vân dana, Special:Contributions/Nguyễn Minh Đào 1996, Special:Contributions/Vô Danh 69, Special:Contributions/Funny Man 1999. It seems this situation has been ongoing for months. This is a great loss for the Vietnamese Wikipedia community. Plantaest (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like these are socks of a glocked user. @Jmabel, I think a post on SRG is in order for these accounts? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Funny Man 1999‎. Yann (talk) 20:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a filter: Commons talk:Abuse filter#Add a filter to block the addition of the "No permission" template for new accounts. I hope the admins can review it and consider using it to block accounts with similar behavior in the future. Thank you. Plantaest (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Filter looks good, thanks for helping us sort this out, It has been a chaotic 24 hours on commons. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 16:34, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Datasets about potential logos released

Hi all! As part of our current work with the logo detection tool, we have conducted an analysis over 22 days of recent file uploads (August-September 2024) and identified 1,594 images as potential logos using the developed logo detection model.

We have released two datasets: one with all identified logos - fields are image title, confidence score, URL, uploader, whether the uploader is a bot - and another one with an additional field that tells if the image is tagged as “own work” or “not own work”. Note that the latter contains 180 less files than the former, because in the meantime those files were deleted. We consider this as a positive signal, in line with the main goal of facilitating content moderation.

We thought these datasets would be of interest to you, especially in terms of patrolling recent uploads. We also wanted to point out that, according to our statistics, our experimental tool can detect ~47% more files that are not correctly categorized as logos or are not correctly pointed out as such.

We can also expand this dataset to include one more full month of data (i.e. July 2024), as well as exporting those datasets regularly on a monthly basis.

Hope this could be of help for your moderation work and more specifically identification of problematic/copyrighted logos. If you need more info, feel free to ping me. Thanks in advance! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sannita (WMF), can you add their deletion status and relevant info? (who tagged, who deleted, DR or CSD, etc) All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck I'll ask the dev who did the dataset, and will let you know if we can integrate the dataset. Now it's already weekend, so if it will be possible, it will happen early next week. Sannita (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! All the Best -- Chuck Talk 18:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to detect how likely a logo is to be above the threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 21:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again User:Adamant1 made a lot of Speedy deletions I do not agree with, please do not delete them

Again User:Adamant1 put a deletion request in a lot of gallery pages which are fine (two or more images). Now he even emptied them and put a speedy deletion request in them. For me that is vandalism. Please do not delete these gallery pages. They should all be reverted to the versions before the vandalism.

It is at least about:

JopkeB (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out that hundreds of them have already been deleted, but they are no longer in his list with contributions, only in my inbox of my mailbox. And I cannot tell whether he also made deletion requests for gallery pages that I did not have on my watchlist. Very sad. JopkeB (talk) 16:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JopkeB: 99% of them only had one image. Otherwise they only had a couple with zero chance of expansion or anything that made them worth keeping. Again though, most of them only had a single image. Although it's not like that's the only criteria for speedy deletion. There's several others that you seem to be ignoring for whatever reason and I really don't appreciate your spurious accusation that anything here is vandalism or that you are trying to get admins to revert things based on your clearly false personal opinion that I wasn't basing the speedy deletions on the guidelines. Just because you aren't privy to why the galleries where deleted or what my motivations where at the time doesn't mean it's vandalism. So I'd appreciate it if you dropped the stick instead of trying to use admins to get your way about something that clearly isn't an issue.
Just to give one example of what I'm talking about, the gallery for "Rosa 'Editor Stewart'" only contained two images and essentially recreates the category without adding anything or there being a way to expand it. It's totally valid to nominate a gallery for deletion that purely recreates the category and has not chance of being expanded. Again, your free to disagree with that, but calling it vandalism is just hyperbolic nonsense. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The vandalism is that you emptied the gallery pages, so that the administrator cannot see anymore whether it is jusitified to use the speedy deletion. And GA1 is only for gallery pages with zero or one image, not for two. And I doubt that only 1% of the deleted pages had more than 1 image, you can see on the removed kb's that in the row above there were at least two pages had more (four and five). And I do not know any other reason to use GA1 than having no or one image. For other reasons you still need to make a proper deletion request. JopkeB (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=927191381"