User talk:Gampe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Older threads you will find here: User talk:Gampe/Archive

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Praha kostel sv Jilji z Uh trhu.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Giles in Prague, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

TUSC token: 88e828c1771dc16fad949afc1595b3bc[edit]

I am now proud owner of a WMFLabs TUSC account!--Gampe (talk) 07:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
You are a very good uploader ! Thanks for your contribs ! Photographically - Yours Frze > talk 03:28, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank You! --Gampe (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kamenicka 35-1512.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenicka 35-1512.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kamenicka 35-1515.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenicka 35-1515.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AIR House CTU 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AIR House CTU 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Letná palace 5953.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letná palace 5953.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Letná palace 5958.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letná palace 5958.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

New Fotograf[edit]

Hi Gampe, I have seen a new User:Radka.Novakova.9, with photos near Brno, but I think she need a little help, I don't now, if there speak more than cestina ;-) it's only information, and have a nice day, regards from the neighbourhood --K@rl (talk) 12:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, this one I don't see it ;-) --regards K@rl (talk) 13:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Descriptions[edit]

Hi Gampe, now a new request: the photos from User:Martina Pařízková haven't a description. There are not many, but for the few, which I know, I added ingerman, parhaps you can add there in česky too. regards and děkuji --K@rl (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi K@rl, all contributions of Martina Pařízková are from WLM 2013. Since then she had no editing. --Gampe (talk) 18:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
I know,but the photos havent a decription till now :-) - this was the request, that you can add this description - there are not so many photos.-regards K@rl (talk) 21:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Done (I hope). Thanks! --Gampe (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Josef Ullmann - Oráč (po r.1910).jpg[edit]

Prosím o kontrolu tohoto souboru: File:Josef Ullmann - Oráč (po r.1910).jpg po jeho načtení se tam ukazuje toto: Error in template * unknown parameter name (Template:Information): '1; 2'

patrně jsem něco udělal špatně, ale nemohu příjít na co jsem udělal špatně. Nerozumím tomu. Děkuji--Martin wolf (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Problém byl v té složité internetové adrese, která obsahovala znaky, se kterými si šablona nevěděla rady. Zjednodušil jsem ji. Druhá věc, kterou jsem tam našel, byla kategorie, kde se míchali dva Josefové Ullmanové. Rozsadil jsem je a udělal rozcestník. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 04:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Děkuji za pomoc. S tím jsem si nevěděl rady. Toho malíře Josefa Ullmanna jsem založil na Wikipedii, ale adresa Josef Ullmann již byla obsazená, tak jsem musel založit Josef Ullmann (malíř). Na commons však někdo načetl jeho obrazy pod Josef Ullmann a tak jsem tam s tím kouzlil, abych to nějak sloučil. Ještě se v tom tolik nevyznám. Něco podobného se stalo u stránky Josef Král (malíř). Stránku jsem založil pod touto již připravenou adresou (na Wikipedii svítila červeně), ale na comons někdo načet jeho obrazy pod adresou Josef Jaroslav Král. Dal jsem to (ani nevím jak) do podkategorie. Josef Král (malíř) a Josef Jaroslav Král jsou jedna osoba. Díky za pomoc a zdravím--Martin wolf (talk) 07:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ernestine Roessler.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ernestine Roessler.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

  • solved --Gampe (talk) 03:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Categories in slovak monuments[edit]

Ahoj Gampe, I need your help, because it looiks like, that an slovak user the User:Ľuboš Repta don't understand the sceme of the categories of monuments in slovakie. Each community need an own category:Cultural monuments in xy, because they are used in slovak and german articles and wikidata to upload files. But I think he understand wheter teh english explanation nor the sense of the system. This system is approx. teh austrian and works thince few years. Perhaps its possible, that you can explain him this. It's not necessarey, that he makes new categories, vbut he shgould not disturb the existing system. thank a lot --regards K@rl (talk) 16:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Odborový dům Na Perštýně (7849).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odborový dům Na Perštýně.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.