User talk:Beria/Archive/2011-4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Talk page of Béria Lima

Obs.: o trecho seguinte está "compactado" de modo a despoluir
visualmente o contexto da página toda.

WikiLove and more WikiLove[edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg Here is something sweet for you. Also, first!!!! Theo10011 (talk) 10:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

A very beautiful Nectarine Pie.jpg Making a point....start counting!! Theo10011 (talk) 12:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Iris cat.jpg
Sorry, couldn't find puppies.....3!

Theo10011 (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Onni from Helsinki.jpg Fluffies
Found some puppies....4! Theo10011 (talk) 12:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

The Puppy.jpg Fluffies
More fluffies....5! Theo10011 (talk) 12:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Akita Inu 22.jpg Pup
Another pup....a little older and wiser.....6! Theo10011 (talk) 12:57, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Cadillac Eldorado[edit]

Re: File:1953 custom Cadillac El Dorado 01.jpg, etc., thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 14:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


Prezada Beria, bom dia. Solicito sua ajuda para solucionar a questão que me foi colocada em três imagens que recentemente fiz upload. Sou detentora dos direitos autorais das três imagens (ARCON SOC - Rio de Janeiro.jpg, ARCON SOC - São Paulo.jpg e Logo ARCON 250.jpg), inclusive, enviei um email para explicitando os meus direitos de uso sobre as imagens. Contudo, acredito que não estou escolhendo as licenças certas para utilização das mesmas aqui na Wikimedia Commons. Ficarei muitíssimo grata se puder me auxiliar. Um abraço,--Arcon (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Olá administradora[edit]

Queria não precisar ter vindo até aqui, mas infelizmente tive.

Primeiro de tudo leia esse artigo, preste atenção em todos os nomes que aparecem no artigo. Agora remova todo o material ilegal que foi upado por esse usuário aqui. O que mós vamos fazer com isso no Commons? Boas edições. Bruno Ishiai 15:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker (discusión | contribuciones)‎ m (5.121 bytes) (Bot: Eliminando "Cheb.jpg". Borrado en Commons por Beria. (In category Media without a source as of 17 October 2011; no source)) (deshacer)

No entiendo por qué borraron la foto. Gracias

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Beria/Archive,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Botticelli's Birth of Venus souvenirs.jpg[edit]

Please restore this file, with {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} lisense. I've made it same day as File:Venus of Milo souvenirs by shakko.jpg (you can check the metadata), but during upload didn't notice that lisence is lost somewhere. --Shakko (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Early deletions[edit]

Beria, I noticed you emptied and deleted everything in Category:Media missing permission as of 17 October 2011 today. These are only supposed to be ran a full week after the category's date, eight days after the listed date. For instance, your deletions from the 17th's category should have been done after the calendar turned to the 25th, not today. These uploaders were accordingly only given five days to get permission to OTRS, not the week the rules; if you'll notice, Category:Media missing permission has a counter for which days category should be considered for deletion, and deletions for the current listing, the 15th, were processed this morning. Please don't jump the gun like this again. Courcelles (talk) 23:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Ícones ferroviários[edit]

Olá, Béria! Obrigado pela ajuda aqui! --Tuvalkin (talk) 06:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Ready ;-)[edit]

Thank you for your help!

Took a bit more time, but with a little help... Template:WLM-invite-WCN
Can you spread the message? Ciell (talk) 22:50, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of File:U2 Stay Berlin 1.jpg[edit]

Hi Beria. Why was File:U2 Stay Berlin 1.jpg deleted? Your deletion summary says that it was a copyright violation as a screenshot, but that is not true; the summary description was incorrect. As was outlined on the talk page by three editors, the image was of the film set; you can see the model statue, the film crew, and elements of the soundstage. It is not a screenshot of the music video (you can compare the image with the actual music video here. I don't believe that an image of the film set constitutes a copyright violation of the music video. With that in mind, would it be possible for you to undelete/restore the image? I hope to hear your thoughts on this. Cheers, Melicans (talk) 04:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

This issue has been raised at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:U2_Stay_Berlin_1.jpg and should be discussed there where it will get more attention.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


How can you say that File:Chopin1849opt02.jpg is not a duplicate of File:Frederic Chopin photo.jpeg and how can you say that File:Jacques Offenbach.jpg is not a scaled-down version of File:Félix Nadar 1820-1910 portraits Jacques Offenbach.jpg? Please, next time try to be more careful before undo revisions! Angelus (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Then, I have completely redone this image, so the vectorization of the current version of the file is being done by me, not by Forthommel. You can compare the different images in the file history! Angelus (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Blank map of Aguascalientes.png[edit]

Hi Beria !

I saw you solved my problem with this file by changing its extension but it still wears my renaming request. What shall we do now ?

I'd say the easiest way might be to delete my request, the file seem to be usable, isn't it ?

Since I'm not an elder filemover and don't know all the secrets about file moving on Commons, I'd be glad if you could finish the work.

Please. Papatt (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Mass deletion[edit]

I don't understand these mass deletions without explications... These photos have the CC-BY-SA license, so they're OK here. Furthermore, more of these photos are available here here without problem.--Traleni (talk) 18:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

I assume most of them are flickrwashed, and should be deleted. AzaToth 20:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Vereinbarte Verwaltungsgemeinschaft Hexental in FR.svg[edit]

Hello Beria,

you deleted my rename request for File:Vereinbarte Verwaltungsgemeinschaft Hexental in FR.svg. The reason was that the filename is misleading, because a de:Vereinbarte Verwaltungsgemeinschaft is a completly different legal construct from a de:Gemeindeverwaltungsverband. The municipality is officially named de:Verwaltungsgemeinschaft Hexental and is a Gemeindeverwaltungsverband and not a Vereinbarte Verwaltungsgemeinschaft. Thanks for reconsidering your decision. --S.K. (talk) 08:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Continued at User_talk:S.K.#Re:File:Vereinbarte_Verwaltungsgemeinschaft_Hexental_in_FR.svg --Saibo (Δ) 13:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


File:Rhinoceros_spp._1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
FunkMonk (talk) 20:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


Unfortunately, you cannot revert and protect your version, even without writing anything on talk page! That is against wikipedia and commons rules. Admins should, same as other editors explain their attitude, and not just protect it, without anyone's agreement. --WhiteWriter speaks 16:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, ok, see here. Administrators noticeboard --WhiteWriter speaks 16:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Off course ?[edit]

Did you mean off-course?. Probably of course not. Does not make much sense there. Kind regards, ZeaForUs (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Local rinoceronte-de-java1.svg[edit]

Olá Beria, tem como desfazer a "burrada" que fiz nesse ficheiro? Carreguei a versão errada, rsrs. Bjs Burmeister (talk) 20:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks amore. Burmeister (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thanks a lot Beria for creating Wikimedia logo family with WMIN in center -- Naveenpf (talk) 08:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sharon Aguilar.jpg[edit]

Dear Beria,
I have let myself undelete File:Sharon Aguilar.jpg which you deleted just after two days since the deletion request had been opened. You have, sadly, acted against the instructions for administrators listed at Commons:Deletion requests; clearly, this situation wasn't an obvious copyright violation, especially considering that the other user has given some detailed arguments against closing it. Please let the uploader have seven days to prove the copyright status of this image (e.g. by sending an e-mail to OTRS); this is a widely accepted practice on Commons, so let us just follow it. Thanks! odder (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Child affected by malnutrition.jpg[edit]

Hi Beria Lima,

Can you take another look at the discussion on this file [1]. Specifically [2]. The copyright information for the file has already been provided on the talk page although 1) there's a lot of noise from a single disruptive editor, Jod0doe, who has been banned on several other projects, and whose comments make it understandably hard to follow the discussion (he just throws a lot of random noise into it all) and 2) while the copyright information has been provided on the talk page it was never incorporated into the file description itself because... well, because somebody got lazy and then because the file got protected (it's impossible to update the license if the file is protected). The image is not a copyright violation and even the dispute over it's authenticity has been settled (again, there was only one person - who's been banned exactly for this kind of crap on other projects - who was disputing this, against something like 7 or 8 other editors).

So please, don't delete the file unillaterally. If you really think there is some problems with the license - I don't think there are, but for the sake of 100% transparency - let's have this discussion on some general forum where we can have a wide range of opinions comment on it, rather than having just Russavia - who's making shit up just out of spite (which is obvious if you know the history of the editors involved, and Russavia's role in it) - influence the decision as to whether delete it or not.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

And let me add, that if you're gonna go protecting files, then you should probably protect this one as well (though please revert Jo0doe's nonsense first if possible) [3]. Seriously, this is what this guy does. He keeps pushing the same line no matter what is said to him or what kind of evidence is presented on one article, say on en-wiki. He then ends up getting that article protected. He moves onto a related article and repeats the process. Same thing happens. He does this on enough articles and he gets indef banned. So he moves to a different wiki. And it starts all over again. And he ends up banned. And now he's at Commons doing the same. exact. thing. again. The whole thing is just ridiculous.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Ti chiedo una cortesia[edit]

Ciao Beria, dato che mi hai dato modo di scoprire che l'italiano lo comprendi bene perdona se scrivo nella mia lingua madre per semplicità. Ti chiedo cortesemente di passare a dire la tua opinione in Bar italiano#Logo sufficientemente semplice? interpellando al bisogno qualche altro admin per raggiungere un minimo di consenso (o dissenso). L'esito mi darà uno strumento in più per valutare se un logo possa essere sufficientemente semplice da essere caricato senza venire a farvi perdere del tempo ogni volta ;-). Muito obrigado pela vossa atenção :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg Your regular doze of Wikilove. Enjoy! ;) Theo10011 (talk) 11:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


Prezada Beria, boa noite. Solicito sua ajuda para solucionar a questão que me foi colocada em uma imagens que recentemente fiz upload, inclusive, enviei um email para explicitando os meus direitos de uso sobre as imagens. Contudo, acredito que não estou escolhendo as licenças certas para utilização das mesmas aqui na Wikimedia Commons. Ficarei muitíssimo grato se puder me auxiliar. Um abraço, Madmaxv8 Discussão

Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Registros[edit]

Peço que verifique e elimine, se possível, as imagens desta lista, pois, a cada dia, ela se torna cada vez mais longa.

Já abri três PEs:

Abraços. Francisco (talk) 01:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

You comments would be appreciated[edit]

VDA, eu?[edit]

Carreguei algumas imagens do Flickr sob licensa 2.0, com o devido template, só que o user:Martin H. marcou tudo pra eliminar por VDA.

O sujeito é alemão, fala mal inglês, e o meu não é lá essas coisas.

Pode dar uma olhada nas fotos que ele marcou? É só ver os avisos na minha discussão.

Obrigado e beijos saudosos daquém-mar.

Yanguas (talk) 01:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


Hello Beria!

Since the Template:Uwlsubst is widely used on Commons, it would be helpful to have the text in other languages, too. Can you please write the text in Portuguese as well? Thank you in advance! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Book cover - Shibari, the Art of Japanese Bondage.jpg[edit]

The file already has permission checked and logged in the OTRS system. The file is clearly tagged to show this. It was done after the file was uploaded to Wikipedia and before it was moved to the Commons. If you have any reason to doubt the tag please contact a user with OTRS access. In the meantime I have simply removed the "no permission" tag. --Simonxag (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

In art[edit]

"In art" categories are generally used for paintings, drawings, sculpture &c, but usually not for photography. (I certainly agree photography can be art, but photographs generally have their own categories.) Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Ajuda de um Administrador[edit]

Boa tarde. Sou um colaborador antigo do Projeto, porém estou a muito inativo, talvez se lembre de mim da wikipédia. Bem, estou a escrever porque preciso de uma pequena ajuda e não descobri nada sobre o assunto. A algum tempo fiz o upload de algumas imagens e inclui meu nome completo como autor dos arquivos. Agora quando alguém busca pelo meu nome completo no Google encontra estas páginas. Você sabe como fazer para trocar o nome apenas pelo nick? Segue abaixo a lista de arquivos. Desde já agradeço. - FORTES

File:Bandeira CamposdoJordao SaoPaulo brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Cruzeiro SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Guaratingueta SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Lagoinha SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Lorena SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira SaoJosedosCampos SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Ubatuba SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Brasao CamposdoJordao SaoPaulo Brasil.svg


Beria, eu não gostei de uma foto que eu carreguei. Eu me arrependi de ter carregado só 1 uma foto no Commons. Ver aquela foto não me faz bem. Aquela foto não tem descrição, não tem fonte de origem, não tem autor e não tem licença. A licença é o mais importante e não tem. Você poderia apagar essa foto? Que não me satisfez, nem um pouco. Somos seres humanos e erramos. E nem sempre falamos a mesma língua. Eduardo P (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)