User talk:Tm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch | English | français | magyar | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | русский | +/−

File:Address by the President of Ukraine at a Joint Sitting of Dáil & Seanad Éireann (51986304939).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Address by the President of Ukraine at a Joint Sitting of Dáil & Seanad Éireann (51986304939).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Launch of a new Ukrainian children's book in the national library (52000742752).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Launch of a new Ukrainian children's book in the national library (52000742752).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

218.250.36.212 02:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Special Military Operation in Ukraine, 2022[edit]

Hello.
You replaced the category I created [1] (and deleted it from all my photos) with a redirect to another category - may I know why you do that?
What rules did the category I created violate?
In the comments of the edit, you expressed not quite clear claims: "putinist newspeak propaganda". Can you explain in more detail what you meant?
Why I can't create a category with that name? This has already been discussed in Commons, are you have such examples? (I remember you that it is not ru-wiki or ukr-wiki or anyelse where such rules really exist. But here - they not.)
I think your edits are wrong and they should be undone. I believe that I have not violated any rules of Common (for example: Commons:File naming and Commons:Naming categories ). I have not found in any Common's discussions that administrators have banned the expression "Special Military Operation".
I have taken this wording in English from the official website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation [2]. --Kursant504 (talk) 15:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Nederlands  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Tagalog  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


Gtk-dialog-info.svg
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#"Russian invasion of Ukraine" name edit warring. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Andy Dingley (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecation of CC BY on president.gov.ua[edit]

As you seem to have been uploading president.gov.ua images to Commons lately, you might have idea why the license was omitted and what are the implications. I was thinking of filing a delete request to random image after 5th to establish a precedent, but thought I'd just start asking around. Thanks! --Märt Põder (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homotopy (51953579939).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Homotopy (51953579939).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierre Lorenzi (talk) 15:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rita Matias, File:Gabriel Mithá Ribeiro, File:Jorge Galveias, File:André Ventura, File:Rita Matias (2), File:Pedro Pinto, File: Dr. José Martins, File: Gabriel Ribeiro, File: Rui Sousa e File: Pedro Frazão[edit]

Good afternoon, TM. Just to thank you for the notice and to communicate that I have already indicated the copyright, which was previously missing in the respective files mentioned above. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 18:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TM - Meanwhile I also added the copyright of the other files. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Duke of Winterfell: Porque não fala em português, visto que sabe falar a mesma ou não é português? Estas duas imagens são cada uma (má) composição tipo photoshop de outras duas fotos, nenhum das imagens carregadas por si tem metadados completos, baixas resoluções, etc. Se as imagens não são tiradas\fotografadas por si porque continua a carrega-las no Commons?? Cumprimentos. ̴ Tm (talk) 19:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Não sabia, que era português. As fotografias são sim uma fotografia, eu utilizei foi nas duas primeiras Photoshop para colocar as bandeiras de Portugal talvez seja por isso o erro. Eu não estou habituado ao commons, por isso é que tive este problema e não conheço nenhum editor edite aqui e que me poderia ter ajudado. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 19:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Duke of Winterfell: O que é facto é que nenhuma das fotos por si carregadas são da sua autoria, i.e. não foi o Duke of Winterfell que tirou alguma das fotos (muitas delas de estúdio profissional), i.e. não é o Duke of Winterfell que tem os direitos de autor. Tm (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Já entendi, eu pensava que ao carregar seriam minhas os direitos de autor, peço desculpas pelo lapço. Entretanto existem ficheiros, que fui eu que tirei as fotografias pelo qual serão meus os direitos de autor. Todas as fotografias, que foram carregadas por mim (mas não fui eu que fotografei) retirei os direitos de autor (pelo qual peço que sejam apagadas). Mais uma vez peço desculpas pelo lapço e tentarei informar-me melhor para a próxima. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Duke of Winterfell: ̃Obrigado pelo esclarecimentos. Então, quais são as fotos que foram tiradas por si, i.e. sobre os quais tem os direitos de autor? Cumprimentos.̴̴ Tm (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As fotografias que fui eu que tirei~(e como tal tenho os direitos de autor) são: ficheiro1, ficheiro2, ficheiro3 e ficheiro4. Mais uma vez peço desculpa pelo lapço. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 19:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Duke of Winterfell Como é que uma foto com cerca de 80 anos pode ser da sua autoria? E outra que parece uma foto tirada de outra? Tm (talk) 12:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A fotografia com 80 anos, é uma fotografia caseira (que tenho em casa) e a segunda fotografia foi tirada pelo meu telefone e deve ser do efeito das luzes do local. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 14:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

apaguei a pergunta anterior, pois já reparei no seu e-mail na página principal. Apenas para mencionar, que coloquei esta fotografia fui eu que a tirei, logo são meus os direitos de autor. Entretanto gostava de saber se falta alguma coisa na imagem ou alguma informação, que deva dar. Cumprimentos. --Duke of Winterfell (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback @ File talk:Speech by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Knesset. (51951564630).jpg[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Tm. You have new messages at File talk:Speech by President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Knesset. (51951564630).jpg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Aimarekin (talk) 22:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senedd book (9200911606).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Senedd book (9200911606).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : None.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFT 1758 (8593319770).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:AFT 1758 (8593319770).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

19h00s (talk) 21:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Dear Tm, could I ask you what is the meaning of this revert: Revision as of 16:51, 29 May 2022? --Taterian (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And could i question you why are you desorganizing the info uploaded next to the image, as seen in the same edit? Tm (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick reply, but what do you mean by "desorganizing"? --Taterian (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Putting all info in the same line of description or muddle the authorship field. Tm (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure if this is OK on a scripting side but since I am against edit warring I just go back and revert all my edits on your PD-mark Flickr files that were nominated for deletion. By the way, do you want me to put back deletion boiler plate too? --Taterian (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TaterianThere is no need. I´ve already removed the deletion boiler plates automatically added on the upload (as this are clearly PD images) and reorganized the info. Anywway, thanks for the addition of usefull categories. Tm (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr review tag on already reviewed files[edit]

Hello,

Could you explain me that edit: Special:Diff/661015266?

Thanks.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another user removed "PDMark-owner" tags from several Signal Corps photos. Tm (talk) 10:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of Ettelbruck, Luxembourg - DPLA - f1e0abaff822244d172e49d6985bb1be.jpg[edit]

Hi, "Reverted to version as of 22:33, 25 November 2020". Would you please explain your reasoning? the DPLA-bot uploads NARA-files using a bot-created titile, that is often not correct (as it was used for propaganda when it was made), and often does not give name, date, or location of what is shown on the photo. Also a file number is not given, just the DPLA-weblink. And what do you have against editing? Thank you and cheers Cobatfor (talk) 17:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please explain your reasoning for deleting any information\metadata from DPLA, the renaming of the original name given by NARA on its catalog (so not a "bot-created titile") to another made up by you and also why did you removed the DPLA identifier "1e0abaff822244d172e49d6985bb1be.jpg" (not an "DPLA-weblink") and replaced it with the National Archives Identifier, when this was clearly not an "meaningless or ambiguous name". So you changed the original NARA name, replaced one identifier for another and what for? Tm (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind answer. In my opinion, bot-uploaded files have serveral problems. In this case, I see no reasoning for oploading NARA-files from a different source, why not directly from NARA? With this file, the name may just have missed the date, but, as I already mentioned, the descriptions given are often incorrect and were war propaganda. For example, you reverted the edition of the File:SC 199031 - Troops of the 7th Armored Division on the lookout for snipers in the littered streets of St. Vith, Luxembourg. Company C, 23rd Armored Infantry Battalion, 7th Armored Division (49346509337).jpg. Well, okay. However, you did not mention that the NARA gives the date of 23 January 1945 and the arcive in Ireland 1 December 1944. Historically, it could be both, as the U.S. 7th Armored Division was in Sank Vith, in Belgium (not Luxembourg as mentioned in the description), both before and after the Battle of the Bulge. Compared with other photos, it may be the late date. As a historian, I see it as my duty to at least mention questions arising out of the description. A bot-upload just fires everything as it is into Commons. Take your upload File:SC 374761 - Three methods of packing tentage for shipping overseas. (52128711156).jpg. What does the title tell us about this historic photo? Not much, in my humble opinion. No date, given, no place given. The date you gave, is the (7 June 2022, 09:54), but not the date, the picture was taken (15 September 1943). So maybe, we just have different views. Kind regards Cobatfor (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rust (43904924980).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rust (43904924980).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

0xDeadbeef (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bridges by name[edit]

Hello Tm,

At [3], you removed the category by name of the bridge. Is there any point in doing that? Enhancing999 (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, this bridges are note "named after Roman Bridge", como se pode ler perfeitamente em português. Tm (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The category is called "named Roman Bridge", not named after'. If they are called "Roman bridge", the category should apply. Enhancing999 (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fala português? Estas pontes não são "named Roman Bridge", pelo que esta categoria não é aplicável. Tm (talk) 19:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ou agora também vamos ter uma categoria para "named Suspension bridge"? Tm (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not rare that bridges are called "Roman bridge" without any relation to Romans. Similarly "New Bridge" can be the oldest bridge in town. I'm not aware of that problem for suspension bridges. Enhancing999 (talk) 19:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They are called "Roman bridge" (at same place or over some river). Enhancing999 (talk) 19:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Espero pela criação de uma categoria para pontes "named suspension bridge" e similares, pelo reverti para as suas edições. Agora, quantas pontes com o nome "Ponte de Trajano" em Portugal conhece para justificar mover Category:Ponte de Trajano para Category:Ponte de Trajano (Chaves)? Tm (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For bridges, it can help identify their location in the category name, particularly when the name is shared with others, even if it may be in another language [4][5] or that name isn't the main one in use [6]. Enhancing999 (talk) 07:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:張敬軒演唱會 Hins Cheung Concert 27 5 2022 (52105216918).jpg[edit]

Hello Tm, Could you kindly explain the reason of reverting this file back to the uncropped version? Thanks. AVD1MF5119 (talk) 03:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop Tm (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Please stop moving files to a NPOV title, thanks, Huldra (talk) 21:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this, thanks, Huldra (talk) 21:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I´ve already answered you in User_talk:Huldra#Moves_outside_of_any_rules. And also others say that your moves are without any reason. Tm (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rio Alcabrichel[edit]

Hi Tm. I don't understand why this change since you once told me not to change the language of the category names chosen by the original creator. I don't mind the change if you have a strong reason for it, but I am wondering why you left the files in the old category.

Also, when you do a change like that, please do include the DEFAULTSORT: in the category, otherwise in the category:Rivers of Portugal by name this river appears under R instead of A and it is difficult to find for other users. Regards, tyk (talk) 18:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The river is Rio Alcabrichel, not Alcabrichel River, i.e. a proper name. And, if i ever told you something is more something in the region of changing its native portuguese name to a non existing english name. Regards. Tm (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categorize[edit]

Hello, good night i come for this announcement for you to stop categorizing all files with Category:Brazil is categorizing files all files is wrong. -- LeonaardoG (talk) 23:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you uploading tens of thousands of files (the vast majority about Brazil) without any modicum of categorization is right? Tm (talk) 18:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: Mas é muito melhor adicionar a categoria correta do que colocar qualquer categoria você não acha? - LeonaardoG (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Com tudo isso eu tenho que agradecer muito a você pelo seu trabalho na categorização dos meus arquivos cumprimentos amigo. - LeonaardoG (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW (9630954728).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:TW (9630954728).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:21B0:644D:EC2F:696F:E77A:B64B:A092 05:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marseilles (5275214384).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Marseilles (5275214384).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2019 Internationaux Féminins de la Vienne[edit]

Hi, Tm. Emoji u1f60a.svg
Why did you revert the changes I did in the files on the Category:2019 Internationaux Féminins de la Vienne? They were too dark so I changed the light. Minerva97 (talk) 19:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

É brasileiro, sou português e escreve em inglês? As imagens não estavam escuras, se quiser editá-las carregue as suas versões com um nome de ficheiro diferente. Também, se estiver correcto, usa definições automáticas de exposição, etc, de um programa de edição de imagem não é "changed the light" pois muitas versões ficam sobreexpostas . Tm (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bom dia.Emoji u1f60a.svg
  1. Eu não sabia sua nacionalidade, se soubesse teria feito a cortesia de escrever em português.
  2. Sim, as imagens continuam extremamente escuras.
  3. Talvez fosse uma boa ideia responder os outros usuários com um pouco mais de “elegância” em vez de grosseria.
Tenha um bom dia e boas edições. Minerva97 (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As minhas desculpas, mas cometi um lapsus linguae. Onde se lê "Também, se estiver correcto, usa definições automáticas de exposição , etc, de um programa de edição de imagem não é "changed the light" pois muitas versões ficam sobreexpostas" devia-se ler "Também, se eu estiver correcto,o Minerva usa definições automáticas de exposição, etc, de um programa de edição de imagem, que não é a mesma coisa que "changed the light" manualmente pois muitas versões ficam sobreexpostas com esses automatismos.
E as imagens não estavam subexpostas. Cumprimentos. Tm (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categorização[edit]

Obrigado pelo seu trabalho de categorizar há arquivos que estavam faltando e passaram despercebidos por mim. Continue com seu excelente trabalho. - LeonaardoG (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]