User talk:Tm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

File:07 2010 przystanek Woodstock.jpg[edit]

Are you claiming it doesn't need an explanation? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

No it doesnt need, specially when it was previously kept, even more with a template made with a crusader agenda. Tm (talk) 02:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

If you think the template can be re-worded to sound less harsh, then I would welcome your feedback. If anything it's a pragmatic response to the people who say practically anything is in scope. The template is asking them to explain WHY. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No, what your trying to do is to delete images you do not like for morality\wahtever reasons. For nominate images to deletions related with educational or scope issues we have other templates that you know very well as your making use of them. This template and its language is not based in none of our policies as is POV all the way about an very particular subject with an particular agenda. Tm (talk) 02:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry you feel that way. It seems we have a difference of opinion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No what i have is an opinion, you on the other hand have an morality agenda to censor perfectly in scope, legal and consensual female nudity images, disguised as an attempt to improve scope and educational use. Like you i have seem many and i´am not easily fooledTm (talk) 02:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
If they are in scope, legal and consenual, then I can't see why you have a problem in providing a use rationale explaining this. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
And they show, your the one that doesnt want to see. Tm (talk) 02:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I'll ask again, Why do you take issue with providing an explanation? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
See my previous aswer (and not ironically you seem to really not see). Also your trying to demand of this images explanations about scope and educational use that is not demanded for other kind of imagery. So your attempting to change Commons policies in a stealth way. Tm (talk) 02:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Ah. Well if that was the concern, the template has been put up for immediate speedy delete, . We can take the issue of scope/context in respect of particular content types somewhere more appropriate.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you providing the explanations in the two other DR's where you commented. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 02:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


And about this image is particular see Commons:Deletion requests/File:07 2010 przystanek Woodstock.jpg as you seem no not manage or want to see. Tm (talk) 02:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
@Tm: Let's face it: There are several images involving nudity on Commons that could probably be cleared out without too much complaint because of their lack of educational value (scope). I feel like ShakespeareFan is articulating himself poorly here. Personally, I think the better targets would be images like File:Akt-fisch-rr.jpg. I have a hard time seeing the EV in that image, or in File:Time For A Bath.jpg. Basically, nomination for deletion of images containing nudity shouldn't be done willy nilly, but nor should we be blind to the fact that some of the ones currently on Commons probably are out of scope. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 02:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

You should see is contributions in commons of ShakespeareFan to understand that he has an agenda and not a concern about scope or educational use (as he almost only opens deletions related with this images). Also i´ve already nominated some nude images (do to being revenge porn, out of scope or copyright violations) so i know that some nude images are out of scope (but very few. copyright and personality rights are other subject). What no one manage to explaim is why are nude images automatically more out of scope than images of trains, cats, and when i ask no one manage to articulate a rationale explanation. Not starting with some users on a morality crusade. Tm (talk) 03:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Personally, I don't think they are, which is why I've been explaining to ShakespeareFan on IRC that the better way to go about the cleanup that they want to do is to nominate images that appear to lack EV/be out of scope independently of the fact that they contain nudity. This is why I say that the two I mentioned above could go (I don't see the potential EV in those images), but the ones like the tree nudity ones he nominated should probably stay (they could conceivably be used to illustrate public nudity). Or at least that's how my thinking is going. So basically I feel like he has a legitimate concern, but is applying it rather in a rather poor way. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I've withdrawn the DR's on the basis of the explanation provided by Tm (including some he'd not yet commented on.), I seriously mis-judged this (partly as moral panic given some news coverage of the UK porn ban), and would welcome an opportunity to discuss the issues you've raised when in a position to make a more rational articulation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 03:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342872204).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342872204).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 06:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Fotos produzidas pelo Senado (31213998015).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fotos produzidas pelo Senado (31213998015).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 06:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Fotos produzidas pelo Senado (31213997875).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fotos produzidas pelo Senado (31213997875).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 06:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Fotos produzidas pelo Senado (31200902425).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fotos produzidas pelo Senado (31200902425).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 06:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Plenário do Senado (30392953223).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plenário do Senado (30392953223).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 06:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Verplaatsen, verplaatst[edit]

Beste TM,

De indeling van Santo Domingo is aangepast aan de situatie zoals die door de Dominicaanse regering enkele jaren geleden is ingesteld. Het oude Santo Domingo de Guzman bestaat niet meer, maar op Commons wilde de admin deze categorie niet meteen verwijderen. Hierdoor is er nu een probleem met de herkenning van de nieuwe situatie. Santo Domingo de Guzmán is nu een stad in de municipio van het Distrito National, waardoor ook de navy haven in Santo Domingo Este is komen te liggen en het airport in Boca Chica. Het is in het begin best lastig om de afbeeldingen in de juiste categorie te plaatsen, maar niet onmogelijk. De afbeeldingen die jij nu hebt verplaatst hebben geen plaatsaanduiding en had ik daarom in de provincie Santo Domingo laten staan. Dit is gelijk aan de categorie locatie van de oude situatie en dus niet verplaatst.

De categorie Santo Domingo en het oude SD de Guzman moeten leeg blijven. want die worden eerdaags toch verwijderd als men inziet dat de situatie is gewijzigd.

Ik ben nog bezig om categorieen en afbeeldingen naar de nieuwe indeling te schakelen. Er zijn dus wat locaties bij gekomen, ook om het ongeveer op de oude manier vindbaar te maken. Wil je zo vriendelijk zijn om de files terug te zetten? --Jos1950 (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Presidência do Senado (30914907432).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Presidência do Senado (30914907432).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 11:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342871224).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342871224).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 11:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Presidência do Senado (31021446826).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Presidência do Senado (31021446826).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (31128154646).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (31128154646).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Presidência do Senado (31057218795).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Presidência do Senado (31057218795).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (31128153906).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (31128153906).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342862474).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342862474).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Presidência do Senado (30914921492).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Presidência do Senado (30914921492).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342874074).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feiras. Exposições. Mostras (30342874074).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 12:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Portugal e Espanha DSC05912 (25469464684).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Portugal e Espanha DSC05912 (25469464684).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Marina de Albufeira[edit]

Hello Tm you have changed the category tree for Marina de Albufeira. The Marina is an environment rather than Transport! There are property developments, Bars, shops, restaurants, entertainment venues ect. If you want to create a category from this I suggest that you create "Category boats in Albufeira Marina" and place that in the transport category Kolforn (talk) 12:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Lisbon Portugal (3016881027).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lisbon Portugal (3016881027).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mhhossein talk 13:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)