User talk:Tm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.


Deutsch | English | français | magyar | македонски | +/−

File:Nathalie Volk (34308971563).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nathalie Volk (34308971563).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NVolk97 (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Why did you revert my map edit?[edit]

Trying to understand why you reverted my map edit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1855_Colton_Map_of_Kansas_and_Nebraska_(first_edition)_-_Geographicus_-_NebraskaKansas-colton-1855.jpg

Is there a Wikipedia rule that old maps must keep their yellowed aged look? My edit makes the map look more like it did when originally published. Jim Evans (talk) 14:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Now I see you've been going along behind me undoing many of my edits. I spend a lot of time doing these. If you are going to undo them with a quick click please have courtesy to notify me you are doing this and the reason. Jim Evans (talk) 14:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment How do you know what was the "look more like it did when originally published", if GLAMs dont know? Also Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Exceptions is pretty clear that "If digital restoration work is being done on a historical document or artwork, the restoration (no matter how minor) should always be uploaded under a new filename from the original file, providing a link back to the source on which it was based in the new file's "other versions" field.". So if you want a new version, upload under a new filename. Hope it is usefull. Tm (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Just as an example, in the file File:Cleveland_First_Cabinet.png cant you see why your claim that you "removed age yellowing" is clearly wrong. Just a hint:
I don't see the map in your link As for Cleveland_First_Cabinet.png. I don't see where I'm wrong Jim Evans (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
If you dont know your source material, i.e. Carte de visite and what are their characteristics, dont claim to be removing "age yellowing". This is not a hint. Tm (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
You're a rude sort. What I feel sure it true, a picture of a president of the U.S. with his cabinet would not have been so dull and faded originally. But, from here one I will leave old pictures alone even if one cannot make out much like this one. This is not sarcasm -- Can you tell me how old a picture has to be for it to be called a "historical . . . artwork" Jim Evans (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
After being told what is wrong and still think that you know everything is bad and trying to show you what your doing wrong is not being rude.
Again, saying that a "picture of a president of the U.S. with his cabinet would not have been so dull and faded originally" and claim to be removing "age yellowing", shows that you are merely in assumptions based in no knowledge of the source material. See what a Carte de visite, read something about the process. If you want to make a derivative work (i.e. other version), upload your version under a new filename and link to the original. Tm (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question. Can you tell me how old a picture has to be for it to be called a "historical . . . artwork" Jim Evans (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Tim, I hope you don't mind me jumping into a conversation on your talk page. @Jim Evans: Please see Commons:Overwriting existing files. Except in very limited circumstances, you shouldn't replace an existing image, no matter how historical or recent. It is normally better to upload the alternate version as a new file under a new file name. That way editors can choose whether to use the unaltered original or the enhanced alternative. If you upload your new versions as derivatives of the orignal and licence them on the same terms, your new versions can be kept and used. Feel free to ask for help at the help desk or my talk page if you need assistance with setting up a derivative work. From Hill To Shore (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

"Lisbon" castle walls[edit]

Image File:Moor Castle Walls, Lisbon (31578156765).jpg is not of Lisbon castle. It's way too big and the landscape doesn't fit. Moreover, the area around the castle at Lisbon is densely populated and this shows forested hills. My guess would be that this is either Sintra (but I think that's more densely forested) or Silves. In any case, not Lisbon. --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Filename and category shows very well were this image was taken. Cheers. Tm (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Geolocation shows Sintra, though. Also a Moorish castle, but about 30 km from Lisbon. --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 09:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment But in Lisbon district. Tm (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Explications[edit]

Can you explain why you leave meaningless name to the pictures whith the model Gemma Louise ? --Cody escouade delta (d) 12:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Those are not meaningless names, as these were the names given originally by the photographer and these files have been discussed in several venues. Also why putting the models full name in the filename? Tm (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
They are totally meaningless. Please read Commons:File naming: “descriptive, chosen according to what the image displays or contents portray”. --Cody escouade delta (d) 12:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
And this filenames are descriptive, as someone that is a filemover is saying to you. Also why did you rename this files to the models full name, as you did to the category in your last edits here in Commons (in January 2020), when this model name was never mentioned in the files, in the flickr descriptions or in any other place? To someone that blurred an image of two persons in a driving school this is very odd, as is the focus on the files and categories related with this model. Tm (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
No they are not descriptive, that is why they were renamed (and not by me). Because this model is known as "Gemma Louise", not only "Gemma", so the full name must appear in the file name.
The pictures of the driving school has been add to promote its company, the user was blocked on the french wikipedia.
--Cody escouade delta (d) 13:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes, they are descriptive, as i filemover is saying. I dont understand your fixation with this model, as you moved the name from a single name to the full name in the category when there was not direct connection and wihtout any reason to move the category, this back in January. Now you want to put her full name in all files??? Wanting to say the full name of the model everywhere, when you blurred the faces in an image of a driving school is ironic in the minimum. Tm (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Delete foto[edit]

Hi TM I will solve it with OTRS. Need some time to read into how to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elie Hague (talk • contribs) 20:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Speravir 20:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Html tag[edit]

Hello!

You have the html tag <a href="http://exeypanteleev.com/geeklendar" rel="noreferrer nofollow">exeypanteleev.com/geeklendar</a> in a few file of yours but it doesn't work. Do you know how to fix them?Jonteemil (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Can you please answer.Jonteemil (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello!? Can you please respond.Jonteemil (talk) 18:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Floor vs. plenary chamber[edit]

Pore favor pare imediatamente de fazer trapalhada com essas categorias, com moções copy paste. Você está errado. Como o próprio artigo indica, "floor" é o espaço dentro do plenário onde as pessoas falam, não é o próprio plenário. É impressionante, passam os anos e você continua igual. Pare imediatamente com essa mega-trapalhada ou leva bloqueio.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Pare você de fazer as suas trapalhadas. Primeiro leia en:Floor (legislative) e estes termos foram aprovados por falantes nativos de inglês. Pare de fazer ameaças de bloqueio e de abusar dessas ferramentas. Se acha que estas categorias devem ser movidas abre uma discussão para mover e espere que outros comentem, em vez da sua politica habitual de mover sem discussão e ameaçar outros. Tm (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Você devia levar bloqueio direto por depois de tantos anos ainda continuar a fazer moções por copy-paste como se ainda fosse um novato inexperiente. "Floor" é um conceito anglófono que sequer existe no Brasil, e como o próprio artigo indica, é apenas uma parte da câmara plenária. Que parte do artigo é que você não percebeu, para continuar a insistir que floor é a mesma coisa que plenário? Onde é que isso está escrito lá,s equer? -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
"Activity on the floor of a council or legislature, such as debate, may be contrasted with meetings and discussion which takes place in committee, for which there are often separate committee rooms.[1] Some actions, such as the overturning of an executive veto, may only be taken on the floor". Plenário não é mesma coisa que uma comissão parlamentar. Tm (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Senate floor. Tm (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Glossário do Senado Federal dos Estados Unidos. Tm (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Porque você traz fontes sobre o senado americano, quando o assunto é o Senado Federal do Brasil? E essa citação não indica de modo algum que "floor" é o mesmo que plenário.-- Darwin Ahoy! 21:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Você leu a própria fonte que colocou? "Action "on the floor" is that which occurs as part of a formal session of the full Senate" - não percebeu que isso e´apenas a forma de designar a actividade que se passa dentro do plenário, e não o próprio plenário?-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

veja aqui como você entendeu tudo errado. Pedir "floor" é pedir para falar durante uma sessão legislativa, não tem qualquer relação com o edifício em si. Entendeu errado, e ainda teve o desplante de reverter de qualquer maneira a correcção que foi feita, até por copypaste.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Enfim. sempre a mudar os conceitos. Primeiro o floor era o "espaço dentro do plenário onde as pessoas falam, não é o próprio plenário", agora o floor já é "apenas a forma de designar a actividade que se passa dentro do plenário, e não o próprio plenário". Afinal, ironicamente, floor é um espaço ou uma actividade? Tm (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Você sequer leu o artigo para onde linkou, por acaso? "floor" no parlamento britânico é um espaço próprio onde as pessoas falam, e é daí que vem o termo. Nos outros parlamentos é simplesmente o acto de ter voz e falar na sessão. É nisso que dá ler deficientemente inglês, depois faz essa sopa com tudo.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Veja https://www.senate.ca.gov/ e veja "The next Senate Floor Session will convene on Monday, May 4, 2020". "Senate Floor Session", enfim. Tm (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Isso não é o edifício. É impressionante, a casmurrice e a persistência no erro.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction. Se é, como diz, porque é que este documento fala de que "With very few exceptions, the House determines and enforces its own procedures for considering legislation on the floor. Its standing rules include several alternative sets of procedures for acting on individual bills and resolutions. (...) In general, though, all these procedures permit a majority of Members to work their will without excessive delays. The House passes many bills by motions to suspend the rules, with limited debate and no floor amendments, but only with the support of at least two-thirds of the Members voting." Esclarecedor, aonde há moções, votações, etc no floor. Tm (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Quanto tempo vai levar a você perceber que isso não existe no plenário brasileiro? Porque continua mostrando fontes de outros lugares e outras realidades? E mesmo na House isso continua não sendo a câmara do plenário, é apenas uma parte dela.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Quanto tempo vai levar a você parar de querer impor as suas opiniões por cima dos outros? Primeiro move sem discussão, a seguir ameaça bloquear e agora está a tentar argumentar com "outras realidades", quando já não tem mais argumentos e já sabe que não pode ameaçar impunemente? Saiba que, com estas suas atitudes, perdeu qualquer consideração que tinha ganho. Tm (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Devido ao seu deficiente conhecimento da língua inglesa, à proverbial casmurrice, e ao desprezo pelos procedimentos de moção de categorias, você lançou o caos em toda essa categorização. Vou esperar até que outra pessoa tenha a paciência de o educar sobre o que é uma câmara de plenário, e depois volto a repor tudo como estava. Se mesmo assim insistir na asneira, tanto na do nome como nas suas moções trapalhonas, já sabe onde vai parar, e desta vez espero que apanhe um mês.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Enfim... Em vez de discutir, continua com as ameaças? Por isso já se vê que é inútil continuar com estas mensagem, pelo "excelente" exemplo de comportamento por parte de um administrador, mesmo tendo em conta qualquer situação externa que possa estar a ocorrer. Tm (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Eu tento evitar conflitos, tanto que já abandonei essa categorização à completa trapalhice que você anda a fazer. Mas realmente a aplicação de um conceito anglófono ao parlamento brasileiro, porque leu mal o artigo da Wikipédia anglófona e achou que era um termo "aprovado por falantes nativos de inglês", como se os falantes de inglês fossem superiores aos outros, ou assim - o que não deixa de ser irónico, quando insiste em usar "Senado Federal do Brasil" quando existe tradução perfeitamente estabelecida para inglês; e mais uma vez a trapalhice que faz ao mover as categorias, continuando a cortar de um lado e a colar do outro como se ainda estivessemos em 2007, realmente tiram qualquer um do sério. E é sempre você, e só você que faz isso. É impressionante.-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Já agora, você não achou estranho que os seus "floors", que você garante que estão totalmente correctos, sejam os únicos plenários categorizados assim aqui no Commons? Será que estão todos errados menos você?-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | svenska | українська | 中文(中国大陆)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Hello Tm,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Desperate Journalist at Privatclub (24649055658).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Nathalie Volk (35079317976).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nathalie Volk (35079317976).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

NVolk97 (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Service members, DoD civilians and military families committed to mission success (49843698167).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Service members, DoD civilians and military families committed to mission success (49843698167).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Friend[edit]

Is our friend back, or is it just a friend of a friend? Vysotsky (talk) 18:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

@Vysotsky: I think that your talking about Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImperialArchivesRU and apologize if i´am wrong and in that case i ask that you correct me. Albeit our little friend seems give a proof of life in Wikidata, but i almost sure (99%) that this user is not in any way related with Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImperialArchivesRU. Right now i cannot answer in greater detail, but in a few hours i will present my assessment. Tm (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Clear. Vysotsky (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Fake News (48708611322).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fake News (48708611322).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

187.143.42.165 00:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Duplicates in Category:Orchids[edit]

@Tm: Hello TM, please check the 148 pictures in Category:Orchids. I think all these photos are duplicates. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Freetown 4 (49758072392).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Freetown 4 (49758072392).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Freetown 7 (49757341563).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Freetown 7 (49757341563).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bunny_Bleu[edit]

FredWalsh (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wrestling_Isn't_Wrestling[edit]

MisterSynergy (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

U.S. Naval Academy Graduation Categories[edit]

I don't know where my head is today, but I seemed to have accidentally screwed up a lot of the pictures in Category:U.S. Naval Academy Graduation May 12, 2020, between accidentally putting them in the May 14 category, taking them out but hiding the change, etc. I think I have fixed all of my mistakes now, but I just wanted to apologize regardless. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

@Elisfkc: No problem. Anyone can make mistakes and, just as an example, i´ve made some mistakes just a few days ago like delete proper categories. And the number of files in the categories in Flickr correspond with the number of files in each album in Flickr, so no harm done. Cheers. Tm (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Swearing-in Event May 16 (49921798862).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Swearing-in Event May 16 (49921798862).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

FPCandiateicon.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

File:AMIE at night (21690125821).jpg[edit]


File:AMIE at night (21690125821).jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by User:Chenzw. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Actinocephalus[edit]

Observo que ha revertido Actinocephalus, adjuntado referencias obsoletas, excepto Kew que es actual y que si lo mira bien indica que ha sido sustituido por Paepalanthus. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 07:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

cats[edit]

Category:George Floyd protests is currently four levels above Category:George Floyd protests in Washington, D.C. on June 2, 2020. Please stop adding these files back into Category:George Floyd protests. Thank you, Featous (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop removing them, before there all have been review by me. Tm (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


File tagging File:Animated Curfew Breaker.jpg[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Animated Curfew Breaker.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Animated Curfew Breaker.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
廣九直通車 (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jada Stevens and Kelsi Monroe at AVN Expo 2016 (25037794363).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jada Stevens and Kelsi Monroe at AVN Expo 2016 (25037794363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
179.236.72.180 17:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mike D'angelo - 49982542672.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mike D'angelo - 49982542672.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Mike D'angelo - 49982286011.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mike D'angelo - 49982286011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:BLM Protest 5-30-55.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:BLM Protest 5-30-55.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
A1Cafel (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Outside East Lake Hennepin County Library (49956443363).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Outside East Lake Hennepin County Library (49956443363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
(talk) 19:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | British English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
FredWalsh (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Stop reverting my edits[edit]

  • Wikimedia allows people to upload a new version of an image [1]. I have found, and uploaded a newer version of certain images, so why do you keep reverting them? PhotoBooth11 (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
You are ovwerwriting files with different works of art\sources, when upload under a new name is the norm. So upload your versions\works of art under a new filename. Tm (talk) 22:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
They are the same work of art, but i've uploaded a better quality version of it. If you look at the 4 images you will see what i'm talking about!! PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Read Commons:Overwrite. Tm (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Problem now is all of the better quality images aren't on wikipedia anymore. So if you can add them we won't be warring anymore!! PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Stop lying, as you can see that so called "better quality images" are alread uploaded under new filenames but you keep overwriting them, so you are the one that is warring.
Can you add the images to wikipedia please!! PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Do you expect to 1- fall for that excuse that you cant see them, 2 - Even if you cant see what is clearly marked and linked i will not explain where they are, as i´am not your employee and your actions do not warrant such favour. Tm (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
So you're not going to add images to wikipedia? PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Stop wasting my time. I´am not your employee that you can order around. Tm (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
So you threw a tantrum and can't even be bothered to add images you've uploaded to wikipedia...PhotoBooth11 (talk) 23:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
You are the one that overwrites images with others completely different, keep reverting even after warnings of other users, keep open deletion requests of different works of art just by spite. and i´am the one that is making a tamtrum? Tm (talk) 23:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomes[edit]

Por favor, agradaço-te que não voltares a renomar "Category:International railway line between Barca d'Alva and La Fuente de San Esteban" para "Category:Linha Internacional de Barca d’Alva a La Fregeneda e a Salamanca". Além de ser o inglês a língua padrão para as categorias em Commons, trata-se de uma linha espanhola, portanto, não faz sentido colocares o nome em português. Também não voltes a fazer, por favor, a troca de "Category:International railway bridge over river Águeda" para "Category:Ponte Internacional do Rio Águeda". Trata-se de uma ponte que liga os dois paises, portanto, além de ser o inglês a língua padrão em Commons, não faz sentido privilegiares "o nome" português. Se voltares a fazê-lo, vou ter de põr uma queixa. --Lojwe (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

A linha foi construída por iniciativa e capitais portugueses (Silva, J.R. e Ribeiro, M. (2008). Os comboios de Portugal - Volume I. 3ª Edição.Terramar.Lisboa) e o nome da Ponte já existe há muito tempo, conforme várias outras entre Portugal e Espanha com nomes portugueses ou espanhóis. Tm (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
E a linha também é em Portugal ou Barca de Alva agora é Espanha? Tm (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Muitas empresas portuguesas/espanholas/qualquer nacionalidade constróem infraestruturas no estrangeiro e não colocam o nome na sua língua, bem como no caso das espanholas. O inglês é a lingua padrão na Commons. A discussão não faz sentido. --Lojwe (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Faz sentido, esta linha foi feita para ligar o Porto e a região Duriense ao Centro da Europa, daí que a iniciativa e os capitais tenham sido exclusivamente portugueses. E a linha é Luso-espanhola pois abrange os dois territórios, não exclusivemnete em Espanha. E eu sugeria que leia bem as políticas, pois a lingua inglesa não é usada em nomes próprios. Tm (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
A sua afirmação de que "trata-se de uma linha espanhola" é contradita pelo próprio nome da Linha em Espanhol Línea Pocinho-La Fuente de San Esteban ou agora do Pocinho para leste (distrito da Bragança) é Espanha? Tm (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Isto não é um nome próprio. É só uma ponte, não tem nome. Ter nome seria alguma coisa como Ponte 25 de Avril. Eu não tenho problema em que coloques o nome em português em qualquer coisa apenas portuguesa, mas aqui é uma coisa partilhada. --Lojwe (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

O artigo na Wikipedia em espanhol não está correto, pois o troço de Pocinho até Barca d'Alva faz parta da linha do Douro. --Lojwe (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

.Pois, quando não interessa não tem nome próprio (e todas as pontes famosas tem nome próprio) e quando interessa os artigos estão errados. Tm (talk) 21:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Não é quando interessa. Eu não tenho interesse nenhum, só quero que o sujeito fique bem e o mais neutral possível. Vou editar o artigo da linha Línea Pocinho-La Fuente de San Esteban para que fique bem. Além disso, não acho que esta seja uma ponte famosa. Há muitas pontes assim na raia, sem nome próprio. --Lojwe (talk) 21:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

.Esta ponte, bem como a estação próxima, é bem conhecida em Portugal. E diz que "Vou editar o artigo da linha Línea Pocinho-La Fuente de San Esteban para que fique bem". Estou para ver as referencias que encontra para suportar o que afirma. Tm (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

File:0310 - Moskau 2015 (26373082796).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:0310 - Moskau 2015 (26373082796).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Portuguese border west of Badajoz on BA-020 (48852760412).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Portuguese border west of Badajoz on BA-020 (48852760412).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853078278).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853078278).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Vivar del Cid (48853141113).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Vivar del Cid (48853141113).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Saab 9-5NG in southern grounds (48794688483).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Saab 9-5NG in southern grounds (48794688483).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Tarifa (48808325917).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tarifa (48808325917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Tarifa (48808326932).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tarifa (48808326932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 20:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Ronda, Andalucia (48794640917).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ronda, Andalucia (48794640917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853082158).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853082158).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Labrang (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 17jiangz1 (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49883694608).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49883694608).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49884195051).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49884195051).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Unreasonable requests to delete my pictures[edit]

Hello. Thank you for saving my File:COLUMBUS STATE STATUE REMOVED.jpg picture. The same person who tried to delete that is also trying to delete File:May 1, 2020 Ohio Anti-COVID-19 Lock-down Protest.jpg and File:May 28, 2020, Aftermath of George Floyd Riot in Columbus, Ohio.jpg They are claiming that these images are not my own work but they are. I took them for the purpose of documenting history. Can you help? ThanksGingerbreadhouse97 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385451575).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385451575).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385460965).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385460965).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385469645).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385469645).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385503555).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385503555).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385597313).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385597313).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385616363).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385616363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385620603).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385620603).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385625323).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385625323).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385629923).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385629923).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385667803).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385667803).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385681903).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385681903).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385822124).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385822124).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385826874).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385826874).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385861184).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385861184).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385870444).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385870444).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Short-eared Owl (13385881264).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Short-eared Owl (13385881264).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
GRDN711 (talk) 15:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Rumble In The Valley- Release 20k By May 4IMG 0466 (49814489713).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rumble In The Valley- Release 20k By May 4IMG 0466 (49814489713).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
A1Cafel (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Ambere nude in a photographic studio 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ambere nude in a photographic studio 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
MayfieldKings (talk) 16:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Gilda Roberts @ Salon Mutzenbacher 2010 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gilda Roberts @ Salon Mutzenbacher 2010 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
MayfieldKings (talk) 16:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Pile of Poo or U+1F4A9 (31891643061).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pile of Poo or U+1F4A9 (31891643061).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
MayfieldKings (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Freedom Or Bust May Day Rally (Ohio) bIMG 1116 (49843906701).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Freedom Or Bust May Day Rally (Ohio) bIMG 1116 (49843906701).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Freedom Or Bust May Day Rally (Ohio) bIMG 1329 (49843906501).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Freedom Or Bust May Day Rally (Ohio) bIMG 1329 (49843906501).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Santa Rita de Cássia (ship, 1995)[edit]

Ferry Boat Santa Rita de Cassia 02.JPG

You changed the category. But have a look at the image. The name of the vessel is painted with large letters on the ship. Here in Commons we use the names of categories the names as painted on the vessel. To make it easy to find images. So the Category:S.ta Rita de Cássia (ship, 1995) was the correct category. --Stunteltje (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

In what policies do you base your assertions? Also do you know what means that dot in portuguese in this context. My move was correct, as shown by the local municipality, local news site, regional radio, regional newspaper or a national newspaper. Tm (talk) 22:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately we do not have strict rules for naming categories in Commons. But it is intended to make it as easy as possible to find images. No problem at all with different naming systems, based on the language, in local wikipedia's. But Commons is for international use. Not exepert international users are not aware of what that dot means in portuguese language and look for the ship by the name as painted on the vessel. I categorised thausands of ship and follow that practice. --Stunteltje (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
But the name is "Santa Rita de Cássia" and that is the name that is the dot in S.ta is merely an abbreviation of S[an]ta and anyone that searchs this ship will search for its name, not an abbreviation, and so using an abbreviation that almost none no-portuguese speaker would know and also many portuguese speakers and so this would not "make it as easy as possible to find images". Tm (talk) 22:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
"S.ta Rita de Cássia" ferry references in Google search= 16900 against "S.ta Rita de Cássia" ferry references in Google search= 1. Tm (talk) 22:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
O.K. Good argument. I'll rest my case. There is a redirect. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)