User talk:Tm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

File:100Years 6371 (8435664221).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:100Years 6371 (8435664221).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 12:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Highly Suspect[edit]

Hello Tm, how are you? First of all, thank you for the images of Highly Suspect you have uploaded, they are great. I wanted to use one of those images but I couldn't. I am a user of Spanish Wikipedia (sorry for my poor English) and I just created the article of this band, but I couldn't use your files, I don't know why. Could you help me? --Santi Cba (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Julio da Luz (4916705607).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Julio da Luz (4916705607).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

nombres de categorías[edit]

Hola, bom dia: Según la política de nombres de categorías en Wikimedia Commons, las categorías deben ser nombradas en inglés y no en el idioma del lugar de las fotos. Disculpa que te escriba en español. Puedes contestarme en portugués --DPC (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Não é bem assim. Veja "Particular individual object (a specific person, building, monument, artwork, organization, event etc.) uses a singular form usually (but not always). Proper nouns which have not an established English variant are not translated ad hoc and use the original form" em Commons:Categories#Category_names e esta prática também é ussda nas categorias de países francófonos e germânicos. E também é impossível dividir os monumentos portugueses por feguesias, pois se existem 308 concelhos portugueses e a categorização já é difícil para oncerca de 4/5 utilizadores que os mantém regularmente (e que chegaram a esta categorização pela prática e discussão), com as freguesias a serem 3092, seria seja um pesadelo de categorização, pois se juntarem a estas categorias temos as por distrito, por grau e as por género. Tm (talk) 10:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Entiendo y comparto lo que me dices sobre la imposibilidad de asignar cada foto a una freguesia. Sin embargo, no comparto tu interpretación sobre el nombre de las categorías. Por ejemplo, «Necrópole medieval do Vascoveiro» o «Cruzeiro em Lamegal» no son nombres específicos, sino genéricos, completamente traducible al inglés, como podría ser «Cathedral of Palencia» o mejor «Cologne Cathedral», pero las creas en portugués. Yo creo que no se debe hacer así, aunque franceses y alemanes (y españoles) lo hagan. No voy a discutir ni cambiarlas.
Gracias por mantener y crear nuevas categorías, sé que es un trabajo duro. Cuando termine de subir fotos de esa zona (Pinhel, Figueira de Castelo Rodrigo, Vila Nova de Foz Côa y Mêda) te aviso por si quisieras crear algunas más. --DPC (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Tm and @David Perez: I got a ping from @Hedwig in Washington: Could you explain me what the problem is in English or Spanish? I don't understand Portuguese. Thanks. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: and @Cookie: there were two questions: one is already solved, and it is whtat I said to Hedwig in Washington about deleting a Category I created. I created the "Category:Classified monuments in parish of Pinhel" which was deleted as duplicated of "Category:Classified monuments in Pinhel". Pinhel is a municipality but a parish too, so I thought it could be a good idea to make it. TM showed me that it's impossible to create a category for every parish in Portugal. I do agree.
The other question is about naming categories in portuguese. I created some categories of places and monuments in Portugal with English titles that were changed into Portuguese by TM. I told him to name them in English but he argued " 'Particular individual object uses a singular form usually' and 'Proper nouns which have not an established English variant are not translated ad hoc and use the original form' as they do in French and German languages too". Then I answer that neither "Necrópole medieval do Vascoveiro" (medieval necropolis of Vascoveiro) nor "Cruzeiro em Lamegal" (wayside cross in Lamegal) are specific names but general names and they also are names perfectly translatable into English. These are two examples, but there are more: "Category:Church of Our Lady of Annunciation, Leomil" changed to "Category:Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Anunciação (Leomil)", "Category:Metellos Manor House in Pinhel" to "Category:Solar dos Metelos", "Category:Church of Our Lady of Annunciation, Leomil" to "Category:Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Anunciação (Leomil)", etc.
Finally, I thanked TM for creating and making maintenance of portuguese categories and I told him that when I finished uploading some photos of Pinhel and surroundings, I'll ask him to create new categories if necessary. And, with different words, I said to both, TM and Hedwig in Washington, that I do prefer to use my time on uploading photos to Wikimedia Commons than arguing about categories, so that's why I said "I don't mind the —in this case, IMO, and not only— portuguese categories mess". But, obviously, I do prefer a well ordered and standardized system of categories ;) --DPC (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
The problem here seems to be the interpretation of the policy. One of the exceptions to naming a category in English is when it's referred to a particular individual object, such a specific building, monument, etc. With this premise on sight, if we tried to translate Category:Casa dos Bicos into English it'd be a mistake, since it is indeed an exclusive building. But a "igreja" is not, no matter if the church is devoted to a certain saint, or a certain advocation, it's just one among many others and the same happens to "necrópole", "cruzeiro", "aqueduto" or any other common names. There's a real mess in Portuguese categories, but the issue isn't new. It was treated here some years ago. In my opinion all these categories should be renamed. That there are German, French or Spanish categories named in their own language is not a reason to replicate the error as a rule. I'd like to read @Hedwig in Washington: opinion on this and see if something can be done. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Esta categoría que acabas de crear «Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Assunção (Pinhel)» ¿no sería mejor llamarla «Igreja de Nossa Senhora da Assunção em Lamegal (Pinhel)»? Está claro que Lamegal se encuentra en Pinhel, también en Guarda, y creo que ese nombre dará lugar a confusiones. Por supuesto yo creo que el nombre correcto sería «Church of Our Lady of the Assumption, Lamegal» --DPC (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Nâo. Veja forma como as outras categorias de igrejas poruguesas estão criadas e verá que não é assim. E o nome é sempre em português, não inglês Tm (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Sí, veo que muchas otras categorías de iglesias portuguesas están creadas así, es decir, no siguen las políticas de Wikimedia Commons, están también mal creadas. Imagínese que rusos, chinos, ucranianos... creen categorías en su idioma y grafía, sería imposible encontrar nada. Por eso las directrices de Commons piden que se escriban en el idioma franco: inglés. Otra cosa son las páginas, esas pueden ir en cualquier idioma y grafía. Debería reconsiderarlo. --DPC (talk) 13:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Seguem as regras como disse acima, ou acha que franceses, alemães, belgas, holwndeses ou suecos estão errados? Curioso como ninguém se preocupa com os nomes das categorias dessas línguas, inclusive nativos dessas línguas, mas já com os nomes portugueses e espanhóis muita gente se preocupa. Porque será?
¡Porque portugueses y españoles somos más serios! ;) de todas formas, preguntaba por incluir Lamegal en la categoría, pues hay al menos tres iglesias más de Nossa Senhora da Assunção en Pinhel: Alverca da Beira/Bouça Cova, União das freguesias de Atalaia e Safurdão, Lamegal y Valbom/Bogalhal. --DPC (talk) 14:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I think the two of you should agree to disagree. We probably won't be able to do any serious improvement in the Portuguese categories anytime soon. In general, I agree with Cookie that the Cathedral categories should be renamed. But I won't start a world war about some silly categories. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Silly categories? world war? IMO, this is not a good sysop answer. --DPC (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Well, these categories might be as silly as the French, Spanish, German or Chinese ones. The discussion here is about naming categories according to policies so, as we have more civic ways to solve something than starting a war I've put them into discussion. Let's read some other opinions on this issue. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Obey (6405257643).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Obey (6405257643).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Found5dollar (talk) 17:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Ellen Rosenblum.jpg[edit]

Per Commons:File renaming, criterion #2 states "To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image displays." Flickr ID isn't necessary for image identification. MB298 (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

  • This criteria of "meaningless or ambiguous nameas" as nothing to do with flickr id as this is clearly labeled as ambiguous names as "building in my city" or meaningless as "photo" not the flickr id. Tm (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

categorías para fotos[edit]

Como te dije más arriba, he subido fotos de Pinhel, Figueira de Castelo Rodrigo, Vila Nova de Foz Coa y Mêda, por si quieres pasarte por aquí para crear nuevas categorías (aunque no estemos de acuerdo en cómo nombrarlas). --DPC (talk) 07:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

u reverted my edit of pic[edit]

Participants with the Water Warrior class perform squats prior to entering the pool at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, July 6, 2011 110706-M-VD776-004.jpg

Hi... i had cropped this pic and also increased its brightness. U reverted my edit. Actuly id removed the African American lady from the pic as she was not exactly in a squatting position, which is what the pic wanted to show. So plz dont put her back by reverting my edit. As for changing its brightness, u can do so if u wish.

Please see Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop as this crop is substancial, overexposed. So if you want upload your version under a new filename. Tm (talk) 23:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24535862682).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24535862682).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24644205935).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24644205935).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24016046994).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24016046994).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24562123021).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24562123021).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24348752260).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24348752260).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24348786120).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24348786120).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24348806390).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24348806390).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork and Ann (24017572433).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork and Ann (24017572433).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24017476553).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24017476553).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Madeira - Hotel Calheta Beach, Calheta - the parrot show (24013558744).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Madeira - Hotel Calheta Beach, Calheta - the parrot show (24013558744).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24535938172).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artwork (24535938172).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artworks (24618145376).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Calheta - Casa das Mudas Art Centre - artworks (24618145376).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Avro Tutor, The Shuttleworth Collection. (12075193575) (2).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Avro Tutor, The Shuttleworth Collection. (12075193575) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Some of the content of your talk page was archived[edit]

Hello Tm, I archived some of the content of your talk page (from 1 January 2015 to 29 December 2015) to User talk:Tm/Archive 6, because the template include size has exceeded. When the template include size exceeds, new templates added on a page will not work. So I advise you to watch your talk page's parser profiling data. Thanks! Poké95 11:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Avro Tutor, The Shuttleworth Collection. (12075193575) (2).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Avro Tutor, The Shuttleworth Collection. (12075193575) (2).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Poké95 11:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)