More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.
-- 17:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You've tagged the file 'File:Interior of the Chowringhee Theatre, Calcutta, from the circle looking towards the stage, showing the first few rows of seats by William Prinsep.jpg,' as needing restoration. Please note that this is a pen-and-ink drawing. I question whether it needs 'restoration.' Moreover, I've had some poor luck recently here with heavy-handed restoration. Thanks. MarmadukePercy (talk) 21:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC) noted- it is removed--Moneya (talk) 00:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello Moneya, could you elaborate on your copyvio suspicion for this image? There is nothing copied; the peoples listed on the file's map are listed on the book's map, and the page number is given. The map is not a copy, and its origin is explained in the information section of the file. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 22:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- No harm done, such things happen. I gave the citation of the image content before the citation of the map background because that's what a wikipedia editor looks for to satisfy the "use reliable sources" criterion (ie, "where did this content come from" rather than "where did the background come from") ... from a commons point-of-view, the content citation is probably irrelevant, but I started doing it this way some time ago, because I'm aiming at the wikipedia community. Sorry if the info section threw you for a loop for a second. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 02:53, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
|File:Dragon 3.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Hello Moneya, there is a discussion about a request regarding your image-reviewer userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Inactive_Image-reviewers. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
File tagging File:Rose.gif
|This media was probably deleted.|
|Thanks for uploading File:Rose.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (email@example.com). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (