User talk:Papa Lima Whiskey
|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
Hi - I am hoping to change the licensing on my photographs from GFDL-1.2 to multilicence GFDL-1.2 and CC-BY-SA-3.0 in the near future. As you made changes to this image, would you be happy for this to be licensed in the same way? – Tivedshambo (talk) 11:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Hello, Papa Lima Whiskey!
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.
BotMultichillT 22:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Dragonfly colourful wings.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Yellow Lamborghini Gallardo edit2
Sorry for the late reply, I saw you made some minor edits but for me it was the general composition which was unappealing: the grey car parking (?) setting, the coloured tags on the plants on the right, the random patches of sky in the background... This is not to say is not a good image, is just not FP for me. Sorry if this is dissapointing. --Elekhh (talk) 01:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Message from Igor Sokolov
Hello. My name is Igor Sokolov. I am a history teacher at the university. I am very interested in portraits of rulers of Europe. Maybe you have the ability and desire to place and other high-resolution images from the collections of the National Gallery? I'll be very grateful for the help. I think these high-quality images will please many fans of portraiture.
Portrait of the Doge, Andrea Gritti probably 1523-31, Vincenzo Catena http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/vincenzo-catena-portrait-of-the-doge-andrea-gritti
Cardinal de Richelieu 1633-40, Philippe de Champaigne http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/philippe-de-champaigne-cardinal-de-richelieu
Triple Portrait of Cardinal de Richelieu probably 1642, Philippe de Champaigne and studio http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/philippe-de-champaigne-and-studio-triple-portrait-of-cardinal-de-richelieu
Edzard the Great, Count of East Friesland 18th century, German http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/netherlandish-edzard-the-great-count-of-east-friesland
Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici and Monsignor Mario Bracci after 1532, Attributed to Girolamo da Carpi http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/attributed-to-girolamo-da-carpi-cardinal-ippolito-de-medici-and-monsignor-mario-bracci
The Duke of Wellington 1812-14, Francisco de Goya http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/francisco-de-goya-the-duke-of-wellington
The Duc d'Orléans after 1842, Studio of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/studio-of-jean-auguste-dominique-ingres-the-duc-dorleans
Portrait of Pope Julius II 1511, Raphael http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/raphael-portrait-of-pope-julius-ii
The Dauphin, Louis de France 1760s, Studio of Alexandre Roslin http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/studio-of-alexandre-roslin-the-dauphin-louis-de-france
Cardinal Fleury after 1728, Studio of Hyacinthe Rigaud http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/studio-of-hyacinthe-rigaud-cardinal-fleury
Portrait of the Archduke Albert about 1615, Studio of Peter Paul Rubens http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/studio-of-peter-paul-rubens-portrait-of-the-archduke-albert
Portrait of the Infanta Isabella about 1615, Studio of Peter Paul Rubens http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/studio-of-peter-paul-rubens-portrait-of-the-infanta-isabella
The Grand Duke Ferdinand II of Tuscany and his Wife probably 1660s, Justus Sustermans http://nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/justus-sustermans-the-grand-duke-ferdinand-ii-of-tuscany-and-his-wife
The Emperor Napoleon I 1815, Emile-Jean-Horace Vernet http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/emile-jean-horace-vernet-the-emperor-napoleon-i
Philip IV of Spain about 1656, Diego Velázquez http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/diego-velazquez-philip-iv-of-spain
Philip IV of Spain in Brown and Silver about 1631-2, Diego Velázquez http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/diego-velazquez-philip-iv-of-spain-in-brown-and-silver
The image File:Rathaus Großbottwar neu edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rathaus Großbottwar neu edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.
Notification about possible deletion
|Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.