User talk:Rjcastillo/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rjcastillo!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bienvenido[edit]

Bienvenido mi pana --The Photographer (talk) 15:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Version Alterna de Cerveza Zulia[edit]

Epale Ricardo, he creado una version alterna de la Cerveza Zulia, dime que te parece?

Original
Versión Alterna

--The Photographer (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gorra MLB.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nuevas fotos[edit]

Verga no las veo, hay que esperar un pelo a que toolserver genere las miniaturas de las fotos que acabas de subir, acuérdate de firmar cada vez que me escribas --The Photographer (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Están muy buenas, especial mención a Santa Lucia III, fue la que quedo mas clara y claro la de la plaza de las Muñecas. Veo que las tomaste desde el carro, acuérdate de preparar la exposición correcta, cuando hay demasiada diferencia de contrastes es bueno lanzarse la misma foto en diferentes aperturas y luego unirlas en un hdr. He realizado una modificación de corte y exposición a la versión III de la Plaza de Santa Lucia, dime que piensas? --The Photographer (talk) 03:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Es muy probable que solo te digan overexposed, hay que ir anotando las exposiciones para los tipos de cielo de aqui dependiendo de la hora. Me voy a dormir, hablamos otro dia, ando mamao del juego de infarto del Barcelona contra Granada. Hablamos --The Photographer (talk) 04:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excelente, felicitaciones, ambas fueron seleccionadas de calidad --The Photographer (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La luna se ve bastante bien, para haberla hecho sin tripode esta excelente. Creo que para hacer este tipo de fotos si nos haria falta un opteka de esos manuales de 400 mm, sin embargo es casi imposible enfocar con esos. He estado leyendo que para tu camara sería bueno uno similar al Sigma APO Teleconverter 2x EX DG, sería cuestión de averiguar. El problema que tenemos es que con nuestros lentes podemos tomar solo el tipo de fotos para lo que fueron construídos --The Photographer (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chamo me puse a revisar la pagina de tu usuario y cambie category por cat para ver que pasaba y se actualizo, no se que pasa sinceramente, sin embargo, se actualizo que es lo que importa --The Photographer (talk) 22:28, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Viste lo que te escribió Sfu?, "no me gusta la gente que no respeta su perspectiva corregida de santo poderoso ;)". Es una broma, hay que saber entender las bromas en Ingles --The Photographer (talk) 01:55, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tu corrección de perspectiva de la chinita, te quedo mejor que la que yo hice --The Photographer (talk) 04:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chamo me puedes explicar que esta haciendo el tipo sentado en el banco con los dedos aqui? --The Photographer (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Derechos de autor sobre juguetes[edit]

El asunto es que en principio, antes del proceso de fabricación del juguete, este fue diseñado por alguien y posiblemente sus derechos cedidos a alguna empresa como Disney, Marvel, Matel, ect. El juguete en si mismo es visto como una obra de arte, las obras de arte, al igual que los juguetes tienen derechos de autor y que solamente caducan en la mayoría de los casos 100 anos luego de la muerte de su autor, estos pasan al dominio publico. En otros sitios para subir imagenes no es tan importante el asunto de los derechos de Autor, aquí mismo en Venezuela no existe una legislación al respecto, sin embargo, los trabajos que subimos aqui son vistos por millones de personas, por ello la importancia de respetar los derechos de autor en la mayoría de sus países. He sabido de fotos que he tomado que han sido expuestas en el Museo de Historia Natural de Francia, por ejemplo, si esta foto habría tenido un problema con derechos de autor, esto no habria sido posible. Existen muchos vacíos legales en Venezuela respecto a estos temas. --The Photographer (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Por otro lado, los logotipos también tienen derechos de autor a excepción de aquellos que son solo letras, las letras no tienen derechos de autor y por ello la foto de la gorra esta bien. --The Photographer (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, chamo suerte manana en las votaciones, voy a ver si logro hacer unos cuantos disparos, hablamos. --The Photographer (talk) 02:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Sta. Lucia III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, nice.--Jebulon 10:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza La Muñeca.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exhibicion de carro II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very fine composition. No need for PC here. --Kreuzschnabel 17:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Isla Dorada.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please remove the dust spot, annotation added. -- JDP90 17:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Ready. thanks for the observation --Rjcastillo 16:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Better to be slightly brightened. --JDP90 17:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC) Please have another look --Rjcastillo 00:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buzz Lightyear.JPG[edit]

File:Buzz Lightyear.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collection toys I.JPG[edit]

File:Collection toys I.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collection toys II.JPG[edit]

File:Collection toys II.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carro de Madera.JPG[edit]

File:Carro de Madera.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carro de madera II.JPG[edit]

File:Carro de madera II.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carro de madera III.JPG[edit]

File:Carro de madera III.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:37, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max I.JPG[edit]

File:Max I.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

George Miquilena · talk 00:38, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:San_Sebastián_I._Paseo_Ciencias.JPG[edit]

¡Holà Rjcastillo, Bienvenido en QI de "Commons"!

I've promoted your picture of San Sebastian, which is not perfect, but could pass for QI.

There are a few formal issues you should maybe correct, in a next occasion:

Beware of the categorization. You have to chose the more precise categories. In this case, you chose "Saint Sebastian", but we have a special category "Statues of Saint Sebastian in Venezuela", which was empty !!! I've corrected this.

Finding many categories is interesting too: your picture will be more visible, and more useful for users.

Please be more precise in your description: apart from the category "Maracaibo", nothing in the file page describes the subject: "Who" ? "Where" ? "What" ? sometimes "why" ? are questions of reviewers, and maybe of users of "Commons".

As French, I don't know (almost) nothing about your country (I've had some news about your presidential election yesterday

), and it is very interesting to me to know things from South-America. But if one read the comment on the file page, one does not learn anything about this statue, only about the surroundings. If you try: "Statue of Saint Sebastian, by sculptor XXX in the year XXX, located in XXX square, Maracaibo, Venezuela", (even in spanish) and then, your interesting explanation, it could be interesting for me, don't you think so ?

Do you know what is "geocoding" ? It is a way to provide geo coordinates of pictures, there are many tools for that, and it is very interesting if one can find the place where a picture was taken, with Google maps for instance.

Anyway, welcome again, and in case of need, please don't hesitate for help ! If I can help you, I should !

Friendly from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 17:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Derechos de autor[edit]

Hola, Rjcastillo. Lamentablemente, las fotografías de juguetes están sujetas a los derechos de autor de los juguetes y legalmente son obras derivadas; por lo tanto, es imposible aceptarlas en Commons sin permiso expreso del titular de los derechos de autor de cada juguete. Puedes verificarlo en Commons:Trabajos derivados. Lo lamento, pero todas las fotografías de juguetes que subiste deben eliminarse. --Ralgis^talk 04:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aunque no tenga marca, el creador es el titular de los derechos de autor. Si deseas conservar esa imagen, debes pedirle permiso al amigo de tu padre y confirmarlo a través de OTRS, teniendo en cuenta que el autor debe estar de acuerdo con que se publique bajo una licencia libre y que cede este permiso perpetuamente a todo el mundo (o sea, no solamente a ti o a algún proyecto Wikimedia). --Ralgis^talk 05:25, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Temas en QI[edit]

Quería que te pasaras por Commons talk:Quality images candidates, ahí encontré varios temas que nosotros hemos tratado antes, te recomiendo que leas "Overdose in QIC ?". He subido unas cuantas fotos que tome en San Carlos el Viernes, hablamos en el trabajo --The Photographer (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Estoy revisando el historial para ver que ha sucedido, a veces usuarios no registrados vandalizan la pagina. Esto es Commons y al igual que Wikipedia todo el mundo puede editar, es la mecánica aunque a veces pasan estas cosas por personas malintencionadas, sin embargo, si no soy yo, alguno de los de QI lo reparara pronto, acuerdate que a esta hora en la mayoria de sus paises es media noche --The Photographer (talk) 02:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listo! ya esta reparado --The Photographer (talk) 02:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mira las fotos de Marcial Quintero, el chamo que te dije que trabaja con Nori aqui --The Photographer (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formas de votar --The Photographer (talk) 18:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Una FP no depende del sitio en donde vivas o cuanto viajes sino del Buen ojo, Ingrediente correcto, Creatividad y Humor --The Photographer (talk) 15:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Un espacio[edit]

Pareciera referirse a un espacio entre los comentarios, no entiendo tampoco a decir verdad, pregúntale a Alto Contrate que rayos suizo decir. --The Photographer (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enlace a la galería[edit]

Éste es el enlace a la galería que te comentaba --The Photographer (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chamo he estado probando algunos plugins de gimp, especificamente liquid, compara este mismo archivo con su versión anterior. --The Photographer (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Busto. Simon Bolivar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. I added an English file description together with the location. Next time, please do this prior to nomination. --NorbertNagel 15:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant en Isla Dorada.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please remove the dust spot, annotation added. -- JDP90 17:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Ready. thanks for the observation --Rjcastillo 16:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC) Please have another look --Rjcastillo 00:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A bit dark, but I'll give you benefit of the doubt and assume that was reality's problem. Mattbuck 12:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa de Reconocimeinto.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments NIce. A geocode would add to the value.--Jebulon 15:03, 11 October 2012 (UTC) Done--Rjcastillo 15:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendedor de cepillado.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Problematic IMO because of the personal rights of the people on the photo. Do you have their permission to publish the photo? --NorbertNagel 15:22, 7 October 2012 (UTC) yes --Rjcastillo 16:27, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Sebastián II. Paseo Ciencias.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:Antena parabólica.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

Blond (talk) 16:05, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be more careful[edit]

Please, be more careful, I undo your edit, remove almost all the contents of the page. Add your last comment again, it is removed during the rollback. --Art-top (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries--High Contrast 21:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me--Lmbuga 22:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC) Comment The sentence "please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries" was not written by me. Some software error occured and caused this. Maybe the real author of this line can be determined. Regards, High Contrast 09:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zinnia elegans 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries--High Contrast 21:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, and I have requested the file to be renamed to correct binomial ID. Prenn 15:36, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Comment The sentence "please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries" was not written by me. Some software error occured and caused this. Maybe the real author of this line can be determined. Regards, High Contrast 09:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flor amarilla I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mattbuck 01:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa en honor. Virgen de Coromoto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please distort into a rectangle. Mattbuck 14:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC) Done Uploaded new version. Please another look --Rjcastillo 17:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 17:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna de los Cedros III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpen and increase contrast please. Mattbuck 16:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks for the recomendation. Please another look --Rjcastillo 23:33, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that's any better. Mattbuck 11:24, 23 October 2012 (UTC) Done now?. Please look again --Rjcastillo 00:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tried my own version. Mattbuck 11:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Comment very good. nice. thanks for the correccion --Rjcastillo 15:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Good now.--Jebulon 22:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasarela de Humanidades I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sufficient for QI. - A.Savin 16:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About "File:Virgen de Coromoto.jpg"[edit]

Hi, Rjcastillo. Just a few words about your withdrawal of File:Virgen de Coromoto.jpg. I think your picture is good but, after the last correction, you probably didn't noticed that you uploaded it with a too small resolution : 179 Ko instead of 2 Mp required by the QI rules. So I think you've got to nominate your file again in a few days from now, but with a higher resolution. If you have some problems about this, ask me : I'm an old retired man (you're younger than my son !) and I've been helped a lot here in my beginnings, in may... so, even if I'm not a specialist, I think it's my turn to try to help others. -- Thanks for your review about the dustspot on my file, this morning : I worked a lot on it but I didn't see the spot... and I'm not really sure the picture is good. Anyway, it's not a big problem. -- Sorry for my ENglish. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Nicolás I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done now? --Rjcastillo 01:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Has corregido el balance de blancos, que es de agradecer, pero sigue estando demasiado oscura Poco a poco 19:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Comment ahora ? --Rjcastillo 23:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now --Poco a poco 19:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transmisión de energía eléctrica II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remolque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now Poco a poco 12:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Jardin El Monumental (pasarela de Humanidades).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted a bit anticlockwise, would probably also be better with sharpening. Mattbuck 02:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Done now? --Rjcastillo 03:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still a bit unsharp but acceptable. Mattbuck 11:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estructura principal de la pasdarela de humanidades.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 02:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de agua. Jardin El Monumental.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really nice photo, nice colours and detail, looks a lovely place.--Danesman1 21:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vías del Metro de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estructura eléctrica (Metro de Maracaibo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 10:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 07:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camón Grúa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 06:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antenas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (though a bit too birdy). - A.Savin 10:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torta de Cumpleaños.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit blurry at the bottom, but OK. - A.Savin 10:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tranvía de Maracaibo III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 10:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación Altos de La Vanega I (Metro de Maracaibo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancla I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's good, but please add English description in your QI candidates. --Kadellar 15:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks. Please another look --Rjcastillo 19:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! QI --Kadellar 21:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tranvía de Maracaibo I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment CCW tilt. --Iifar 10:05, 6 November 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks. Please another look. --Rjcastillo 16:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC) Support --Iifar 17:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tranvía de Maracaibo II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 13:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats and thanks[edit]

A few days ago I wrote I could help you, but now I'm not sure it's necessary : since the day of my message you've got a lot of pictures promoted. So, congratulations not only because of the promotions but because your photos are really nice. You've got technical skills I haven't and you'll soon be a very good contributor... -- Before writing these words, on your discussion page, I read a message Jebulon sent you in October: he's one of the Commonners who helped me a lot and his advices have always been good concerning my photos ; moreover he's really friendly and always ready to help other contributors. -- Thanks for your votes too, of course, but don't fotget to be demanding (I'm sometimes absent-minded) ! -- Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 09:24, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Indio Mara I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Ana María Campos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good despite the light conditions. QI for me. --JLPC 11:11, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Vigen de la Chinita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque infantil I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:57, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atardecer II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atardecer I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:01, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Burate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Light could be better but I like the composition and technical quality is OK for me --Haneburger 08:45, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but I'd like to know a bit more about the statue. --JLPC 08:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Distribuidor Ricardo Aguirre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be a bit brighter imo. -- JLPC 19:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Comment now ? --Rjcastillo 17:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better imo. --JLPC 08:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venta de caña de azúcar III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque de Diversiones.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquaventura Park (Parque Acuático).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:36, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About your questions[edit]

After six month on the QI page, I often feel the same as you : I don't understand everything but I think I can help you. So, ask as many questions as you want : I'll try to answer and if I can't I'm sure one or two French Wikipedians will help me.... The main problem, in my opinion, is the language : I don't speak Spanish at all and your English is not better than mine ! There's a possible solution : ask your questions in English and in Spanish (it might be useful for me, even if I'm a non-speaker)... and if some friends of yours speak French I can answer in English and in French too (!). -- Let's try. Best regards. JLPC (talk) 14:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-review Heissen-Markt-Und-Alte-Buergermeisterei-Abend.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your comment to my photo File:Heissen-Markt-Und-Alte-Buergermeisterei-Abend.jpg on QI. I've corrected distortion and sharped a bit. It would be great, if you re-review. Many Thanks! --Tuxyso (talk) 18:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Benito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 08:56, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San José I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanque de almacenamiento.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pala Excavadora I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tractor I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balancín petrolero III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:42, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antena II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but a few words about it (place, use) would be interesting. --JLPC 18:46, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balancín petrolero I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (despite short caption imo). --JLPC 18:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Indio Mara II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Thanks. Please anther look --Rjcastillo 12:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC) Comment Trataron de hacerlo rectangular, pero los bordes son malos --Rjcastillo 13:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you lighten it a bit up? It looks a bit underexposed, sorry for missing that in the first comment Poco a poco 03:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Comment now ? --Rjcastillo 17:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see no difference regarding brightness Poco a poco 03:17, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Done Please another look. now ? --Rjcastillo 02:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Poco a poco 04:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balancín petrolero II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --JDP90 04:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bréhat 22 Jardin Kéranroux 2010.jpg (Answer)[edit]

Hi, Rjcatillo, Bréhat is a small (and flat) island in northern French Britanny and cars are not allowed on this small part of the country : inhabitants or tourists can olny use bikes to go from one point to another (on the day I took this picture, I walked all day). Of course the islanders can use their tractors and I think two or three public cars are allowed (postman for instance). So the bike in the corner is an indication about the life on Brehat Island... But I give you these details, only because you live on a distant part of the world ! In fact, I try never to discuss about my photos (and generally agree about technical issues) . An old photographer saying is : "A good picture is worth a thousand words" but, imo, a thouthand words (or ten thousands) can't turn a bad picture into a good one ! -- Don't worry about my picture : if it's is not good for you, no problem and thanks for your promoting the onter one.-- Concerning your photos, their technical quality is good ; just an advice : mind the light when you shoot ourdoors. I've noticed you shot some of them "against the light" but all of them are intended be used in Wikipedia, i. e. the more detailed they are, the better they are, so it's better to work with a good "traditional" light (sun behind you) ! -- Concerning your reviews, up to now they're all relevant... -- Sorry for my English. Best regards. JLPC (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plazoleta Estación Chinita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The composition is no good. Use Rule of thirds to put the bottom of the wall one third of the picture. That way you don't get so much empty sky. --Esquilo 22:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review. Please another look --Rjcastillo 01:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better. --Esquilo 22:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural (Chinita).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please provide description in English. --Ximeg 22:59, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retablo de La Chinita II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 06:59, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesús de Nazaret en el huerto VI.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adornos de navidad I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categorización[edit]

Recien tu foto sea elegida como de calidad, pasate por Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted para categorizar según el scope. Si quieres una foto valiosa segura, pasate por en:Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Venezuela --The Photographer (talk) 14:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pasate por aqui --The Photographer (talk) 14:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empleados Alcaldía de Maracaibo V.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Water makes the photo interesting. --Tuxyso 06:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Chiquinquirá V.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 11:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retablo de La Chinita IVI.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retablos de La Chinita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Chiquinquirá I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nørre Vorupør Coast 2012-11-18.jpg[edit]

Dear Rjcastillo,

Thank you for taking your time to review this FPC. Since your vote on the original an alternative has been proposed, and another reviewer has requested that early votes also consider the alternative. Thanks, --Slaunger (talk) 08:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitral II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa (Obispo Marcos Sergio Godoy).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:10, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obispo Marcos Sergio Godoy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better without that slashing shadow. --Daniel Case 06:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iguana de Venezuela.jpg[edit]

Chamo echale un vistazo pa ve si esta bien para FP --The Photographer (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lo que me costo fue verga, y ahora? --The Photographer (talk) 03:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Video[edit]

Enlace al video --The Photographer (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! (Vista interior) Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Chiquinquirá III 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Libertad de panorama[edit]

Le puedes colocar esta plantilla: {{FoP-Venezuela}} --The Photographer (talk) 01:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

===Listo Puedes ver las imagenes --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adorno navideño.JPG[edit]

File:Virgen de la Chinita (Plaza El Angel).JPG[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 02:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del Rosario de Nuestra Señora de La Chiquinquira I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente (Plaza del Rosario de Nuestra Señora de La Chiquinquira).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!. Please add English description --Moroder 00:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente (Plaza del Rosario de Nuestra Señora de La Chiquinquira) II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to go Poco a poco 13:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola[edit]

Podrías señalarme donde está la aberración cromática en File:MovilTvPúblicaArgentina.JPG, no la alcanzo a ver Ezarateesteban 13:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Error[edit]

. --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento El Angel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Chinita II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Just a slight problem, easy to fix (see note). --JLPC 14:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks --Rjcastillo 17:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in Maracaibo II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK - A.Savin 10:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación central. Tranvía de Maracaibo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The last five outdoor photos of you are all (for me) too bright and have too less contrast (in LR 4 ~-0,5EV, +Shadows, -Black). Probably a problem with your monitor? --Tuxyso 10:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Barbara 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estrella navideña.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 12:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parroquia Santa Lucia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Baralt by Beria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venta de agua de coco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 18:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendedor de agua de coco II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa. Parque La Marina I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Remarkably washed out. Easy to fix. --Tuxyso 10:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC) Done new version uploaded. Please another look --Rjcastillo 16:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. I like the fine brown colors very much. Definetely QI. --Tuxyso 17:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave central de Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some OE on the altair, but OK for me. - A.Savin 22:04, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgen de La Chinita II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 22:02, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Simón Bolívar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo Escudo de Venezuela (1954 - 2006).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good but it needs an english description and a category. --Selbymay 10:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Done Comment Sorry. Thanks for reviews. Please another look --Rjcastillo 12:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC) Ok now. --Selbymay 13:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Urdaneta II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice light. --Moonik 08:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Rafael Urdaneta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañon frente al Museo Rafael Urdaneta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canna × generalis IV.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. --Mattbuck 16:01, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long exposure I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it, and have renamed. Now QI. Mattbuck 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! (Vista interior) Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Chiquinquirá I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave central. Catedral de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pila bautismal I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --A.Savin 11:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla Santa Teresita I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ugly wires, but OK for QI. --A.Savin 11:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla Santa Teresita III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rzuwig 10:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! (Vista interior) Basílica de Nuestra Señora de Chiquinquirá IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 07:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital de niños II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add english description.--ArildV 07:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camión de Bomberos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the shadow is a bit distracting but good quality however. --Moonik 07:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Rafael Arcangel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza San Rafael Arcangel II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 08:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcada de los Héroes IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 20:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Antonio Ricaurte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MACZUL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 20:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Paez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DoneThanks for reviews --Rjcastillo 17:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza San Rafael Arcangel (Fuente de agua) I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pesebre I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada al Museo Rafael Urdaneta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:05, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cooper Bristol T40, Bj. 1955 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG[edit]

Hallo Rjcastillo, would you kindly look once more for the Cooper T 40? I think it should be good now for QI. Thank you very much and best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanque de agua I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Ajepbah 18:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San José IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tendido eléctrico II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Válvula industrial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa. Parque La Marina II-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Hola[edit]

--Veronidae (talk) 00:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El popular Jesus Ríos (Venta de cepillados).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, please add a english description.--ArildV 09:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly …[edit]

Hallo Rjcastillo, would you kindly look to my Porsche 356 B, Cunningham Special and Bentley from December 8th too? Perhaps you like these photos which seem to be forgotten. Best Regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guardia Nacional Bolivariana de Venezuela II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa Ricardo Aguirre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del Buen Maestro V.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:00, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirador del Lago III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medanos de Coro IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanque de agua II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Puerta de madera.jpg[edit]

Hi, Rjcastillo ! Congrats for your recent promotions and for your work on Commons... Just a few words about "File:Puerta de madera.jpg" you uploaded this morning. In my opinion the reflections (sun or flashlight, I don't kow) are very disturbing. Have you got another file ? If not, I've noticed you took this picture last week : maybe this door isn't too far from your home and you can try to shoot it again. Can you ? -- Another point : it would be interesting for everybody, and especially for you, to mention, in addition to the geolocalization, the exact location of your photos in the description (I mean town and country) : those who want to use them in an article will be able to do it more easily... -- But I don't want to bore you with a lot of advices... -- Best regards from France. JLPC (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp and detailed, excellent! -- Alvesgaspar 21:52, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora del Perpetuo Socorro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not optimal lighting, but OK for QI --A.Savin 11:34, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green Iguana (left side view).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitral La Chinita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 09:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna artificial. Distribuidor vial La Chinita II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 09:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna artificial. Distribuidor vial La Chinita III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 09:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sede Rectoral LUZ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best composition, but still QI --Smial 10:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Las Mercedes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del Buen Maestro III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add an English file description. --NorbertNagel 20:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Done--Rjcastillo 21:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balancín petrolero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, please add an English file description. --NorbertNagel 20:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 21:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done now?. Please another look --Rjcastillo 00:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque La Marina II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI. Even though my "castellano" is very bad, I understand that this is an important historical place. Maybe you can give a short description in english? Thanks --Isiwal 23:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 02:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medanos de Coro III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tendido eléctrico I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tendido eléctrico III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello, Rjcastillo

Congratulations on your FP. I think it is your first FP. You will be notified in 1 or 2 days. Hope to see more of your image on commons. Regards, Joydeep _Talk 05:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Iguana V.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana V.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Felicitaciones!!. Fíjate en esta categoría de ejemplo. --The Photographer (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de la Gaita III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta. Casa del barrio EL Empedrao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ventana. Casa del barrio El Empedrao I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esquina de la Tradición Pa' que Luis II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Horrible cables :) and not the best lighting but still QI to me --Poco a poco 20:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Ramón Nonato I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panteón Regional.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural pintado I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI Poco a poco 11:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta lateral I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Museo de la Gaita I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI Poco a poco 11:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco. Plaza de La Republica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:27, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Instalación deportiva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada Puerto de Maracaibo I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Lothar Spurzem 19:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada Puerto de Maracaibo III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Lothar Spurzem 19:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pesebre en la entrada del puerto de Maracaibo V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Lothar Spurzem 19:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pesebre en la entrada del puerto de Maracaibo I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Lothar Spurzem 19:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista interior Torre de transmisión I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirador del Lago II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good, even if I'm not a fan of the crop below.--Jebulon 16:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Buen Nadal 2012[edit]

--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Merry-Christmas[edit]

Thanks for your kind Christmas wishes. I also wish a merry christmas to you. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Rjcastillo, gracias por tus deseos que hago extensivos a ti y a tu familia. Qué pases unos días de felicidad y tengas mucha salud, trabajo y fotos de calidad en el 2013 :) Poco a poco (talk) 10:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

¡Holà Rjcastillo! Muchas gracias ! Feliz Navidad a ti y a tu familla !--Jebulon (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Que pases una Feliz Navidad en compañía de los tuyos comiendo hallaquitas, pan de jamón, pernilito y mil cosa ricas más :) --Veronidae (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! Rjcastillo ! Thanks a lot for your greetings. Merry Christmas and happy new year a ti y a tu familla ! --JLPC (talk) 13:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep _Talk 18:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias mi pana, igual para ti y tu familia, que la paloma de la paz revolotee en tu nido --The Photographer (talk) 12:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa barrio El Empedrao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and QI! Please add an English file description. --NorbertNagel 11:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC) Done--Rjcastillo 15:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Santa Lucía I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 12:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogar Clinica San Rafael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa barrio El Empedrao I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo Reten de Bella Vista I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cine Imperio I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adornos navideños III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital Central Dr. Urquinaona I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Details of dark brown areas (door) does not really come out (not sure if it is fixable). Overall sharpness could be better (fixable). --Tuxyso 23:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC) Comment Thanks for you review. Details brown not come out side right because the sun is on the left. corrected a slightly. Please another look. --Rjcastillo 00:25, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sharpness is much better. For me the right bottom part (door, windows) are still too dark. Probably you can perform some local corrections?! --Tuxyso 09:45, 24 December 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks. Please another look --Rjcastillo 00:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still not optimal due to lightning conditions, but IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 13:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza La Herencia II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me the left part is a bit too dark, probably you can apply a gradient filter in LR and increase shadows and brightness. --Tuxyso 12:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks. Please anoher look again. --Rjcastillo 16:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me Lothar Spurzem 10:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lancha de motor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teleferico II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like it --Moroder 18:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]

Hello Rjcastillo, on the quality image page you gave my image "Trinity church" a remark on January 12. I updated the picture and corrected the tilt problem. Could you have another look at it? I promoted your image "Estatua mujer yacente". Greetings from Berlin, Germany. --Avda (talk) 16:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indígena tallado en piedra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo Colegio de Médicos Edo. Zulia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua mujer yacente. India Isabel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Avda 16:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Talla en piedra de Alonso de Ojeda II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lincoln 1938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Alonso de Ojeda III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 05:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Alonso de Ojeda (Parte posterior).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Request Please categorize. --JDP90 17:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC) Done Sorry --Rjcastillo 18:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --JDP90 18:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medanos de Coro V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The people are a bit unsharp. Mattbuck 21:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but still: good quality. I like it. --Martin Falbisoner 17:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Alonso de Ojeda II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaza Alonso de Ojeda III.jpg[edit]

Hola Rjcastillo tienes idea del año y quien es el arquitecto o escultor de las obra en la plaza de esta foto tuya--Veronidae (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aguilas del Zulia.jpg[edit]

File:Aguilas del Zulia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 08:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alonso de Ojeda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mira Esta foto[edit]

Mira esta foto aquí --The Photographer (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barco encallado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teleferico I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgen de Coromoto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment QI but better if you cut the lowest part imo. --JLPC 18:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgen del Rosario de Chiquinquira.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be a bit brighter but QI for me. --JLPC 18:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo del Estado Zulia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guitarra I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please, include the model in the description --Poco a poco 18:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 19:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venta de frontales para vehiculos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moledora de hielo II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moledora de hielo IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. --A.Savin 10:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadio Olímpico Alejandro Borges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message[edit]

Thanks for writing on my talk page, I've answered. You have 1 message in my talk page. Thanks --The Photographer

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asentamiento informal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de transmisión de energía eléctrica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Useful imo --JLPC 18:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Duda !!![edit]

Hola Rjcastillo, gracias por el apunte. Efectivamente la descripción no era la correcta (error de copiar y pegar). Ya lo he corregido. Un saludo! Poco a poco (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabrica de cementos de Venezuela II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 03:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Las Banderas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:59, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabrica de cementos de Venezuela I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Disculpa pero no visualizo la inclinación. Si me la puedes indicar. Gracias --Rjcastillo 19:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Revisando de nuevo la imagen, he llegado a la conclusión de que el problema es menor Poco a poco 00:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message[edit]

Thanks for writing on my talk page, I've answered. You have 1 message in my talk page. Thanks --The Photographer

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! José Gregorio Hernández I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of a Griffin, Parliament building (Vienna).jpg[edit]

Thanks for your comments on this image. I added the category. I use Photoshop. I'm not sure how to fix CA when it is different colors in different places. As I correct one, the other goes bad. I may be missing something. Do you have any advice? Thanks - Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, it looks great! I'm buying lightroom today ;-) - Godot13 (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I bought lightroom and it is so much easier than photoshop... - Godot13 (talk) 01:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your question on my page- Godot13 (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi Rjcastillo- I uploaded a fixed version I did myself (thank you for your example). Could you see if it meets with your approval? Thank you in advance. - Godot13 (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dr. José Gregorio Hernández I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario del Niño Jesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting document. --JLPC 17:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Panorámicas de Mérida[edit]

Chamo lo tenias guardado no!, tremendas panorámicas las que echaste en Merida, muy buenas. --The Photographer (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascada I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario del Dr. José Gregorio Hernández III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Thanks for reviews --Rjcastillo 05:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message[edit]

Thanks for writing on my talk page, I've answered. You have 1 message in my talk page. Thanks --The Photographer

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedum dendroideum I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dr. José Gregorio Hernández II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please perspective correct. Mattbuck 01:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviews --Rjcastillo 02:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Better. Mattbuck 11:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Otra version del Castillo[edit]

Saludos, te envie por correo una version que estuve trabajando en la casa, me gustaria saber que opinas, si tienes el RAW, tu mismo puedes mejorar las sombras, un abrazo. --The Photographer (talk) 00:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo San Ignacio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Wow --Moroder 14:29, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento de las Cinco Aguilas Blancas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista de Milla II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NormanB 02:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Molino II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Andino II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Please another look. Thanks. --Rjcastillo 01:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento al Perro Nevado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural, Mérida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surtidor de combustible antiguo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photography.--Grondin 14:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontiac Parisienne Convertible.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. Especially the people at the pedestrain looking at the Pontiac are intersting. --Tuxyso 10:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Roasdter de Luxe 1931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry, but the bottom wheel is cut off. --King of Hearts 07:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Done new version. Please another look. --Rjcastillo 15:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC) ok now --Arcalino 18:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Clock Tower - Palace of Westminster, London - September 2006.jpg[edit]

I just noticed that you voted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clock Tower - Palace of Westminster, London - September 2006-2.jpg. But according to our policy "Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured". So please vote accordingly at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Clock Tower - Palace of Westminster, London - September 2006.jpg too. J Kadavoor J e e 04:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural crucifixión de Jesús.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Any idea about the author? There is FOP in Venezuela? --Moroder 12:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Comment author unknown. Yes FOP in Venezuela --Rjcastillo 13:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maqueta pueblo de Jají.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Diablo de Yare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Beethoven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments weak Support: also a bit underexposed and soft, but good enough for QI IMHO --Carschten 16:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Simón Bolivar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Diablo danzante de Yare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 22:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intertype Machine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parte superior de la Capilla de piedra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 06:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior de la Capilla de piedra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 06:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motor Packard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 22:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kurfuerstliche Burg Eltville.jpg[edit]

Thank you for your review, I made a mistake, had the wrong JPG-compression (compressed from 30 to 3 MB) :-( . I fixed the image, May be you have a second look on it--Arcalino 07:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)}} Thanks for your second review -- Arcalino (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Replica Plaza de Toros de Maracay II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 16:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural automovil Lincoln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colección de armas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, but the crop at the left is very tight. --Tuxyso 17:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Lucía de Mucuchíes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, although the tree at the left is rather dominant; some cropping on the left could possibly produce a better composition, even with a part of the tree cut off. -- MJJR 10:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Done thanks for suggest --Rjcastillo 15:49, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely better. Now certainly QI! -- MJJR 20:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista del Pueblo de Apartaderos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Please another look --Rjcastillo 23:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet there, see note Poco a poco 20:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Done now ? --Rjcastillo 00:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Merideño I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Merideño II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Merideño III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuatro Gigante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Proyector cinematográfico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna de Mucubaji III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to go --Poco a poco 20:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Merideño V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Merideño VII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Rafael de Mucuchíes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tight upper crop, otherwise good.--ArildV 07:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje Merideño VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museo de Arte Contemporáneo del Zulia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Pablo Apóstol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough --Poco a poco 09:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espacio Zuliano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak support OK, but could've been sharper. --A.Savin 13:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santo Sepulcro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes! --Poco a poco 14:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital Mucuchíes II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Casa barrio El Empedrao I.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casa barrio El Empedrao I.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collado del Condor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de los Andes - Benigno y Vicenta Sanchez.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antiguo Retén de Bella Vista, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

HI[edit]

I sent you an email --Ezarateesteban 14:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagrado Corazón de Jesús II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza José Ramón Yepes I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality! --NorbertNagel 20:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre en forma de Cruz latina Iglesia Las Mercedes I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Sagrado Corazón de Jesús I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Udón Pérez.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes --Poco a poco 13:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti Huellas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:58, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti Doni.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Simón Bolívar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Señora de Fátima I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Thanks for reviews --Rjcastillo 15:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK now. --JLPC 16:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Publicidad - Fiesta to go.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guitarra eléctrica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural III.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop it please, there is no any need to have road at the bottom and bushes at the up on that photo. --Nino Verde 14:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviews. Please another look. --Rjcastillo 17:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural (La Chinita).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural IV.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural (Maracaibo).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juguetería.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice! --Moroder 06:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Mural (Venezuela).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mural (Venezuela).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aquí te traigo este regalo, chamo felicitaciones por tu nueva FP --The Photographer (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural (Escudo de la ciudad de Marcaibo).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guachafilandia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casita de Chocolate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments wow! Good quality. --Steinsplitter 17:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola[edit]

Ya hice algunas correcciones en File:CampanarioCapillaSantaGemma.jpg, Saludos!!! --Ezarateesteban 00:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Sagrado Corazón de Jesús II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Símbolo Club de Leones.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good. --A.Savin 09:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural La Chinita II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Clanes Wayúu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neumático.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural La Chinita I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Slight barrel distortion. --JLPC 13:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks. New version uploaded. now ? --Rjcastillo 01:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not perfect but better. In other words QI for me. --JLPC 15:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lluvia en Maracaibo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but please add an English description and a geotag (if useful) --Tuxyso 21:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviews --Rjcastillo 22:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 05:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Gran Mariscal de Ayacucho Antonio José de Sucre II.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please add an English description and geotag, if possible. --Tuxyso 21:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviews --Rjcastillo 22:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sharpness could be better, but IMHO nonetheless QI now. --Tuxyso 05:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Delfines.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural V.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pista de Karting.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Guerra de Independencia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 13:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural Pulpo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altar Mayor Iglesia Santa Bárbara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 06:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura Jesús de Nazaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 10:37, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara Church (Maracaibo) (Interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reliquia de la Iglesia Santa Barbara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Thanks for the recommendation --Rjcastillo 18:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sucio CONVIASA[edit]

Si, ya me fije la cantidad de sucio que me estaba arrojando la camara, hoy me puse a limpiar el sensor, ya que es lo que veo que esta realmente sucio. Una forma de ver sucios es fotografiar el cielo y luego bajar los brillos en lr. Por cierto, que te han parecido las fotos que he subido nuevas en 35mm ? --The Photographer (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iguana en portada[edit]

Chamo mis felicitaciones por la iguana que esta ahorita en la portada, por tu foto. De igual manera, si mal no recuerdo creo que estas cumpliendo ano hoy. Un abrazo hermano, saludos desde Margarita --The Photographer (talk) 01:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquamarina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some CA on the umbrella, otherwise OK --A.Savin 10:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC) Support --A.Savin 07:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascada I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Malchen53 13:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Vereda del Lago.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support --Christian Ferrer 11:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lancha II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Need english description.--ArildV 06:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cayo Sal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Background not really sharp but QI for me. --JLPC 17:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC) --JLPC 17:13, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lancha I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 19:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arecaceae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me: Difficult picture--Lmbuga 02:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Meritorious IMO--Lmbuga 11:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transporte de combustible.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The picture is QI, but not perfect (see notes). Improvable IMO --Lmbuga 01:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piscina Hotel Coral Suites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me: The dark areas are a bit dark IMO--Lmbuga 23:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cayo Muerto I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strong noise reduction? Poor detail. See note--Lmbuga 23:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The size is good, but the quality it's not IMO, sorry. Too much sky: Poor composition IMO (Rule of thirds)--Lmbuga 23:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New revision: Improvable IMO--Lmbuga 12:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks for reviews..New version upload. Please another look. --Rjcastillo 17:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. Sorry, without the other problems, I've seen a bit of CAs in the closest waves (foam). If you have time, it could be fixed--Lmbuga 19:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada a Dabajuro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior Cúpula (Sambil de Paraguana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but needs an English descrition, please. --JLPC 17:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de Elefante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 01:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subela de nuevo[edit]

Sube la imagen de nuevo con otro nombre y la nominas --The Photographer (talk) 05:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Francisco de Miranda y Simón Bolivar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done Thanks --Rjcastillo 18:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me--Lmbuga 01:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bicicletas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE:[edit]

Quedo muy linda, Gracias!!! Ezarateesteban 19:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigridia pavonia I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 11:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de Barro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support very good --A.Savin 11:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle en Niquitao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not too sharp but nice mood imo. --JLPC 16:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moras (frutas).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 18:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle de Niquitao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de campo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. Please add english file description. --NorbertNagel 18:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tithonia diversifolia I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Clément Bardot 16:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esculturas de América.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I think that it's good, but it needs perspective correction and it's a bit tilted CW (see notes)--Lmbuga 16:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for your review --Rjcastillo 22:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good--Lmbuga 22:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carreta II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Virgen de La Paz II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the greatest but ok. Mattbuck 06:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viaducto Agrícola Batalla de Niquitao II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viaducto Agrícola Batalla de Niquitao I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --A.Savin 15:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza en Niquitao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice fog, good quality. --Tuxyso 05:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Afluente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well exposed. Good quality. --Tuxyso 17:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista del Río Burate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please add geocoordinates if possible. --Tuxyso 17:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 23:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de Niquitao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and QI--Lmbuga 19:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tagete erecta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 06:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celosia (Roja).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK Support --Christian Ferrer 17:,42 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celosia (Amarilla).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ventana tradicional.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 09:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Busto de Simón Bolivar (Niquitao).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 22:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa artesanal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medidor monofásico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 16:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti en Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would have prefered less perspective for this kind of picture, but ok --Poco a poco 15:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna de Agua negra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 09:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heroés trujillenses II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:18, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Cristobal Mendoza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality and nice centring --Christian Ferrer 19:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo del Estado Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo de la Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Molino Hidráulico II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Xicotencatl 19:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Camioneta. Hummer H2.JPG

And also:

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Heroes caídos II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 05:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa Himno Nacional de Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carro de karting 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carro de karting 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Heroes caídos III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 15:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti Guardian de la naturaleza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kloster Maria Engelport (2013-07-09 01) Kirche.JPG[edit]

Hallo Rjcastillo, thank you very much for your effort to remove the CA in my photo. No we have to wait what critics think. Kindest regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kloster Maria Engelport (2013-07-09 01) Kirche.JPG[edit]

Hallo Rjcastillo, thank you very much for your effort to remove the CA in my photo. No we have to wait what critics think. Kindest regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Burate II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanque de guerra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sede Dirección General de Policía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 09:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placas II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 09:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario del Niño Jesus I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality though I would like a blue sky. -- Spurzem 07:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Excavadora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 10:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural F1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --JLPC 16:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Pichincha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Spurzem 14:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placas I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --Christian Ferrer 07:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice annotations. Good for navigation. --Slaunger 21:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de ciclistas en hierro II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de ciclistas en hierro III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumentos en el Parque Fuerzas Armadas Nacionales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vehículo acuático.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 11:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estructura La Flor de Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada al estado Anzoategui.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciudad de Barquisimeto I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Barquisimeto I.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok (a bit soft though) --A.Savin 21:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada al Estado Yaracuy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitral de la Naturaleza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. File description could be a bit more detailed. --NorbertNagel 20:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 01:42, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de ciclistas en hierro I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 23:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de ciclistas en hierro IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:52, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de ciclistas en hierro V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 13:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna de los Cedros IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit to bright maybe, but QI. --Pleclown 11:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de ciudad de Bocono.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you try to darkened it a little ? Pleclown 11:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks. Please another look --Rjcastillo 01:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now --Pleclown 06:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asentamiento informal I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo de armas del Estado Yaracuy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paseo de La Cruz y El Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 16:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figura de una sandía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (... but could you explain, in the caption, why and where this has been done ?) --JLPC 17:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agricultor e hijo con sus bueyes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a las Banderas I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 10:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cartel de venta de tizana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:46, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Martin de Tours II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments i like such colors, sky without blue. very good. --Ralf Roletschek 15:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada pueblo de Mochima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment New version uploaded --Rjcastillo 18:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antigua escuela Martin Tovar y Busto a Simón Bolívar I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Benitz o Café Muhstall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrada Colonia Tovar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa a Cristobal Mendoza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a perspective distortion in the upper right corner, maybe combined with a slight barrel distortion. Resolution a bit low, but acceptable. The file page could benefit from a geocode. --Slaunger 20:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Done Comment Thanks for reviews. --Rjcastillo 02:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK now IMO. --Slaunger 19:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transporte escolar Mochima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipomoea purpurea I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bienvenidos Colonia Tovar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:30, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Moritz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Los Tres Héroes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología. Mochima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Despacho parroquial II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please add english description.--ArildV 10:42, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 13:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Despacho parroquial I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asteraceae I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 15:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodegón El Milagro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please archive your talk page[edit]

QICbot is choking on it :-(. Thanks. --Dschwen (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archived[edit]

Hello Rjcastillo, I took the liberty of archiving your talkpage to User talk:Rjcastillo/Archive because it had become uneditable due to its large size. This caused the QICbot to stall on it. Cheers --Dschwen (talk) 22:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia San Martin de Tours.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanchas en el ambarcadero de Mochima III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pescadores de la localidad de Mochima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista panorámica del Parque Nacional Mochima II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:51, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de la Victoria del Prado de Talavera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good --A.Savin 18:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanchas en el ambarcadero de Mochima I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bievenida al Parque Nacional Mochima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 18:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calles de la Colonia Tovar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Lmbuga 20:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café Breidenbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, some additional cats would be useful, though --Poco a poco 20:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tunel El Paraiso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvavida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 15:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodegón El Milagro I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, but please, add more cats, e.g. regarding restaurants --Poco a poco 21:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Done --Rjcastillo 02:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en la Colonia Tovar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanchas en el ambarcadero de Mochima II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 14:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesucristo (Grafiti).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but please add a location and some cats about it --Poco a poco 07:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks --Rjcastillo 11:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza El Vapor de Las Caracas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de reloj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 13:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanchas en el ambarcadero de Mochima IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I can understand the proposal, but I think that the proposal should be in English. Good for me--Lmbuga 13:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taller de reparación de lanchas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. See the note, please--Lmbuga 13:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaza de toros Monumental de Maracaibo (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tunel El Paraiso.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tunel El Paraiso.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de Jesús Ríos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:33, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomba Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de las Madres III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadio Alejandro Borges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:31, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de las Madres IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia San Alfonso María de Ligorio I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro Ambulatrio Sur de Veritas II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estátua Ecuestre del Libertador Simón Bolívar I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti de León.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but I'd like to know a bit more about it.... --JLPC 13:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti de Mono.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti de Serpiente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grafiti de Elefante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pozo de la dicha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de Toros Monumental de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and quality. -- Felix Koenig 18:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de la Victoria del Prado de Talavera I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QICpromoted/layout

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted