User talk:Supanut Arunoprayote

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Supanut Arunoprayote!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

File:Rangsan Torsuwan.jpg[edit]

File:Rangsan Torsuwan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paul_012 (talk) 14:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sumet Jumsai and Geodesic dome.jpg[edit]

File:Sumet Jumsai and Geodesic dome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paul_012 (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sappaya-Sapastan, Thailand.jpg[edit]

File:Sappaya-Sapastan, Thailand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paul_012 (talk) 15:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model Chula Main Auditorium.jpg[edit]

File:Model Chula Main Auditorium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paul_012 (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal crematorium of King Rama IX - Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now. --Berthold Werner 09:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal crematorium of King Rama IX at night II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal crematorium of King Rama IX at evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal crematorium of King Rama IX at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of Chedi Singha Lom Wat Thammikarat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 14:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three Chedi(s) of Wat Phra Si Sanphet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 22:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On perspective correction[edit]

สวัสดีครับ ก่อนอื่นต้องขอขอบคุณสำหรับภาพของคุณศุภณัฐนะครับ เป็นผลงานคุณภาพที่นำไปใช้ประโยชน์ในวิกิพีเดียได้มากเลย

แต่ทั้งนี้ทั้งนั้นก็อยากจะเสนอความเห็นนิดนึงน่ะครับ เกี่ยวกับการใช้ perspective correction ว่าสำหรับภาพที่ field of view กว้างมาก ๆ การปรับให้เส้นแนวตั้งขนานกัน 100% เลย บางทีอาจจะทำให้ดูไม่เป็นธรรมชาติแทน อย่างภาพหอสมุดเมืองหรือบ้านเลขที่ 1 ซอยกัปตันบุช ในความเห็นผมรู้สึกว่ามันถูก correct มากเกินไป (แม้ว่าเส้นแนวตั้งจะขนานกัน) เพราะปกติมุมใกล้ขนาดนี้ ความรู้สึกของคนจะคาดหวังที่จะเห็น perspective แนวตั้งอยู่พอสมควร หรือภาพพระที่นั่งดุสิตมหาปราสาท ซึ่งปกติสำหรับสถาปัตยกรรมวัดหรือปราสาทเหล่านี้สายตาเราจะคุ้นเคยกับความเป็นมุมเงยอยู่แล้ว การปรับแก้ perspective จนหมดเลยอาจจะทำให้ดูเหมือนหลังคาบานออกแทน

ที่ว่าไปก็เป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวน่ะนะครับ เพราะจริง ๆ เรื่องนี้ไม่มีผิดถูก คุณศุภณัฐน่าจะรู้ดีกว่าผมด้วยซ้ำ แต่อยากเสนอไว้เผื่อพิจารณาดูครับ --Paul_012 (talk) 12:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ขอบคุณสำหรับความคิดเห็นนะครับ แต่สำหรับความคิดเห็นผมนะครับ โดยทั่วไปตามธรรมชาติ มุมมองสายตาเรา มอง landscape/architecture ในมุมมองปกติ (Normal view/Normal perspective) จะเห็น อาคารเป็นเส้นตั้งขนานแกน Y เสมอนะครับ ยกเว้นกรณีที่เป็นมุมเงยขึ้น ดังนั้นช่างภาพแนวๆ Landscape/Architecture ที่ใช้เลนส์ Wide หรือ Ultra-wide ที่มีมุมมองกว้างกว่าระยะสายตาเรามาใช้ถ่าย ทำให้ได้มุมมองที่กว้างกว่าระยะสายตา ซึ่งเวลาถ่ายออกมาก็จะมีลักษณะไม่เข้า Perspective (ไม่ขนานแกน Y) เป็นปกติของเลนส์ทั่วๆไป (ยกเว้นพวกเลนส์ Tilt–shift (เลนส์ถ่ายภาพแนวสถาปัตยกรรม) ที่ปรับแก้ perspective ตอนถ่ายเลย) จึงมักไปแก้ภาพให้เข้า perspective ในโปรแกรมกันหมดครับ ซึ่งการแก้ perspective ภาพแนวๆ นี้ มันก็มีผลทำให้ภาพเสียเรื่องสัดส่วน (Proportion) ความคมภาพ (Sharpness) เหมือนกันครับ แต่ถึงอย่างไรก็ดีมันก็ขึ้นกับระยะที่ถ่ายด้วยอ่ะครับ เช่น ภาพหอสมุดเมือง, บ้านเลขที่ 1 ซอยกัปตันบุช ที่มุมมีระยะใกล้อาคารมาก ก็จะมีลักษณะบีบมาก ตามที่คุณได้กล่าวไว้ สัดส่วนก็จะเพี้ยนไป ซึ่งจริงๆ แล้ว ถ้ามุมสายตาเราปกติเวลามองอาคาร ก็ต้องเห็นภาพแบบนี้เหมือนกัน เพียงแค่มุมมองถูก crop ไม่ครอบคลุมเห็นภาพทั้งอาคารเหมือนในภาพอ่ะครับ สัดส่วนเวลาถ่ายจะไปเพี้ยนมากๆ ในอาคารที่เลยชั้นแรกไปอ่ะครับ (ซึ่งหากใช้เลนส์พวก Tilt–shift ในจุดที่ถ่ายเดียวกัน ภาพก็มีลักษณะเป็นแบบนี้เหมือนกันครับ) สำหรับภาพที่มีระยะไกลมาหน่อย เวลาไปแก้ Perspective ก็มีเพี้ยนเรื่องสัดส่วนเหมือนกันครับ แต่อาจน้อยกว่า ลักษณะผิดสัดส่วนของภาพทั้งหมดนี้ก็เป็นปัญหาปกติทั่วๆ ไปของการถ่ายภาพแนวๆ Architecture จากมุมมองสายตาทั่วไปอ่ะครับ

ก็สำหรับภาพที่ผมถ่ายบางรูปเช่นถ่ายอาคารสูงๆ ระยะใกล้ๆ หรือมุมมองไม่ใช่ระยะ Normal eye view เวลาแก้แล้วสัดส่วนจะเพี้ยนมากๆ ก็ปรับเป็นมุมเงยแทนก็มีเหมือนกันนะครับ เช่น โดม มธ. ทั้งหมดที่ผมกล่าวก็เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผมนะครับ ขอบคุณสำหรับความคิดเห็นอีกครั้งนะครับ --Supa A. 16:17, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Arun, entrance 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Prang Wat Arun during day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bang Khun Phrom Palace from Rama VIII Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Phra Kaew Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CUAuditorium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Karawah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But please add the geo location. --XRay 16:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Supanut Arunoprayote 17:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Mahakan The day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Good enough focus on the fort. -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedi Wat Rachathiwat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Rattanakosin Hotel at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Thinang Chakri Maha Prasat (II) BKK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dusit Maha Prasat, BKK 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok National Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inside Wat Karawah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 06:02, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Wat Ben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Sri Sakayamunee Wat Mahathat (Bangkok).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Granada Tue, 01 May 2018 06:34:25 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruen Thai Chulalongkorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality and very nice Frank Schulenburg Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:46:40 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Sampson & Son Department Store, BKK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Basotxerri Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:39:04 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Sri Sawai - Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Basotxerri Wed, 02 May 2018 16:10:16 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubosot of Wat Nim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Si Sanphet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Granada 06:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sala(s) at Wat Arun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Granada 06:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and instructive. The Template:Panorama could be added here. --Milseburg 17:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Khlong Phasi Charoen near Bang Wa BTS Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House No.1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chulalongkorn University Auditorium at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ho trai Wat Apson Sawan (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty wat and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Phuttha Yodfa Bridge Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River City Bangkok Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Park in Siriraj Bimuksthan Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Three Buddhas, Wat Leng Noei Yi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministry of Defense building of Thailand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 08:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Siam (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Office of His majesty's Principal Private, Thailand (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 05:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion in Siriraj Bimuksthan Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 10:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Buddha Theva Patimakorn (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks but, but can you please crop a bit more on the left and so get rid of the cropped lamp? --Poco a poco 10:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Done --Supanut Arunoprayote 16:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Architect 1 Building (2), Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Wat Kanlayanamit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction--ArildV 10:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Done --Supanut Arunoprayote 16:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Ok--ArildV 15:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Siam (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 20:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat, Bangkok (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Ratchapradit, BKK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Ratchapradit, BKK (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Phuttha Sihing, Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tsungam 15:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Three Chedis, Wat Phra Kaew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Local houses along Khlong Ratchamontree (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Sri Sawai (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo seems somewhat overworked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Kwai Bridge Railway Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thonburi Railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. People are out of focus but the train which is the main subject is sharp --Podzemnik 04:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kwai bridge Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, possible FP candidate --Podzemnik 04:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kwai bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit blurry but good enough for me --Podzemnik 04:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Khet Pom Prap Sattru Phai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pharotracha House Day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 10:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Prathan Yim Rub Fa (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Right corner is a bit unsharp but o.k. --Ermell 12:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wihan of Guan Im Sutham Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 14:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedi Wat Prayur (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 15:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khao Mo at Wat Prayurawongsawat (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Makes me feel like going to Thailand --Podzemnik 14:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dusit Maha Prasat, BKK (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buddha images at Wat Bowonniwet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siwamok Phiman Hall (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanchanaburi World War II Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Princess Srinagarindra Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Atamari 08:39, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baan Sathon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empire Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pra Sitharod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Nice detail, well lit --Daniel Case 05:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chao Praya River view (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Met, Sathon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Chana Songkhram (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat, Bangkok (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chao Praya River view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good annotations! --GPSLeo 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phutthaisawan Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some CA on light masts, and maybe this distortion is correctible --Daniel Case 05:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you, how about the new one? --Supanut Arunoprayote 13:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)}[reply]
Support Very good now. Johannes Robalotoff 19:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thai Royal Gold Funerary Urns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BKK Art and Culture Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maha Chetsadabodin Pavilion (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 13:18, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pano view of Wat Phra Kaew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maha Chetsadabodin Pavilion (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It needs a perspective correction, the bottom is wider that the top --Michielverbeek 07:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please eliminate the dust spot in the upper left. If you do, I will support, because the photo is otherwise IMO very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThank you! @Michielverbeek @Ikan Kekek --Supanut Arunoprayote 06:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC) Well done --Michielverbeek 07:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I see the slight rotation. Good eye, Michiel! -- Ikan Kekek 10:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MBK Center (New facade).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siam Piwat building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 17:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siriraj Hospital-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:04, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat, Lop Buri (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Prang Sam Yod (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Prang Sam Yod (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat, Lop Buri (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI in my opinion, Tournasol7 13:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubosot of Wat Bowonniwet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 17:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khlong Bang Luang Floating Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support I will forgive the unsharpness because it clearly seems like it was raining --Daniel Case 06:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat, Lop Buri (III) - Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, would be slightly better with the bottom-right rock cropped out. --Trougnouf 15:38, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koh Loi (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koh Loi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ban Laem Railway Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Talad Rom Hoop (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 15:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Chuthathut Palace (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC) --Supanut Arunoprayote 15:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Chuthathut Palace (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Suwannaram (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support A bit noisy and could be sharper, but QI for me. --C messier 13:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LHONG 1919 (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Nice subject, and IMO good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pano view of Wat Phra Kaew (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stupa Model of Wat Pak Nam Phasi Charoen (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scala Cinema (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Klang Kret (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:26, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chulalongkorn U - Samyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:25, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok Pano (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santacruise Church, BKK (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chedi Wat Prayur (V).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ideo Q Chula-Samyan (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Weird architecture. Quality is just OK but over the QI line, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platinum Fashion Mall (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit too bright, but still ok --Poco a poco 14:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ananta Samakhom (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ananta Samakhom (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rajamangala hall, Rama 9 Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Tower, BKK (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you enhance the contrast? --MB-one 15:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for your recommendation. --Supanut Arunoprayote 12:49, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better now --MB-one 08:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheraton Hotel & Towers Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lang Pae (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Na Noi Cliff (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anodard Pond (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:20, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok City Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Racha Wang Derm (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Racha Wang Derm (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Good quality. I don't think the blown areas on the sides are important. -- Ikan Kekek 06:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anodard Pond (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Traphang Thong (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Traphang Thong (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Lovely --Podzemnik 08:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Phra Phai Luang (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Tilt is tricky here - the temple is tilted but some columns look straight so let's say it's the temple that is tilted :) Good good --Podzemnik 08:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Mahathat, Sukhothai (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Saphan Hin (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Phuttha Chinnarat (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Phuttha Chinnarat (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saritphong Dam (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ram Khamhaeng the Great (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 18:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wat Phra Si Rattana Mahathat, Phitsanulok (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Four Chedi of Wat Pho (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 18:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chum Phon Gate (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Customs House, Bang Rak (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embassy of Portugal, Bangkok (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubosot of Wat Arun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion Of The Enlightened (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. If you could get a sharp photo of this pavilion in good light, with good clouds, you might be able to shoot an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 03:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangphet Prasat (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangphet Prasat (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok Pano (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient City Floating Market (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient City Floating Market (V).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient City Floating Market (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment this looks tilted left to me. ? Seven Pandas 20:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThanks for review me. --Supanut Arunoprayote 09:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC) Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient City Floating Market (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I can accept the questionable left crop, but what is that strange diagonal line in the sky near the upper right corner? -- Ikan Kekek 04:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DoneThanks for review me. --Supanut Arunoprayote 09:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Bangkok Sports Club Pano (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You have a stitching problem at the upper border (see my annotations) - can you please fix that? --PtrQs 00:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Very good eye, thank you. --Supanut Arunoprayote 10:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Quality --PtrQs 00:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient City Floating Market (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavilion of Splendour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate in Imperial City, Huế (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Ram Ratchaniwet Palace (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Ram Ratchaniwet Palace (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Ram Ratchaniwet Palace (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 08:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Ram Ratchaniwet Palace (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Ram Ratchaniwet Palace (V).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Nakhon Khiri (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phuket Thai Hua School (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs an horizontal perspective correction, the left side is higher than the right side --Poco a poco 10:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version, Thanks for checked me. --Supanut Arunoprayote 13:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. Drops of rain falling from the blue sky create additional effect. --Stoxastikos 16:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phra Nakhon Khiri (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gulf of Thailand Learning Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but there is a ccw tilt --Poco a poco 10:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done New version, Thanks for checked me. --Supanut Arunoprayote 13:18, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meridian Gate, Hue (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor Thom (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, structures of building good visible. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, I like the water reflections --PantheraLeo1359531 14:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Useful detailed image. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yes, but Supanut, please insert your intended text and link in the leftmost label, which is currently just labeled "thumb". -- Ikan Kekek 15:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good view from the front --PantheraLeo1359531 14:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detailed image, lines are parallel to camera rotation --PantheraLeo1359531 14:40, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Supanut Arunoprayote,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Supanut Arunoprayote,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penang High Court (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penang High Court (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, verticals are straight. however it looks a bit distorted --Michielverbeek 08:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bank Negara Malaysia Penang (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheong Fatt Tze Mansion (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:25, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinang Peranakan Mansion (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. The sky in the top right corner is a bit too bright, so if you could make it darker locally, the image would be even better. --Aristeas 09:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jewel Changi (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:08, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jewel Changi (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower Dome (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:00, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloud Forest (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:57, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nice image --PantheraLeo1359531 16:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower Dome (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Hive, NTU (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Hive, NTU (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina Bay Sands (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kek Lok Si Temple (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kek Lok Si Temple (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Cornwallis, Penang (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khoo Kongsi (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Pinnacle@Duxton (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merlion (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esplanade Bridge (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suvarnabhumi Airport Terminal E interior (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suvarnabhumi Airport Terminal E interior (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central World (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sam Yot MRT Station (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Singapore, Downtown Core (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henderson Wave Bridge (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Assumption, Penang (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sappaya-Sapasathan Pano (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Supanut Arunoprayote,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok Pano (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Truong Tien bridge (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Hat Yai City (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chi River (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuan An Keng Shrine (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santacruise Church, BKK (IV).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --IM3847 06:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khoo Kongsi (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --IM3847 06:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Singapore, Downtown Core (II).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khoo Kongsi (III).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO the image is cropped awkwardly (too much sky). --F. Riedelio 06:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ok, I cropped into new one. --Supanut Arunoprayote 09:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 14:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand[edit]

เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย

เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้

มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป

หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้

ขอแสดงความนับถือ
ทีมผู้จัด Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
วิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย

Dear Fellow Wikimedians,

Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021.

There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category.

If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest.

Kind Regards,
The organizing team of Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
Wikimedia Thailand

--Karto1 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoi An (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Royal crematorium of King Rama IX at night.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal crematorium of King Rama IX at night.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Benjakitti Forest Park (I).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benjakitti Forest Park (I).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My best appreciations for your work on Penang[edit]

Hey, I'm Tan (alias PenangLion). While editing several pages and images concerning the city of George Town, I was slightly astounded by the quality of the images you have provided related to several important landmarks in the city. As a local of the city, I would like to extend my best gratitude towards your wonderful work. Cheers, PenangLion (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With my pleassure! ^ ^ --Supa A. 12:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ho Kum Luang (I).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Drow male 13:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Supanut Arunoprayote,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Scaling in File:Assumption Cathedral Bang Rak (I).jpg[edit]

I mentioned this on the file talk page, but you probably didn't see it. I think the vertical/horizontal scaling in the image needs to be adjusted, as the round rose window is visibly flattened. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I feel that the picture is not good enough because the situation was too dark and the building was taken too close with an ultra wide lens, resulting in a very distorted image, so I intend to retake it when I have another chance. Supanut Arunoprayote 16:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

ขอขอบคุณ[edit]

ก่อนอื่นขอขอบคุณคุณ Supanut Arunoprayote สำหรับภาพของพิธา ลิ้มเจริญรัตน์ คุณภาพสูง ผมขอถือวิสาสะตัดทอน (crop) รูป File:Pita Limjaroenrat @CentralWorld 07092023 (IV).jpg ให้เล็กลงเพื่อนำไปใช้ในกล่องข้อมูลบทความของพิธาฯ แทนรูปเดิมใน พ.ศ. 2564 ด้วยรูปที่ใหม่กว่าและมีคุณภาพ โดยเทียบเคียง en:MOS:IMAGEQUALITY ในวิกิพีเดียภาษาอังกฤษครับ –PhakkaponP (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ออได้เลยครับ คือตอนแรกผมชอบรูปเดิมในกล่องบทความมากกว่า ดูเป็นมุมภาพที่ close up ชัดเจนและคุณภาพไฟล์ภาพก็ค่อนข้างดี เลยไม่ได้อัปเดตเปลี่ยนรูปเดิมออกน่ะครับ

อย่างไรก็ดีผมได้ปรับสีในรูปที่ crop ใหม่ โดยลด saturation ของสีลงนะครับ จะได้ดู casual มากกว่ากว่าของเดิมที่ค่อนไปทางเน้นโทนสีส้มครับ Supa A. 17:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

General Post Office building[edit]

Thanks for File:Bangkok General Post Office 07.23.jpg. It's another excellent work, as usual. Interesting solution to circumventing the issue of the very shallow vantage point available; took me quite a while to notice. I wonder if there's a specific reason you chose not to clone out the duplicate antennas in the background? I think removing them (the ones around the garuda) would be an improvement to the overall image. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing my image Supa A. 14:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

notification from Wiki love monument[edit]

งานประกวดภาพถ่ายที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในโลก Wiki Loves Monuments Thailand 2023 ได้เริ่มขึ้นแล้ว! ทุกท่านที่สนใจสามารถเข้าร่วมงานประกวดภาพถ่าย WLM 2023 ได้โดยไม่จำเป็นต้องเป็นช่างภาพมืออาชีพ เพียงอัปโหลดภาพถ่ายโบราณสถานหรือแหล่งมรดกทางวัฒนธรรมในไทยที่ท่านถ่ายด้วยตนเองเข้าไปในฟอร์มที่กำหนดให้ภายในวันที่ 30 กันยายน 2566 ท่านจะได้สิทธิ์พิจารณารางวัล และได้รับการคัดเลือกเพื่อเข้าร่วมการแข่งขันระดับนานาชาติต่อไป

ท่านสามารถอัปโหลดภาพ และศึกษารายละเอียดการแข่งขันได้ที่

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2023_in_Thailand

ดูภาพถ่ายจากผู้เข้าประกวดชาวไทยที่ชนะอันดับ 1 การประกวด WLM 2022 ระดับนานาชาติได้ที่

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2022_winners

Wiki Loves Monuments Thailand 2023, the largest photography competition in the world, is starting now!

Everyone interested, no need to be a professional photographer, can participate in WLM 2023 by submitting your self-taken photo of any monument in Thailand by September 30, 2023. Then, You will have the right to be considered for the award, and selected to participate in international competitions !

Here, you can submit your photos, and explore more about WLM 2023.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2023_in_Thailand

Take a look at the photo from the Thai participiant who won first place in the international WLM 2022 competition !

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2022_winners

File:Bank of Georgia Headquarters 09.23 (2).jpg[edit]

File:Bank of Georgia Headquarters 09.23 (2).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

According to Georgia's Freedom of Panorama, Images cannot be used if a protected work is the main subject or it is used for commercial purposes however, the lead architect died in 2007 (The copyright term in Georgia for buildings is the lifetime of the architect + 70 years + the end of the calendar year or died before 1953)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]