User talk:AleXXw/Archive/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Train stations in St. Pölten

Hallo AleXXw! Du hast die Kategorie "Train stations in St. Pölten" angelegt und bei den einzelnen Bahnhöfen/Haltestellen die Kategorie "Train stations in Lower Austria" gelöscht. Diese Änderung halte ich für nicht hilfreich. Die Kategorie "Train stations in Lower Austria" soll einen Überblick über alle Bahnhöfen/Haltestellen in Niederösterreich geben. Eine zusätzliche Einordnung in eine Kategorie "Train stations in St. Pölten" ist dabei sicher kein Fehler. Ersuche dich das Löschen der Kategorieeinträge "Train stations in Lower Austria" wieder rückgängig zu machen. Priwo (talk) 08:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Servus Priwo! Ich verstehe zwar nicht warum es übersichtlicher ist alle NÖ Bahnhöfe in einer Riesenkategorie zu haben (btw: Warum nicht alle österreichischen Bahnhöfe?), habe aber auch gar kein Problem damit die Bahnhöfe zusätzlich darin zu kategorisieren :-) Mach ich im laufe des Tages. LG --AleXXw 14:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Danke für dein Verständnis. Ursprünglich entstand die Einteilung der Bahnhöfe nach Bundesländern analog zu den "Railway lines" die gibt es auch aufgeteilt und nicht nur für ganz Österreich. Priwo (talk) 17:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Gerne ;) Sind solch Stadtkategorien grundsätzlich erwünscht, gerne auch zusätzlich zu den Landeskategorien? LG --AleXXw 18:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Die zusätzliche Einordnung in Stadtkategorien würde einen Gewinn an Information bringen, halte ich grundsätzlich für sinnvoll. Priwo (talk) 15:51, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Ungarn

Hallo Alex, wie kann ich Bilder von Ungarn, z.B. hu:Datei:M21 autópálya térkép.png auf Commons verschieben ? --JonnyBrazil (talk) 16:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Servus! Am leichtesten gehts mit dem commonshelper, einfach die Felder ausfüllen und schon ist die Datei herüben :) LG --AleXXw 22:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Danke mal, aber die M21_autópálya_térkép.png geht irgendwie nicht zum Übertragen. Versuchst du es einmal ? --JonnyBrazil (talk) 08:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Paprika

Hast recht, habe es jetzt auch gesehen. Muss ich nochmal nacharbeiten ;-) - danke Dir. --Grunpfnul (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Sehr gut, ich bin froh dass nicht nur ich das sehe ;) LG --AleXXw 12:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Monitoring of the request

Good night, sorry to bother you, but advised me to speak with an OTRS volunteer, so that you do not care, do the follow-up request. The request concerns the following images: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Agarra_que_%C3%A9_honesto.png and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vai_de_Email_a_pior.png

Thanks,Shania Twain Portugal (talk) 20:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

RfA

I don't think your RfA failed because of the question of asking for endorsements from your WP:DE colleagues. We don't have a rule against it -- perhaps we should, but that's another matter. Sreejith, whom I nominated, was elected without much comment about a solicitation for votes on WP:ML.

I meant it when I said that you could be a good admin here, but you do need to gather more experience. That's best gathered by simply making comments on DRs -- I can work through a day's log much faster when a known colleague has made comments -- even very brief ones -- on DRs.

On the other hand, the fact is that our principal need is in closing DRs -- more than 5,000 are open at the moment, partly due to a technical problem, but also partly due to a shortage of Admins willing to do the work -- six of us do half of the ~1,300 deletions each day. If you truly aren't interested in that aspect of Commons, then perhaps Admin is not for you.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jim, my RfA was just a try, i'm not very sad about the result ;)
I noticed that, if I'd start a second RfA, I'll need to work on some DRs before. I would not be a hardcore closer, as well as I am not a hardcore user. Perhaps I would decide some dozen DRs a week, but I wouldn't need to annoy other admins with the tasks generated by me. My thought was that each hand would be helpful, no matter how small the contribution... Thanks for your nice words! Greets --AleXXw 15:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC) PS: could you archive my RfA?
A dozen a week would put you in the top 30% of all Admins and would be very welcome. This is the record for the last six months -- as you see it drops off very fast.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Obviously not very welcome... just kidding ;) I need to gather some exoerience on DR, perhaps I'll start a second try in a couple of month... @canvassing: I belive its not preventable, if you're not active on en.wp you probably don't know such rule (just have a look on interwikis here). I really never heard before that this kind of advertising is kind of evil, I posted one message on my own user talk... Greets --AleXXw 23:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Orth bei Nacht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Probably slightly to damage it will be better... the file is updated). --Aleks G 20:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
I love the composition and the subject, but I'm not convinced. Perhaps a bit tilted? Also a fair amount of colour blocking in the sky. Mattbuck 19:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
GIMP says it's not tilted but sees a slight perspective distortion (vertical lines falling by 0.3° on the left and right). That's to be expected. --Aisano 18:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted the picture to my original version, I like it better -> less color blocks... @tilted: perhaps, but the building is some kind of rounded triangle, take a look at the satelite view. Greets --AleXXw 19:00, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Still needs tilt correction - the spire's reflection should be directly below the actual spire. Correct that and I'll promote. Mattbuck 16:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Great one, no real QI problems in sight... --

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einsteigturm 80 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian A1 map.svg

Hi AleXXw. Die Karte File:Bulgarian A1 map.svg bedarf eine Aktualisierung. Und zwar ist die Autobahn bis zur Major road bei Yambol fertig. Gruß --Vammpi (talk) 10:37, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Töpperbrücke 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wohnhaus beim schwarzen Bären 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Appears clockwise rotated in full resolution on my screen. --Cayambe 14:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, but it seems ok to me. Albeit the wrong way up. Mattbuck 11:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schutzengelkreuz Illmitz 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, bit unsharp. --Mattbuck 11:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Göstling an der Ybbs 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Many dust spots in the sky, a bit dark, unsharp. Can someone review my new version? Also why the hell was it 28MB? Mattbuck 11:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
QI for me, though still looks as if the sensor’s resolution was much greater than the lense’s --Kreuzschnabel 06:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
It's stitched, this one out of 5 images, the bridge (next file) out of 7. The giant filesize was my fault, 100% JPG-quality in hugin ;) Greets --AleXXw 18:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Unused Slovakia

I fixed the template, check out de:Benutzer:Multichill/Unused Denkmal Slowakei now :-) Multichill (talk) 19:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, just read that... Greets --AleXXw 19:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Peter am Kammersberg 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Logo TCK.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rapsar (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Karte Traisen (Fluss).svg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Karte Traisen (Fluss).svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 21:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


Hello, AleXXw/Archive. You have new messages at Eleassar's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

File:Bulgarian A1 map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stickedy (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian A2 map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stickedy (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian A3 map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stickedy (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian A4 map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stickedy (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian A5 map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stickedy (talk) 22:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bulgarian A6 map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stickedy (talk) 22:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Karte Traisen (Fluss).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 16:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear AleXXw/Archive,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Datei umbenennen

Hi Alex, kannst du mir bitte die File:Kastiel.JPG auf File:Kastiel-Ivanka.JPG umbenennen. Nix linkt daher, aber der Name ist halt sehr eindeutig :-) --danke K@rl (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2012 (UTC)